| 期刊論文1. | 徐振國(20020900)。政治學方法論偏頗發展的檢討。政治與社會哲學評論,2,123-178。 延伸查詢 | 2. | 郭秋永(20021200)。邏輯實證論、行為主義及後行為主義:經驗性政治研究的理論基礎。人文及社會科學集刊,14(4),465-514。 延伸查詢 | 3. | 郭秋永(20030300)。科學哲學中的兩種因果解析。政治與社會哲學評論,4,121-177。 延伸查詢 | 4. | 郭秋永(2005)。批判實存主義與價值中立原則。人文及社會科學集刊,17(3),565-614。 延伸查詢 | 5. | Gibbons, Michael(2006)。Hermeneutics, Political Inquiry, and Practical Reason: An Evolving challenge to Political Scienc。The American Political Science Review,100(4),563-571。 | 6. | Dryzek, John(2006)。Revolutions without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science。The American Political Science Review,100(4),487-492。 | 7. | Pleasants, Nigel(2000)。Winch, Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory。History of the Human Sciences,13(1),78-91。 | 8. | Pettit, P.(2000)。Winch's Double-edged Idea of a Social Science。History of the Human Sciences,13(1),63-77。 | 9. | Gerring, John、Yesnowitz, Joshua(2006)。A Normative Turn in Political Science。Polity,38(1),101-133。 | 10. | Miller, Eugene(1972)。Positivism, Historicism, and Political Inquiry。The American Political Science Review,66(3),796-817。 | 11. | Bond, Jon(2007)。The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on Behavioral Evolution in Political Science。The Journal of Politics,69(4),897-907。 | 圖書1. | Moon, Donald J.(1975)。The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives?。Political Science: Scope and Theory。Reading, MA:Addison Wesley。 | 2. | Winch, Peter(1972)。Ethics and action。London:Rouletge。 | 3. | Hempel, Carl G.(1965)。Aspects of Scientific Explanation: And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science。Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.。 | 4. | Rudner, Richard S.(1966)。Philosophy of Social Science。Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall。 | 5. | Bhaskar, Roy(1998)。The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences。Routledge。 | 6. | 郭秋永(1993)。政治參與。臺北:幼獅。 延伸查詢 | 7. | 袁頌西(2003)。當代政治研究:方法與理論探微。臺北:時英出版社。 延伸查詢 | 8. | Winch, P.(1958)。The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy。London:Routledge。 | 9. | Almond, Gabriel A.(1990)。A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science。London:Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publication。 | 10. | Hollis, Martin(1994)。The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction。Cambridge University Press。 | 11. | 郭秋永(1988)。政治學方法論研究專集。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。 延伸查詢 | 12. | 楊深坑(20020000)。科學理論與教育學發展。臺北:心理。 延伸查詢 | 13. | Searle, John R.(1969)。Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language。Cambridge University Press。 | 14. | King, Gary、Keohane, Robert O.、Verba, Sidney(1994)。Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific inference in Qualitative Research。Princeton University Press。 | 15. | 馮友蘭(1996)。貞元六書。上海:華東師範大學出版社。 延伸查詢 | 16. | 洪漢鼎(2002)。詮釋學史。桂冠。 延伸查詢 | 17. | 易君博(1984)。政治理論與研究方法。臺北:三民書局。 延伸查詢 | 18. | Bowen, Elinor、Balch, George(1981)。Epistemology, Methodology, and Method in the Study of Political Behavior。The Handbook of Political Behavior, Vol. 5。London, UK/ New York, NY。 | 19. | Alker, H. R.、Alker, Hayward R.(1996)。Political Methodology, Old and New。A New Handbook of Political Science。Oxford。 | 20. | Collier, Andrew(1994)。Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskars's Philosophy。Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskars's Philosophy。London, UK/ New York, NY。 | 21. | Winch, Peter(1990)。The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy。The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy。Atlantic Highlands, NJ。 | 22. | Johnson, Janet、Reynolds, H. T.(2005)。Political Science Research Methods。Political Science Research Methods。Washington, DC。 | 23. | Abel, Theodore(1953)。The Operation Called Verstehen。Readings in the Philosophy of Science。New York, NY。 | 24. | Elster, Jon(2007)。Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Science。Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press。 | 25. | Ferejohn, John(2004)。External and Internal Explanation。Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics。Cambridge, MA。 | 26. | Roth, Paul(1987)。Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A case for Methodological Pluralism。Meaning and Method in the Social Sciences: A case for Methodological Pluralism。Ithaca, NY。 | 27. | Yanow, Dvora、Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine(2006)。Doing Social Science in a Humanistic Manner。Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn。Armonk, NY。 | 28. | Yanow, Dvora(2006)。Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences。Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn。Armonk, NY。 | 29. | Fay, Brian、Moon, J. Donald(1994)。What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?。Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science。Cambridge, MA。 | 30. | Rawls, John(1967)。Two Concepts of Rule。Theories of Ethics。London, UK。 | 31. | MacIntyre, Alasdair(1973)。The Idea of a Social Science。The Philosophy of Science Explanation。Oxford, UK。 | 32. | Moses, Jonathon、Knutsen, Torbjorn(2007)。Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research。Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research。New York, NY。 | 33. | Potter, Garry(2000)。The Philosophy of Social Science: New Perspectives。The Philosophy of Social Science: New Perspectives。Harlow, UK。 | 34. | Lerner, Berel(2002)。Rules, Magic, and Instrumental Reason: A Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences。Rules, Magic, and Instrumental Reason: A Critical Interpretation of Peter Winch's Philosophy of the Social Sciences。London, UK/ New York, NY。 | 35. | Moon, J. Donald(1982)。Interpretation, Theory, and Human Emancipation。Strategies of Political Inquiry。Beverly Hills, CA。 | 36. | Searle, John(1969)。How to Derive 'Ought' from 'Is'。The Is-ought Question: A Collection of Papers on the Central Problem in Moral Philosophy。New York, NY。 | 圖書論文1. | Bevir, Mark、Rhodes, R. A. W.(2002)。Interpretive Theory。Theory and Methods in Political Science。New York, NY:Hampshire, UK:Palgrave Macmillan。 | 2. | Brodbeck, May(1968)。Meaning and Action。Reading in the Philosophy of the Social Science。New York:Macmillan。 | 3. | Taylor, Charles(1994)。Interpretation and the Sciences of Man。Reading in the Philosophy of Social Science。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。 | |