:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐盟審議民主的機制發展與實踐經驗之探討
作者:林子倫
書刊名:歐洲聯盟的公共治理 : 政策與案例分析;朱景鵬 (主編)
頁次:61-102
出版日期:2013
出版項:臺北:國立臺灣大學出版中心
主題關鍵詞:歐盟審議民主
學門:政治學
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:17
期刊論文
1.Bohman, James(2004)。Republican Cosmopolitanism。The Journal of Political Philosophy,12(3),336-352。  new window
2.Delvenne, Pierre、Fallon, Catherine、Brunet, Sebastien(2011)。Parliamentary technology assessment institutions as indications of reflexive modernization。Technology in Society,33(1/2),36-43。  new window
3.Dryzek, J. S.、Tucker, A.(2008)。Deliberative Innovation to Different Effect: Consensus Conference in Denmark, France, and, the United State。Public Administration Review,68(5),864-876。  new window
4.Grimm, D.(1995)。Does Europe Need A Constitution。European Law Review,1(3),282-302。  new window
5.Habermas, Juergen(2001)。Why Europe Needs a Constitution?。New Left Review,11,5-26。  new window
6.Luskin, Robert C.、Fishkin, James S.、Boucher, Stephen、Monceau, Henri(2008)。Considered Opinions on Further EU Enlargement: Evidence from an EU-wide Deliberative Poll。International Society of Political。  new window
7.Majone, G.(1998)。Europe’s Democratic Deficit: The Question of Standards。European Law Journal,4(1),5-28。  new window
8.Majone, G.(2002)。The European Commission: The Limits of Centralization and the Perils of Parliamentarization。Governance,15(3),375-92。  new window
9.Moravcsik, Andrew(2002)。In Defence of the 'Democratic Deficit': Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union。Journal of Common Market Studies,40(4),603-624。  new window
10.Moravcsik, A.(2004)。Is there a 'Democratic Deficit' in World Politics?。A Framework for Analysis. Government and Opposition,39(2),336-363。  new window
11.Weiler, J. J.(1995)。Does Europe Need a Constitution? Demos, Telos, and the German Maastricht Decision。European Law Journal,1(3),219-258。  new window
12.洪德欽(20081200)。消費者權利在歐盟基改食品標示之規定與實踐。歐美研究,38(4),509-578。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蘇宏達(20090600)。里斯本條約生效後對歐盟對外行動能力與民主治理機制可能的影響。政治科學論叢,40,81-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林國明(20090600)。國家、公民社會與審議民主:公民會議在臺灣的發展經驗。臺灣社會學,17,161-217。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Ryfe, David M.(2005)。Does Deliberative Democracy Work?。Annual Review of Political Science,8(1),49-71。  new window
16.盧倩儀(20050100)。歐洲制憲會議對歐盟民主化之影響。問題與研究,44(1),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Finke, Barbara(2007)。Civil Society Participation in EU Governance。Living Reviews in European Governance,2(2),1-34。  new window
18.周桂田(20070900)。新興風險治理典範之芻議。政治與社會哲學評論,22,179-233。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Dator, Jim(2009)。Five Futures for Governance。Post 20th Anniversary Conference European Technology Assessment Network 2009 Conference。London。  new window
研究報告
1.Stie, Anne Elizabeth(2007)。Assessing Democratic Legitimacy from a Deliberative Perspective: An Analytical Framework for Evaluating the ElTs Second Pillar Decision-Making System。  new window
圖書
1.Chambers, S.(1996)。Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
2.Danish Board of Technology(2012)。World Wide Views on Biodiversity--From the World's Citizens to the Biodiversity Policymakers Results Report。Denmark:The Danish Board of Technology。  new window
3.de Schoutheete, P.(2000)。The Case for Europe--Unity, Diversity, and Democracy in the European Union。Boulder:Lynne Rienner Publishers。  new window
4.European Union(2001)。European Governance: A White Paper。  new window
5.Scharpf, F.(1999)。Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic!。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Shapiro, Ian(2003)。The State of Democratic Theory。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Vig, Norman J.、Paschen, Herbert(2000)。Parliaments and Technology: The Development of Technology Assessment in Europe。New York:State University of New York Press。  new window
8.Young, Iris Marion(2002)。Inclusion and Democracy。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Bohman, James(1996)。Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy。MIT Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Schmitter, P.(2001)。What Is There to Legitimize in the European Union... And How Might This Be Accomplished?。  new window
其他
1.ECAS(2010)。How the Participatory Democracy Toolbox Can Make the European Union Less Remote from Citizens,Brussels:European Citizen Action Service。,http://www.ecas-citizens. eu/content/view/84/355/, 2013/04/30。  new window
2.EUROPTA European Participatory Technology Assessment Report(2000)。European Participatory Technology Assessment--Participatory Methods in Technology Assessment and Technology Decision-Making,www.tekno.dk/europta, 2012/10/14。  new window
3.Meeting of Minds(2006)。European C itizens’ Deliberation on Brain Science,http://www.kbs-frb.be/otheractivity. aspx?id=193934&langtype=1033, 2013/04/30。  new window
圖書論文
1.盧倩儀(2007)。從歐盟制憲經驗看歐盟之民主赤字問題。歐盟憲法。臺北:中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Berloznik, Robby、廖錦桂、江盈誼(2007)。參與式科技評估:歐洲和比利時的國會TA制度。口中之光:審議民主的理論與實踐。臺北:臺灣智庫。  延伸查詢new window
3.Andersson, Edward、Shahrokh, Thea(2012)。Crossing Boundaries with Deliberation: But Where Are We Going?。Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance。London:New York:Earthscan。  new window
4.Benhabib, Seyla(1996)。Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy。Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political。Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Hendriks, Carolyn M.(2005)。Consensus conferences and planning cells: Lay citizen deliberations。The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
6.Kluver, Lars(1995)。Consensus Conferences of the Danish Board of Technology。Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe。London:Science Museum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE