臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：政治學改造運動的爭議和啟發：從「通則」到「脈絡」的轉向
書刊名：政治與社會哲學評論
作者：徐振國
作者(外文)：Hsu, Chen-kuo
出版日期：2013
卷期：45
頁次：頁1-61
主題關鍵詞：改造運動；方法論；通則；脈絡；論述轉向；周全科學的政治學；Perestroika movement；Generalization；Context；Discourse turn；Textual content analysis；An ecumenical science of politics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:42
2001年美國政治學年會爆發了一場類似政變的政治學「改造運動」，指摘理性抉擇和實證量化研究形成聯合「霸權」，扭曲了政治學的發展方向，故要求進行改造。就方法論的訴求而言，改造者從「理論負載」和「問題驅策」等訴求，形成一條明確的批判主軸。然而彼等的重建主張卻很單薄，許多方面是在重複後行為主義政治學革命的論調。本文發現，在改造者和其他批判者言語的字裡行間，透露了不少對「脈絡」的殷切需求。而此一需求和1960年代開啟的諸多知識「轉向」有呼應關係，旨在開啟更寬廣而有系統的脈絡探索之學。基於此，本文特別強調當代語言學的「論述轉向」，認為政治學可以從偏重「通則」轉向偏重「脈絡」。如此，將有助於達成改造者所揭示的方向：「周全科學的政治學」。
The Perestroika Movement in political science reflects the long existed ”fractured” situation in the discipline and confusion for the future development in the post-cold war era. Perestroika activists accuse that quantitative-oriented positivism and rational choice have conformed a united ”hegemony” in the discipline as distorting research resource and developmental courses. This article contends that the so called ”hegemony” refers to the superior of knowledge status based on the logic foundation of the nomological model of explanation. Perestroika activists present strong criticisms on this problem. However, they did not see the much more serious problem of the short of ”context” in the discipline and thus can not give good suggestion of reconstructing. For reversing this biased view, this article suggests that the discipline should take the way of ”discourse turn” to follow the new perspective of the post-positivism and to adopt the new research methods such as textual content analysis and textual narrative analysis. Eventually, it may enhance the dialectical interactions between empirical science and interpretative science in the discipline. And hopefully it may help to reach the goal of ”an ecumenical science of politics” stated by the Perestroika activists.
期刊論文
1.苑舉正(20040700)。維根斯坦哲學對後實證科學哲學發展的影響。東海大學文學院學報，45，427-454。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭秋永(20090900)。改造運動：政治哲學與政治科學。東吳政治學報，27(3)，1-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Monteiro, Nuno P.、Ruby, Keven G.(2009)。IR and the False Promise of Philosophical Foundations。International Theory，1(1)，15-48。  new window
4.Shapiro, Ian(2002)。Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to do about It。Political Theory，30(4)，596-619。  new window
5.Shapiro, Ian、Wendt, Alexander(1992)。The Difference that Realism Makes: Social Science and the Politics of Consent。Politics & Society，20(2)，197-223。  new window
6.徐振國(20020900)。政治學方法論偏頗發展的檢討。政治與社會哲學評論，2，123-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Laver, Michael、Benoit, Kenneth、Garry, John(2003)。Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data。American Political Science Review，97(2)，311-331。  new window
8.Kasza, Gregory J.(2001)。Perestroika: For an Ecumenical Science of Politics。PS: Political Science & Politics，34(3)，597-599。  new window
9.林益年(2005)。虛假霸權：臺灣政治學研究中的理性選擇。政治科學論叢，25，67-104。  延伸查詢new window
10.Easton, David(1969)。The New Revolution in Political Science。American Political Science Review，63(4)，1051-1061。  new window
會議論文
1.徐振國(2012)。從維根斯坦前後期哲學的轉變探討政治科學的「轉向」問題。2012中國政治學會年會《劇變中的危機與轉機：全球治理的發展與困境》學術研討會，(會議日期: 11月17-18日)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Isaak, Alan(2003)。The Scope and Method of Political Science(-)，Wadsworth。  new window
圖書
1.Beaugrande, Robert de(1997)。The Story of Discourse Analysis。Discourse as Structure and Process。London：Sage Publications。  new window
2.Dryzek, John S.(2005)。A Pox on Perestroika, A Hex on Hegemony: Toward A Critical Political Science。Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。New Haven：London：Yale University Press：Yale University Press。  new window
3.Dye, Thomas R.(2012)。Understanding Public Policy。Taipei：Pearson。  new window
4.Franzosi, Roberto(2004)。From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Buttolph, Johnson, J.、Reynolds, H.T.、Joslyn, Richard(2004)。Political Science Research Methods。Washington, D.C.：A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.。  new window
6.King, Gary、Keohane, Robert、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Desinging Social Inquiry。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Reason, Peter、Rowan, John(1981)。Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research。John Wiley and Sons。  new window
8.William, Riker, H.(1992)。Political Science and Rational Choice。Perspectives on Positive Political Economy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Shapiro, Ian、Smith, Rogers M.、Masoud, Tarek E.(2004)。Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
10.Yanow, Dvora Schwartz-Shea(2006)。Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn。New York：M. E.Sharpe。  new window
11.Moon, Donald J.(1975)。The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives?。Political Science: Scope and Theory。Reading, MA：Addison Wesley。  new window
12.Hempel, C. G.(1952)。Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science。Chicago, Ill：University of Chicago Press。  new window
13.Monroe, Kristen Renwick(2005)。Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science。Yale University Press。  new window
14.Green, Donald P.、Shapiro, Ian(1994)。Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science。Yale University Press。  new window
15.King, G.(1989)。Unifying Political Methodology: the likelihood theory of statistical inference。Cambridge。  new window
16.Almond, Gabriel A.(1990)。A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science。London：Newbury Park, CA：Sage Publication。  new window
17.Sokolowski, Robert、李維倫(2004)。現象學十四講。臺北：心靈工坊出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Hempel, Carl Gustav(1966)。Philosophy of Natural Science。Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
19.Fukuyama, Francis、李永熾(1993)。歷史之終結與最後一人。臺北：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Francis, Fukuyama(2012)。How Academia Failed the Nation: The Decline of Regional Studies，http://www.sais-jhu.edu/pubaffairs/publications/saisphere.winter04/Fukuyama.html。  new window
2.Miller, D.W.(2001)。Storming the Political Science: Scholars Join Revolt against the Domination of Mathematical Approaches to the Discipline，http://chronicle.com/free/v48/i04/04a01601.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.徐振國(2012)。內容及文本內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法（第二冊）：質性研究法。東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Van Dijk, Teun A.(1997)。The Study of Discourse。Discourse as Structure and Process: A Multidisciplinary Introduction。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：405（臺灣：401，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67464528
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上