:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:預防原則歐盟化之研究
書刊名:東吳政治學報
作者:洪德欽 引用關係
作者(外文):Horng, Der-chin
出版日期:2011
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁1-56
主題關鍵詞:歐盟歐盟化預防原則科學不確定性歐盟運作條約TFEUWTOEUEuropeanizationThe precautionary principleScientific uncertainty
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(1) 專書(2) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:79
本篇論文乃預防原則歐盟化的研究,主要議題包括預防原則的概念、發展背景,在歐盟的相關規定、實務操作與適用;以及預防原則為何歐盟化、如何歐盟化、歐盟化又有那些意涵與影響?本文研究方法採取法律文義解釋法、歐盟法院與WTO案例分析法 (case law study)、比較方法等方式,以了解預防原則在歐盟法律體系的發展路徑、法律意義以及政策影響;預防原則的性質以及為何具有強制力;預防原則如何從內國法、環境法原則發展為一項歐盟法律一般原則;適用範圍如何從環境擴大至健康、食品安全及消費者保障等領域;如何從原則規定發展為具體實務操作以及在會員國適用,歐盟執委會及歐盟法院在實踐方面又扮演那些角色;歐盟又如何在WTO及國際論壇積極主張預防原則,其間又涉及那些不同利益的競合關係。這些議題又如何影響到預防原則將來的發展,凡此種種皆值得重視,而有研究之必要。
The theme of this paper is to review the Europeanization of the precautionary principle in the European Union (EU). Based on a method of legal interpretation, the following core issues are explored: the concept, background, formation and practice of the precautionary principle; the processes of Europeanization of the principle; the role of EU institutions in the Europeanization of this principle; and the significance and impact of the Europeanization of this principle. Developed and applied originally in the field of environmental regulation, the precautionary principle has been subsequently extended to other policy areas such as human health, food security, and consumer protection. The precaution has been featured as a general principle of EU law through the process of Europeanization. The precautionary principle has had a substantial impact on both EU policies and international laws.
期刊論文
1.Andomo, Roberto(2004)。The Precautionary Principle: A New Legal Standard for a Technological Age。Journal of International Biotechnology Law,1,11-19。  new window
2.Mittelstrass, Jürgen(2009)。Focus: Global Science. The Future of Science a Welcome Address。European Review,17(3/4),463-468。  new window
3.Dashwood, Alan(1978)。The Principle of Direct Effect in European Community Law。Journal of Common Market Studies,16(3),229-245。  new window
4.Olsen, Johan P.(2002)。The Many Faces of Europeanization。Journal of Common Market Studies,40(5),921-952。  new window
5.Müller, Jan-Werner(2008)。A European Constitutional Patriotism? The Case Restated。European Law Journal,14(5),542-557。  new window
6.Haas, Peter M.(1989)。Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control。International Organization,43(3),377-403。  new window
7.洪德欽(20081200)。消費者權利在歐盟基改食品標示之規定與實踐。歐美研究,38(4),509-578。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Horng, Der-Chin(2005)。歐盟基因改造食品延宕核准審查之爭端。中華國際法與超國界法評論,1(2),405-451。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Ma, In(2005)。科技研究管理與風險預防原則。科技管理研究,10,52-54。  延伸查詢new window
10.Benvenisti, Eyal、Downs, George W.(2009)。National Courts, Domestic Democracy, and the Evolution of International Law。European Journal of International Law,20(1),59-72。  new window
11.Bodansky, Daniel(1991)。Scientific Uncertainty and the Precautionary Principle。Environment,33(7),4-44。  new window
12.Cartabia, Marta(2009)。Europe and Rights: Taking Dialogue Seriously。European Constitutional Law Review,5(1),5-31。  new window
13.European Parliament(1998)。Resolution of 10 March 1998 on the Commission Green Paper on the General Principles of Food Law in the European Union。Official Journal of the European Union,C104,60-68。  new window
14.European Union(1997)。Treaty of Amsterdam。Official Journal of the European Union,C340,1-144。  new window
15.European Union(1998)。Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment in the North-East Atlantic。Official Journal of the European Union,41(L104),3-21。  new window
16.European Union(1999)。Commission Directive 1999/39/EC of 6 May 1999, Amending Directive 96/5/EC on Processed Cereal-Based Foods and Baby Foods for Infants and Young Children。Official Journal of the European Union,42(L124),8-10。  new window
17.Christoforou, Theofanis(2003)。The Precautionary Principle and Democratizing Expertise: A European Legal Perspective。Science and Public Policy,30(3),205-211。  new window
18.Cuesta López, Víctor(2010)。The Lisbon Treaty's Provisions on Democratic Principles: A Legal Framework for Participatory Democracy。European Public Law,16(1),123-138。  new window
19.Dratwa, Jim(2002)。Taking Risks with the Precautionary Principle: Food (and the Environment) for Thought at the European Commission。Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning,4(3),197-213。  new window
20.Markl, Hubert(2009)。Challenges of Globalization for Science and Research。European Review,17(3/4),499-509。  new window
21.Codex(1999)。Code of Hygienic Practice for Refrigerated Packaged Foods with Extended Shelf Life。CAC/RCP,46(1999),1-20。  new window
22.United Nations Conference on Environment and Development(1992)。Rio Declaration on Environment and Development。International Legal Materials,31(4),874-880。  new window
23.European Union(2001)。Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001, on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC。Official Journal of the European Union,44(L106),1-38。  new window
24.European Union(2002)。Regulation 178/2002 Laying Down the General Principles and Requirements of Food Law,Eestablishing the European Food Safety Authority and Laying Down Procedures in Matter of Food Safety。Official Journal of the European Union,45(L31),1-24。  new window
25.European Union(2007)。Treaty of Lisbon。Official Journal of the European Union,50(C306/01),1-271。  new window
26.European Union(2010)。Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union。Official Journal of the European Union,53,(C83/01),1-388。  new window
27.Gialdino, Carlo Curti(1995)。Some Reflections on the Acquis Communautaire。Common Market Law Review,32(5),1089-1121。  new window
會議論文
1.Codex(2008)。Issues of Importance to the Region。Warsaw。  new window
圖書
1.O'Riordan, T.、Cameron, J.、Jordan, A.(2001)。Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle。London:Cameron May。  new window
2.Usher, J. A.(1998)。General principles of EC law。London, UK:Longman。  new window
3.Marr, Simon(2003)。The Precautionary Principle in the Law of the Sea, Modern Decision Making in International Law。The Hague:Kluwer Law International。  new window
4.Scharpf, Fritz W.(1999)。Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.WTO(2003)。Understanding the WTO。Geneva:WTO。  new window
6.Dworkin, Ronald(1977)。Taking Rights Seriously。London:Gerald Duckworth and Co Ltd.。  new window
7.Sands, P.(2003)。Principles of International Environmental Law。Cambridge。  new window
8.Franck, Thomas M.(1995)。Fairness in International Law and Institutions。New York, NY:Clarendon Press。  new window
9.Brownlie, Ian(1998)。Principles of Public International Law。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
10.National Research Council(1983)。Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process。National Academies Press。  new window
11.Craig, Paul De Búrca, Gráinne(2008)。EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials。Oxford。  new window
12.Dell'Olio, Fiorella(2005)。The Europeanization of Citizenship. Between the Ideology of Nationality, Immigration and European Identity。Hants。  new window
13.Sands, Philippe(1995)。Principle of International Environmental Law, Framework, Standards and Implementation。Manchester。  new window
14.Codex(2001)。Codex Alimentarius- Food Labelling- Complete Texts。Rome。  new window
15.Commission of the European Communities(1997)。Consumer Health and Food Safety, COM (97) 183 final。Brussels。  new window
16.Commission of the European Communities(1997)。The General Principles of Food Law in the European Union, COM (97) 176 final。Brussels。  new window
17.EFTA Court(2001)。Case E-3/00-EFTA Surveillance Authority v The Kingdom of Norway。Luxembourg。  new window
18.Hartley, Trevor C.(2007)。The Foundations of European Community Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Community。Oxford。  new window
19.Spender, Herbert(1890)。First Principle。Edinburgh。  new window
20.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1970)。Case11/70: Internationale Handesgesellschaft v. Einfubrund Vorratsstelle Getreide, para。Luxembourg。  new window
21.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1971)。Case5/71: Schöppenstedt。Luxembourg。  new window
22.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1978)。Case 106/77: Simmenthal。Luxembourg。  new window
23.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1978)。Case 112/77: Töpfer。Luxembourg。  new window
24.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1986)。Case 205/84: Commission v Germany, para。Luxembourg。  new window
25.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1986)。Case 205/84: Commission v. Germany, para。Luxembourg。  new window
26.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Jointed Cases T-74/00, T-76/00, T83/00, T84/00, T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 : Artegodan GmbH, para。Luxembourg。  new window
27.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Case T-13/99: Pfizer Animal Health, para。Luxembourg。  new window
28.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1991)。Case C-180/89: Commission v.Italy, para。Luxembourg。  new window
29.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1991)。Case C-180/89: Commission v.Italy, para。Luxembourg。  new window
30.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, paras。Geneva。  new window
31.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
32.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, paras。Geneva。  new window
33.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1998)。Case C-157/96: National Farmers' Union, para。Luxembourg。  new window
34.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
35.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
36.WTO(1999)。Japan-Measures Affecting Agricultural Products, WT/DS76/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
37.WTO(2006)。European Communities–Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (EC–Biotech Products), WT/DS291/AB/R, WT/DS292/AB/R, WT/DS293/AB/R。Geneva。  new window
38.WTO(2006)。European Communities–Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (EC–Biotech Products), WT/DS291/AB/R, WT/DS292/AB/R, WT/DS293/AB/R: 1070-1076。Geneva。  new window
39.WTO(2004)。Trade Policy Review: European Communities, WT/TPR/S/136: 27, para。Geneva。  new window
40.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1998)。Case C-180/96: UK v. Commission, para。Luxembourg。  new window
41.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1998)。Case C-180/96: UK v. Commission, para。Luxembourg。  new window
42.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1998)。Case C-180/96: UK v. Commission, para。Luxembourg。  new window
43.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1998)。Case C-180/96: UK v. Commission, para。Luxembourg。  new window
44.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2003)。Case 192-01: Commission of the European Communities v. Kingdom of Denmark, para。Luxembourg。  new window
45.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2005)。Jointed Cases T-366/03 and T-235/04, Land Oberösterreich。Luxembourg。  new window
46.Tickner, Joel A.、Raffensperger, Carolyn(1999)。The Precautionary Principle in Action: A Handbook。North Dakota:Science and Environmental Health Network。  new window
47.United Nations General Assembly(1982)。World Charter for Nature A/RES/37/7。New York。  new window
48.UNESCO(2005)。World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology, The Precautionary Principle。Paris:UNESCO。  new window
49.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R。Geneva。  new window
50.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Case T-13/99: Pfizer Animal Health, para。Luxembourg。  new window
51.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Case T-13/99: Pfizer Animal Health, para。Luxembourg。  new window
52.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Case T-13/99: Pfizer Animal Health, para。Luxembourg。  new window
53.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Jointed Cases T-74/00, T-76/00, T83/00, T84/00, T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 : Artegodan GmbH, para。Luxembourg。  new window
54.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1983)。Case 174/82: Sandoz, para。Luxembourg。  new window
55.The Court of Justice of the European Union(1985)。Case 240/83: Procureur de la République v. Association de Défense des Brûleurs d'Huiles Usagées。Luxembourg。  new window
56.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
57.The Court of Justice of the European Union(2002)。Jointed Cases T-74/00, T-76/00, T83/00, T84/00, T-85/00, T-132/00, T-137/00 and T-141/00 : Artegodan GmbH, para。Luxembourg。  new window
58.WTO(1998)。EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (EC–Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R, para。Geneva。  new window
59.WTO.(2007)。Relationship with Codex, IPPC and OIE. G/SPS/GEN/775。Geneva。  new window
60.Cottier, Thomas(2002)。Implications for Trade Law and Policy: Towards Convergence and Integration。The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Reconciling Trade in Biotechnology with Environment and Development。London。  new window
61.Cranor, Carl F.(1999)。Asymmetric Information, the Precautionary Principle, and Burdens of Proofs。Protecting Public Health and the Environment : Implementing the Precautionary Principle。Washington, DC。  new window
62.Douma, Wybe Th(2001)。How Safe is Safe? The EU, the USA and the WTO Codex Alimentarius Debate on Food Safety。The European Union and the International Legal Order: Discord or Harmony?。The Hague。  new window
63.Fossum, John Erik、Schesinger, Philip R.(2007)。The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making?。The European Union and the Public Sphere A Communicative Space in the Making?。London。  new window
64.Inglis, Kirstyn(2008)。EU Environmental Law and Its Green Footprints in the World。Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape。Cambridge。  new window
65.Jacobs, Francis G.(2005)。The Evolution of the European Legal Order。A Review of Forty Years of Community Law. Legal Developments in the European Communities and the European Union。The Hague。  new window
66.Krasner, Stephen D.(1983)。Structural Cause and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables。International Regimes。Ithaca。  new window
67.Somsen, Han(2008)。Cloning Trojan Horses: Precautionary Regulation of Reproductive Technologies。Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes。Oxford。  new window
68.Lenaerts, Koen(2005)。In the Union We Trust: Trust -Enhancing Principles of Community Law。A Review of Forty Years of Community Law. Legal Developments in the European Communities and the European Union。The Hague。  new window
69.Moltke, K. von.(1988)。The Vorsorgenprinzip in West German Environmental Policy。Twelfth Report of Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution。London。  new window
70.Nicolaides, Phedon(2003)。Preparing for Accession to the European Union: How to Establish Capacity for Effective and Credible Application of EU Rules。The Enlargement of the European Union。Oxford。  new window
71.Petersmann, Ernst - Ulrich(2007)。Biotechnology, Human Rights and International Economic Law。Biotechnologies and International Human Rights。Oxford。  new window
72.Radaelli, Claudio M.(2003)。The Europeanization of Public Policy。The Politics of Europeanization。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.Commission of the European Communities(2000)。Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle,http://ec.enropa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf, 20091110。  new window
2.Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.(2000)。Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety,http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/, 20110706。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cowles, Maria G.、Caporaso, James、Risse, Thomas(2001)。Europeanization and domestic change: Introduction。Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change。Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press。  new window
2.洪德欽(200611)。歐盟東擴與人權歐盟化。歐洲聯盟人權保障。台北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪德欽(2007)。歐盟憲法之法理分析。歐盟憲法。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE