:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:薪傳、文創、現代化:談《陣頭》中的電音三太子奇觀
書刊名:臺灣文學研究集刊
作者:廖勇超 引用關係
作者(外文):Liao, Yung-chao
出版日期:2015
卷期:18
頁次:頁83-103
主題關鍵詞:文化創意產業傳統宗教現代化時間性陣頭Cultural and creative industryTraditional religionModernizationTemporalityDing Tao
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:57
本論文以當代臺灣所風行的文創現象為出發探討電影《陣頭》中所 呈現的宗教文創化以及現代時間性「除魅化」所產生的種種問題。本文 認為,當今所謂的宗教文創化所代表的並非是表面上意欲延續傳統文化 的思維,而是某種企圖將傳統宗教世俗化、娛樂化、以及奇觀化的策 略。更精確地說,宗教文創化所指向的並非是所謂的傳統風骨延續,而 是馬克斯所言之異化(alienation)與資本化,以及此異化後的資本如何 整合、收編於國家機器與全球資本主義的體制與時空性之中。藉由將傳 統所具備的時間性文創化,宗教所具備的傳統時間性便能成為符號(文 化資本)而具備交換價值,而企業、商家、地方、甚至是國家便成為了 文化生意的資本家,各取所需。筆者擬由上述問題意識出發探討臺灣電 影《陣頭》(2011)中的宗教文創化現象及其限制。《陣頭》此一文本的 重要性在於其對於傳統宗教形式(陣頭)的呈現恰恰服膺了當代臺灣文 創風潮的迷思,而其在票房上的亮眼成績也說明了其嫁接於當代娛樂工 業的有效性和作為商品的高獲利性。文章分為兩部分:第一部份討論當 代臺灣官方的文創意識形態以及其在臺灣社會所引發的各式論戰。第二 部分則以《陣頭》為文本,進一步剖析宗教文創化在援引現代時間性除 魅化過程中所衍生的種種問題。
Taking the hit movie Ding Tao as the text of analysis, the paper aims to examine the hotly debated issue of Cultural and Creative Industry in contemporary Taiwan by taking a look at the problems generated in the incorporation of traditional religion by that industry and its relation to the disenchantment of traditional time in the process of modernization. The paper suggests that the purpose of encouraging the incorporation of traditional religion into Cultural and Creative Industry in contemporary Taiwan is not simply an attempt to preserve traditional religion in its own right but a strategy adopted to secularize it by turning it into a spectacle for capitalist consumption and entertainment. This incorporation actually aims to alienate traditional religion by turning it into capital, which will further facilitate its smooth integration into the global capitalist economy and easy co-optation by the state apparatus. In this way, pre-modern temporality embodied by traditional religion is thereby capitalized and equipped with an exchange value to be circulated and profited by local communities, shops, industry, and nation state. This paper aims to tackle the problematic outlined above by taking the movie Ding Tao as a case in point for discussion. This movie is suitable for the purpose at hand, for its representation of traditional Taiwanese religious practice (ding tao) foregrounds the myth of Cultural and Creative Industry in contemporary Taiwan, and its successful box office sales also proves itself to be a competent commodity for the entertainment industry on the competitive market. The paper is divide into two parts. The first part discusses the ideology of Cultural and Creative Industry in Taiwan’s cultural policy and the subsequent debates on the issue. The second part addresses the problematic of “the disenchantment of traditional religion” by modern temporality and the ideology of Cultural and Creative Industry in the movie Din Tao.
期刊論文
1.王佳煌(20100300)。文化/創意產業、創意階級/城市論著的批判性檢視。思與言,48(1),131-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.陳逸淳(2011)。文化創意的(再)品味化:文創法及其社會意涵。2011臺灣社會研究學年會:碰撞.新生:理論與實踐「踹共」研討會,主辦單位:台灣社會研究學會。協辦單位:亞洲大學社會工作系、世新大學台灣社會研究國際中心。 (會議日期: 2011/09/24-09/25)。臺中:亞洲大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇明如(2009)。觀光思潮下的文化創意產業政策凝視。2009文化創意產業永續與前瞻研討會,(會議日期: 2009/11/28)。屏東縣:屏東教育大學。214-240。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Berman, Marshall(1982)。All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity。New York:London:Simon and Schuster:verso。  new window
2.云游天工作室(2010)。我愛三太子:眾神喧嘩太子幫。臺北縣新店市:向陽文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.Harvey, David(1989)。The Urban Experience。Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
4.Harvey, David(1990)。The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change。Blackwell Publishers。  new window
其他
1.行政院文化建設委員會。推動文化創意產業之系統服務規劃,http://www.cci.org.tw/cci/cci/market_detail.php?sn=3754, 2015/08/07。  延伸查詢new window
2.李深耕(20101117)。張大春:臺灣文創產業來自一群寄生蟲,http://blog.udn.com/glee/4608295, 2015/07/30。  延伸查詢new window
3.汪宜儒,李維菁(20101117)。《問題一:文創產業是空泛名詞?》王偉忠:不至於狗屁不通吧!。  延伸查詢new window
4.林采韻(20120916)。七星大法會 發展宗教文創,http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E4%B8%83%E6%98%9F%E5%A4%A7%E6%B3%95%E6%9C%83-%E7%99%BC%E5%B1%95%E5%AE%97%E6%95%99%E6%96%87%E5%89%B5-213000985.html, 2012/09/17。  new window
5.林欣誼(20101117)。王榮文:作家特權就是可以亂講話。  延伸查詢new window
6.林欣誼(20101117)。張大春:狗屁的文化創意產業 PO文回應淡大生 批此空泛名詞源自媒合政商資源者 學院趕時髦開學程就像老鼠會 勸學生趕快遠離。  延伸查詢new window
7.柯有倫,馮凱(2011)。陣頭 [錄影資料],臺北市:濟湧影業:得利影視發行。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar(2001)。On Alternative Modernities。Alternative Modernities。Duke University Press。  new window
2.Chakrabarty, Dipesh(1997)。The Time of History and the Times of Gods。The Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital。Durham, NC:Duke University Press。  new window
3.Hammer, Espen(2010)。Temporality and the Culture of Modernity。Responsibility in Context: Perspectives。Dordrecht:Springer。  new window
4.Robertson, Roland(1995)。Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity。Global Modernities。Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE