:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:寵「物」之外:以場域論探討國父紀念館遛狗者社交行為
書刊名:觀光休閒學報
作者:邱啟新黃嫈凱
作者(外文):Chiu, ChihsinHuang, Ying-kai
出版日期:2016
卷期:22:2
頁次:頁151-181
主題關鍵詞:休閒性遛狗場域論生活空間都會公園社會互動Recreational dog walkingField theoryLife spaceUrban parkSocial interaction
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:43
本文以質性研究法探討國父紀念館暨中山公園遛狗者之社交表現、社群關係及休閒意涵, 方法包含以飼主與非飼主為對象之半結構訪談、行為觀察、環境分析與檔案分析。透過場域 論,發現遛狗者社交行為是心理場域在引力作用下形成社會場域,再由公園實質場域鞏固之 結果。飼主受各自生活空間驅使,以飼主與寵物犬形成之單位彼此接觸,組成溜狗者之主社 交系統,飼主與非飼主間亦形成含三種接觸模式之次社交系統;飼主在實質場域支持下以非 約定式遛狗會與約定式狗聚深化社會關係。本文補強象徵互動論遛狗研究對個體能動性、社 群關係與生態脈絡探討之不足,指出社會互動之引力、團體動能與環境因素。結論歸納以遛 狗建立社交之關鍵原則與後續研究建議。
Drawing upon field theory, this paper explores dog walkers’ social interaction in Dr. Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall Park and its implications for leisure studies. Qualitative research methods include behavioral observation, environmental analysis, semi-structured interviews, and archival research. Social interaction occurs within the social fields when dog walkers encounter one another in psychological fields, namely life spaces. The process forms the first-level socialization system. There is a secondary socialization system created among dog walkers and non-dog walkers. The physical field of the park facilitates the social fields among dog walkers in terms of public gatherings and planned parties. This paper responds to the gap of symbolic interactionism of dog walking research by uncovering the roles of individuals’ agency, community formation, and ecological context. It specifically discusses the importance of the forces, group dynamics, and physical settings. This study suggests the existence of a set of principles underlying dog walking-based socialization, and provides suggestions for further studies.
期刊論文
1.游婉婷、湯幸芬(20121200)。飼主對寵物的依附關係與寂寞感、憂鬱情緒之探討。旅遊健康學刊,11(1),45-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Chandler, C. K.、Fernando, D. M.、Minton, C. A. B.、Portrie-Bethke, T. L.(2015)。Eight domains of pet-owner wellness: Valuing the owner-pet relationship in the counseling process。Journal of Mental Health Counseling,37(3),268-282。  new window
3.Eddy, J.、Hart, L. A.、Boltz, R. P.(1988)。The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgments of people in wheelchairs。Journal of Psychology,122(1),39-45。  new window
4.Hargrave, C.(2015)。In-practice management of stress in cats and dogs--Improving the welfare of companion animals and practice finances。Companion Animal,20(5),292-299。  new window
5.Hart, L. A.、Hart, B. L.、Bergin, B.(1987)。Socializing effects of service dogs for people with disabilities。Anthrozoös,1(1),41-44。  new window
6.Hobman, E. V.、Walker, I.(2015)。Stasis and change: Social psychological insights into social-ecological resilience。Ecology and Society,20(1),39-52。  new window
7.Mader, B.、Hart, L. A.、Bergin, B.(1989)。Social acknowledgments for children with disabilities: Effects of service dogs。Child Development,60(6),1529-1534。  new window
8.Noble, H.、Smith, J.(2015)。Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research。Evidence-Based Nursing,18(2),34-35。  new window
9.Robins, D. M.、Sanders, C. R.、Cahill, S. E.(1991)。Dogs and their people: Pet-facilitated interaction in a public setting。Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,20(1),3-25。  new window
10.Rossbach, K. A.、Wilson, J. P.(1992)。Does a dog's presence make a person appear more likable? Two studies。Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People and Animals,5(1),40-51。  new window
11.Tannen, D.(2004)。Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse。Research on Language and Social Interaction,37(4),399-420。  new window
12.李鴻昌、陳渝苓(20090900)。新休閒夥伴:寵物家人的概念建構與休閒互動之質化分析。運動休閒餐旅研究,4(3),114-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.McNicholas, J.、Collis, G. M.(2000)。Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect。British Journal of Psychology,91(1),61-70。  new window
學位論文
1.吳怡伶(2006)。動物溝通:寵物作為人際互動的中介(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.尹德月(2009)。國立國父紀念館社教功能及營運成效之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周樺暄(2009)。寵物共生理念落實於臺灣住宅環境之探討(碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.謝佳書(2009)。現代寵物飼養--互動論取向研究(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.Petersen, A.(2011)。From fur baby to chick magnet: A sociological view of dogs and their people(碩士論文)。University of Montana,Missoula, MT。  new window
圖書
1.Gibson, J. J.(1979)。The ecological approaches to visual perception。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin。  new window
2.Goffman, E.(1961)。Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction--Fun in games and role distance。Indianapolis, IN:Bobbs-Merrill。  new window
3.Geertz, C.(1973)。The interpretation of cultures。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
4.Appleton, Jay(1975)。The Experience of Landscape。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
5.Goffman, Erving(1963)。Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings。New York:Free Press。  new window
6.Lewin, Kurt(1951)。Field theory in social science。New York:Harper and Brothers。  new window
7.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(1985)。Naturalistic inquiry。Sage。  new window
8.Goffman, Erving(1959)。The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life。Anchor Books。  new window
9.Bronfenbrenner, Urie(1979)。The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design。Harvard University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Messent, P. R.(1983)。Social facilitation of contact with other people by pet dogs。New perspectives on our lives with companion animals。Philadelphia, Pennsylvania:University of Pennsylvania Press。  new window
2.孫中興(1992)。高夫曼「日常生活中的自我表演」導讀。日常生活的自我表演。台北:桂冠。  延伸查詢new window
3.Cain, A. O.(1983)。A study of pets in the family system。New perspectives on our lives with companion animals。Philadelphia, PA:University of Pennsylvania。  new window
4.Cain, A. O.(1985)。Pets as family members。Pets and the family。New York:Haworth。  new window
5.Ittleson, W. H.、Franck, K. A.、O'Hanlon, T. J.(1976)。The nature of environmental experienc。Experiencing the environment。New York:Plenum。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE