:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中文多面向健康識能量表(MMHLQ)之發展
書刊名:臺灣公共衛生雜誌
作者:魏米秀 引用關係王英偉張美娟 引用關係謝至鎠
作者(外文):Wei, Mi-hsiuWang, Ying-weiChang, Mei-chuanHsieh, Jyh-gang
出版日期:2017
卷期:36:6
頁次:頁556-570
主題關鍵詞:健康識能測量多面向中文成人Health literacyMeasurementMulti-dimensionsMandarinAdults
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:182
目標:本研究目的在發展一個適用於台灣成人的中文多面向健康識能量表。方法:首先經焦點團體訪談、專家內容效度、語文適讀修正等程序發展檢測題目;接著以566名成人為測定樣本,用以檢測量表心理計量特質及檢定測量模型適配度;最後以2,394名成人為效化樣本,用以檢測量表複核效度。結果:結果顯示二階五因素的測量模型適配度良好。量表包含五個面向:「獲取健康資訊」、「理解健康資訊」、「評估健康資訊」、「應用健康資訊」及「溝通與互動」,共20題自陳式題目。心理計量分析顯示量表的內部一致性信度、再測信度、建構效度、聚斂效度、區辨效度、效標關聯效度及已知群組效度表現良好。複核效度檢定結果,符合跨樣本的量尺不變性。最後,以標準參照方式訂出健康識能程度分級的切分點。結論:MMHLQ為具有良好信、效度的多面向健康識能測量工具,可用以評量群體的健康識能程度,也可做為教育介入的需求評估工具。
Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop a tool capable of measuring multidimensional health literacy among adults in Taiwan. Methods: In the first phrase, we adopted focus-group interviews, consultations with experts, and readability check to formulate calibration items. In the second phrase, a calibration sample of 566 adults was recruited to examine the psychometric characteristics of the items and test the fitness of the measurement model. In the last phrase, a validation sample of 2394 adults was used for evaluating cross-validation. Results: CFA demonstrated the high degree of fitness of the proposed second-order five-factor model. The proposed scale covers the following five dimensions: accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information, and communication and interaction. The scale includes 20 self-reported items. Psychometric analysis demonstrated that the scale has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as good construct, convergent, discriminant, criterion-related, and known group validity. Cross-validation analysis demonstrated the metric invariance of the scale across the two samples. Cutting scores were selected for criterion-referenced grading. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the Mandarin Multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire (MMHLQ) is a reliable and valid measure of multi-dimensional health literacy. The tool is useful in evaluating the level of health literacy among adult populations as well as in needs assessments geared toward interventions to improve health literacy.
期刊論文
1.蔡慈儀、李守義、蔡憶文、郭耿南(20100600)。中文健康識能評估表的發展與測試。醫學教育,14(2),122-136。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李守義、蔡慈儀、蔡憶文、郭耿南(20120400)。「中文健康識能評估量表」簡式量表的發展與效度檢測。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,31(2),184-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Morris, N. S.、MacLean, C. D.、Chew, L. D.、Littenberg, B.(20060324)。The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability。BMC family practice,7(21),1-7。  new window
4.林純雯(20101200)。Newest Vital Sign健康素養量表中文版之信效度檢驗與應用--以幼兒職前教師為例。健康促進與衛生教育學報,34,1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chinn, D.、McCarthy, C.(2013)。All aspects of health literacy scale (AAHLS): Developing a tool to measure functional, communicative and critical health literacy in primary healthcare settings。Patient Education and Counseling,90(2),247-253。  new window
6.Marsh, H. W.、Hau, K. T.、Balia, J. R.、Grayson, D.(1998)。Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis。Multivariate Behavioral Research,33,181-220。  new window
7.Sørensen, Kristine、Van den Broucke, Stephan、Pelikan, Jürgen M.、Fullam, James、Doyle, Gerardine、Slonska, Zofia、Brand, Helmut(2013)。Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q)。BMC Public Health,13(1)。  new window
8.Pleasant, A.(2014)。Advancing health literacy measurement: a pathway to better health and health system performance。J. Health Commun.,19,1481-1496。  new window
9.Lee, S. Y. D.、Tsai, T. I.、Tsai, Y. W.(2013)。Accuracy in self-reported health literacy screening: a difference between men and women in Taiwan。BMJ Open,3,e002928。  new window
10.Berkman, N. D.、Sheridan, S. L.、Donahue, K. E.、Halpern, D. J.、Viera, A.、Crotty, K.、Tant, E.(2011)。Health Literacy Interventions and Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review。Evidence Report/Technology Assessment,199(1),1-941。  new window
11.Altin, S. V.、Finke, I.、Kautz-Freimuth, S.、Stock, S.(2014)。The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review。BMC Public Health,14,(1207)1-(1207)13。  new window
12.Wolf, M. S.、Williams, M. V.、Parker, R. M.、Parikh, N. S.、Nowlan, A. W.、Baker, D. W.(2007)。Patients' shame and attitudes toward discussing the results of literacy screening。J. Health Commun.,12(8),721-732。  new window
13.Osborne, R. H.、Batterham, R. W.、Elsworth, G. R.、Hawkins, M.、Buchbinder, R.(2013)。The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)。BMC Public Health,13。  new window
14.Dowse, R.(2016)。The limitations of current health literacy measures for use in developing countries。J. Commun. Health,9,4-6。  new window
15.Haun, J. N.、Valerio, M. A.、McCormack, L. A.、Sørensen, K.、Paasche-Orlow, M. K.(2014)。Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments。Journal of Health Communication,19(Suppl 2),302-333。  new window
16.Jordan, J. E.、Osborne, R. H.、Buchbinder, R.(2011)。Critical appraisal of health literacy indices revealed variable underlying constructs, narrow content and psychometric weaknesses。Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,64(4),366-379。  new window
17.Nguyen, T. H.、Park, H.、Han, H. R.、Chan, K. S.、Paasche-Orlow, M. K.、Haun, J.、Kim, M. T.(2015)。State of the science of health literacy measures: validity implications for minority populations。Patient Education and Counseling,98(12),1492-1512。  new window
18.Duong, T. V.、Aringazina, A.、Baisunova, G.(2017)。Measuring health literacy in Asia: validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asia countries。J. Epidemiol.,27,80-86。  new window
19.Duong, T. V.、Chang, P. W.、Yang, S. H.(2017)。A new comprehensive short-form health literacy survey tool for patients in general。Asian Nurs. Res.,11,30-35。  new window
20.Hwang, S. Y.、Yen, M.、Lee, B. O.、Huang, M. C.、Tseng, H. F.(2010)。A critical thinking disposition scale for nurses: short form。J Clin. Nurs.,19,3171-3176。  new window
21.Chinn, D.(2011)。Critical health literacy: a review and critical analysis。Soc. Sci. Med.,73,60-67。  new window
22.魏米秀、洪文綺(20101200)。都市與偏遠社區成人的健康資訊尋求經驗:焦點團體訪談結果。健康促進與衛生教育學報,34,93-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.Nutbeam, Don(2000)。Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century。Health Promotion International,15(3),259-267。  new window
24.Sørensen, Kristine、van den Broucke, Stephan、Fullam, James、Doyle, Gerardine、Pelikan, Jürgen、Slonska, Zofia、Brand, Helmut(2012)。Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models。BMC Public Health,12(1),(80)1-(80)13。  new window
25.Aquilino, W. S.(1994)。Interview Mode Effects in Surveys of Drug and Alcohol Use: A Field Experiment。Public Opinion Quarterly,58,210-240。  new window
學位論文
1.劉孟珊(2004)。人際溝通能力量表之發展(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃秀雲(2008)。中文版批判性思維特質測量表於臺灣臨床護理人員之測試(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱皓政(2011)。量化研究法(三):測驗原理與量表發展技術。臺北:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wang, J. C.、Wang, X. Q.(2012)。Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.DeVellis, Robert F.(2017)。Scale Development: Theory and Applications。SAGE。  new window
4.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
5.Kline, Rex B.(2016)。Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling。Guilford Press。  new window
6.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Literacy、Nielsen-Bohlman, Lynn、Panzer, Allison M.、Kindig, David A.(2004)。Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion。National Academies Press。  new window
其他
1.WHO。Health Promotion Glossary,http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/hp-glossary_en.pdf, 。  new window
2.HLS-EU Consortium。Comparative report of health literacy in eight EU member states,http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/documents/news/Comparative_report_on_health_literacy_in_eight_EU_member_states.pdf。  new window
3.The Centre for Literacy(2017)。The calgary charter on health literacy: rationale and core principles for the development of health literacy curricula,http://www.centreforliteracy.qc.ca/sites/default/files/CFL_Calgary_Charter_2011.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.胡幼慧(1996)。質性研究的分析與寫成。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Finney, S. J.、DiStefano, C.(2013)。Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling。Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course。Charlotte:Information Age。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE