:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構釣魚臺爭議 :臺灣主要報紙的檢視1971~2012
書刊名:亞太研究通訊
作者:楊仕樂 引用關係
作者(外文):Yang, Shih-yueh
出版日期:2014
卷期:12
頁次:頁1-34
主題關鍵詞:釣魚臺爭議物質深化功能深化象徵深化觀念深化Diaoyutai disputeMaterial entrenchmentFunctional entrenchmentSymbolic entrenchmentIdeational entrenchment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:27
釣魚台主權爭議的懸而未決,其時間延宕之久似乎遠超過其牽涉之利益所能解釋。對於這類多年來遲遲無法化解的小型領土爭端,海斯納(Ron E. Hassner)曾提出「物質深化」(material entrenchment)、「功能深化」(functional entrenchment)、「象徵深化」(symbolic entrenchment)等三種過程,說明這類爭議為何會隨著時間累積而日益難以化解。只是,這三個過程似乎都無法適用在釣魚台的爭議上。物質方面,釣魚台並未與爭議任何一方的既有領土,有日益加深的經濟生活聯繫;功能上,作為海島的釣魚台,其界線並不曾模糊不清;象徵層面而言,釣魚台的土地並未與爭議任何一方的人民發生直接情感。因此,本文嘗試在海斯納的基礎上,提出「觀念深化」的過程,也就是一片爭議領土如何被認為是不可退讓的,來解釋釣魚台爭議的長期延續,並對此一假設進行初步檢驗。對此,本文已發現了相當的證據,值得日後以持續加以檢驗。
期刊論文
1.尹盛先(19970800)。釣魚臺問題之研究。海軍學術月刊,31(8),9-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.尹盛先(19970900)。釣魚臺問題之研究。海軍學術月刊,31(9),8-16。  延伸查詢new window
3.王冠雄(20120500)。近期黃岩島爭議所涉及之國際法議題分析。戰略安全研析,85,5-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Erickson, Andrew S.、Denmark, Abraham M.、Collins, Gabriel(2012)。Beijing’s "Starter Carrier" and Future Steps: Alternatives and Implications。Naval War College Review,65(1),14-54。  new window
5.Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.(2000)。The U. S. Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945-1971。The China Quarterly,161,95-123。  new window
6.Dreyer, June Teufel(2012)。The Shifting Triangle: Sino--Japanese--American Relations in Stressful Times。Journal of Contemporary China,21(75),409-426。  new window
7.Buszynski, Leszek(2011)。The San Francisco System: Contemporary Meaning and Challenges。Asian Perspective,35(3),315-335。  new window
8.Hagstroem, Linus(2012)。Power Shift' in East Asia? A Critical Reappraisal of Narratives on the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands Incident in 2010。Journal of International Politics,5(3),267-297。  new window
9.Hagstroem, Linus(2005)。Quiet Power: Japan's China Policy in Regard to the Pinnacle Islands。The Pacific Review,18(2),159-188。  new window
10.Hagstroem, Linus(2005)。Relational Power for Foreign Policy Analysis: Issues in Japan's China Policy。European Journal of International Relations,11(3),395-430。  new window
11.Schanz, Marc V.(2011)。AirSea Battle’s Turbulent Year。Air Force Magazine,94(10),31-35。  new window
12.Gau, Michael Sheng-ti(2011)。Problems and Practices in Maritime Delimitation in East Asia: With Special Reference to Taiwan。Journal of East Asia & International Law,4(2),377-404。  new window
13.Koo, Min Gyo(2009)。The Senkaku/Diaoyu Dispute and Sino-Japanese Political-economic Relations: Cold Politics and Hot Economics?。The Pacific Review,22(2),205-232。  new window
14.Flin, Rhona、Slaven, Georgina、Stewart, Keith(1996)。Emergency Decision Making in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry。Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,38(2),262-277。  new window
15.Scott, Richard(2011)。Networked Concept to Square the ASW Circle。Jane's International Defense Review,44(1),42-47。  new window
16.Hassner, Ron E.(2006)。The Path to Intractability: Time and the Entrenchment of Territorial Disputes。International Security,31(3),107-138。  new window
17.Goddard, Stacie E.、Pressman, Jeremy、Hassner, Ron E.(2007)。Correspondence Time and the Intractability of Territorial Disputes。International Security,32(3),191-201。  new window
18.Ramos-Mrosovsky, Carlos(2008)。International Law's Unhelpful Role in the Senkaku Islands。University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law,29(4),903-946。  new window
19.Grant, Rebecca(2010)。Countering the Missile Threat。Air Force Magazine,93(12),40-44。  new window
20.Su, Steven Wei(2005)。The Territorial Dispute over the Tiaoyu/Senkaku Islands: An Update。Ocean Development & International Law,36(1),45-61。  new window
21.Fravel, M. Taylor(2010)。International Relations Theory and China's Rise: Assessing China's Potential for Territorial Expansion。International Studies Review,12(4),505-532。  new window
22.蕭怡靖(20061200)。臺灣閱報民眾的人口結構及政治態度之變遷--1992至2004年。臺灣民主季刊,3(4),37-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.李貞怡、李秀珠(20060700)。臺灣媒體競爭市場之報紙內容多樣性研究。新聞學研究,88,135-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Pak, Hfui-gwfon(2000)。The Law of the Sea and Northeast Asia: A Challenge for Cooperation。Cambridge:Kluwer Law International。  new window
2.Jackson, Robert(2002)。The Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft。Queen Street House:Parragon。  new window
3.Snyder, Jack L.(1991)。Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition。Ithaca, New York:Cornell University Press。  new window
4.Shlapak, David A.、Orletsky, David T.、Reid, Toy I.、Tanner, Murray Scot、Wilson, Barry(2009)。A Question of Balance: Political Context and Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Dispute。Santa Monica, California:RAND。  new window
5.王天濱(2003)。台灣報業史。台北:亞太圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中華民國總統府(20120805)。總統札記--「東海和平倡議」--合作開發東海資源,http://www.president.gov.tw/Default.aspx?tabid=1103&itemid=27867/。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19690718)。我國對領海以外資源得行使主權上權利。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19690718)。大陸礁層石油資源我有充分主權。  延伸查詢new window
4.(19710612)。社論:抗議美國擅將琉球移交日本--並堅決主張我對釣魚台列嶼之領土主權--。  延伸查詢new window
5.(19710411)。我們的遺憾與憤慨。  延伸查詢new window
6.(19960810)。社論:以務實態度處理中日海權爭執。  延伸查詢new window
7.(20120924)。社論:釣魚台歸屬法理論證台灣不缺席。  延伸查詢new window
8.王景弘(20120918)。一場辛苦為誰忙?。  延伸查詢new window
9.石之瑜(20120920)。在釣魚台實踐重疊主權。  延伸查詢new window
10.(19960907)。社論:理性謹慎處理釣魚台主權問題。  延伸查詢new window
11.林濁水(20120920)。台港保釣憤怒夢一場。  延伸查詢new window
12.姜皇池(20121002)。讓國際法徹底解決釣魚台爭端。  延伸查詢new window
13.孫慶餘(20120918)。維護誰的固有主權。  延伸查詢new window
14.孫慶餘(20120927)。為生存護漁權抗議有理。  延伸查詢new window
15.廖千瑤(20120915)。釣魚台議題該有的冷靜考量。  延伸查詢new window
16.(19690718)。領海附近天然資源我國保有行使主權。  延伸查詢new window
17.(19960912)。社論:釣魚台的主權、漁權與礦權不能完全區隔處理。  延伸查詢new window
18.(20120925)。釣魚台的主權與漁權。  延伸查詢new window
19.(19710412)。對留美學人及留學生愛國運動的看法。  延伸查詢new window
20.(20120816)。蘋論:朝野切勿遭民粹主義綁架。  延伸查詢new window
21.(19821210)。United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea,http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE