:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:強化社區組織功能之參與式行動研究
書刊名:衛生教育學報
作者:邱詩揚劉潔心 引用關係晏涵文
作者(外文):Chiou, Shy-yangLiu, Chieh-hsingYen, Han-wen
出版日期:1999
卷期:12
頁次:頁23-47
主題關鍵詞:社區組織組織功能參與式行動研究Community organizationOrganizational functionParticipatory action research
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:72
     本研究乃「運用社區組織策略促進社區居民參與環境行為之介入研究」的社區組 織發展部分,係採取參與式行動研究法,並運用社區組織策略來強化社區組織之功能。 期 盼在研究過程中與社區一起工作,能逐步強化社區內之自發力量,使組織化後之社區能發展 出日後自行主導、運作的功能,而持續推動社區中更多、更豐富的居民共同參與的環境行動 。本研究之社區組織為台北市大安區民輝社區發展協會,共有 22 位理監事,其男女,性別 比例約為 3:4,年餘層分布以 41-50 歲居多,職業類別多為中上階層。本研究經過「社區 組織功能診所及需求評估」、「建立社區組織網絡及擬定社區工作計畫」、「整合社區資源 及執行社區工作計畫」、「成果檢討與評價」四個階段的介入過程,研究結果顯示,組織在 研究介入後行動力增加,組織成員對「組織內部運作」及「成員與組織約互動」之評價均為 中上程度。尤其對團體合作及領導者的角色方面給予高度評價。在組織與社區資源聯結方面 ,合作之組織由介入前的 3 個組織擴展為 21 個,比介入前有長足之進步。 約有六成的組 織成員認為協會推動資源回收工作使社區環境更整潔、提升了居民對社區的認同感與關心。 約五成四的組織成員認為協會推動資源回收工作使居民參與社區的資源回收工作由被動轉為 主動。此外,民輝社區之居民在介入活動後,在「垃圾分類、資源回收」為主題之環境行動 的參與上,的確達到顯著提升的立即效果(此一部份的詳細內容將另文發表)。
     The purpose of this study is to empower the function of an organization in a community-based setting within the Taipei City. The organization is a self-directed organization and its members are consisted of lay leaders in its community. The theoretical model of the research is based on Brown's model of community organization. The study is designed in a Participatory-Action-Research Approach (PARA). Ming-Hu is a small-sized, urban area community with around 5000 households, which is fitted the research criteria and therefore was selected for the study. The main strategies used in this intervention study are included: the diagnosis and needs assessment for the community organization and the coalition for the community resources. There were both qualitative and quantitative data been collected. The qualitative data collected by the indepth interviews of 22 lay leaders in the core organization. The paper documents of the organization, the meeting records among the lay leaders, the observational records, tapes, and research's working dairy are also used as part of the qualitative data. The quantitative data collected by a structure-ended questionnaire, which was used to evaluate the outcome of the organizational functions among the lay leaders. Major results are as follows: The community actions of the self-directed organization have become more powerful after the intervention. From the results of the structure-ended questionnaire, "the function of the organizational internal system" "the function of the interactive among the system and its members", "the team cooperative atmosphere" and "the function of the leader's role" have shown significantly enhanced. After the intervention stage, the organization expands its network system significantly. Its coalition units from 3 to 22. And nearly half of the 22 community resource organizations have already established the cooperative relationship with the community core organization based on a "mutual beneficial relationship" and "formal cooperative procedure".
期刊論文
1.蔡勳雄(1997)。生活環境總體營造改造計畫。環境教育季刊,33,8-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.Tandon, Rajesh(1988)。Social transformation and participatory research。Convergence,21(2/3),5-14。  new window
3.Fisher, E. B. Jr.(1995)。The results of COMMIT trial。American Journal of Public Health,85,159-160。  new window
4.Murray, D. M.(1995)。Design and analysis of community trials: Lessons from the Minnesota heart health program。American journal of epidemiology,142,569-575。  new window
5.Butterfoss, F. D.、Goodman, R. M.、Wandersman, A.(1996)。Community coalitions for pervention and health promotion。Health Education Research,8(3),315-330。  new window
6.Winkleby, M. A.、Taylor, C. B.、Jatulis, D.、Fortmann, S. P.(1996)。The long-term effects of a cardiovascular disease prevention trial: the Stanford Five-City Project。Am J Public Health,86(12),1773-1779。  new window
7.Butterfoss, F. D.、Goodman, R. M.、Wandersman, A.(1996)。Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning。Health Education Quarterly,23(1),65-79。  new window
8.Israel, B. A.、Checkoway, B.、Schulz, A.、Zimmerman, M.(1994)。Health education and community empowerment conceptualizing and measuring perceptions of individual, organizational and community control。Health Education Quarterly,21(2),149-170。  new window
9.Travers, K. D.(1997)。Reducing inequities through participatory research and community empowerment。Health Education & Behavior,24(3),344-356。  new window
10.Wals, A. E. J.、Alblas, A. H.(1997)。School-based research and development of environmental education : a case study。Environmental Education Research,3(3),153-267。  new window
11.Wilkinson, E.、Elander, E.、Woolaway, M.(1997)。Exploring the use of action research to stimulate and evaluate workplace health promotion。Health Education Journal,56,188-198。  new window
學位論文
1.葉燕燕(1995)。八十三年度臺北市十大環保社區環境行動及其影響因素之探究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.吳靜吉(1994)。追求人際關係的成長。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.McKenzie, J. F.、Jurs, J. L.(1993)。Community organization Planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs。New York:Macmillan Publishing Company。  new window
3.Ross, Murray G.(1967)。Community Organization: Theory, Principles, and Practice。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
4.Whyte, William Foote(1991)。Participatory Action Research。Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications。  new window
圖書論文
1.Minkler, M.(1990)。Improving health through community organization。Health behavior and health education。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.曾旭正(1997)。讓社區動起來--社區總體營造。行動資源手冊。宜蘭縣:宜蘭縣立文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Rothman, J.、Tropman, J. E.(1987)。Models of community organization and macro practice perspectives: Their mixing and phasing。Strategies of community organization: Macro Practice。Itasca, Illinois:F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top