:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:殺蟲劑應用於登革熱防疫之成本效用分析:以高雄市為例
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:曾子容李昌駿何惠彬詹大千 引用關係
作者(外文):Tseng, Tzu-jungLee, David Chang-chunHo, Hui-pingChan, Ta-chien
出版日期:2015
卷期:34:6
頁次:頁646-656
主題關鍵詞:登革熱噴消成本決策分析成本效用分析Dengue feverCost of insecticide sprayDecision makingCost-effectiveness analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:156
目標:登革熱為一蟲媒傳染病,廣泛流行於東南亞、美洲及西太平洋等地,危及民眾之健康生命安全,目前尚無有效治療方式,病媒防治為首要工作。本研究以成本效用分析探討登革熱疫情初期進行噴消之效用為何?研究成果期能提供防疫決策參考,透過有限資源降低疫情與社會負擔。方法:使用Treeage Pro 2011進行決策樹與敏感度分析,以噴消殺蟲劑與不噴消的疾病發生率與登革熱病患的醫療成本,及噴消所需的成本、傷殘調整生命年作為成本效用分析的參數。結果:決策樹分析結果確定個案半徑100公尺家戶內外同步強制噴藥暨地毯式孳生源清除較好。若進行噴消,當登革熱發生率在0.0536時,每人花費957.16元損失0.0144 DALYs/百萬人;若不噴消,當發生率0.0954時,每人花費1,575.24元,更損失0.0257 DALYs/百萬人,而發生率在0.058至0.091區間內,早期噴消符合成本效用。結論:本研究定義符合登革熱噴消成本效用的發生率區間,在區間外可搭配其他防疫措施(如孳生源清除、環境清理)降低後續登革(出血)熱之幅度及嚴重度。
Objectives: Dengue fever is a human health and life-threatening mosquito-borne disease in tropical regions of the world, and is prevalent in southeast Asia, Central America, South America, and the western Pacific region. Without effective treatment, insecticide spray to control the vector has been the top priority in attempts to prevent dengue transmission. This study evaluated the cost utility of insecticide spray in the early stage of a dengue outbreak in Kaohsiung. These results will provide suggestions for controlling dengue fever with limited resources and lowering the epidemic size and social burden of dengue fever. Methods: Decision-making and sensitivity analysis were performed with Treeage Pro 2011. The incidence of dengue fever with incorporation of the following factors into a decision tree: with or without early insecticide spraying; manpower; material expenditures; medical expenses of patients; and DALYs. Results: A cost utility analysis indicated that spontaneous spraying of insecticide and environmental clearance indoors and outdoors within a radius of 100 meters of the case premises was a better decision than no spray control. Specifically, it would cost 957.16 NTD/person and 0.0144 DALYs lost per 1 million population with an incidence of 0.0536 with insecticide spray. In contrast, it would cost 1575.24 NTD/person with and 0.0257 DALYs lost per 1 million population with an incidence of 0.0954 without insecticide spray. The early spray approach had good cost utility, with an incidence ranging from 0.058-0.091. Conclusions: This study defined a suitable incidence interval with cost utility with respect to dengue fever control using early insecticide spraying. Despite the cumulative incidence beyond this range, other control strategies may cooperate with insecticide spraying to reduce the outbreak and severity of dengue (hemorrhagic) fever.
期刊論文
1.Bhatt, S.、Gething, P. W.、Brady, O. J.、Messina, J. P.、Farlow, A. W.、Moyes, C. L.、Drake, J. M.、Brownstein, J. S.、Hoen, A. G.、Sankoh, O.(2013)。The global distribution and burden of dengue。Nature,496(7446),504-507。  new window
2.Edillo, F. E.、Halasa, Y. A.、Largo, F. M.(2015)。Economic cost and burden of dengue in the Philippines。Am J Trop Med Hyg,92,360-366。  new window
3.Suaya, J. A.、Shepard, D. S.、Chang, M. S.(2007)。Cost-effectiveness of annual targeted larviciding campaigns in Cambodia against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti。Trop Med Int Health,12,1026-1036。  new window
4.Shepard, D. S.、Undurraga, E. A.、Halasa, Y. A.(2013)。Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,7,e2055。  new window
5.Meltzer, M. I.、Rigau-Perez, J. G.、Clark, G. G.、Reiter, P.、Gubler, D. J.(1998)。Using disability-adjusted life years to assess the economic impact of dengue in Puerto Rico: 1984-1994。Am J Trop Med Hyg,59,265-271。  new window
6.Undurraga, E. A.、Betancourt-Cravioto, M.、Ramos-Castaneda, J.(2015)。Economic and disease burden of dengue in Mexico。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,9,e0003547。  new window
7.Anderson, K. B.、Chunsuttiwat, S.、Nisalak, A.(2007)。Burden of symptomatic dengue infection in children at primary school in Thailand: a prospective study。Lancet,369,1452-1529。  new window
8.Esu, E.、Lenhart, A.、Smith, L.、Horstick, O.(2010)。Effectiveness of peridomestic space spraying with insecticide on dengue transmission; systematic review。Trop Med Int Health,15,619-631。  new window
9.Tozan, Y.、Ratanawong, P.、Louis, V. R.、Kittayapong, P.、Wilder-Smith, A.(2014)。Use of insecticide-treated school uniforms for prevention of dengue in schoolchildren: a cost-effectiveness analysis。PLoS One,9,e108017。  new window
10.Chu, H. J.、Chan, T. C.、Jao, F. J.(2013)。GIS-aided planning of insecticide spraying to control dengue transmission。Int J Health Geogr,12。  new window
11.Vazquez-Prokopec, G. M.、Kitron, U.、Montgomery, B.、Horne, P.、Ritchie, S. A.(2010)。Quantifying the spatial dimension of dengue virus epidemic spread within a tropical urban environment。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,4,e920。  new window
12.Carrasco, L. R.、Lee, L. K.、Lee, V. J.(2011)。Economic impact of dengue illness and the cost-effectiveness of future vaccination programs in Singapore。PLoS Negl Trop Dis,5,e1426。  new window
13.劉英姿、方啟泰、顏哲傑(20150800)。2003至2013年臺灣地區登革熱併發登革出血熱危險因子分析。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,34(4),437-446。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Horstick, O.、Runge-Ranzinger, S.、Nathan, M. B.、Kroeger, A.(2010)。Dengue vector-control services: how do they work? A systematic literature review and country case studies。Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg,104,379-386。  new window
15.Corbel, V.、Nosten, F.、Thanispong, K.、Luxemburger, C.、Kongmee, M.、Chareonviriyaphap, T.(2013)。Challenges and prospects for dengue and malaria control in Thailand, Southeast Asia。Trends Parasitol,29,623-633。  new window
16.Villar, L.、Dayan, G. H.、Arredondo-Garcia, J. L.(2015)。Efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in children in Latin America。N Engl J Med,372,113-123。  new window
17.Thomas, S. J.(2015)。Preventing dengue--is the possibility now a reality?。N Engl J Med,372,172-173。  new window
研究報告
1.夏維泰、林秀品(2013)。登革熱病媒蚊抗藥性監測研究(第三年)。  延伸查詢new window
2.莊人祥、李丞華、王大為(2008)。登革熱疾病負擔之估計與應用。  延伸查詢new window
3.高雄市政府民政局。人口統計。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐琬婷(2007)。2006年高雄縣鳳山市登革熱之流行特徵及醫療費用分析研究(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.王儒傑(2011)。台灣地區推動血友病帶因者檢測計畫之成本效果分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.尤喬憲(2012)。傳染病的社區特性:以高雄市登革熱為例(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.WHO(1995)。Report of the Consultation on Key Issues in Dengue Vector Control Towards the Operationalization of a Global Strategy。Geneva:WHO。  new window
其他
1.衛生福利部疾病管制署。登革熱/登革出血熱,http://www.cdc.gov.tw/diseaseinfo.aspx?treeid=8d-54c504e820735b&nowtreeid=dec84a2f0c6fac-5b&tid=77BFF3D4F9CB7982, 2015/01/15。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛生福利部疾病管制署。傳染病統計資料查詢系統:登革熱,http://nidss.cdc.gov.tw/singledisease.aspx?pt=s&dc=1&dt=2&disease=061&treeid=1f07e8862ba550cf&nowtreeid=e7bbb22a47416adc, 2015/01/05。  延伸查詢new window
3.衛生福利部疾病管制署。登革熱流行病學、防治政策及相關法規介紹,http://www.cdc.gov.tw/downloadfile.aspx?fid=00A3CFA4265F1A4C, 2015/01/05。  延伸查詢new window
4.高雄市政府。高雄市政府登革熱防治室內化學防治標準作業流程,http://163.32.223.8/mosquito/?wpfb_dl=1, 2015/10/09。  延伸查詢new window
5.Australian Bureau of Statistics(2011)。Census QuickStats--Cairns,http://www.abs.gov.au/, 2015/07/02。  new window
6.衛生福利部疾病管制署。登革熱整體疫情雖逐漸趨緩,清除孳生源仍刻不容緩,http://www.cdc.gov.tw/professional/info.aspx?treeid=cf7f90dcbcd-5718d&nowtreeid=F94E6AF8DAA9FC01&tid=94DCD931B67C6028, 2014/12/05。  延伸查詢new window
7.高雄市政府。高雄市2011年至2014年登革熱防治工作四年計畫,http://www.sln.ks.edu.tw/mosquito/plan.pdf, 2015/10/15。  延伸查詢new window
8.衛生福利部疾病管制署。登革熱防治工作指引,http://www.cdc.gov.tw/uploads/files/201207/b13ebe8e-70ec-4648-8a15-981d2eebda24.pdf, 2015/01/05。  延伸查詢new window
9.WHO。Global strategy for dengue prevention and control, 2012-2020,http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2013/april/5_Dengue_SAGE_Apr2013_Global_Strategy.pdf, 2015/01/02。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE