:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:莊子死亡觀評論
書刊名:新竹教育大學人文社會學報
作者:李凱恩 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Jack
出版日期:2008
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁3-14
主題關鍵詞:莊子死亡恐懼Chuang TsuDeathFear
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:106
在中國古代的哲學家中,能夠直接面對死亡問題,並企圖提出一套深刻的理論予以正面回應的,首推莊子。莊子的死亡觀極為恢宏、複雜,不過,本文不打算對這一大套的理論系統予以探究,我們只想集中於以下的一個命題:莊子如何試圖減緩我們對死亡的恐懼甚或超越它?簡言之,莊子如何超越死亡?對於上述的問題,莊子分別採取以下三個進路:(1)指陳「死乃不可避免的自然現象」,(2)齊一生死,(3)貴死輕生。在闡明這三大進路後,本文將個別予以批判及檢討。
In Chinese history, Chuang Tsu is definitely the first philosopher who directly faces the puzzling philosophical problems concerning “death” and attempts to raise a complicated theory to resolve them. Indeed, Chuang Tsu’s view of death has deeply affected the Chinese mind. In addition, it is not only complicated but also comprehensive. However, this paper does not want to explicate Chuang Tsu’s whole view of death. I nevertheless want to focus only on the following question: How does Chuang Tsu try to lessen the fear of death or even transcend it? To sum up, how does Chuang Tsu transcend death? In the face of this question, he takes three approaches: (1) explicating that death is a natural phenomenon; (2) equaling life and death; (3) treating death as valuable but life as valueless. After illustrating these three approaches, I will criticize them respectively.
期刊論文
1.何保中(19990100)。死亡問題在莊子思想中的意義與地位。國立臺灣大學哲學論評,22,215-235。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭仕平(20020800)。莊子的三種生死觀的矛盾及其解決。哲學與文化,29(8)=339,735-746+774-775。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Li, Jack(2002)。Can Death Be a Harm to the Person Who Dies?。London:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Perry, John(1975)。Personal Identity。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
3.鄭曉江(19940000)。中國死亡智慧。臺北:東大出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Murphy, Jeffrie G.(1993)。Rationality and the Fear of Death。The Metaphysics of Death。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE