:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺南市老人的居住安排與居住環境之地區性比較--兼論社區老人住宅之接受度
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:黃幹忠 引用關係夏晧清
作者(外文):Huang, Kan-chungHsia, Hao-ching
出版日期:2013
卷期:14:2/3
頁次:頁67-81
主題關鍵詞:人際網絡在地老化步行友善Social networkAging in placePedestrian friendly
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
居住環境對老人的人際網絡、活躍老化與在地老化皆有非常重要的影響,因此對於老人居住環境的跨地區比較顯然有其必要性,然而台灣學術界到目前似乎仍少有人論及此一議題。因此本研究以台南市中西區、永康區與新化區等三個都市發展程度不同的行政區為研究範圍,經由系統抽樣法與家戶訪談得150份有效問卷,而後透過交叉分析與單因子變異數分析檢討不同行政區老人在居住安排偏好與鄰里環境評價的差異性。最後以社區老人住宅作為居住安排的選項,檢討其接受度與可能的實施方向。研究結果發現:(1)80.0%的老人認為理想的居住安排型態是與子女同住,另有15.3%回答「未與子女同住但與成年子女同鄰而居」,顯示原生家庭緊密連結的關係對於老人的重要性,且此一觀點不存在行政區上之差異。(2)目前多數老人居住的鄰里環境並不完全符合步行友善環境的要求,尤其涉及老人移動性的項目之評價偏低,此特別在永康區這種人口成長過速且發展失衡的地區更為明顯。(3)72%的老人並不願意移住社區老人住宅,但若能結合配套措施與既有之人際網絡,則仍有28%的老人願意移住。
Residential environment is critical to elderly social network, active aging, and aging in place. Therefore, it is necessary to compare elderly residential environment across districts. However, it seems that few efforts are made in this area. This study took West Central District, Yong Kang District, and Sin Hua District as cases, and 150 questionnaires were completed by using Systematic Sampling Method and household investigation. Comparison of elderly living arrangement and residential environment across districts were implemented by Cross Analysis and One-Way ANOVA. Community Senior Housing was also set as an option of living arrangement, and elderly were asked to reply their viewpoints. The empirical results show that (1) 80% elderly prefer aging in place and live with adult children and 15.3% elderly response that not live with adult children but live in the same community. It indicates the importance of tight connection between elderly and their original family and there is no difference across districts. (2) Residential environment to most elderly are not pedestrian friendly, and items related to mobility are valued with low scores especially in Yong Kang District which is refer to a crowed and unplanned district. (3) 72% elderly are not interested in Community Senior Housing, however, 28% of all are still willing to live in Community Senior Housing while connecting with supportive measures and original social network.
期刊論文
1.Bihig. M.(2004)。Supportive communities, an opimum arrangement for the older population?。Journal of & Social Welfare,31(3),131-151。  new window
2.Burton, E. J.、Mitchell. L.、Stride, CR.(2011)。Ciood places for ageing in place: development of objective build environment measures for investigating links with older people'€™s wellbeing。BMC Public Health,11,1-13。  new window
3.Caspi, A., Bolger, N.、Eckenrode, J.(1987)。Linking person and context in the daily stress process。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(1),184-195。  new window
4.Carp, F. M.(1994)。Assessing the environment。Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics,14,302-323。  new window
5.Clarke, P.、Nieuwenhuijsen, E. R.(2009)。Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review。Maturitas,64(1),14-19。  new window
6.Cutchin, Malcolm P.(2003)。The process of mediated aging-in-place: a theoretically and empirically based model。Social Science & Medicine,57(6),1077-1090。  new window
7.Herlitz, C.(1997)。Distribution of informal and formal home help for elderly people in Sweden。The Gerontologist,37(1),117-124。  new window
8.Inoue, S.、Murase, N.、Shimomitsu, T.、Ohya, Y.、Odagiri, Y.、Takamiya, T.,、Ishii, K.,、Katsumura, T.、Sallis, J. F.(2009)。Association of physical activity mid neighborhood environment among Japanese adults。Preventive Medicine,48(4),321-325。  new window
9.Inoue, S.、Ohya, Y.、Odagiri, Y.、Takamiya, T.、Kamada, M.、Okada, S.、Oka, K.、Kitabatake, Y.、Nakaya, T.、Sallis, J. F.、Shimomitsu, T.(2011)。Perceived neighborhood environment and walking for specific purposes among elderly Japanese。Journal of Epidemiology,21(6),481-490。  new window
10.Jirovec, R. L.、Jirovec, M.、Bosse, M.(1985)。Residential satisfaction as a function or micro and macro environmental conditions among urban elderly men。Research on Aging,7(4),601-616。  new window
11.Krause, N.(1997)。Received support, anticipated support, social class, and mortality。Research on Aging,4(19),387-422。  new window
12.Kunkel, S.、Applebaum, R.(1992)。Estimating the prevalence of long-term disability for an aging society。Journal of Gerontology,47(5),253-260。  new window
13.Lawton, M. P.、Nahemow, L.、Yeh, T. M.(1980)。Neighborhood environments and well-being of older tenants in planned housing。International Journal of Aging and Human Development,11(3),211-227。  new window
14.Liu, C. W.、Everingham, J. A.、Warburton, J.、Cutholl, M.、Bartlett, H.(2009)。What makes a community age-fiiendly: a review of international literature。Australasian Journal on Ageing,28(3),166-121。  new window
15.Masotti, P. J.、Fick, R.、Johnson-Masotti, A.、MacLeod, S.(2006)。Healthy naturally occurring retirement communities: a low-cost approach to facilitating healthy aging。American Journal of Public Health,96(7),1164-1170。  new window
16.Shank, K. H.、Cutchin, M. P.(2010)。Transaction occupations of older women aging-in-place: negotiation change and meaning。Journal of Occupational Science,17(1),4-13。  new window
17.Sallis, J. F.、Bowles, H. R.、Bauman, A.、Ainsworth, B. E.、Bull, F. C.、Craig, C. L.(2009)。Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries。American Journal of Preventive Medicine,36(6),484-490。  new window
18.Sallis, J. F.、Kerr, J.、Carlson, J. A.、Norman, G. J.、Soelens, B. E.、Durant, N.(2010)。Evaluating a brief self-report measure of neighborhood environments for physical activity research and surveillance: physical activity neighborhood environments scale (PANES)。Journal of Physical Activity and Health,7(4),533-540。  new window
19.Tang, F.、Lee, Y.(2011)。Social support networks and expectations for aging in place and move。Research on Aging,33(4),444-464。  new window
20.Wagnild, G.(2001)。Growing old at home。Jour,14,71-84。  new window
21.Ward, A. R.、Gory, L. M.、Sherman, S. M.(1988)。The Environment for Aging Interpersonal, Social and Spatial Contexts。  new window
22.Wu, Z.、Hart, R.(2002)。Social and health factors associated with support among elderly immigrants in Canada。Research on Aging,24,391-412。  new window
23.Woodruff L.、Applebaum, R.(1996)。Assuring the quality of in-home supportive services: a consumer perspective。Journal of Aging Studies,10(2),157-169。  new window
24.Holt-Lunstad, J.、Smith, T. B.、Layton, J. B.(2010)。Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review。PLoS Medicine,7(7)。  new window
25.黃耀榮(20060200)。實現「在地老化」之終生住宅發展形式探討。臺灣老年醫學雜誌,1(3),138-150。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.任思豪(2012)。高齡者鄰里環境宜走性與活躍老化之關聯性研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃政玄(2008)。少子女高齡化社會的終身住宅研究--以高速鐵路新竹車站特定區新建透天厝為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃珠茵(2005)。老人社區居住環境之剖析--以台北市南機場公寓社區為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pastalan, Leon A.(1990)。Aging in Place: The Role of Housing and Social Support。Haworth Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kasl, S. V.、Rosenfield, S.(1980)。The residential environment and its impact on the mental health of the aged。Handbook of Mental Health and Dying。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE