:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:認知的學習理論的教學意涵及其對教學的啟示
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:鄭婉敏
作者(外文):Cheng, Wan-min
出版日期:1999
卷期:13
頁次:頁57-72
主題關鍵詞:認知學習理論教學Cognitive learning theories
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(6) 專書(3) 專書論文(5)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:39
     本文的目的在經由探討一些重要的認知學習理論對知識的形成和獲得、學習的機 制以及學習的策略的看法,來歸納出隱藏在這些看法之後的教學內涵,並由這些內涵來引伸 其對教學的啟示。文中所探討的理論包括Bruner的發現學習論、Piaget的認知發展論、 Vygotsky的認知發展論、訊息處理以及建構主義的學習論。經過分析這些理論,本文提出 認知的學習理論的教學意涵如下:賦予學習材料新意、強調學習者本身資源的可利用性、提 昇語言的功用、強調教師充分的準備與覺知、強調社會互動與情境認知的教學、強調思考的 教學、強調獲得學習工具為教學的重要目標,以及強調教學的動力性。而由這些教學意涵所 引伸出的對教學的啟示則於文末有所論述。
     The theories of Bruner's, Piaget's, and Vygotsky's plus information processing theory and constructivism were explored in terms of their viewpoints on assumptions about learning, the epistemology of learning, learning mechanism, and learning strategies. Instructional implications from these theories were proposed as follows: (a) renewing the meaning of learning materials; (b) emphasizing the utilization of resources coming from learners themselves; (c) highlighting language as both learning material and learning tool; (d) emphasizing teachers full preparation and awareness; (e) emphasizing instruction focusing on social interaction and situated cognition; (f) emphasizing teaching thinking; (g) regarding students' attaining learning tools as an important teaching goal; and (h) highlighting the dynamics of teaching. Also, insights from these instructional implications were discussed at the end of this paper.
期刊論文
1.Tessmer, M.、Wilson, B.、Driscoll, M. P.(1990)。A new model of concept teaching and learning。Educational technology research and development,38(1),45-53。  new window
2.Bonds, C.、Bonds, L.、Peach, W.(1992)。Metacognition: developing independence in learning。Clearing House,66(1),56-59。  new window
3.Cramer, S. R.(1996)。Assumptions central to the quality movement in education。The Clearing House,69,360-364。  new window
4.Johnson, J.、Carlson, S.、Kastl, J.、Kastl, R.(1992)。Developing conceptual thinking: The concept attainment model。The Clearing House,66,117-121。  new window
5.Raines, P.、Shadiow, L.(1995)。Reflection and teaching: The challenge of thinking beyond the doing。The Clearing House,68,271-274。  new window
6.LeNoir, W. D.(1993)。Teacher questions and schema activation。The Clearing House,66,349-352。  new window
7.Sternberg, R. J.(1998)。Principles of teaching for successful intelligence。Educational Psychologist,33,65-72。  new window
8.Vosniadou, S.(1996)。Towards a revised cognitive psychology for new advances in learning and instruction。Learning and Instruction,6,95-109。  new window
9.Schraw, G.、Moshman, D.(1995)。Metacognitive theories。Educational Psychology Review,7(4),351-371。  new window
圖書
1.蔡敏玲、彭海燕(1998)。教室言談:教與學的語言。臺北市:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.林清山(1997)。有效學習的方法。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hamilton, R.、Ghatala, E.(1994)。Learning and instruction。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Gunter, M. A.、Estes, T. H.、Schwab, J. H.(1990)。Instruction: A models approach。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Driscoll, M. P.(1994)。Psychology of learning for instruction。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
6.Sternberg, R. J.(1996)。Cognitive psychology。Fort Worth, TX:Harcourt Brace。  new window
7.Sprinthall, N. A.、Sprinthall, R. C.(1994)。Educational psychology: A developmental approach。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
8.West, C. K.、Farmer, J. A.、Wolff, P. M.(1991)。Instructional design: Implications from cognitive science。Boston:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
9.Gredler, M. E.(1997)。Learning and instruction: Theory into practice。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall。  new window
10.林美珍(1996)。兒童認知發展。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關期刊論文
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE