:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國中學生生涯建構系統之結構分析
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:金樹人許宏彬
作者(外文):Jin, Shuh-renSheu, Hung-bin
出版日期:1998
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁59-99
主題關鍵詞:國中學生生涯建構系統Junior high school studentsCareer construction systems
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:22
     本研究採用Kelly(1955)的個人建構理論應用在國中學生的生涯選擇行為上,主要 有兩個目的:(1)設計用以研究國中學生生涯建構的生涯選擇方格,以探討一般國中學生據 之判斷生涯選項、進行生涯決定時的一些重要想法;(2)其次,從這些重要想法之中,進一 步的瞭解建構彼此之間的結構關係。 本研究之研究參與者為48名台北縣市的國民中學三年級學生。本研究所採用的生涯選 擇方格,係參考Wu(1997)改良自Kelly以三角比較法所進行的自陳式集成方格,加以調整 設計,以適合國中學生使用。在國中學生的建構內容方面,抽取出這廿個生涯建構。這些建 構大多反映出外圍建構的工作價值。在生涯建構的結構分析部分,從生涯方格的五點量表以 及焦點側面圖中,得到每一位研究受訪者分化性、統整性以及衝突性等三項結構指標。根據 研究受訪者在各組生涯建構上的數量性資料,進行統計。三類結構指標所得之數據以平均數 為切截點,區分為八大類:(1)原初A型(2)原出B型(3)慎思A型(4)慎思B型(5)明辨A型(6) 明辨B型(7)篤行A型(8)篤行B型。分析的過程中,首先進行簡短的背景描述,其次呈現量 化的數據,以及描述焦點側面圖上的資料出現情形。之後,針對該類型受訪者這三個結構指 標的特性,描繪其生涯發展的狀態。最後,進一步評估與討論在進行該類型個案的諮商時, 可能的方向與建議。
     The purpose of this study is to explore the content and the structure of the career construction systems of junior high students in Taiwan. The research participants were forty-eight junior high students in grade three. A repertory grid technique based on Kelly's personal construct theory was carefully revised and adapted as research methods especially for the students in these ages. The participants were requested to finish a repertory grid and to accept an one-hour in- terview. Twenty constructs were extracted by the data of repertory grid and the test analyzed by the qualiative method of Hycner's(1985)phenomenological analysis of interview data, representing peripheral career values in its nature. As to the structure analyses, each participant's data was analyzed by the cognitive differentiation, cognitive integration, conflict ratio and the focus profile. Eight types of the participant were categorized by the degree of differentiation, integration and conflict ratio: Primitivity A, Primitivity B, Preemptiom A, preemption B, Circumspection A, Circumspec- tion B, Control A, and Control B. The nature of the career construction systems and the implications for counseling for different categories were suggested.
期刊論文
1.Bannister, D.、Mair, J. M. M.(1968)。The evaluation of personal constructs。British Journal of Guidance and Counseling,5,149-158。  new window
2.Cochran, L.(1977)。Difference between supplied and elicited construct: Considerations in career evaluation。Social Behavior and Personality,5,241-247。  new window
3.金樹人(19970600)。生涯測驗與自我覺察。測驗與輔導,142,2933-2936。  延伸查詢new window
4.Nevill, D. D.、Neimeyer, G. J.、Probert, B.、Fukutama, M.(1986)。Cognitive Structures in vocational information processing and decision making。Journal of Vocational Behavior,28,110-122。  new window
5.Neimeyer, G. J.(1989)。Testing the test: Applications of repertory grid technique to vocational assessment。Journal of Counseling and Development,67,585-589。  new window
6.Kortas, L.、Niemeyer, G. J.、Prichard, S.(1992)。Structure and style in career decision making。Journal of Career Development,18(3),199-213。  new window
7.Cochran, L.(1983)。Conflict and integration in career decision schemes。Journal of Vocational Behavior,23,87-97。  new window
8.Cochran, L.(1983)。Seven measures of ways that deciders frame their career decisions。Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance,16,67-77。  new window
9.Brook, J. A.(1992)。Use of the Repertory Grid in career counseling。Career Development Quarterly,41,39-50。  new window
10.Bodden, J.(1970)。Cognitive complexity as a factor in appropriate vocational choice。Journal of Counseling Psychology,17,364-368。  new window
11.金樹人、王淑敏、方紫薇、林蔚芳(19920600)。國民中學生涯輔導計畫規劃之研究。教育心理學報,25,125-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Hycner, R. H.(1985)。Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data。Human Studies,8(3),279-303。  new window
會議論文
1.Mau, W.(1995)。Assessing vocational constructs using the career grid: A comparison of expressed and supplied methods。The Meeting of Assessment '95。Tucson, AZ。  new window
2.夏林清(1995)。青少年升學、就業問題及其輔導對策。1995全國青年輔導會議。台北市:劍潭海外青年活動中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Landfield, A. W.(1977)。Interpretive man: The enlarged self-image。Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1976。Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press。  new window
4.行政院青年輔導委員會(1995)。跨世紀的青少年問題與對策:工作報告。1995全國青年輔導會議。台北市:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何幸娥(1993)。生涯資料介入方式對高一女生之認知複雜性、生涯決策行為與人境適配性之影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許宏彬(1997)。大學生職業建構系統之性別差異及其生涯發展狀態之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.江佩真(1996)。青少年自殺企圖的影響因素及發展脈絡之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bonarius, H.(1971)。Personal construct theory and extreme response style。Amsterdam:Swets & Zeitlinger。  new window
2.Neimeyer, R. A.(1985)。The development of personal construct psychology。Lincoln:London:University of Nebraska Press。  new window
3.Neimeyer, R. A.、Neimeyer, G. J.(1987)。Personal construct therapy casebook。New York:Springer Publishing Company。  new window
4.Slater, P.(1977)。Dimensions of intrapersonal space。New York:Wiley。  new window
5.Super, D. E.(1970)。Work Values Inventory: Manual。Boston, MA:Houghton-Mifflin。  new window
6.Wu, C. Y.(1997)。A Personal Construct Approach to the Study of Career Decision Making: A Sample of Taiwanese Undergraduates。Reading University。  new window
7.Peterson, G. W.、Sampson, J. P. Jr.、Reardon, R. C.(1991)。Career development and services: A cognitive approach。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole。  new window
8.Adams-Webber, J.(1979)。Personal construct theory: Concepts and applications。New York:Wiley。  new window
9.黃煜峰、雷靂(1995)。國中生心理學。台北:五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.行政院青年輔導委員會(1995)。現代青少年生活現況調查。台北:行政院青年輔導委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.朱智賢(1989)。心理學大辭典。北平市:北京師範大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Pervin, Lawrence A.(1989)。Personality: Theory and research。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
13.郭生玉(1993)。心理與教育研究法。臺北市:精華書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1989)。Fourth generation evaluation。Sage Publications。  new window
15.Kelly, George A.(1955)。The Psychology of personal constructs。W. W. Norton。  new window
圖書論文
1.Landfield, A. W.、Schmittdiel, C. P.(1983)。The interpersonal transaction group: Evolving measurements in the pursuit of theory。Applications of personal construct theory。Toronto:Academic Press。  new window
2.Landfield, A. W.、Cannell, J. E.(1988)。Ways of assessing functionally independent construction, meaningfulness, and construction in hierarchy。Cognition and personal structure: Computer access and analysis。New York:Prager。  new window
3.Werner, H.(1987)。The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view。The concept of development。Minneapolis。  new window
4.Shaw, M. L. G.(1978)。Interactive computer programs for eliciting personal models of the world。Personal Construct Psychology。London:Academic。  new window
5.Bieri, J.(1968)。Cognitive complexity and judgement of inconsistent information。Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook。Chicago:Rand McNally。  new window
6.Borgen, F. H.(1992)。Expanding scientific paradigms in counseling psychology。Handbook of Counseling Psychology。New York:Wiley。  new window
7.Guba, Egon G.、Lincoln, Yvonna S.(1994)。Competing paradigms in qualitative research。Handbook of qualitative research。Sage Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top