臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：災難的永恆回歸：記憶政治與災難反覆的探討
書刊名：臺灣人類學刊
作者：容邵武 引用關係
作者(外文)：Jung, Shaw-wu
出版日期：2011
卷期：9:2
頁次：頁95-134
主題關鍵詞：記憶；災難人類學；921地震；公共論述；Memory；Anthropology of disaster；The 921 earthquake；Public discourse
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:259
本文探討為什麼在台灣災難之後總是重覆著相似的模式。筆者贊成李丁讚(1997)所說的因為台灣尚未跳脫傳統主義的生活情境，行動模式受到未經反省的習慣決定，因此難以有清楚的意識和溝通。不過，本文探討國姓鄉南港村的二個例子並不缺乏李丁讚所言之第一步的情感建構階段，但是災難的「記憶」論述與再現，催化並轉化感情，使得情感建構階段很快消失，既沒能跨越到社會交互性論述，甚至成為官方合法性論述的動力。一個例子是「震爆點」上的九份二山國家地震紀念園區；國家以及專業規劃團隊投入相當大的人力與金錢，彷彿是國家直接在這個地景上銘刻它對921地震的記憶敘事。但是它從一開始就是龐大的官方記憶，要轉化在地的傷痛記憶。另一個例子是「鹿神祭活動」，相對於「九份二山國家921地震紀念園區」比較靜態、日常、官方、銘刻式的記憶，鹿神祭在表面上以Connerton (1989)著名的區分，則具有動態、特殊、地方、表演式的記憶。透過這二個例子，筆者要闡明的重點是，災難的重覆、災難論述的永恆回歸，是因為遺忘，社會記不起來、記不清楚，或更糟的是「被扭曲」的記憶，每次的敘說充滿了各式各樣的情感，然而這些情感似乎總像是第一次面臨災難，沒有真正變成溝通，並且進而發揮行動上或學習上的效果。
This article studies why similar patterns of coping with disasters are repeated in Taiwan. To explore the issue, I take two cases in Nangang Village, Guoxing Township. The first case I examine is Jiufener Mountain National Earthquake Memorial Park, located at the epicenter of the 9/21 earthquake in the village. The state and the professional design teams put in place tremendous manpower and money to build the Park in a way that appears to inscribe onto the landscape the state’s grand narrative of the earthquake, which from the beginning aimed to convert local memories of suffering into an official memory. The second case is the “Deer Deity Festival”, also held in the village after the earthquake. The Festival is distinguished from the Park, a fixed, routine, official, and inscriptive memorialization, by its dynamic, particular, local, and performative character, to use Connerton’s famous categorizations (1989). Through analysis of the two cases, I want to show that when a disaster strikes, discourses are easily transformed into official memory without the critical construction of social communication. When there is no learning and communication, a society may not act to change, and the patterns of coping with disaster are doomed to repeat.
期刊論文
1.阮秀莉(20020200)。大地的變貌．自然的銘刻--論述九二一集集大地震景觀。中外文學，30(9)=357，118-150。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Kansteiner, Wulf(2002)。Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies。History and Theory，41(2)，179-197。  new window
3.張素玢(20091200)。從治水到治山--以濁水溪流域為例。臺灣文獻，60(4)，81-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Olick, Jeffrey K.、Robbins, Joyce(1998)。Social Memory Studies: From 'Collective Memory' to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices。Annual Review of Sociology，24，105-140。  new window
5.單德興(20070400)。創傷．回憶．和解：析論林瓔的越戰將士紀念碑。思想，5，95-127。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Nora, Pierre(1989)。Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire。Representations，26(1)，7-25。  new window
7.Oliver-Smith, Anthony(1996)。Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters。Annual Review of Anthropology，25(1)，303-328。  new window
8.李丁讚(19970300)。公共論述、社會學習與基進民主：對「食物中毒」現象的一些觀察。臺灣社會研究，25，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳佳利(20091200)。創傷、知識與回憶：探921地震教育園區之展示建構與詮釋。臺灣文獻，60(4)，439-469。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Alonso, Ana Maria(1988)。The effects of truth: Re-presentations of the past and the imagining of community。Journal of Historical Sociology，1(1)，33-57。  new window
11.Connerton, Paul(2009)。How Modernity Forgets。New York。  new window
12.Handelman, Don(1981)。Introduction: The Idea of Bureaucratic Organization。Social Analysis，9，5-23。  new window
13.Heyman, Josiah McC(1995)。Putting Power in the Anthropology of Bureaucracy: The Immigration and Naturalization Service at the Mexico-United States Border。Current Anthropology，36(2)，261-287。  new window
14.Petryna, Adriana(1995)。Sarcophagus: Chernobyl in Historical Light。Cultural Anthropology，10(2)，196-220。  new window
15.Littlewood, Roland(2009)。Neglect as Project: How Two Societies Forget。Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute，15，113-130。  new window
16.Marschall, Sabine(2010)。Commemorating the 'Trojan Horse' Massacre in Cape Town: the Tension between Vernacular and Official Expressions of Memory。Visual Studies，25(2)，135-148。  new window
研究報告
1.南投國姓鄉南港社區發展協會(2008)。97年度南港社區發展協會評鑑報告。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉宇雲(2003)。震災、集體記憶與重建：以東勢匠寮巷為例(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Douglas, Mary(1992)。Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory。London：Routledge。  new window
2.謝國興(2001)。全國民間災後重建聯盟兩年工作紀要。臺北：全國民間災後重建聯盟。  延伸查詢new window
3.林照真(2002)。「戰慄土石流--災難、政治與風險管理」。台北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Navaro-Yashin, Yael(2002)。Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
5.Birkland, Thomas A.(1997)。After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University Press。  new window
6.吳洛健(2001)。九二一集集大地震九份二山整治成果及國家地震紀念地規劃。行政院農委會水土保持局。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃榮村(2009)。臺灣921大地震的集體記憶。台北：INK印刷文學生活雑誌出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gillis, J. R.(1994)。Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity。Princeton, N. J.：Princeton University Press。  new window
9.Verdery, Katherine(1996)。What was Socialism, and What Comes Next?。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
10.Kundera, Milan、尉遲秀(2002)。笑忘書。皇冠。  延伸查詢new window
11.Connerton, Paul(1989)。How Societies Remember。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.九二一災後重建委員會(2006)。九二一震災重建經驗。南投。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳儀深(2001)。九二一震災口述訪問紀錄。台北：中央研究院近代史研究所。  延伸查詢new window
14.鍾起岱(2002)。重建地區二十四鄉鎮市九二一重建成果、遠景與重大施政彙編。南投。  延伸查詢new window
15.Cole, Jennifer(2001)。Forget Colonialism? Sacrifice and the Aet of Memory in Madagascar。Berkeley。  new window
16.Moore, Sally Falk(1986)。Social Facts and Fabrications: "Customary" Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980。Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Oliver-Smith, Anthony、Hoffman, Susanna M.(1999)。The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective。New York。  new window
18.Sant Cassia, Paul(2005)。Bodies of Evidence: Burial, Memory and the Recovery of Missing Person in Cyprus。Oxford。  new window
19.Hoffman, Susan、Oliver-Smith, Anthony(2002)。Catastrophe and Culture: The Anthropology of Disaster。Santa Fe, NM。  new window
20.Feuchtwang, Stephan(2000)。Reinscriptions: Commemoration, Restoration and the Interpersonal Transmission of Histories and Memories under Modern States in Asia and Europe。Memory and Methodology。London。  new window
21.Handelman, Don(1976)。Bureaucratic Transactions: The Development of Offical-Client Relationships in Israel。Transaction and Meaning: Directions in the Anthropology of Exchange and Symbolic Behavior。Philadelphia。  new window
22.Alexander, Jeffrey C.(2004)。Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma。Cultural Trauma and Collective Memory。Berkeley。  new window
23.Boyarin, Jonathan(1994)。Space, Time, and the Politics of Memory。Remapping Memory: The Politics of Time and Space。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
24.Deleuze, Gilles(1994)。Foldings, or the Inside of Thought (Subjectivation)。Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate。Cambridge。  new window
25.Yoneyama, Lisa(1994)。Taming the Memoryscape: Hiroshima's Urban Renewal。Remapping Memory: The Politics of Time and Scape。Minneapolis, MN。  new window
26.Kirmayer, Laurence J.(1996)。Landscapes of Memory: Trauma, narrative and Dissociation。Tense Past: Cultural Essays in Trauma and Memory。NY。  new window
27.Kuhn, Annette(2000)。A Journey Through Memory。Memory and Methodology。London。  new window
28.Lambek, Michael、Antze, Paul(1996)。Introduction: Forecasting Memory。Tense Past: Cultural Essays in Trauma and Memory。NY。  new window
29.Malkki, Lisa(1992)。National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees。Cultural Anthropology。Durham。  new window
其他
1.卞中佩(2009)。政府的無能不僅在救災，http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/jw!7wJW3rSRHxuZm35jUEBpTAGe/article?mid=7401， 20100521。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐偉群(1999)。無能政府的宿命與個人生活觀的再造，http://www.yam.com.tw/921news， 19991213。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院農業委員會水土保持局(2001)。九二一國家地震紀念地九份二山整體規劃及建設事業計畫書。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Warner, M.(1993)。The mass public and the mass subject。The phantom public sphere。Minneapolis, MN：University of Minnesota Press。  new window
2.Foucault, Michel(1977)。Nietzsche, Genealogy, History。Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews。Cornell University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：628（臺灣：614，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67170134
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上