:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:濕地利用經濟分析
書刊名:土地經濟年刊
作者:曾明遜
作者(外文):Tseng, Ming-hsun
出版日期:1998
卷期:9
頁次:頁125-140
主題關鍵詞:濕地保育價值外部效果環境機會成本市場失靈評價WetlandsPreservation valuesExternalitiesEnvironmental opportunity costMarket failureValuation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:43
  • 點閱點閱:11
     維持原始風貌的濕地利用方式可為社會大眾帶來許多正面的外部效果,但是這些外部效益在以往濕地利用決策過程中往往被忽略,因此常導致高估濕地開發價值與低估保育價值的現象。為了解與辟免忽略外部效果導致濕地資源錯置的情況,本文利用靜態與動態經濟模式分析濕地有效利用(納入外部效果)的課題,結果顯示未能將開發環境機會成本納入考量時,將導致濕地過度轉用的情況。為了修正此種「市場失靈」與避免走向「全有或全無」的發展模式,濕地保育評價將扮演一個相當重要的角色。
     Wetlands in their natural state provide many beneficial externalities for society. In the past, wetlands use policy decision process have generally failed to incorporate these social benefits into the analysis. This will lead to an overestimation of development values and underestimation of preservation values. This paper use an economic approach to debate and discussion on wetlands beneficial economic use issues. The analysis of an economic model indicates that failure to consider the environmental opportunity cost of wetlands loss will lead to excessive wetlands are converted to alternative uses. In order to correct the "market failure" and avoid "all or nothing" use pattern, wetlands conservation valuation will play an important role.
期刊論文
1.李永展、曾明遜(19951200)。不確定情況下濕地永續利用管理策略。規劃學報,22,63-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bishop, R. C.(1978)。Endangered species and uncertainty: The economics of a safe minimum standard。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,60,10-18。  new window
3.國會雙週刊(1993)。蘇煥智痛批七輕計劃。國會雙週刊,47,44-47。  延伸查詢new window
4.Barbier, E. B.(1994)。Valuing Environmental Functions: Tropical Wetlands。Land Economics,70,155-173。  new window
5.Bishop, R. C.(1979)。Endangered Species, Irreversibility/and Uncertainty: A Reply。American Journal of Agricultural Economics,61,376-379。  new window
6.Heimlich, R. C.(1994)。Costs of an Agricultural Wetland Reserve。Land Economics,70,234-246。  new window
7.Parks, P. J.、Kramer, R. A.(1998)。A Policy Simulation of Wetlands Reserve Program。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28,223-240。  new window
8.蕭代基、楊重信、傅祖壇(19930500)。永續發展的意義--經濟學的觀點。臺灣經濟預測與政策,24(1),43-61。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.戴華、何志青、張慶輝(19930500)。永續發展的規範意涵。臺灣經濟預測與政策,24(1),63-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳明健(1994)。自然資源與環境經濟學。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Mitchell, R. C.、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
3.Chiang, A. C.(1984)。Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics。New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
4.Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V.(1952)。Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
5.Kusler, J. A.(1983)。Our National Wetland Heritage: A Protection Guide book。Washington:Environmental Law Institute。  new window
6.Mitsch, W. J.、Gosselink, J. G.(1993)。Wetlands。New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
7.Silberberg, E.(1990)。The Structure of Economics: A Mathematical Analysis。New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company。  new window
8.Varian, H. R.(1992)。Microeconomic Analysis。New York:W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.。  new window
9.Freeman, A. Myrick III(1993)。The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods。Resources for the Future Press。  new window
10.Siebert, H.(1992)。Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy。Springer-Verlag。  new window
圖書論文
1.Costanza, R.(1994)。Three General Policies to Achieve Sustainability。Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability。Washington,D.C.:Island Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE