臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：大專青年的約會暴力經驗與因應策略初探
書刊名：中華心理衛生學刊
作者：沈瓊桃 引用關係
作者(外文)：Shen, April Chiung-tao
出版日期：2013
卷期：26:1
頁次：頁1-31
主題關鍵詞：約會暴力；親密伴侶暴力；因應策略；大專青年；Dating violence；Intimate partner violence；Coping strategy；College student
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:199
研究目的：本研究旨在探討未婚大專青年的約會暴力盛行率及其面對約會暴力所採取的因應策略為何。研究方法：本研究採分層隨機抽樣方式，以問卷調查收集全台1,018位大專青年（416位男性與602位女性；平均年齡為21歲）的量化資料。研究結果：在全體樣本中，59%的學生表示過去一年曾有約會暴力的受暴經驗，包括遭受伴侶的精神暴力（55.5%）、肢體暴力（18.6%）、與性暴力（7.6%）。另有62.4%的學生表示過去一年曾有約會暴力的施暴經驗，包括施予伴侶精神暴力（60.6%）、肢體暴力（24.3%）、與性暴力（6.7%）。本研究發現，遭受約會暴力者使用多重的因應策略來處理和伴侶之間的暴力衝突。學生最常使用的前四種因應策略為：和對方理論、多想想對方和這段感情美好之處、尋求朋友的協助、和忍耐。學生最少使用的前四種因應策略則為：尋求專業人士的協助、尋求警察與司法的協助、尋求學校教師、輔導老師或教官的協助、和使用酒精或藥物。本研究發現，大專青年使用何種因應策略類別，與其所遭受的暴力類型多寡、暴力頻率、伴侶關係特性（交往時間長短和委身程度）和性別，皆有顯著的關係。遭受約會暴力的學生通常只有在受暴類型增加以及受暴頻率增多時，才會尋求正式協助。此外，男性在面對約會暴力時，較少使用問題導向因應策略，且使用情緒導向因應策略的比例顯著地高於女性。研究結論：大專青年遭受約會暴力的盛行率高達六成，但受害者多仰賴個人系統來因應約會暴力，甚少求助於正式體系，使得約會暴力呈現盛行率很高、但能見度很低的現象。教育體系與親密關係暴力防治體系應積極宣導健康、無暴力的約會關係，並教導學生如何因應親密關係中的暴力衝突與保障自己的人身安全。
Purpose: This study examines the prevalence rate of dating violence among Taiwanese college students and the types of coping strategies they adopt. Methods: The research design of this study was cross-sectional and correlational. Self-reports and pen-and-paper questionnaires were employed to collect data from a national stratified random sample of 1018 college students from 28 departments in 21 colleges or universities in Taiwan. The formal sample consists of 416 males (40.7%) and 602 females (59%) with a mean age of 21 years. Results: The data showed that 59% of college students with dating experience had been victims of dating violence during the past year (psychological violence: 55.5%; physical violence: 18.6%; sexual violence: 7.6%). A total of 62.4% of participants had perpetrated violence (psychological violence: 60.6%; physical violence: 24.3%; sexual violence: 6.7%) toward their dating partners. College students victimized by violence used a wide range of coping strategies to deal with dating violence, often employing several strategies. Confronting their partner, focusing on positive aspects of the partner/relationship, seeking help from friends, and enduring were the most common strategies reported. Seeking help from professionals, seeking help from the police or legal system, seeking help from school teachers or counselors, and using alcohol or drugs were the least used strategies. The use of coping strategies was significantly associated with violence frequency, the number of types of violence, relationship characteristics (length of dating and commitment) and gender. College students who experienced more types of violence or who experienced violence more frequently were more likely to seek formal help. In addition, male students used more emotion-focused strategies and fewer problem-focused strategies than female students did. Conclusions: Despite the high prevalence of dating violence, as college students are more likely to rely on themselves and less likely to seek formal help, dating violence in Taiwan is almost invisible. Prevention and intervention programs are needed to advocate healthy non-violent relationships and to teach youth how to cope with violent conflict in intimate relationships and how to protect their own safety.
期刊論文
1.王燦槐(19990200)。約會暴力--兩性平等關係的殺手。兩性平等教育季刊，6，50-54。  延伸查詢new window
2.Arriaga, X. B.、Capezza, N. M.(2005)。Targets of partner violence: The importance of understanding coping trajectories。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，20(1)，89-99。  new window
3.Banyard, V. L.、Cross, C.(2008)。Consequences of teen dating violence。Violence Against Women，14(9)，998-1013。  new window
4.Bird, G. W.、Stith, S. M.、Schladale, J.(1991)。Psychological resources, coping strategies, and negotiation styles as discriminators of violence in dating relationships。Family Relations，40(1)，45-50。  new window
5.Calvete, E.、Estévez, A.、Corral, S.(2008)。Coping as a mediator and moderator between intimate partner violence and symptoms of anxiety and depression。Violence Against Women，14(8)，886-904。  new window
6.Carlson, C. N.(2003)。Inveisible victims: Holding the educational system liable for teen dating violence at school。Harvard Women’s Law Journal，26，351-393。  new window
7.Chan, K. L.、Straus, M. A.、Brownridge, D. A.、Tiwari, A.、Leung, W. C.(2008)。Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide。Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health，53(6)，529-537。  new window
8.Dutton, M. A.、Green, B. L.、Kaltman, S. I.、Roesch, D. M.、Zeffiro, T. A.、Krause, E. D.(2006)。Intimate partner violence, PTSD, and adverse health outcomes。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，21(7)，955-968。  new window
9.Gryl, F. E.、Stitch, S. M.、Bird, G. W.(1991)。Close dating relationships among college students: Differences by use of violence and by gender。Journal of Social and Personal Relationships，8，43-64。  new window
10.Henton, J.、Cate, R.、Koval, J.、Lloyd, S.、Christopher, S.(1983)。Romance and violence in dating relationships。Journal of Family Issues，4，467-48。  new window
11.Krause, E. D.、Kaltman, S.、Goodman, L. A.、Dutton, M. A.(2008)。Avoidant coping and PTSD symptoms related to domestic violence exposure: A longitudinal study。Journal of Traumatic Stress，21(1)，83-90。  new window
12.Lewis, S. F.、Fremouw, W. J.(2001)。Dating violence: A critical review of the literature。Clinical Psychology Review，21(1)，105-127。  new window
13.Littleton, H.、Horsley, S.、John, S.、Nelson, D. V.(2007)。Trauma coping strategies and psychological distress: A meta-analysis。Journal of Traumatic Stress，20(6)，977-988。  new window
14.Mayes, T. A.(2008)。Students with no-contact orders against abusive classmates: Recommendations for educators。Preventing School Failure，52(4)，37-44。  new window
15.O'Keefe, M.(1998)。Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence。Journal of Family Violence，13(1)，39-57。  new window
16.O'Leary, K. D.、Malone, J.、Tyree, A.(1994)。Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，62(3)，594-602。  new window
17.Roscoe, B.、Bernaske, N.(1985)。Courtship violence experienced by abused wives: Similarities in patterns of abuse。Family Relations，34，419-444。  new window
18.Shen, A. C. T.(2011)。Cultural barriers to help-seeking among Taiwanese female victims of dating violence。Journal of Interpersonal Violence，26(7)，1343-1365。  new window
19.Slashinski, M. J.、Coker, A. L.、Davis, K. E.(2003)。Physical aggression, forced sex, and stalking victimization by a dating partner: An analysis of the national violence against women Survey。Violence and Victims，18(6)，595-617。  new window
20.Straus, M. A.(2004)。Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide。Violence Against Women，10(7)，790-811。  new window
21.Straus, M.A.、Gozjolko, K. L.。Intimate terrorism and injury of dating partners by male and female university students。Journal of Family Violence。  new window
22.Waldrop, A. E.、Resick, P. A.(2004)。Coping among adult female victims of domestic violence。Journal of Family Violence，19(3)，291-302。  new window
23.Watson, J. M.、Cascardi, M.、Avery-Leaf, S.、O’Leary, K. D.(2001)。High school students’ responses to dating aggression。Violence and Victims，16，339-348。  new window
24.Whitaker, D. J.、Haileyesus, T.、Swahn, M.、Saltzman, L. S.(2007)。Differences in frequency of violence and reported injury between relationships with reciprocal and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence。American Journal of Public Health，97(5)，941-947。  new window
25.Wolfe, D. A.、Scott, K.、Reitzel-Jaffe, D.、Wekerle, C.、Grasley, C.、Straatman, A. L.(2001)。Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory。Psychological Assessment，13(2)，277-293。  new window
26.Yoshihama, M.(2000)。Battered women’s coping strategies and psychological distress: Differences by immigration status。American Journal of Community Psychology，30(3)，9-45。  new window
27.Skinner, E. A.、Edge, K.、Altman, J.、Sherwood, H.(2003)。Searching for the Structure of Coping。Psychological Bulletin，129(2)，216-269。  new window
28.黃登月、王文中(20050900)。青少年約會衝突因應策略量表之發展。教育與心理研究，28(3)，469-494。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Straus, M. A.(1979)。Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales。Journal of Marriage and the Family，41，75-88。  new window
30.Makepeace, J. M.(1981)。Courtship violence among college students。Family Relations，30，97-102。  new window
31.鄭瑞隆、許維倫(19990600)。遭受婚姻暴力婦女因應方式之研究。犯罪學期刊，4，225-271。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Straus, M. A.、Hamby, S. L.、Boney-McCoy, S.、Sugarman, D. B.(1996)。The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS-2): Development and preliminary psychometric data。Journal of Family Issues，17(3)，283-316。  new window
33.楊嘉玲、趙淑珠(20110400)。影響未婚受暴女性關係抉擇之因素。中華輔導與諮商學報，29，37-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Goodman, L. M.、Dutton, M. A.、Weinfurt, K.、Cook, S. L.(2003)。The Intimate Partner Violence Strategies Index: Development and application。Violence Against Women，9(2)，163-186。  new window
35.王沂釗、陳若璋(20110600)。大學生親密關係暴力：其性質與實務工作者處遇能力之分析。家庭教育與諮商學刊，10，1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.陳秋瑩、王增勇、林美薰、楊翠娟、宋鴻樟(20060200)。原鄉的家庭暴力及受暴婦女求助行為之探討--比較原漢之差異。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，25(1)，65-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.孫頌賢、李宜玫(20091200)。暴力的代間傳遞：原生家庭暴力經驗與依戀系統對大學生約會暴力行為的預測比較。家庭教育與諮商學刊，7，23-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.林淑敏、李宗派(20030900)。變質的親密關係--青少年約會暴力的認知與探討。社區發展季刊，103，157-169。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.Silverman, J. G.、Raj, A.、Mucci, L. A.、Hathaway, J. E.(2001)。Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality。JAMA: The Journal of The American Medical Association，286(5)，572-579。  new window
40.Stets, J. E.、Straus, M. A.(1989)。The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting, and married couples。Journal of Family Violence，4，161-180。  new window
41.Lazarus, R. S.(1993)。Coping theory and research: Past, present and future。Psychosomatic Medicine，55(3)，234-247。  new window
42.修慧蘭、孫頌賢(20030900)。大學生約會暴力行為之測量與調查。教育與心理研究，26(3)，471-499。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.孫頌賢、修慧蘭(20050600)。親子肢體暴力與大學生約會暴力行為之關係--尋找代間傳遞中的危機與轉機。教育與心理研究，28(2)，267-296。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.沈瓊桃(2007)。青年對約會暴力的因應策略及其評量工具之發展 (計畫編號：NSC95-41-H-00-005)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.楊嘉玲(2008)。情，不自禁~遭受伴侶暴力之未婚女性其關係抉擇歷程與影響因素(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許文娟(1998)。受虐婦女暴力因應策略之探討--以天主教善牧社會福利緊急庇護中心為例(碩士論文)。東吳大學，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.方嘉鴻(2003)。外籍新娘婚姻暴力求助行為及其保護措施之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳婷蕙(1997)。婚姻暴力中受虐婦女對脫離受虐關係的因應行為之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃一秀(2000)。婚姻暴力之受虐婦女求助歷程之探討(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.丁文彬(2004)。影響婚姻暴力事件受害者因應策略之探討--以花蓮縣為例(碩士論文)。慈濟大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳源湖(1998)。高雄縣市婚姻暴力受虐婦女生活壓力、因應策略與社會支持之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.江文賢(2001)。大學生約會暴力現象與相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.温筱雯(2008)。不能說的秘密：女同志伴侶親密暴力經驗與因應策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Greenfeld, L. A.、Rand, M. R.、Craven, D.、Klaus, P. A.、Perkins, C. A.、Ringel, C.、Fox, J. A.(1998)。Violence by intimates。Washington, DC：U.S. Department of Justice.。  new window
2.Lazarus, Richard S.、Folkman, Susan(1984)。Stress, Appraisal, and Coping。Springer。  new window
其他
1.教育部(2007)。各級學校及統計/統計資料/4.大專院校概況統計，http://www.edu.tw/statistics/publication.aspx?publication_sn=557&pages=2， 2007/05/08。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dietz, T.，Straus, M. A.(1999)。Relationship Committment in The Personal and Relationships Profile (PRP)，http://pubpages.unh.edu/ mas /PR10N.pdf， 2006/11/30。  new window
圖書論文
1.Levy, B.(1998)。Introduction。Dating violence: Young women in danger。Seattle, WA：Seal Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：806（臺灣：800，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67487376
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上