:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小學生體育態度簡式量表編製研究
書刊名:臺灣體育學術研究
作者:林本源 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Pen-yuan
出版日期:2010
卷期:48
頁次:頁115-138
主題關鍵詞:多變量概化理論概化研究決斷研究評分量表概化信度Multivariate generalizability theoryGeneralizability studyDecision studyRating scaleGeneralizability reliability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究目的是發展「國小學生體育態度簡式量表」。研究工具以中小學學生體育態度量表51題版爲基礎。研究對象爲台閩地區小學四年級至六年級男、女學生;研究分爲二階段,第一階段進行原始量表的測驗品質檢驗,抽取北、中、南四縣市之有效樣本443份進行資料分析;第二階段研究以多變項概化理論進行概化研究與決斷研究後,編擬簡式版試題。研究結果顯示原量表之測驗品質穩定;多變項概化理論提供研究者進行決斷研究時諸多測驗訊息。本研究編製之「國小學生體育態度簡式量表」信、效度俱佳,在不失原測驗品質下更具有經濟有效與簡便實施的特性,對於國小階段的體育態度施測提供更佳的選擇。
The purpose of this study was to develop the ”Short-Form Scale of Elementary Student Attitude toward Physical Education”. This study was base on the 51 items of the ”Scale of Junior High & Elementary School Student Attitude toward Physical Education”. The subjects invited to participate in this study were the students from 4(superscript th) to 6(superscript th) grade in Taiwan and Fukien Provinces. This study was divided into two phases. The first phase was to evaluate the quality of the original scale with 443 valid subjects involved in form the counties in north, centre, and south part of Taiwan. The second phase was to carry out the ”Generalizability Study” and ”Decision Study” utilizing the ”Multivariate Generalizability Theory”, and the development of the Short-Form scale and the pre-test. The results indicated that the quality of the short-form scale was not questionable. The researcher gained useful information from the ”Multivariate Generalizability Theory” to perform the ”Decision Study”. With the productive results form first and second phases, the development of the scale was successful. The new short-form scale was identified to be reliable and valid which possessed the equal quality with the original one but more economical and convenient. It provided a better option to assess the students' attitude toward physical education at elementary level.
期刊論文
1.黃登月、王文中(20050900)。青少年約會衝突因應策略量表之發展。教育與心理研究,28(3),469-494。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.楊志顯(19991200)。樂趣化體育教學內涵認知量表之編製研究。大專體育學刊,1(2),73-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.阮如鈞(19730500)。大學生體育態度量表的編製與研究。教育與文化,403,30-35。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳心怡、花茂棽、朱建軍(20071200)。Development of the Taiwan WAIS-III Two-Subtest Short Forms。測驗學刊,54(2),305-330。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Silverman, Stephen、Subramaniam, Prithwi Raj(1999)。Student Attitude Toward Physical Education and Physical Activity: A Review of Measurement Issues and Outcomes。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,19(1),97-125。  new window
6.劉照金、周宏室(20020700)。大學生體育態度與運動技能學習成就之相關研究。大專體育學刊,4(1),1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林本源(2002)。編製中小學學生體育態度量表之研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Oppenheim, A. N.、呂以榮(2002)。問卷設計、訪談及態度測量。臺北市:六合。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brennan, R. L.(2001)。Generalizability Theory。New York, NY:Springer-Verlag。  new window
3.Shavelson, Richard J.、Webb, Noreen M.(1991)。Generalizability Theory: A Primer。Newbury Park, California:Sage。  new window
4.DeVellis, R. F.、吳齊殷(1999)。量表的發展:理論與應用。台北:弘智文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
5.American Psychological Association、American Educational Research Association、National Council on Measurement in Education(1999)。Standards for educational and psychological testing。Washington, DC:American Psychological Association。  new window
6.姚漢禱(2002)。體育測驗與評量。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王文中、呂金爕、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧(2004)。教育測驗與評量與評量,台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.林麗嬋(1995)。台灣老人壓力源量表之修訂。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪儷瑜、余曉珍(1998)。青少年社會行為簡式量表在情趣障礙學生篩選工作之運用。  延伸查詢new window
4.張智仁、吳晉祥、陳純誠、彭巧珍(2000)。門診糖尿病病人個別衛生教育介入成效之研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭仰三(2005)。高雄市高級中學學生體育態度與體育課學習成效之相關研究,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳心怡(1999)。「簡式」魏氏兒童智力量表之建立研究--四個分測驗之組合。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.廖宜偉(2004)。簡式EIS 之編製及其與傳統智力人格、動機之區分性研究,雲林縣。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔣世光、譚偉象、潘能靜、張勤金、陳永誠、平烈勇、林知遠(2007)。檢驗魏氏成人智力測驗第三版(WAIS-Ⅲ )的Blyler 和四個分測驗組成的簡式版本在住院慢性精神分裂症病患的適用性。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭玲宜、王珮芳、郭乃文、徐道昌(1991)。以迴歸模式建立之簡式中文魏氏兒童智力量表。  延伸查詢new window
10.魏米秀、呂昌明(2005)。「健康促進生活形態」中文簡式量表之發展研究。  延伸查詢new window
11.Beaton, D. E., Wright, J.G., & Katz, J. N.(2005)。Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches。  new window
12.Green, K.E., & Frantom, C.G..(2002)。Survey development and validation with the rasch model。  new window
13.Lee, M.B., & Lee, Y. J(1990)。Reliability and validity of using a brief psychiatric sympyom rating scale in clinical practice。  new window
14.Marsh, H.W., Hau, K. T., Balla, J. R. & Grayson, D.(1998)。Is more ever too much? The number of 43 indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis。  new window
15.Strand, L.I., Ljunggren, A.E., Bogen, B., Ask, T., & Johnsen, T.B.(2008)。The Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change。  new window
16.Suen, H. K.(1990)。Principles of Test Theory,Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
17.Wear, C. L.(1951)。The Evaluation of Attitude Toward Physical Education as an Activity Course。  new window
18.Zanna, M., & Rempel, J. K.(1988)。Attitudes: Anew look at an old concept,New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE