臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：當前朝鮮半島的安全困境--以2010年天安艦事件以來為例
書刊名：遠景基金會季刊
作者：盧業中 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lu, Yeh-chung
出版日期：2015
卷期：16:1
頁次：頁143-188
主題關鍵詞：安全困境；朝鮮半島統一；信任政治；戰略再保證；美中關係；Security dilemma；Unification of the Korean Peninsula；Trsutpolitik；Strategic reassurance；U.S.-China relations
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:17
安全困境意指由於各國之間對彼此意圖的不確定，使得各國之間的不安全感持續存在，並具體反映於各自的外交政策。本文以近期朝鮮半島之安全困境為例，討論北韓核武問題及南北韓統一問題，並探究緩和此一困境之倡議的可行性。本文認為，安全困境或可透過管理來緩解；然現階段東北亞安全困境的管理仍必須透過強權國家的主導與維繫方可能達成，強權政治仍是我們後續關注東北亞區域情勢的重要參照。
The concept of security dilemma is of importance in understanding international relations (IR): It explains why one state's pursuit of security through arms build-ups may trigger others to do the same, because none of them is certain about the other's intentions. When uncertainties accumulate, war seems to be more likely, and even for the state that tries to pursue security in the first place may feel less secure. Current tensions in the Korean Peninsula put parties involved in a security dilemma, wherein, with a lack of mutual trust, their sense of insecurity increases. This paper aims to explore how the security dilemma affects the situation in the Korean Peninsula after the Cheonan Incident in 2010. The security dilemma, as advised in IR literature, cannot be resolved but at most managed and ameliorated. North Korea's nuclearization and South Korea's ambition for unification are a case in point. This is the reason why President Park Geun-hye's call for trust-building between North and South Korea, dubbed Trustpolitik, is worth noting. From an IR theoretical perspective, international institutions and strategic reassurance, more or less, can serve to lessen the security dilemma. However, power politics still trumps the willingness of cooperation among nations.
期刊論文
1.Wheeler, Nicholas J.(2009)。Beyond Waltz's Nuclear World: More Trust May be Better。International Relations，23(3)，428-445。  new window
2.Jervis, Robert(1999)。Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate。International Security，24(1)，42-63。  new window
3.Natban, Andrew F.、Scobell, Andrew(2012)。How China Sees America。Foreign Affairs，91(5)，31-42。  new window
4.Lee, Hee Ok(201407)。South Korea-China Relations: What has Changed and What will be Sustained?。East Asia Foundation Policy Debates，6，1-6。  new window
5.Wheeler, Nicholas J.(200812)。'To Put Oneself into the Other Fellow's Place': John Herz, the Security Dilemma and the Nuclear Age。International Relations，22(4)，493-509。  new window
6.Terry, Sue Mil(2014)。A Korea Whole and Free。Foreign Affairs，93(4)，153-162。  new window
7.Steinberg, James B.、O'Hanlon, Michael(2014)。Keep Hope Alive: How to Prevent U.S.-Chinese Relations from Blowing up。Foreign Affairs，93(4)，107-117。  new window
8.Park, Geun-hye(2011)。A New Kind of Korea。Foreign Affairs，90(5)，13-18。  new window
9.Mastro, Oriana Skylar(2014)。The Problems of the Liberal Peace in Asia。Survival，56(2)，129-158。  new window
10.Martin, Lisa L.(200003)。Book Review on Theories of International Regimes。American Political Science Review，94(1)，241-242。  new window
11.Liu, Hong(1993)。The Sino-South Korean Normalization: A Triangular Explanation。Asian Survey，33(11)，1083-1094。  new window
12.Koga, Kei(2011)。The U.S. and East Asian Regional Security Architecture: Building a Regional Security Nexus on Hub-and-Spoke。Asian Perspective，35(1)，1-36。  new window
13.Kissinger, Henry A.(197510)。Building International Order。The Department of State Bulletin，73(1894)，549-550。  new window
14.Kim, Youngho(200703)。A Northeast Asian Version of the Helsinki Process。International Journal on World Peace，24(1)，19-31。  new window
15.Keohane, Robert O.(201206)。Twenty Years of Institutional Libe。International Relations，26(2)，125-138。  new window
16.Joyner, Christopher C.(200006)。The Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes: Causal Connections and BehavioralMechanism。American Political Science Review，94(2)，524-525。  new window
17.Jervis, Robert(201108)。Dilemmas about Security Dilemmas。Security Studies，20(3)，416-423。  new window
18.Chung, Jae Ho(2014)。China's Evolving Views of the Korean-American Alliance, 1953-2012。Journal of Contemporary China，23(87)，425-442。  new window
19.Cha, Victor D.、Anderson, Nicholas D.(2012)。A North Korean Spring?。The Washington Quarterly，35(1)，7-24。  new window
20.Cha, Victor D.、Kang, David C.(2004)。Can North Korea be Engaged? An Exchange between Victor D. Cha and David C. Kang。Survival，46(2)，89-107。  new window
21.Cha, Victor D.(200910)。What Do They Really Want? Obama's North Korea Conundrum。The Washington Quarterly，32(4)，119-138。  new window
22.(20130711)。尹永寬：中國對朝鮮政策的改變。中國評論月刊。  延伸查詢new window
23.龔克瑜(201211)。中國對美韓同盟的認識與新安全觀。東北亞學刊，2012(5)，23-29。  延伸查詢new window
24.崔志鷹(201208)。朝鮮半島問題與中美關係。韓國研究論叢，2012(1)，119-133。  延伸查詢new window
25.張千慧(201403)。淺析冷戰後東北亞地區安全困境中的美國霸權戰略因素。改革與開放，2014(5)，29。  延伸查詢new window
26.郭銳、王文軍(201301)。中國對朝鮮戰略的再檢視--現時評估、主要難點與調整方向。東北亞學刊，2013(1)，23-28。  延伸查詢new window
27.孫國強(201406)。中美在朝核問題上的合作與分歧。江南社會學院學報，2014(2)，6-10。  延伸查詢new window
28.林秋山(20130300)。展望南韓的新人與新政。戰略安全研析，95，5-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.朱聽昌(201206)。中國地緣安全環境中的“安全困境”問題解析。國際展望，2012(3)，41-58。  延伸查詢new window
30.朱鋒(201212)。奧巴馬連任對美亞太安全政策的影響。國際問題研究，2012(6)，22-25。  延伸查詢new window
31.李熙玉(2011)。中美關係的變化和朝鮮半島的和平。當代韓國，2011(1)，1-8。  延伸查詢new window
32.石源華、文恩熙(201210)。試論中韓戰略合作夥伴關係中的美國因素。東北亞論壇，2012(5)，15-22。  延伸查詢new window
33.李明(20130400)。歐巴馬政府的朝鮮半島政策（2009-2012年）。遠景基金會季刊，14(2)，1-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.石源華(201109)。朝鮮半島戰略新平衡與中國的政策選擇。韓國研究論叢，2011(1)，1-13。  延伸查詢new window
35.Tang, Shiping(2009)。The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis。Security Studies，18(3)，587-623。  new window
36.Kydd, Andrew(2000)。Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation。International Organization，54(2)，325-357。  new window
37.Koremenos, Barbara、Lipson, Charles、Sindal, Duncan(2001)。The Rational Design of International Institutions。International Organization，55(4)，761-799。  new window
38.Jervis, Robert(1985)。From Balance to Concert: A Study of International Security Cooperation。World Politics，38(1)，58-79。  new window
39.Cha, Victor D.、Kang, David C.(2004)。The Debate over North Korea。Political Science Quarterly，119(2)，229-254。  new window
40.Glaser, Charles L.(1997)。The Security Dilemma Revisited。World Politics，50(1)，171-201。  new window
41.Herz, John H.(1950)。Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma。World Politics，2(2)，157-180。  new window
42.Jervis, Robert L.(1978)。Cooperation under the Security Dilemma。World Politics，30(2)，167-214。  new window
43.Herz, John H.(2003)。The Security Dilemma in International Relations: Background and Present Problems。International Relations，17(4)，411-416。  new window
44.Helm, C.、Sprinz, D.(200010)。Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environment Regimes。The Journal of Conflict Resolution，44(5)，630-652。  new window
圖書
1.Herz, John H.(1951)。Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Kydd, Andrew H.(2005)。Trust and Mistrust in International Relations。Oxford：Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
3.Glaser, Charles L.(2010)。Rational Theory of International Politics: the Logic of Competition and Cooperation。Princeton University Press。  new window
4.Deutsch, Karl W.(1954)。Political Community at the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement。Garden City, N. Y.。  new window
5.Jervis, Robert(1976)。Perception and Misperception in International Politics。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.Han, Suk-hee(201211)。South Korea Seeks to Balance Relations with China and the United States，http://www.cfr.org/south-korea/south-korea-seeks-balance-relations-china-united-states/p29447。  new window
2.The White House(20021115)。Bush Backs KEDO Suspension of Fuel Oil to North Korea，http://iipdigital.usembassy.gov/st/english/texttrans/2002/11/20021115172829holdenrd.state.gov0.4453089.html#axzz3Ge0dVncs。  new window
3.Park, Byung(201303)。China's Policy Shift after North Korea's Third Nuclear Test，http://www.koreafocus.or.kr/design2/layout/content_print.asp?group_id=104702。  new window
4.Myers, Stephen Lee(19970701)。North Korea Agrees to Join 4-Party Talks，http://www.nytimes.com/1997/07/01/world/north-korea-agrees-to-join-4-party-talks.html。  new window
5.Klein-Ahlbrandt, Stephanie T.(20140605)。Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on China's Relations with North Korea，http://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/USCC%20Kleine-Ahlbrandt%20China-DPRK%203vi2014.pdf。  new window
6.Kerr, Paul(2006)。U.S., Allies End North Korea Reactor Project，http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_07-08/NKReactor。  new window
7.Deng, Yuwen(20130227)。China Should Abandon North Korea，http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9e2f68b2-7c5c-11e2-99f0-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3LNi0ZC3K。  new window
8.Ahn, Hong-wuk(20140331)。South Korea Focuses on Follow-up Measures to 'Dresden Initiative', While North Korea Threatens a 'New Kind of Nuclear Test'，http://english.khan.co.kr/khan_art_view.html?artid=201403311354237&code=710100。  new window
9.Perlez, Jane(20130401)。Chinese Editor Suspended for Article on North Korea。  new window
10.盧業中(20140527)。當面訪談，匿名受訪者D學者，臺北：政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.盧業中(20140522)。當面訪談，匿名受訪者C研究員，臺北：政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
12.盧業中(20140424)。當面訪談，匿名受訪者B研究員，首爾：韓國統一研究院。  延伸查詢new window
13.盧業中(20140423)。當面訪談，匿名受訪者A研究員，首爾：韓國國防研究院。  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭鏞洙，李素雅(20140329)。統一政策里程碑「德累斯頓構想」，http://chinese.joins.com/big5/article.do?method=detail&art_id=117549&category=002002。  延伸查詢new window
15.儲信艷(20130525)。習近平接收金正恩親筆信朝鮮特使稱願六方會談，http://news.china.com.cn/local/2013-05/25/content_28928170.htm。  延伸查詢new window
16.李大光(20140707)。中韓合作是維護朝鮮半島無核的基石，http://opinion.china.com.cn/opinion_66_103266.html。  延伸查詢new window
17.朱鋒(20130525)。朝鮮「特使外交」訪華能帶來什麼，http://www.zaobao.com.sg/forum/expert/zhu-feng/story20130525-208430。  延伸查詢new window
18.中華人民共和國外交部(20130212)。中華人民共和國外交部聲明，http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/zyxw_602251/t1013359.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
19.(20130912)。習總破例提重啟六方會談暗示拒四方會談，http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1027/3/5/0/102735060.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=102735060&mdate=0912103307。  new window
20.The White House(20020129)。President Delivers State of the Union Address，http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/20020129-11.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.Wallander, Celeste A.、Keohane, Robert O.(1999)。Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions。Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Park, John、Lu, Yeh-chung(2008)。Peace by Piece: The Six-Party Talks and Beyond。Conflict Management, Security and Intervention in East Asia: Third-Party Mediation and Intervention between China and Taiwan。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：977（臺灣：972，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67497740
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上