:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從逕流責任觀點下探討減洪土地使用規劃
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:張學聖 引用關係蘇麗元程韋涵
作者(外文):Chang, Hsueh-shengSu, Li-yuanCheng, Wei-han
出版日期:2018
卷期:45:1
頁次:頁81-101
主題關鍵詞:土地逕流責任水責任逕流分擔減洪土地使用規劃Runoff responsibilityLand responsibility of waterRunoff allocationFlood mitigation strategies
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:12
傳統治水工程手段已無法完全因應氣候變遷及都市快速發展造成的水文環境改變,非工程手段逐漸受到重視,如:海綿城市、低衝擊開發、逕流分擔及出流管制等概念,然而各種方法有其適用尺度,防洪治水應納入大尺度的上位計畫做為指導。本研究嘗試以土地部門角色落實逕流分擔概念於土地使用計畫,以河川集水區為空間單元探討土地逕流責任─水責任,藉由建立水責任架構,作為土地規劃由下而上銜接逕流分擔與出流管制的因應對策。本研究從三個方向釐清水責任,分別為:土地開發水責任、地理環境水責任、貯留潛力水責任,以及將地理環境水責任依面積比例分配給土地單元的基本責任。藉由驗證初探得知水責任確實可以落實於空間,並且藉由不同保護標準進行情境模擬,得出土地開發若同時負擔基本責任和貯留潛力水責任,能達到較佳的減洪成效。依據水責任所繪製的地圖係以水環境作為基礎分析,可視為如環境敏感地的功能應用於土地規劃,位於逕流分擔區應加強對未來開發的管制,要求其負擔水責任才得以開發;非逕流分擔區之土地因其開發行為不須額外負擔基本責任,開發成本較低,在逕流分擔之觀點上具備較佳之開發條件,然仍應視該土地之其他環境敏感項目條件,並綜合評估土地開發與規劃適宜性。
Structural measures for managing flooding are insufficient for managing the runoff caused by climate change and rapid urban growth. Non-Structural measures like Sponge City, LID and Runoff Allocation Policy are gradually being taken seriously. However, a different scale is applied for each of these measures. Therefore, a master plan is needed to measure the total runoff in the river basin scale to guide the urban planning. This study applied the concept of Runoff Allocation Policy on land-use Planning. We define the framework of "Runoff Responsibility" by identifying the causes of flood. Based on this framework, Taichung Dali River Basin was selected for empirical analysis. In scenario analysis, by affording all the "Runoff Responsibility" we define, the flooding situation will be improved. The map of "Runoff Responsibility" can be regarded as the master plan to guide the land-use planning. Development activities should afford certain amount of detention if they are located in high "Runoff Responsibility" area. The map should indicate environmentally sensitive land so that the land-use plan can consider other environmental conditions as well.
期刊論文
1.張學聖、廖晉賢(20130300)。臺南市土地使用計畫之水災風險分析。都市與計劃,40(1),59-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張學聖、廖晉賢(20151200)。與水共生的空間規劃途徑--以曾文溪流域為例。建築與規劃學報,16(2/3),183-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張學聖、謝昕穎(20150300)。調洪式土地使用規劃架構之研究。建築學報,91,81-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳家揚(20111200)。都市綜合治水對策之省思--以都市計畫及建築管理為手段之作法。水利,21,10-13。  延伸查詢new window
5.葛冬梅(20050300)。歐盟環境責任指令淺介。科技法律透析,17(3),7-11。  延伸查詢new window
6.鍾振坤(20110900)。以都市計劃的觀點看氣候變遷影響下的城市防災策略--以荷蘭鹿特丹的城市發展經驗為例。城市發展,11,59-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蘇惠珍、戴秀雄、楊舒茜、陳昶憲(20090400)。臺灣實施集水區洪水出流管制可行性規劃。水保技術,4(2),102-111。  延伸查詢new window
8.Box, P.、Thomalla, F.、van den Honert, R.(2013)。Flood risk in Australia: Whose responsibility is it, anyway。WATER,5(4),1580-1597。  new window
9.Molle, F.(2009)。River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept。Geoforum,40(3),484-494。  new window
10.Rahman, A.、Khan, A. N.(2013)。Analysis of 2010-flood causes nature and magnitude in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan。Natural Hazards,66(2),887-904。  new window
11.Tofiq, F. A.、Güven, A.(2015)。Potential changes in inflow design flood under future climate projections for Darbandikhan Dam。Journal of Hydrology,528,45-51。  new window
12.Walsh, K.、Pittock, A. B.(1998)。Potential changes in tropical storms, hurricanes, and extreme rainfall events as a result of climate change。Climatic Change,39(2/3),199-213。  new window
13.賴炳樹、白仁德(20120300)。因應氣候變遷之洪災調適策略規劃。災害防救科技與管理學刊,1(1),81-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.許晃雄、吳宜昭、周佳、陳正達、陳永明、盧孟明(2011)。臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2011。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schwab, J.、Topping, K. C.、Eadie, C. C.、Deyle, R. E.、Smith, R. A.(1998)。Planning for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction。Chicago, Illinois:American Planning Association。  new window
3.Woods-Ballard, B.、Kellagher, R.、Martin, P.、Jefferies, C.、Bray, R.、Shaffer, P.(2007)。The SuDS manual。London:Construction Industry Research and Information Association。  new window
4.Jha, A. K.、Bloch, R.、Lamond, J.(2012)。Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century。Washington, D.C.:The World Bank。  new window
5.Mileti, Dennis S.(1999)。Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States。Joseph Henry Press。  new window
6.內政部營建署(2015)。流域特定區域計畫之規劃。臺北:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
7.內政部營建署雨水下水道工程處(2014)。都市總合治水綱要計畫。臺北:內政部營建署。  延伸查詢new window
8.台灣氣候變遷科學報告工作小組(2011)。臺灣氣候變遷科學報告。新北:國家災害防救科技中心。  延伸查詢new window
9.宜蘭縣政府(2013)。宜蘭縣水部門綱領計畫擬定暨綜合治水計畫檢討。宜蘭:宜蘭縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
10.經濟部水利署(2014)。修正流域綜合治理計畫(103-108 年)。臺北:經濟部水利署。  延伸查詢new window
11.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2007)。集水區洪水出流管制之評析及初步規劃總報告。臺中:經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
12.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2013)。土地利用型態變遷對逕流影響之評估研究。臺中:經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
13.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2013)。流域綜合治水對策整合與法規修訂之研究。臺中:經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
14.經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(2014)。因應氣候變遷下逕流分擔機制之研究--以大里溪為例。臺中:經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。  延伸查詢new window
15.APFM(2007)。The Role of Land-Use Planning in Flood Management--A Tool for Integrated Flood Management。WMO/GWP Associated Programme on Flood Management。  new window
16.Butler, D.、Davies, J.(2011)。Urban Drainage。London:Spon Press。  new window
17.Department of Communities and Local Government(2009)。Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk Practice Guide。London:CLG。  new window
18.Godschalk, D. R.(1991)。Disaster Mitigation and Hazard Management, Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government。Washington:International City Management Association。  new window
19.Office of Climate Change(2010)。Increasing Queensland's Resilience to Inland Flooding in a Changing Climate。Queensland:Dept. of Environment and Resource Management, Local Govt. Association。  new window
20.White, G. F.(1986)。Geography, Resources and Environment, Volume1: Selected Writings of Gilbert F. White。Chicago:University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.李建良(2007)。釋義《土壤及地下水污染整治法》之污染行為人--闡析台鹼安順廠污染事件之整治責任及行政法院相關判決。2006行政管制與行政爭訟。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE