:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:理性抉擇理論在觀光博弈產業地區治安管理策略中的應用
書刊名:警察行政管理學報
作者:孫義雄
作者(外文):Sun, Yi-hsiung
出版日期:2015
卷期:11
頁次:頁59-73
主題關鍵詞:理性抉擇有限理性主觀期望利益模式觀光博弈產業治安管理策略Rational choiceLimited rationalitySubjective expected utility modelGambling industryPublic security administration strategies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:12
設置博弈產業是我國社會當前重要的議題,而國內相關文獻及民意調查皆顯示民眾對其最大的疑慮,是治安惡化的問題,故設置觀光博弈產業地區採行適當的治安管理策略顯得相當重要。「理性抉擇」之概念,是Becker從經濟學領域引用而來,Clarke和Chornish等人再依之而提出理性抉擇公式並加以引申;其內涵強調人是「有限理性」的、「趨樂避苦」的,所以犯罪行為是人們「主觀期望利益模式」抉擇的結果。由於微觀之理性抉擇理論的提出,促發了巨觀的日常活動理論的產生,也因而發展出了「一般嚇阻策略」、「情境犯罪預防策略」、「特殊嚇阻策略」,以及「長期隔離策略」等當代重要的犯罪預防相關策略。針對觀光博弈產業的具體治安管理作為,都可歸類在此四大策略中;唯其中歸屬「一般嚇阻策略」、「情境預防策略」的治安管理策略,是可以完全由警政單位自行規劃、執行的;而歸屬「特殊嚇阻策略」及「隔離策略」中的治安管理策略,則需要與政府其他機構配合進行。
The gambling industry is one of the most important issues to tourism industry in our country. The deterioration of public security seems to be the most concern of local people based on the poll survey and related literature review reports. As such, a proper security administration strategy plays a vital part when it comes to gambling industry. The concept of Rational Choice Theory, drawn from the economic field by Becker., was extended and enlarged different models by Clarke and Chornish. The main concept emphasizes individuals own limited rationality and hedonistic involved. Therefore, the crime behavior result accounts for the choice of subjective expected utility model adopted by most people. Owning to the micro Rational Choice Theory developed, it advances the macro Routine Activity Theory. That is why the recent attention to crime prevention related strategies has focused on specific ways, such as General Deterrence, Situational Crime Prevention, Specific Deterrence, and Incapacitation. The four specific crime prevention strategies are also involved in gambling industry in terms of public security administration strategies. The General Deterrence and Situational Crime Prevention can be planned and executed solely by police force unit. However, Specific Deterrence and Incapacitation strategies should be working out with other government departments.
期刊論文
1.孫義雄(20110700)。觀光博弈產業安全治理之研究。警學叢刊,42(1)=197,49-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張聖照(20050100)。理性選擇之回顧與展望。警學叢刊,35(4)=158,209-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.賴擁連(20050900)。理性選擇理論與其犯罪防治對策之探討。警學叢刊,36(2)=162,191-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王毅、游旭群、翟群(20080000)。博彩心理學研究綜述。澳門理工學報,11(1)=29,34-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.許福生(20130600)。古典犯罪學派與現代國家犯罪治理模式之評析。刑事法雜誌,57(3),67-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Sullivan, R. F.(1973)。The economics of crimes: An introduction to the literature。Crime and delinquency,19,138-149。  new window
7.曾忠祿(20050000)。有限理性與賭博--賭博行為導因研究。澳門理工學報,8(4)=20,1-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.傅恆德(19960700)。集體行動的整合理論:理性選擇和心理動機理論。東海學報,37(5),107-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳敦源(20000400)。人為何投票?--理性選擇觀點的緣起與發展。民意研究季刊,212,31-64。  延伸查詢new window
10.Becker, Gary S.(1968)。Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach。Journal of Political Economy,76(2),169-217。  new window
學位論文
1.潘昱萱(2000)。理性選擇對竊盜行為解釋效力之考驗(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳宗憲(1997)。西方犯罪學史。北京:警官教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃富源、范國勇、張平吾(2012)。犯罪學概論。台北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cornish, B. D.、Clarke, V. R.(2014)。The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending。NJ:Transaction Publishers。  new window
4.Brown, E. S.、Esbensen, F.、Geis, G.(2013)。Criminology。UK:Elsevier Inc.。  new window
5.Clarke, R. V.、Felson, M.(1993)。Routine activity and rational choice。New Brunswick:Transaction Publishers。  new window
6.宋浩波(2002)。犯罪經濟學。北京:中國人民公安大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Kahneman, Daniel、Slovic, Paul、Tversky, Amos(1982)。Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases。Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.丁興祥、李美枝、陳皎眉(1988)。社會心理學。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.許春金(2013)。犯罪學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Cornish, B. D.、Clarke, V. R.(1986)。Introduction。The reasoning criminal。New York:Springer-Verlag。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE