:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:為平等而設計:美國補償教育方案[Compensatory Education Programs]之經驗與啟示
書刊名:初等教育學刊
作者:張煌熙
出版日期:1995
卷期:4
頁次:頁111-122
主題關鍵詞:美國補償教育方案教育優先區Compensatory Education ProgramsEducational Priority Area
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:186
「教育優先區」是我國當前教育改革深受囑目的課題,其目的在於促進教育機會均等、提昇國民教育品質。由於國人對於「教育優先區」的理念仍多隔閡,增進國人對「教育優先區」理念的了解,頗有必要。補償教育方案的實施,是過去三十年來美國社會促進教育機會均等的最佳範例。六十年代以來,美國全國與地方層次為出身貧困家庭或少數族裔的學童,提供了大規模的教育服務方案,以補償這些學童在智能與社會發展方面的缺憾不足。美國補償教育方案的實施,已經累積了相當長期的經驗,對於我國「教育優先區」工作的規劃推展,或許有值得參考之處。基於此種認識,本文先就美國補償教育方案的背景、內涵、實施、與檢討等部份進行考察,並就立論基礎、目標對象、政策的制度化、聯邦政府的關鍵角色、各級政府的協調合作、方案設計與實施的深受重視、對方案進行長期評估的重要性等方面,探討美國補償教育方案對我國的啟示。
Setting up the "educational priority areas", as a theme of deep concern to the crurent wave of educational reform, IS intended to facilitate the equity of educational opportunities and to advance the quality of educational outcomes. With the recognition that not many of us know much about the idea of "educational priority areas", this author believes that it is imperative for us to gain more understanding in this regard. The implementation of compensatory education programs in the United States for the past thirty years has served to illustrate a paradigm of social design for equity. Through the installation of large-scale educational programs, the U. S. governments at all levels have joined the efforts since the 1960s to compensate for the deficiencies in the cognitive and social skills of minority students or those from low socioeconomic backgrounds. The U.S. experiences in the implementation of compensatory education programs may well carry useful implications for the planning of• educational priority areas in this country. For this very reason, the study will first examine the U. S. compensatory education in terms of its background, provisions, implementation, and evaluation. The implications of the U. S. compensatory education for the planning of educational priority areas in this country will then be considered.
期刊論文
1.Carter, L. F.(1984)。The Sustaining Effects Study of Compensatory and Elementary Education。Educational Researcher,13(7),4-13。  new window
2.Fullan, M. G.、Miles, M. B.(1992)。Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't。Phi Delta Kappan,1992(Jun.),745-752。  new window
3.Kantor, H.、Lowe, R.(1995)。Class, race, and the emergence of federal education policy。Educational Researcher,24(3),4-11。  new window
圖書
1.教育部(1994)。第七次全國教育會議分組研討結論報告。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Kirst, M. W.(1984)。Who controls our schools?: American values in conflict。New York:W. H. Freeman and Company。  new window
3.Jeffrey, J. R.(1978)。Education for children of the poor: A study of the origins and implementation of the elementary and secondary education act。Columbus:Ohio State University Press。  new window
4.Johnson, O.(1995)。Information please almanac。Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
5.Lapati, A. D.(1975)。Education and the federal government。New York:Mason/ Charter。  new window
6.Martin, R.、McClure, P.(1969)。Title I of ESEA: Is it helping poor children?。The NAACP Legal Defense of Education Fund, Inc.。  new window
7.Pressman, J. L.、Wildavsky, A.(1979)。Implementation。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
8.Rivlin, A. M.、Timpane, P. M.(1975)。Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder?。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution。  new window
9.Summerfield, H. L.(1974)。Power and process: The formulation and limits of federal educational policy。Berkeley:McCutchan。  new window
10.U. S. Department of Education(1991)。Digest of education statistics。Washington, DC:Government Printing Office。  new window
11.U. S. Department of Education(1994)。The improving America's schools act of 1994: Reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act。  new window
12.Wirt, F. M.、Kirst, M. W.(1982)。Schools in conflict。Berkeley:McCutchan。  new window
13.Wirt, F. M.、Kirst, M. W.(1989)。Schools in conflict。Berkeley, CA:McCutchan。  new window
14.國立教育資料館(1995)。當前教育問題與對策。臺北市:國立教育資料館。  延伸查詢new window
15.教育部(1995)。中華民國教育報告書。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Halperin, S.(19700909)。The elementary and secondary education act: Five years later(H.8439)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lukas, C. V.(1975)。Problems in implementing head start planned variation models。Planned variation in education: Should we give up or try harder?。Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution。  new window
2.McDill, E. L.(1992)。Compensatory education。Encyclopedia of Educational Research。  new window
3.Murphy, J.(1973)。The education bureaucracies implement novel policy: The politics of title I of ESEA, 1965-1972。Policy and Politics in America。Boston:Little Brown。  new window
4.Stanford Research Institute International(1977)。Overviews, Findings, and Conclusions。Trends in management of ESEA Title I: A perspective from compliance reviews。Menlo Park, Calif。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top