:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣菸農對菸權的願受價格之研究
書刊名:調查研究
作者:張景行 引用關係李佳珍 引用關係盧永祥 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Ching-hsingLee, Jia-janLu, Yung-hsiang
出版日期:2014
卷期:32
頁次:頁129-158
主題關鍵詞:菸農菸草種植權願受價格Tobacco farmingWillingness-to-acceptTwo-stage modelTobacco conversion program
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:66
  • 點閱點閱:52
國內外針對菸農的相關經濟分析付之闕如;因此,本研究在全臺 各菸草種植區域,針對606 個菸農進行訪談,並利用兩階段模型來分 析菸農願受價格之影響因素。在第一階段Probit 模型的實證發現, 對於菸草產業的前景愈樂觀的菸農,愈不願意接受種植權的買賣,願 意接受出價的傾向會隨著種植權的增加而降低;第二階段的2SLS 實 證發現,實際有種植行為的菸農會要求較高的售價,而且菸農私下進 行種植權租賃的成交價格對願受價格有正面的影響,而對菸草產業抱 持樂觀態度的菸農也會要求較高的願受價格。
Empirical studies on tobacco farming in Taiwan are almost nonexistent. To fill the gap, we apply a two-stage model to explore the factors that determine tobacco farmers’ willingness-to-accept (WTA) value to forfeit their contracts on growing tobacco. The results from a first-step Probit model suggest that farmers who are optimistic toward the future of the tobacco industry are less likely to sell their contracts, and large farmers, in terms of scale of cultivation, are less willing to give up their farming contracts. The second stage of our analysis relies on a two-stage least squares model. We find that WTA value is positively associated with actual farming practices, and higher previous contract trading prices lead to a higher WTA value. Consistent with the rationale in the first stage, we also find that optimism regarding the future of the tobacco industry leads to a higher WTA price.
期刊論文
1.Randall, Alan、Stoll, J. R.(1980)。Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space。The American Economic Review,70(3),449-455。  new window
2.Horowitz, John K.、McConnell, Kenneth E.(2002)。A Review of WTA/WTP Studies。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,44(3),426-447。  new window
3.Beach, R. H.、Pattanayak, Subhrendu K.、Yang, J. Chen、Murray, B. C.、Abt, Robert C.(2005)。Econometric Studies of Non-Industrial Private Forest Management: A Review And Synthesis。Forest Policy and Economics,7(3),261-281。  new window
4.Dupraz, P.、Vermersch, D.、De Frahan, H.、Delvaux, L.(2003)。The Environmental Supply of Farm Households: A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model。Environmental and Resource Economics,25(2),171-189。  new window
5.Gregory, S. A.、Conway, M. C.、Sullivan, J.(2003)。Econometric Analyses of Nonindustrial Forest Landowners: Is There Anything Left to Study?。Journal of Forest Economics,9(2),137-164。  new window
6.Jefferson, T.、Taplin, R.(2011)。An Investigation of the Endowment Effect Using a Factorial Design。Journal of Economic Psychology,32(6),899-907。  new window
7.Jones-Lee, M. W.、Hammerton, M.、Philips, P. R.(1985)。The Value of Safety: Results of a National Sample Survey。The Economic Journal,95(377),49-72。  new window
8.Lindhjem, H.、Mitani, Y.(2012)。Forest Owners' Willingness to Accept Compensation for Voluntary Conservation: A Contingent Valuation Approach。Journal of Forest Economics,18(4),290-302。  new window
9.Shogren, Jason F.、Shin, Seung Y.、Hayes, Dermot J.、Kliebenstein, James B.(1994)。Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept。American Economic Review,84(1),255-270。  new window
10.Haab, T.、McConnell, K. E.(1997)。Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,32(2),251-270。  new window
11.Willig, Robert D.(1976)。Consumer's Surplus without Apology。American Economic Review,66(4),589-597。  new window
12.Hanemann, W. Michael(1991)。Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?。The American Economic Review,81(3),635-647。  new window
13.黃宗煌(19900900)。臺灣地區國家公園之遊憩效益評估。臺灣銀行季刊,41(3),282-304。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陸雲(19900300)。環境資源估價之研究--非市場估價方法。經濟論文,18(1),93-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.洪馨蘭(20100300)。屏北平原「臺灣菸草王國」之形成--以《臺菸通訊》(1963-1990)為討論。師大臺灣史學報,3,45-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Croson, R.、Rachlinski, J. J.、Johnston, J.(2005)。Culpability as an Explanation of the WTA-WTP Discrepancy in Contingent Valuation。University of Pennsylvania。  new window
學位論文
1.陳淑君(2004)。居民對文化資產保存認知與願付價格之研究(碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.財團法人豐年社(1998)。臺灣省政府農林廳志。南投:臺灣省政府農林廳。  延伸查詢new window
2.臺灣菸酒股份有限公司(2010)。臺灣地區菸酒事業統計年報。臺北:臺灣省菸酒公賣局。  延伸查詢new window
3.行政院農業委員會(1981)。中華民國70~100 年的農業統計年報。臺北:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.臺灣省政府農林廳(1996)。臺灣省現耕釀酒葡萄農戶申請廢園輔導轉作要點。南投:臺灣省政府農林廳。  延伸查詢new window
5.Bergstrom, A. R.(1990)。Continuous Time Econometric Modelling。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.陳明健(1994)。自然資源與環境經濟學。臺北:巨流圖書公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
8.Wooldridge, Jeffrey M.(2010)。Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data。MIT Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hanemann, M.(1999)。The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA。Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE