:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:初探理解式球類教學對體育課學習效果之影響
書刊名:彰化師大體育學報
作者:王彥邦張家昌
作者(外文):Wang, Yen-pangChang, Chia-chang
出版日期:2015
卷期:14
頁次:頁66-79
主題關鍵詞:體育課傳統式教學法理解式教學法學習效果Physical educationPETechnical approachTeaching games for understandingTGFULearning effects
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:69
體育課是否能提升學習效果取決於教學法,而過去我國都是偏重技能取向教學模式,但往往抹煞學生學習動機或是使學生無法持之以恆從事運動,原因可能在於傳統式教學法較枯燥,因此教學法在體育課程中扮演重要角色,並且能提升學生於認知、情意及技能之學習效果;理解式教學法是透過遊戲或比賽開啟課程先驅,從過程中傳遞運動規則及戰術給學生,培養學生認知能力表現;亦使學生養成做決定之能力,並增進學習動機,培養人際互動,不僅對於學生於情意表現有助益外,比賽中,學生會體會到某些技能缺乏,並向同儕及教師請益且主動練習,進而使學生技能表現提升。本文以理解式球類教學法為理論基礎,探討此教學法對學習效果之影響,並以文獻回顧方式佐證此教學法實用程度,提供體育教學者參考及改進方向,將課程多元化。
Learning effects during physical education (PE) classes is largely dependent on the educational model used. To date most classes in the country adopt the technical approach model, which neglects learning motives and discourages continued participation in sporting activities due to its monotonous nature. The teaching games for understanding (TGfU) model has a potentially important role to play in raising cognitive, emotional, and technical learning effects of students. Competitive games can be a useful way to introduce the curriculum to students, while imparting rules and strategies during play can improve learning motivation as well as cognitive and decision-making skills. Besides improving emotional communication through participation in group activities, students will be motivated to seek out peers and instructors regarding deficiencies in technical aspects of the exercise. We seek to investigate the effects of the TGfU approach on learning effects, with review of the literature demonstrating evidence for this model providing a worthy consideration for physical educators to diversify their teaching methods.
期刊論文
1.Hooper, T.(2002)。Teaching games for understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,73(7),44-48。  new window
2.辛俊德(20060500)。全面品質管理在學校管理之實踐。中正教育研究,5(1),91-123。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳茂昌(2005)。大學生對排球運動行為表現之探討--以黎明、醒吾技術學院的學生為受試對象。中華排球雜誌,119,98-109。  延伸查詢new window
4.尚憶薇(20010800)。九年一貫課程健康與體育學習領域--教學評量工具設計之原則。大專體育,55,81-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hopper, T.(1998)。Teaching games centered games using progressive principle of play。California Association for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance,64(3),4-7。  new window
6.Hopper, T.(2003)。Four Rs for tactical awareness: Applying game performance assessment in net/wall games。Journal of Teaching Elementary Physical Education,14(2),16-21。  new window
7.Turner, A. P.(1996)。Myth or reality?。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance,67(4),46-47+55。  new window
8.Werner, P.、Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1996)。Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of model。Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance,67(1),28-33。  new window
9.McPherson, S. L.、French, K. E.(1991)。Changes in cognitive strategies and motor skill in tennis。Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology,13,26-41。  new window
10.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1982)。A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools。Bulletin of Physical Education,18(1),5-8。  new window
11.French, K. E.、Werner, P. H.、Rink, J. K.、Taylor, K.、Hussey, K.(1996)。The Effects of a 3-Week Unit of Tactical, Skill, or Combined Tactical and Skill Instruction on Badminton Performance of Ninth-Grade Students。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,15(4),418-438。  new window
12.Holt, Nicholas L.、Strean, William B.、Bengoechea, Enrique Garcia(2002)。Expanding the Teaching Games for Understanding Model: New avenues for future research and practice。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,21(2),162-176。  new window
13.Tannehill, D.、Zakrajsek, D.(1993)。Student attitudes towards physical education: A multicultural study。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,13(1),78-85。  new window
14.許義雄(1992)。樂趣化體育教學。臺灣省學校體育雙月刊,2(1),20-21。  延伸查詢new window
15.Nevett, M.、Rovengo, I.、Babiarz, M.(2001)。Fourth-grade children's knowledge of cutting, passing and tactics in invasion games after a 12-lesson unit of instruction。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20(4),389-401。  new window
16.Martin, Charles L.(1988)。Enhancing children's satisfaction and participation using a predictive regression model of bowling performance norms。The Physical Educator,45(4),196-209。  new window
學位論文
1.龔雅慈(2007)。理解式教學法在合作學習情境下對羽球運動技能學習成效與態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.尤佳琪(2014)。理解式球類教學提升排球學習效果與核心素養之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.康志偉(2011)。國小體育教師運用理解式球類教學法的教學反省(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳協恩(2011)。理解式教學與傳統式教學對於國小高年級學童排球低手傳球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Turner, A. P.(1991)。A model for developing effective Decision making during game participation(碩士論文)。North Carolina University,Greensboro。  new window
6.翁春琴(2012)。理解式球類教學法對高職女學生排球之學習效果(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.粘憲文(2010)。理解式球類教學法應用於國小籃球教學成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃志成(2004)。理解式球類教學對國小六年級學生羽球學習效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.郭世德(2000)。理解式教學在國小五年級學生足球學習效果的研究(碩士論文)。國立體育學院。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡宗達(2004)。理解式球類教學法與技能取向球類教學法比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.Turner, A. P.(1995)。An Investigation into teaching games for understanding(博士論文)。North. Carolina University,Greensboro。  new window
12.葉芷嫻(2001)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程政策執行研究--國民中小學教育人員觀點之分析(碩士論文)。臺北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳啟榮(2003)。以全面品質管理建構教育行政機關評鑑指標之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部體育署(20130925)。體育運動政策白皮書。臺北市:教育部體育署。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖玉光(2002)。球類教學--領會式教學。香港:香港教育學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.何長珠(1998)。遊戲治療:國小輔導實務。臺北市:五南出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Mitchell, S. A.、Oslin, J. L.、Griffin, L. L.(2003)。Sport Foundations for Elementary Physical Education: A Tactical Games Approach。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
5.許義雄(1983)。體育學原理。臺北市:文景書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.張春興(1991)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(1997)。課程評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bloom, Benjamin S.、Engelhart, Max D.、Furst, Edward J.、Hill, Walker H.、Krathwohl, David R.(1956)。Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain。David Mckay Co.。  new window
圖書論文
1.闕月清、蔡宗達、黃志成(2008)。理解式球類教學模式。理解式球類教學法。師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.Almond, L.(1986)。Reflecting on themes: A games classification。Rethinking games teaching。University of Technology。  new window
3.闕月清(2010)。理解式球類教學法。體育課程與教學專業。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Combs, A. W.(1973)。Affective education or none at all。Becoming a better elementary teacher。Columbus:E. Merrill Publishing Company。  new window
5.Bunker, D.、Thorpe, R.(1986)。Landmarks on our way to teaching for understanding。Rethinking games teaching。Loughborough, England:University of Technology。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE