臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：遊客對公園中不當行為的知覺與其管理策略認同之研究--以臺中市鄰里公園為例
書刊名：造園學報
作者：侯錦雄 引用關係／郭彰仁 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hou, Jing-shoung／Kuo, Chang-jen
出版日期：1998
卷期：5:2
頁次：頁21-38
主題關鍵詞：不當行為知覺；情境；公園維護管理；Perception of inappropriate behavior；Situation；Park management
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:21
  • 點閱點閱:58
　　　　　本研究之目的即在於瞭解公園環境中，遊客對不當行為的知覺與不當行為管理策略認同之關係， 選取臺中市六座公園為研究基地，利用結構性問卷得到615份遊客問卷結果。依遊客知覺到的不當行為嚴重程度，分為不當行為嚴重度高、中、低等三類型；研究提出 30 項管理策略來測度遊客之認同程度，再利用因素分析簡化 30 題管理策略，結果得到六個管理策略類型，我們將其分別命名為：「宣導溝通」、「執法防範」、「主動參與」、「主動規勸」、「規範使用」及「自我約束」。本研究發現當遊客在知覺不當行為嚴重程度不同之情境下，遊客對管理策略類型的「執法防範」、「主動參與」及「自我約束」認同有顯著差異。研究結果推論「情境」因子為影響遊客對不當行為管理策略認同的影響因子，建議針對不同不當行為之情境應採取不同的管理策略。
　　　　　The purpose of this study was to understand visitors' perception of inappropriate behavior and the acceptance of inappropriate behavior managment strategies in neighborhood parks. Six parks in Taichung city were sampled, and divided them into high, medium, and low perception of inappropriate behavior types. A Likert scale with 30-item attitude statement questionnaire was used to measure visitor's acceptance of inappropriate behavior management strategies. Through factor analysis the variables representing inappropriate behavior management strategies were divided into six types and were named as education and communication, law-enforcement and prevention, practical participation, active admonition, normalized use, and self-disciplined. The results showed that, under different types of park, visitors showed different acceptance of inappropriate behavior management types. It was concluded that, under different situation of inappropriate behavior, park's managers should set up different management strategies.
期刊論文
1.Ibitayo, O. O.、Virden, R. J.(1996)。Visitor and manager perception of depreciative behavior in urban park setting。Journal of Park and Recreation Administration，14(4)，36-51。  new window
2.Kaplan, S.(1983)。A model of person-environment compatibility。Environment and Behavior，15(3)，311-332。  new window
3.羅紹麟(1985)。遊樂衝擊與森林管理。台灣林業，10(5)，1-3。  延伸查詢new window
4.Gramann, J. H.、Vander Stoep, G. A.(1987)。Prosocial Behavior Theory and Natural Resource Protection: a Conceptual Synthesis。Journal of Environmental Management，24，247-257。  new window
5.Gramann, J. H.、Vander Stoep, G. A.(1987)。The Effect of Verbal Appeals and Incentives on Depreciative Behavior among Youthful Park Visitors。Journal of Leisure Research，19(2)，69-84。  new window
6.Wellman, J. D.、Roggenbuck, J.、Smith, A. C.(1982)。Recreation Specification and Norms of Depreciative Behavior among Canoeists。Journal of Leisure Research，14(4)，323-340。  new window
7.張俊彥、蔡協欣、翁仕堯(19950900)。從環境認知觀點探討遊客破壞行為之成因分析--以臺中市中山公園為例。戶外遊憩研究，8(3)，67-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Clark, R. N.、Hendee, J. C.、Campbell, F. L.(1971)。Values, behavior, and conflict in modern camping culture。Journal of Leisure Research，3(3)，143-159。  new window
9.Hendricks, B.、Ruddell, E. J.、Bullis, C.(1993)。Direct and indirect park and recreation resource management decision making: a conceptual approach。Journal of Park and Recreation Administration，11(2)，28-39。  new window
10.Samdahl, D. M.、Christensen, H. H.(1985)。Environmental Cues and Vandalism: An Exploratory Study of Picnic Table Carving。Environment And Behavior，17(4)，445-458。  new window
11.黃茂容(1990)。利社會行為理論與自然資源保護：概念的整合。戶外遊憩研究，3(1)，37-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.林淑晴(19900300)。從環境知覺探討垃圾對遊憩體驗的影響--以日月潭為例。戶外遊憩研究，3(1)，17-30。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Ittelson, W. H.(1978)。Environmental perception and urban experience。Environment and Behavior，10(2)，193-213。  new window
學位論文
1.劉吉川(1983)。人為措施對環境美質衝擊之研究--以太魯閣峽谷為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡協欣(1995)。從環境認知觀點探討遊客破壞行為之成因分析--以台中市中山公園為例(碩士論文)。逢甲大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rutledge, A. J.、李素馨(1995)。行為觀察與公園設計。台北：田園城市。  延伸查詢new window
2.王家微(1994)。行為科學。台北：五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Altman, I.、Wohlwill, J. F.(1976)。Human Behavior and Environment。Plenum Publishing corporation。  new window
4.Hendee, J. C.、Stankey, G. H.、Lucas, R. C.(1978)。Wildness Management。USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication。  new window
5.Jubenville, A.(1978)。Outdoor recreation management。London：W.B. Saunder company。  new window
6.黃章展(1997)。A comparison between direct and indirect visitor management in outdoor recreation : A social psychological perspective。台北：田園城市文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉儒淵(1990)。遊憩資源衝擊之經營理念與策略。國立台灣大學農學院實驗林管理處。  延伸查詢new window
8.Christiansen, M. L.(1983)。Vandalism Control Management。State College, PA：Venture Publishing, Inc.。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cohen, S.(1973)。Property destruction: Motives and Meanings。Vandalism。London：Architectural Press。  new window
2.Dowing, K.、Clark, R. N.(1976)。Users' and Managers' Perceptions of Dispersed Recreation Impact: A Focus on Roaded Forest Lands。Recreational Impact on Wildland。USDA Forest Service：USDI National Park Service。  new window
3.Cook, B.(1976)。Design of campground facilities。Vandalism and Outdoor Recreation: Symposium Proceeding。Technical Coordinators。  new window
4.Knopf, R. C.、Dustin, D. L.(1992)。A Multidisciplinary Model for Managing Vandalism and Depreciative Behavior in Recreation Settings。Influencing Human Behavior: Theory and Application in Recreation, Tourism, and National Resources Management。Sagamore Publishing Co., Inc.。  new window
5.McDonough, M. H.(1986)。Role of Communication Science in Understanding Depreciative Behavior。Wildland Recreation Research。Seattle, WA：Pacific Northwest Forest Range. Exp. Stn.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：802（臺灣：798，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67379990
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上