「行動」和「結構」的拿捏__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	「行動」和「結構」的拿捏
書刊名：	國立臺灣大學社會學刊
作者：	葉啟政
作者(外文)：	Yeh, Chi-jeng
出版日期：	1998
卷期：	26
頁次：	頁53+55-97
主題關鍵詞：	社會整合；體系整合；二元性；二元論；施為；結構；Social/system integration；Duality/dualism；Agency/structure
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:3 共同引用:0 點閱:365

在一九六零年代，Lockwood企圖以社會╱體系整合的二元概念來修補傳統結構功能論和衝突論之間理論論述上的裂痕。自此，學者們以「行動╱結構」來對應「社會╱體系整合」的二元概念，開展了一系列的論爭。在這一系列論爭中，Giddens以結構化理論立場提出了所謂的結構二元性，Habermas則企圖融薈Lockwood之社會╱體系整合的二元概念與Parsons的AGIL的社會體系說，提出體系╱社會世界的二元說，而Archer持形態衍生的立場，透過對Giddens結構化理論的批判，力主「行動╱結構」二元論。最後，Mouzelis則在兼顧二元性與二元論的情形下，提出了聯組╱項類的二元性╱二元論的主張。綜觀這些不同的主張，他們事實上分享著一個共同的思考模式－笛卡兒的主客對張二元觀。其所意圖處理的是，在同時承認「行動」與「結構」的存有意義的前提下，考察它們彼此之間如何讓渡或交錯。然而，其結果卻是，整個理論論述，最後又不自主地深陷進入「結構」概念所佈之天羅地網安排下的悲劇性「命運」結局。

以文找文

In the 1960's, Lockwood proposed a pair of concept, namely, "social-versus system-integration" to re-articulate the lasting theoretical controversy between structural functionalism on the one side and conflict theory on the other side. Since then, this pair of concept has been brought into the rubric of "action versus structure" controversy, an important theoretical issue which has long been debated in the Western sociology.
Along this line of debate, four main theoretical statements are examined. They are, namely, Giddens' theory of structuration, Habermas' field theory of system/life-world duality, Mouzelis' theory of hierarchy and Archer's theory of morphogenesis. In spite of the differences in theoretical perspectives appeared as they are, all of these four theoretical statements have in fact shared a common theoretical ground in which the notion of structure turns out as a real backbone of theoretical argument. As a result, in effect, the concept of actor or agency has been diluted into the water of the concept of structure which was initially regarded as merely a counterpart force with equivalent, but opposite momentum.
However, such a structural-prone style of thinking has been a predomiinant model of viewing human society ever since the emergence of modern sociology back to Comte's age. In the final part of this article, the author presented a proto-type of alternative theoretical framework as a foundation to initiate a dialogue with the structural-prone model of society as illustrated in the tradition of Western Sociology.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Archer, M. S.(1996)。Social integration and system integration: developing the distinction。Sociology，30，679-699。
2.	Giddens, A.(1976)。Functionalism: apres la lutte。Social Research，43，325-366。
3.	Mouzelis, N.(1989)。Restructuring structuration theory。Sociological Review，37，613-635。
4.	Mouzelis, Nicos(1997)。Social and system integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens。Sociology，31(1)，111-119。
5.	Wrong, Dennis H.(1961)。The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology。American Sociological Review，26(2)，183-193。
6.	Archer, M. S.(1982)。Morphogenesis vs. structuration。British Journal of Sociology，33，455-483。
7.	Mouzelis, N.(1974)。Social and system integration: some reflections on a foundational distinction。British Journal of Sociology，25(4)，395-409。
8.	Mouzelis, N.(1992)。Social and system integration: Habermas' view。British Journal of Sociology，43(2)，267-288。

圖書
1.	Mouzelis, N.(1995)。Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies。London, UK; New York：Macmillan：Routledge。
2.	Bryant, C. G. A.、Jary, David(1991)。Giddens, Theory of Structuration。London：Routledge。
3.	Bauman, Z.(1973)。Culture as Praxis。London：Routledge and Kegan Paul。
4.	Becker, C. L.(1969)。The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-century Philosophers。New Heaven, Conn.：Yale University Press。
5.	Fielding, N. C.(1988)。Actions and Structures: Research Method and Social Theory。Beverly Hills, California：Sage。
6.	Hearn, F.(1985)。Reason and Freedom in Sociological Thought。Boston, Mass.：Allen & Unwin。
7.	Layder, Derek(1981)。Structure, Interaction and Social Theory。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。
8.	Mouzelis, Nicos P.(1991)。Back to Sociological Theory。London：Macmillan。
9.	Rex, John(1961)。Key Problems of Sociological Theory。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。
10.	Marx, Karl(1964)。The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844。New York：International Publishers。
11.	Saussure, Ferdinand De(1960)。Course in General Linguistics。London, UK：Peter Owen Ltd.。
12.	Bhaskar, R.(1979)。The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences。Hemel Hempstead, UK：Harvester。
13.	Giddens, Anthony(1981)。A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Vol. 1。London, UK：University of California Press。
14.	Bateson, Gregory(1972)。Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology。University Of Chicago Press。
15.	Zeitlin, Inving M.(1981)。Ideology and the Development of Sociological Theory。Englewood Cliff, N.J.：Prentice-Hall。
16.	Giddens, Anthony(1979)。Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis。University of California Press。
17.	Giddens, A.(1976)。New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretive sociologies。London：New York：Hutchins：Basic Books。
18.	Bourricaud, Francois(1981)。The Sociology of Talcott Parsons。Chicago：The University of Chicago Press。
19.	Parsons, T.(1937)。The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of European Writers。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill：The Free Press。
20.	Bourdieu, P.、Collier, Peter(1988)。Homo Academicus。Cambridge：Polity Press。
21.	Alexander, Jeffrey C.、Giesen, Bernhard、Munch, Richard、Smelser, Neil J.(1987)。The Micro-Macro Link。University of California Press。
22.	Giddens, A.(1987)。Social theory and modern sociology。Cambridge。
23.	Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。
24.	Macpherson, Crawford Brough(1962)。The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke。Oxford University Press。
25.	Habermas, Jürgen、McCarthy, Thomas A.(1987)。Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason。Beacon Press。
26.	Giddens, Anthony(1984)。The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration。Cambridge：Polity Press。
27.	Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1977)。Outline of a Theory of Practice。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
28.	Giddens, A.(1977)。Studies in Social and Political Theory。New York：Basic Books。
29.	Craib, Ian(1992)。Anthony Giddens。Routledge。
30.	Archer, Margaret Scotford(1988)。Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory。Cambridge University Press。
31.	Archer, Margaret Scotford(1995)。Realist Social Theory: the Morphogenetic Approach。Cambridge University Press。
32.	Eisenstadt, S. N.、Curelaru, M.(1976)。The Form of Sociology: Paradigms and Crisis。New York：John Wiley。
33.	Dahrendorf, Ralf(1959)。Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society。Stanford University Press。
34.	Weber, Max、Gerth, Hans Heinrich、Mills, C. Wright(1946)。From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology。Oxford University Press。
35.	Coleman, James Samuel(1990)。Foundations of social Theory。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
36.	Bourdieu, Pierre、Nice, Richard(1990)。The Logic of Practice。Stanford University Press。
37.	Habermas, Jürgen(1975)。Legitimation Crisis。Boston, MA：Beacon Press。
38.	葉啟政(1991)。對社會一些預設的反省－本土化的根本問題。制度化的社會邏輯。臺北。延伸查詢
39.	笛卡兒(1984)。方法論。方法論。臺北。延伸查詢
40.	笛卡兒(1984)。沈思錄。沈思錄。臺北。延伸查詢
41.	笛卡兒(1984)。哲學原理。哲學原理。臺北。延伸查詢
42.	Bourdieu, P.、Passeron, J. C.(1970)。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture。London, UK。
43.	Brunkhorst, H.(1992)。Culture and bourgeois society: the unity of reason in a divided society。Cultural-political Intervention in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment。沒有紀錄。
44.	(1985)。Macro-Sociological Theory: Perspectives on Sociological Theory。Macro-Sociological Theory: Perspectives on Sociological Theory。沒有紀錄。
45.	Holmwood, J.、Stewart, A.(1991)。Explanation and Social Theory。Explanation and Social Theory。London, UK。

圖書論文
1.	Giddens, Anthony(1991)。Structuration Theory: Past, Present, and Future。Giddens' theory of structuration: A critical approach。London：Routledge。
2.	Knorr-Cetina, K.(1981)。The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology。Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Mcicro-Sociologies。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。
3.	Lockwood, D.(1964)。Social integration and system integration。Explorations in Social Change。Boston：Hougton-Mifflin。
4.	Thompson, J. B.(1989)。The theory of structuration。Social Theory in Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。
5.	Wilkes, C.(1990)。Bourdieu's class。An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu。London：Macmillan。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	本土的理論研究／理論的本土研究：社會理論在臺大社會系
2.	修養、位移與大迴路：本土行動理論的三種路徑
3.	影響結構與施為之間互動關係的媒介物 : 小學教師的專業認同與文化知覺的分析
4.	經濟地理學的制度轉向：一個理論性回顧與研究取向的建議
5.	資訊革命與技術演化

1.	國民小學英語教師教學施為之研究:結構與施為的觀點
2.	尋找心中的那朵玫瑰花:一趟教師課程意識的敘事探究之旅
3.	社會演化典範之功能論研究：兼論湯恩比、孫中山、馬克思的整合模式

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	生產的政治經濟學到消費的文化經濟學：從階級做為施為機制的角度來考察
2.	「風險社會」中結構與行動的轉轍

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫