:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:再探《莊子》「成心」之起源:以偏執心與死生憂懼為線索
書刊名:國立政治大學哲學學報
作者:廖昱瑋
作者(外文):Liao, Yu-wei
出版日期:2024
卷期:51
頁次:頁33-71
主題關鍵詞:莊子成心死亡情緒自我The ZhuangziCheng-xinDeathEmotionsSelf
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
本文將嘗試證成「成心」包含人的偏執情感,並指出人的偏執情
感與執著於自我存在有密切關聯,而人之所以執著於自我存在,源於
人對於死亡的焦慮。當代對於「成心」有兩種詮釋進路:中性派、負
面派。前者將成心理解為認知侷限,後者則認為成心不但是認知侷限,
還是一種偏執心態。兩者的關鍵差異在於是否將情感納入成心的內
涵,但無論是何種學派,皆沒有深入探討人為何會出現偏執心態。
本論文將站在負面派的立場來分析成心之起源,並指出成心的產生源於人對於死亡的焦慮。筆者將透過分析證明幾點:一,從
死亡議題來理解成心較符合〈齊物論〉原意;二,根據第一點,我們
對於〈齊物論〉中「死亡」與成心的關係應當重估;三,根據第一點,
〈齊物論〉中的修養論「吾喪我」也會有更深入的理解方式。
This article aims to establish a close connection between biased
attitudes and the persistence of self-existence. I will argue that cheng-xin
(成心) encompasses a biased attitude of viewpoint, with the root cause of
humans clinging to their self-existence lying in the anxieties surrounding
death.
In recent research, two perspectives on the meaning of cheng-xin have
emerged. One school views cheng-xin as a limitation of cognition, while
the other sees it not only as a cognitive limitation but also as a biased
attitude of cognition. The key distinction between these perspectives is
whether cheng-xin includes emotions. However, both fail to address the
origin of cheng-xin.This paper will analyze the source of cheng-xin within the school that
argues for the inclusion of emotions. I will present three points to support
this argument. Firstly, it is more apt to understand cheng-xin within the
context of anxieties about death. Secondly, building on the first point, a
reexamination of the relationship between the anxieties of death and chengxin is warranted. Thirdly, in line with the first point, the self-cultivation
theory of wo-shen-wo (吾喪我) in Chapter 2 of the Zhuangzi can be
comprehended in a more profound manner.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE