關於美術著作侵權之議題，向來都只有法律學系專業者做過研究與探討，然而大部分的研究皆著重於法理之操作及理論的適用與變遷，甚少站在創作者的立場，針對著作權法理上以及創作者之設計流程上做兩相對照與比較，以致常使創作者因缺少相關認知而誤蹈法網。本研究透過分析現有美術著作權相關案件，以口語化的方式簡要說明美術著作之非法重製在法律上的定義，以及法律上的判斷要件，從案件中歸納出目前設計師於創作過程中未留意到的創作保護細節，亦或是可能缺少的紀錄，提醒設計師們可參考本研究之結論，而在往後的創作過程中避免諸多不必要之爭議糾紛，並根據此研究提出一侵權保護措施之構想。

On the issue of art copyright infringement, currently only law professionals have conducted research and discussion, but most of the studies focused on the practice of legal principles and the applicability and change of theories, little efforts were spent on the comparison and contrast between the copyright law and the creator's design process from the artist's perspective. The purpose of this study is to analyze the existing art copyright violation cases, and in a colloquial way briefly describes the legal definition of an illegal reproduction of art works, and the elements for a legal judgment. Then an insight is obtained from the cases and a conclusion is drawn on the details ignored by designers or not recorded in the creation process, and a set of corresponding codes against plagiarism is proposed. It is expected that due to the conclusion of this study, designers can pay attention to and record the decision points for key designs, and avoid unnecessary disputes. A concept of avoiding copyright infringement based on the study is proposed accordingly.