資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.145.108.9)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
臺南市老人的居住安排與居住環境之地區性比較--兼論社區老人住宅之接受度
書刊名:
建築與規劃學報
作者:
黃幹忠
/
夏晧清
作者(外文):
Huang, Kan-chung
/
Hsia, Hao-ching
出版日期:
2013
卷期:
14:2/3
頁次:
頁67-81
主題關鍵詞:
人際網絡
;
在地老化
;
步行友善
;
Social network
;
Aging in place
;
Pedestrian friendly
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
6
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
6
共同引用:0
點閱:22
居住環境對老人的人際網絡、活躍老化與在地老化皆有非常重要的影響,因此對於老人居住環境的跨地區比較顯然有其必要性,然而台灣學術界到目前似乎仍少有人論及此一議題。因此本研究以台南市中西區、永康區與新化區等三個都市發展程度不同的行政區為研究範圍,經由系統抽樣法與家戶訪談得150份有效問卷,而後透過交叉分析與單因子變異數分析檢討不同行政區老人在居住安排偏好與鄰里環境評價的差異性。最後以社區老人住宅作為居住安排的選項,檢討其接受度與可能的實施方向。研究結果發現:(1)80.0%的老人認為理想的居住安排型態是與子女同住,另有15.3%回答「未與子女同住但與成年子女同鄰而居」,顯示原生家庭緊密連結的關係對於老人的重要性,且此一觀點不存在行政區上之差異。(2)目前多數老人居住的鄰里環境並不完全符合步行友善環境的要求,尤其涉及老人移動性的項目之評價偏低,此特別在永康區這種人口成長過速且發展失衡的地區更為明顯。(3)72%的老人並不願意移住社區老人住宅,但若能結合配套措施與既有之人際網絡,則仍有28%的老人願意移住。
以文找文
Residential environment is critical to elderly social network, active aging, and aging in place. Therefore, it is necessary to compare elderly residential environment across districts. However, it seems that few efforts are made in this area. This study took West Central District, Yong Kang District, and Sin Hua District as cases, and 150 questionnaires were completed by using Systematic Sampling Method and household investigation. Comparison of elderly living arrangement and residential environment across districts were implemented by Cross Analysis and One-Way ANOVA. Community Senior Housing was also set as an option of living arrangement, and elderly were asked to reply their viewpoints. The empirical results show that (1) 80% elderly prefer aging in place and live with adult children and 15.3% elderly response that not live with adult children but live in the same community. It indicates the importance of tight connection between elderly and their original family and there is no difference across districts. (2) Residential environment to most elderly are not pedestrian friendly, and items related to mobility are valued with low scores especially in Yong Kang District which is refer to a crowed and unplanned district. (3) 72% elderly are not interested in Community Senior Housing, however, 28% of all are still willing to live in Community Senior Housing while connecting with supportive measures and original social network.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Bihig. M.(2004)。Supportive communities, an opimum arrangement for the older population?。Journal of & Social Welfare,31(3),131-151。
2.
Burton, E. J.、Mitchell. L.、Stride, CR.(2011)。Ciood places for ageing in place: development of objective build environment measures for investigating links with older people's wellbeing。BMC Public Health,11,1-13。
3.
Caspi, A., Bolger, N.、Eckenrode, J.(1987)。Linking person and context in the daily stress process。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(1),184-195。
4.
Carp, F. M.(1994)。Assessing the environment。Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics,14,302-323。
5.
Clarke, P.、Nieuwenhuijsen, E. R.(2009)。Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review。Maturitas,64(1),14-19。
6.
Cutchin, Malcolm P.(2003)。The process of mediated aging-in-place: a theoretically and empirically based model。Social Science & Medicine,57(6),1077-1090。
7.
Herlitz, C.(1997)。Distribution of informal and formal home help for elderly people in Sweden。The Gerontologist,37(1),117-124。
8.
Inoue, S.、Murase, N.、Shimomitsu, T.、Ohya, Y.、Odagiri, Y.、Takamiya, T.,、Ishii, K.,、Katsumura, T.、Sallis, J. F.(2009)。Association of physical activity mid neighborhood environment among Japanese adults。Preventive Medicine,48(4),321-325。
9.
Inoue, S.、Ohya, Y.、Odagiri, Y.、Takamiya, T.、Kamada, M.、Okada, S.、Oka, K.、Kitabatake, Y.、Nakaya, T.、Sallis, J. F.、Shimomitsu, T.(2011)。Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese。Journal of Epidemiology,21(6),481-490。
10.
Jirovec, R. L.、Jirovec, M.、Bosse, M.(1985)。Residential satisfaction as a function or micro and macro environmental conditions among urban elderly men。Research on Aging,7(4),601-616。
11.
Krause, N.(1997)。Received support, anticipated support, social class, and mortality。Research on Aging,4(19),387-422。
12.
Kunkel, S.、Applebaum, R.(1992)。Estimating the prevalence of long-term disability for an aging society。Journal of Gerontology,47(5),253-260。
13.
Lawton, M. P.、Nahemow, L.、Yeh, T. M.(1980)。Neighborhood environments and well-being of older tenants in planned housing。International Journal of Aging and Human Development,11(3),211-227。
14.
Liu, C. W.、Everingham, J. A.、Warburton, J.、Cutholl, M.、Bartlett, H.(2009)。What makes a community age-fiiendly: a review of international literature。Australasian Journal on Ageing,28(3),166-121。
15.
Masotti, P. J.、Fick, R.、Johnson-Masotti, A.、MacLeod, S.(2006)。Healthy naturally occurring retirement communities: a low-cost approach to facilitating healthy aging。American Journal of Public Health,96(7),1164-1170。
16.
Shank, K. H.、Cutchin, M. P.(2010)。Transaction occupations of older women aging-in-place: negotiation change and meaning。Journal of Occupational Science,17(1),4-13。
17.
Sallis, J. F.、Bowles, H. R.、Bauman, A.、Ainsworth, B. E.、Bull, F. C.、Craig, C. L.(2009)。Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries。American Journal of Preventive Medicine,36(6),484-490。
18.
Sallis, J. F.、Kerr, J.、Carlson, J. A.、Norman, G. J.、Soelens, B. E.、Durant, N.(2010)。Evaluating a brief self-report measure of neighborhood environments for physical activity research and surveillance: physical activity neighborhood environments scale (PANES)。Journal of Physical Activity and Health,7(4),533-540。
19.
Tang, F.、Lee, Y.(2011)。Social support networks and expectations for aging in place and move。Research on Aging,33(4),444-464。
20.
Wagnild, G.(2001)。Growing old at home。Jour,14,71-84。
21.
Ward, A. R.、Gory, L. M.、Sherman, S. M.(1988)。The Environment for Aging Interpersonal, Social and Spatial Contexts。
22.
Wu, Z.、Hart, R.(2002)。Social and health factors associated with support among elderly immigrants in Canada。Research on Aging,24,391-412。
23.
Woodruff L.、Applebaum, R.(1996)。Assuring the quality of in-home supportive services: a consumer perspective。Journal of Aging Studies,10(2),157-169。
24.
Holt-Lunstad, J.、Smith, T. B.、Layton, J. B.(2010)。Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review。PLoS Medicine,7(7)。
25.
黃耀榮(20060200)。實現「在地老化」之終生住宅發展形式探討。臺灣老年醫學雜誌,1(3),138-150。
延伸查詢
學位論文
1.
任思豪(2012)。高齡者鄰里環境宜走性與活躍老化之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。
延伸查詢
2.
黃政玄(2008)。少子女高齡化社會的終身住宅研究--以高速鐵路新竹車站特定區新建透天厝為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。
延伸查詢
3.
黃珠茵(2005)。老人社區居住環境之剖析--以台北市南機場公寓社區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Pastalan, Leon A.(1990)。Aging in Place: The Role of Housing and Social Support。Haworth Press。
圖書論文
1.
Kasl, S. V.、Rosenfield, S.(1980)。The residential environment and its impact on the mental health of the aged。Handbook of Mental Health and Dying。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
老人住宅滿意度之關鍵服務屬性分析
2.
南向商機--銀髮族住宅與設施需求之研究:以馬來西亞吉隆坡的華人為例
3.
非都市地區高齡者鄰里活動類型、活動空間與鄰里環境供給滿意度之研究:以新北三峽與桃園新屋區為例
4.
臺灣縣市別長照需求之中長期推計及趨勢分析
5.
兩代「三老」家庭照顧轉銜與老年遷移:老年父母、中老年智障者與手足
6.
住宅規劃量表發展之研究
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
臺灣老人住宅產業發展之系統動態學模型
2.
退休生涯經營:概念、規劃與養生
3.
台灣老人的居住安排與住宅問題
4.
老人住宅滿意度之關鍵服務屬性分析
5.
老人居住設施之現況探討
6.
老人幸福居:全齡住宅與通用設計之探討
7.
善用閒置校園協助老人住宅在地化之探討
8.
老人住宅休閒健康服務現況與需求初探--以長青園老人住宅為例
9.
高齡產業新商機--以養生住宅為例
10.
民間參與老人住宅建設之法令分析--以裁併學校改建為例
11.
整體住宅政策及住宅法草案介紹--高齡化社會與老人住宅之開發實現
12.
民間參與老人住宅建設之現況與檢討
13.
民間團體與政府機關的資源統合運用--以老人住宅為例
QR Code