臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺北市迪化街URS之藝術和創意轉型：誰的文化？誰的城市？
書刊名：藝術教育研究
作者：邱淑宜 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chiu, Shu-yi
出版日期：2014
卷期：28
頁次：頁65-98
主題關鍵詞：都市再生前進基地；創意街區；藝術和創造力教育；Urban regeneration stations；Creative neighborhood；Art and creative education
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:44
  • 點閱點閱:51
藝術和創造力教育，在Florida（2002，2005，2009）和Landry（2000）創意階級和創意城市論述倡議下，躍升為培養創意人才、形塑創意氛圍和提升區域競爭力的萬靈丹。本文以臺北市都市更新處設置在迪化街的都市再生前進基地（URS）為例，探討進駐URS的文創工作者所傳遞之藝術和創造力教育對形塑迪化街為創意街區的影響，尤其關照是誰推動和介入迪化街URS的藝術和創造力教育相關的政策論述？以及是什麼形式的文化美學和生活品味，透過URS的文創工作者植入迪化街區？最後則是URS所推動的是誰的都市活化與再生？本文將藉由經驗研究的田野資料與西方論述交織對話，討論藝術和創造力教育之影響層面如何擴及至臺北市都市發展策略，並指出其潛在的危機和陷阱。
According to Florida (2002, 2005, 2009) and Landry (2000) art and creative education can be employed as a panacea for fostering creative talent, shaping creative milieus, and promoting local competitive advantage. This paper uses the example of UrbanRegeneration Stations (URS) set up by the Taipei City Urban Regeneration Office at Dihua Street (West Central Taipei City), in order to foster art and creative education with the goal of transforming Dihua Street into a creative neighborhood. Using empirical data gathered between 2012 and 2014 routed through Zukin's discourse on ＂Whose culture? Whose city?＂ this paper demonstrates how creative practitioners in the URS employ art and creative education to shape Dihua Street as a creative neighbourhood. In particular it focuses on who is involved in policy making, and creating dominant policy discourse; and whose cultural aesthetics, lifestyle, and taste is being fore-grounded in the re-making of Dihua Street? The paper concludes by highlighting some possible dangers and limitations of such an approach.
期刊論文
1.Belfiore, E.(2002)。Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies。UK International Journal of Cultural Policy，8(1)，91-106。  new window
2.Eijk, G. V.(2010)。Exclusionary policies are not just about the 'neoliberal city': A critique of theories of urban revanchism and the case of rotterdam。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，34(4)，820-834。  new window
3.Pratt, Andy C.(2011)。The cultural contradictions of the creative city。City, Culture and Society，2(3)，123-130。  new window
4.Sasaki Masayuki(2010)。Urban regeneration through cultural creativity and social inclusion: Rethinking creative city theory through a Japanese case study。Cities，27，53-59。  new window
5.Zukin, S.、Braslow, L.(2011)。The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplaned cultural zones。City, culture and society，2，131-140。  new window
6.林怡廷(2013)。大稻埕新文藝復興。臺灣光華雜誌，12，8。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳郁秀(2003)。文化航行：創意世紀。文化視窗，50，20-27。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳歆怡(2012)。臺北市文化局長劉維公：用設計改造城市。臺灣光華雜誌，11，102-103。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃海鳴(20030900)。藝術介入社會的一種模式。藝術家，57(3)=340，197-201。  延伸查詢new window
10.Bell, D.、Jayne, M.(2003)。"Design-led" urban regeneration: A critical perspective。Local Economy，18(1)，121-134。  new window
11.Buckingham, D.、Jones, K.(2001)。New Labour's cultural turn: Some tensions in contemporary educational and cultural policy。Journal of Education Policy，16(1)，1-14。  new window
12.Julier, G.(2005)。Urban designscapes and the production of aesthetic consent。Urban Studies，42(5/6)，869-887。  new window
13.Lees, L.、Melhuish, C.(2013)。Arts-led regeneration in the UK: The rhetoric and the evidence on urban social inclusion。European Urban and Regional Studies，20(1)，1-19。  new window
14.Krätke, S.(2010)。Creative cities' and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida's approach to urban theory。International Journal of Urban and Regional Research，34(4)，835-853。  new window
15.林崇傑(20120400)。全球競逐下的臺北都市再生實踐。臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌，66，34-40。  延伸查詢new window
16.Comunian, R.(2010)。Rethinking the creative city: The role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy。Urban Studies，48(6)，1157-1179。  new window
17.王佳煌(20100300)。文化／創意產業、創意階級／城市論著的批判性檢視。思與言，48(1)，131-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.顏亮一(20060600)。市民認同、地區發展與都市保存：迪化街個案分析。都市與計劃，33(2)，93-109。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(2003)。創造力教育政策白皮書--打造創造力國度。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.文建會(2010)。最小的無限大：文建會營造紀實 1994-2010。臺北：文建會。  延伸查詢new window
3.DCMS(2004)。Culture at the heart of regeneration。London：Department for Culture, Media and Sport。  new window
4.Zukin, Sharon、王志弘、王玥民、徐苔玲(2012)。裸城：純正都市地方的生與死。臺北市：群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.文化部(2012)。藝術介入空間計畫補助作業要點。台北：文化部。  延伸查詢new window
6.臺北市政府文化局(2013)。ADAPTIVE CITY　設計臺北．不斷提升的城市。臺北市：臺北市政府文化局。  延伸查詢new window
7.臺北市政府都市發展局(2010)。2010年臺北市都市發展局年報。臺北市：臺北市政府都市發展局。  延伸查詢new window
8.臺北市政府都市發展局(2012)。2012年臺北市都市發展局年報。臺北市：臺北市政府都市發展局。  延伸查詢new window
9.臺北市政府都市發展局(2012)。臺北市政府都市發展局101年5月份施政報告。臺北市：臺北市政府都市發展局。  延伸查詢new window
10.臺北市都市更新處(2010)。「臺北市都市再生前進基地」推動計畫。臺北市：臺北市都市更新處。  延伸查詢new window
11.臺北市都市更新處(2013)。「臺北市都市再生前進基地推動計畫」補助要點。臺北市：臺北市都市更新處。  延伸查詢new window
12.臺灣經濟研究院(2003)。推動文化創意產業之系統服務規劃書。臺北：文建會。  延伸查詢new window
13.Arts Council England(2007)。Arts and regeneration: Creating vibrant communities。London, UK：Arts Council England。  new window
14.(2006)。Creative partnerships and the creative industries。London, UK：Arts Council England。  new window
15.Dickson, B.(2011)。Education and the arts。Edinburgh, UK：Dunedin Academic。  new window
16.Florida, R.(2009)。Who's your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
17.Liebau, E.、Wagner, E.、Wyman, M.(2013)。International yearbook for research in arts education 2013。New York, NY：Waxmann。  new window
18.Lloyd, R.(2010)。Neo-bohemia: Art and commerce in the post-industrial city。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
19.National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education(1999)。All our futures: Creative and cultural education。London, UK：DfEE。  new window
20.UNESCO(2006)。Road map for arts education。Lisbon, Portugal：UNESCO。  new window
21.FLORIDA, RICHARD(2007)。The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent。New York：Harper Collins Publishers。  new window
22.Zukin, S.(2010)。Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Place。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
23.Bourdieu, Pierre、Darbel, Alain、Schnapper, Dominique(1991)。The Love of Art: European Art Museums and Their Public。Polity。  new window
24.Storey, John、張君玫(2001)。文化消費與日常生活。臺北市：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
25.Florida, R.(2002)。The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life。New York：Basic Books。  new window
26.Landry, Charles(2000)。The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators。Earthscan Publications。  new window
27.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
28.Florida, Richard(2005)。Cities and the Creative Class。Routledge。  new window
29.教育部(2005)。藝術教育政策白皮書。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Peck, J.(2007)。The creativity fix，https://www.eurozine.com/the-creativity-fix/?pdf。  new window
其他
1.楊正海(20091224)。北市力拚東西軸線翻轉老西區風華再現。  延伸查詢new window
2.葉穎(20120703)。都市再生/以URS都市針灸術讓大臺北有新面貌，http://www.xinmedia.com/t/article.aspx?id=3177。  延伸查詢new window
3.臺北市政府文化局(20131119)。臺北市成功申辦2016世界設計之都：邁向不斷提升 的城市Adaptive City用設計實現市民生活願景，http://www.taipeidesign.org.tw/download_news.aspx。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺北市政府都市發展局(2011)。臺北市議會第11屆第1次大會：臺北市政府都市發展局工作報告（99 年7月至 99 年12 月），http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802。  延伸查詢new window
5.臺北市政府都市發展局(2012)。臺北市議會第11屆第4次大會：臺北市政府都市發展局工作報告（101年1月至101年6月），http://www.tcc.gov.tw/iFrame.aspx?n=7B5BF7DC2EE91802。  延伸查詢new window
6.(2014)。關於URS都市再生前進基地，http://www.urstaipei.net/%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BCurs#wrapper。  new window
7.Guetzkow, J.(2002)。How the arts impact communities: An introduction to the literature on arts impact studies，https://www.princeton.edu/~artspol/workpap/WP20%20-%20Guetzkow.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Darras, B.(2011)。Creativity, creative class, smart power, social reproduction and symbolic violence。The Routledge international handbook of creative learning。London：Routledge。  new window
2.Costa, P.(2008)。Creativity, innovation and territorial agglomeration in cultural activities: The roots of the creative city。Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development。Cheltenham：Edward Elgar Publishing。  new window
3.Krätke, S.(2012)。The new urban growth ideology of "creative cities"。Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city。London：Routledge。  new window
4.Zukin, S.(1996)。Whose culture? Whose city?。The city reader。London：Routledge。  new window
5.吳靜吉、郭旭展、王佩淳、李澄賢、湯宗勳(2008)。創造力教育國際交流工作的點點滴滴。「風乎舞雩」：教育部顧問室創造力教育中程計畫推動實錄。臺北市：教育部顧問室。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bamford, A.(2013)。The wow and what now? the challenges of implementation of arts education。International yearbook for research in arts education 2013。New York, NY：Waxmann。  new window
7.Belfiore, E.(2006)。The social impacts of the arts: Myth or reality?。Culture vultures: Is UK arts policy damaging the arts?。London, UK：Policy Exchange Limited。  new window
8.Belfiore, E.(2011)。The "transformative power" of the arts: History of an idea。The Routledge international handbook of creative learning。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
9.Craft, A.(2005)。Changes in the landscape for creativity in education。Creativity in primary education。Exeter, UK：Learning Matters。  new window
10.Drotner, K.(2011)。The cult of creativity: Opposition, incorporation, transformation。The Routledge international handbook of creative learning。London, UK：Routledge。  new window
11.Jeffrey, B.、Craft, A.(2001)。The universalization of creativity。Creativity in education。London, UK：Continuum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：771（臺灣：757，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67484572
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上