參考文獻
一、中文部分
丁惠琪（2000）。合作學習應用在國小數學教學之探究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所，台北。
丁興祥（1989）。社會心理學。台北：空中大學。
丁興富、李敬東（2005）。從黑板到交互白板的歷史進程－對資訊技術與課堂教學整合前景的展望。中國電化教育，31-35。
于富雲（2001）。從理論基礎探究合作學習的教學效益。教育資料與研究，38，22-28。
中國電化教育雜誌專題論文（2006）。交互白板促進課堂教學的創新：交互白板的工作原理和基本功能。學科信息化－現代教學，3。
方金雅、鍾易達、邱上真（1998）。國小學童閱讀摘要能力評定規範之發展。載於台南師院測驗發展中心（主編），國小教學評量的反省與前瞻（頁123-137）。台南師院測驗發展中心。
毛國楠、何英奇、周文欽、張景媛（2001）。學習輔導。台北：心理。
王文科（1991）。學習心理學－學習理論導論。台北：五南。
王正和（1979）。五年制工專學生學業成就與職業興趣、學習習慣和態度、理工性向之相關分析。高雄：復文。
王金國（2003）。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。王金國、張新仁（2003）。國小六年級教師實施國語科合作學習之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，21，53-78。
王俊良（2007）。部落格小組互評在五年級國語文大意教學之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所，嘉義。
王財印、吳百祿、周新富（2004）。教學原理。台北：心理。
王福林（1990）。新制師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其學習行為、學業成就之調查分析。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。
王磊（2000）。論遠距教學中的互動理論。電化教育研究，2004(4)，23-25。
石兆蓮（2002）。合作學習對兒童溝通表達能力影響之實驗研究。未出版博士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，台北。朱敬先（1986）。學習心理學。台北：國立編譯館。
利亞蒨（2002）。網路輔助教學在國小數學學習領域學習成效學習態度之影響研究。未出版碩士論文，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所，屏東。
吳明清（1991）：教育研究－基本觀念與方法分析。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
吳武典（1971）。從心理動力學的觀點談影響學生學習的因素。教育文摘，16(5)，5-11。
吳爭雅（2002）。團體探究法在國語科統整教學上的應用。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯（1995）。M. Q. Patton（1990）著。質的評鑑與研究。台北：桂冠圖書公司。
吳芝儀譯（2001）。資料分析。載於黃光雄主譯，R. C. Bogdan 與 S. K. Biklen著（1998）。質性教育研究：理論與方法（頁219-263）。嘉義：濤石文化事業有限公司。
吳美玲（1996）。國中補校學生自我概念、對教師教學行為的知覺與數學學習態度關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。
吳英長（1998）。國民小學國語故事體課文摘寫大意的教學過程之分析。台東師院學報，9，149-184。吳敏而（1993）。摘寫文章大意的教材教法。載於台灣省國民學校教師研究會（主編），國民小學國語科教材教法研究第三輯（頁87-101）。台灣省國民學校教師研究會。
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。教育新詞書。台北：高等教育文化事業有限公司。
吳愛玲（1999）。台北市國民小學級任教師領導行為類型與學生學習行為之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所，台北。
宋文菊（1999）。國小學童在閱讀理解實作評量上的表現分析。未出版碩士論文，國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所，台南。
李志賢（2006）。團體獎勵在資訊融入合作學習之歷程與成效研究－以數學低成就學童分數加減為例。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學教育科技研究所，嘉義。
李明昌（1997）。國民小學學生家長參與、學習態度及自我概念關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所，台中。
李秋芳（2002）：國小高年級社會科合作學習之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，屏東師範學院國民教育研究所，屏東。
李美枝（1981）。社會心理學—理論研究與應用。台北：大洋。
李美枝（2000）。社會心理學。台北：大洋出版社。
李雅惠（2006）。概念構圖教學對八年級學生閱讀理解能力與國文學習態度之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學國文教學碩士班，高雄。
李咏吟（1997）。小組教學與合作學習。載於李咏吟、單文經合著，教學原理。台北：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
李咏吟（1998）。唯考斯基的認知學說在教學的應用。教師天地，93，17-22。
沈珠帆（2008）。國民小學國語習作大意練習的內容分析。未出版碩士論文，國立臺東大學語文教育學系，台東。
周立勳（1994）。國小班級分組合作學習之研究。未出版博士論文，國立政治大學教育學系，台北。
官美媛（1999）。國小學生摘寫文章大意策略之教學研究－以五年級說明文為例。未出版碩士論文，國立東華大學教育研究所，花蓮。
官淑如（1997）。綜合高中學生學習態度及其相關因素之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所，台北。
林千惠、郭惠君（1997）。同儕個別教學對高職智能障礙學生學業表現與學習態度效果之研究。特殊教育季刊，12，125-152。
林再山（1998）。腳本合作學習對國小學生閱讀成就之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所，嘉義。
林佩璇（1991a）。合作學習的實施 (上)。研習資訊，8(5)，29-34。
林佩璇（1991b）。合作學習的實施 (下)。研習資訊，8(6)，22-25。
林國樑（1986）。語文科教學研究。台北：正中。
林宜利（2003）。「整合繪本與概念構圖之寫作教學方案」對國小三年級學童記敘文寫作表現之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，台北。
林俊賢（2004）。小學國語文摘寫大意的教學過程分析－以議論文為例。台東大學教育學報，15(2)，123-162。
林紀達（2005）。資訊融入國語文教學對學生學習態度與成就影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，佛光人文社會學院資訊學研究所，宜蘭。
林達森（2001）。合作建構教學與認知風格對國中學生生物能量概念學習之效應。未出版博士論文，國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所，台北。林淑真（2002）。國中學生班級氣氛知覺、學習態度與學業成就關係之研究：以國文科為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所，彰化。
林雅凰（2002）。小組討論概念圖學習成效之研究—以族群與群落為例。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所，嘉義。
林寶貴、錡寶香（1992）。高職階段聽障學生學習態度、成就動機及其與學業成就之相關研究。特殊教育研究學刊，8，17-32。邵瑞珍、皮連生（1989）。教育心理學。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
邱上真（1989）。知識結構的評量：概念構圖技巧的發展與試用。特殊教育學報，4，215-244。邱上真、洪碧霞（1999）。中文閱讀成分與歷程模式之建立及其在實務上的應用：評量與診斷、課程與教材、學習與教學－國語基本能力檢定診斷與協助系統之發展（國科會專題研究計劃成果報告編號：NSC88-2614-H-017-004-F18）。中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
施頂清（2000）：自我發問策略與合作學習（小組討論）對國中生國文閱讀理解的效果比較考驗。未出版碩士論文，國立中山大學教育研究所，高雄。
柯正峰（1989）。升大學補習班學生學習態度、對補習班態度及生活型態之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。
柯昔枚（2003）。合作學習對國小一年級學生國語學習成就之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
洪志成（2000）。俗民法論及其在教育上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所主編，質的研究方法（頁152-182）。高雄：麗文。
洪裕欣（2009）。國小兒童摘要能力與學業成就之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，台北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所，台北。
洪慧萍（2002）。合作學習融入閱讀教學模式對國小六年級學生閱讀理解、後設認知、閱讀動機影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，屏東師範學院國民教育研究所，屏東。
洪寶蓮（1987）。國中學生個人與環境因素對其學習行為之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。徐喬禹（2006）。合作學習與電腦概念構圖教學對國小二年級學童寫作成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所，台北。
唐璽惠（1988）。高中生英語學習動機態度師生互動親子關係、英語科成就之相關研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範學院教育研究所，高雄。秦夢群（1992）。高中教師管理心態、學生內外控與學生學習習慣與態度之關係研究。教育心理與研究，15，129-172。翁麗鵑（2004）。摘寫大意的教學—記敘文閱讀摘要策略教學設計。師友，444，64-66。
高淑清（2000）現象學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所主編，質的研究方法（頁95-132）。高雄：麗文。
高瑩真（2008）。互動式電子白板應用於國小高年級健康課程教學對不同學習風格學習者學習情形影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立新竹教育大學教育系，新竹。
涂志賢（1998）。相互教學法對國小六年級學童國語科閱讀理解、後設認知、自我效能影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所，花蓮。
時蓉華（1996）。社會心理學。台北：東華書局。
許文松（2008）。資訊融入教學輔以合作學習對國三學生數學學習成就與學習態度之影響。未出版碩士論文，銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班：桃園。
張大均、余林（1998）。文章結構分析訓練對閱讀理解水平影響的實驗研究。心理科學，21，136-139。
張世忠（2000）：建構教學理論與應用。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。張正仁（2005）。合作學習對國小六年級學生國語文學習成效與同儕互動影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所，屏東。
張坤鄉（1990）。山地與平地國中之學生在認知時態上，英語科學習行為及其對英語科教學行為知覺上之比較研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄。
張春興、楊國樞（1987）。心理學。台北：三民書局。
張春興（1989）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華書局
張春興（1996）。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北：東華。
張淑美（1992）。合作學習的意涵、實施與成效。教育文粹(22)，20-25。
張莉珍（2003）。故事構圖策略與摘要策略對增進國小六年級低閱讀能力學生閱讀理解之比較研究。未出版碩士論文，中原大學教育研究所，桃園。
張新仁（1982）。國中學生學習行為學習方法學習習慣與學習態度之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。張新仁（2002）：當代教學統整新趨勢：建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。教育學刊，18，43-64。張新仁、王金國（2003），國小六年級實施國語科合作學習之研究，教育學刊，23，111-136。張碧容、鄒慧英（2005）。國小四年級學童閱讀摘要實作表現及自我評量之研究。國立台南大學學報，39(1)，149-174。教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北：教育部。教育部國語推行委員會（2000）。國語辭典簡編本。台北：教育部。線上檢索日期：2009年9月21日。網址：http://140.111.34.46/jdict/main/cover/main.htm
莊雅茹（2005）。國小學生摘寫故事大意之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺東大學語文教育學系，台東。
莊護林，李肖蘭（2006）。在小學中文科及常識科應用互動電子白板的策略。第十一屆全球華人電腦教育應用大會中小學教師論壇：中國廣州。
莊護林、李肖蘭、邱孜御（2007）。IT board大戰傳統黑板，運用於課室教學之經驗與策略。線上檢索日期：2009年8月10日。網址：http://ms.stes.tyc.edu.tw/blog/gallery/77-2342
郭生玉（1985）。教師間接與直接行為和學童創造力及學業成績之關係。教育心理學報，18，57-84。郭生玉（1996）。心理與教育研究法。台北：精華書局。
郭生玉、陳鳳如（1995）。整合性過程導向寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作品質及寫作歷程的影響。國立台灣師範大學學報，40，1-36。郭伊黎（2008）。結合互動式電子白板協助中重度智能障礙兒童學習功能性數學成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學特殊教育學系，台中。
郭佩慧（2006）。中文閱讀摘要學習系統的發展與應用。未出版碩士論文，國立臺南大學測驗統計研究所，台南。
陳文安（2006）。國小學生摘要策略之教學研究－以六年級為例。未出版碩士論文，國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系，屏東。
陳世澎（1994）。合作學習對國小學生數學科學習影響之實驗研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺南師範學院初等教育研究所，臺南。
陳弘昌（1999）。國小語文科教學研究。臺北：五南。
陳秀慧（1984）。高中學生英文學習態度與方法之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所，台北。
陳明和（1997）：整合式學習模式對低年級學童國語文能力影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所，台東。
陳致嘉（1994）。國中學生性別、班級類型對師生互動、班級氣氛、學習態度、學業成就之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄。
陳惠邦（2006）。互動白板導入教室教學的現況與思考，台北市全球華人資訊教育創新論壇：宜蘭。
陳惠邦（2007）。以互動白板實踐互動教學理想的可能性：教師社群與專業發展觀點。Interactive Classroom研討會，北京師範大學。線上檢索日期：2009年8月17日。http://tw.classf0001.urlfelinks.com。
陳雲珠（2004）。合作學習寫作教學對國小三年級學童寫作表現及態度影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所，台北。
陳嘉成（1995）。以概念構圖為學習策略之教學對小學生自然科學習之成效研究。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北。
陳嘉成（1998）。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效研究。教育與心理研究，21，107-128。陳燕珠（2008）。以Wiimote互動白板推動資訊科技融入教學之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所，高雄。
陸又新（1999）。怎樣指導兒童歸納段落大意。國教天地，136，15-20。
曾永美（2004）。多元智能教學對國小五年級學生學習動機、學習態度與社會領域學業成就影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育研究所，高雄。
曾玉玲（1993）。台北市高智商低成就國中學生學習信念與相關因素之探討。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，台北。
游自達（1995）：情境學習論之要義。台中師院初教研究所簡訊，11，4。
湯平冶（2001）。小組合作學習對國小中年級學童識字能力閱讀理解能力暨閱讀態度影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
程仲凱（2005）。以電腦閱讀註記輔助提昇學童大意摘要的學習成效。未出版碩士論文，國立中央大學資訊工程學系，桃園。
賀淦華（1977）。現代心理學。台北：國家。
黃玉佳（2002）。概念構圖與摘要策略對不同性別學生學習成效之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立成功大學教育研究所，台南。
黃昭陵（2007）。以軟體式電子白板－JoinNet應用於「分數的四則運算」教學之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，義守大學資訊管理學系，高雄。
黃政傑、吳俊憲（2006）。合作學習：發展與實踐。台北：五南。
黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習（初版五刷）。台北：五南。
黃國禎（2008）。互動式電子白板融入國小數學領域教學之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北教育大學數學教育研究所，台北。
黃瑞琴（1994）。質的教育研究方法。台北：心理。
黃萬益（1975）。國小學童學習適應問題之研究。新竹師專學報，2，184-256頁。
黃蔓婷（2007）。自我解釋學習策略運用於國小四年級學童摘寫大意之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台南大學教育學系，台南。
黃嶸生（2002）。整合式閱讀理解策略輔助系統對國小學童閱讀能力和策略運用的效果。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系，台北。
黃瓊儀（1996）。相互教學法對國小高年級學童閱讀理解能力、後設認知能力與閱讀態度之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
黃瓊儀（2003）。不同閱讀理解策略教學對國小閱讀理解障礙學生教學成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院特殊教育研究所，台北。
楊巧玲（2000）。問題導向教學與合作學習教學策略之理論與實際。課程與教學，3(3)，121-136。楊淑蘭（2009）。高雄縣國小教師運用電子白板融入教學實施現況之調查研究－以高雄縣文華國小為例。未出版碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系，高雄。
楊韻平（1993）。兒童摘寫文章大意的能力。未出版碩士論文，國立政治大學教育學系，台北。
萬雲英（1991）。小學生獨力閱讀能力培養的實驗研究。載於楊中芳、高尚仁編，中國人．中國心－發展與教學篇（449-505頁）。台北：遠流。葉重新（1982）。教育研究法。台北：心理出版社。
葉瓊華、周台傑、詹文宏（2000）。概念構圖、自問自答及畫重點策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力及後設認知能力教學就之研究。特殊教育學報，14，189-231。
董宜俐（2003）。國小六年級學童中文閱讀理解測驗編製研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所，台中。
廖昭永（2003）。合作學習對國小學童寫作創造力成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。廖碧珠（2006）。合作學習對國國中一年級學生的數學態度與學習成就之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所，彰化。
廖國鋒、葉中桂（1988）。國防管理學院學生學業成就與家庭社經背景、成就動機及學習態度關係之研究。國防管理學院學報，9(2)，43-62。
網奕資訊（2009）。不同技術的互動電子白板比較表。線上檢索日期：2009年5月22日。網址：http://www.habook.com.tw/
趙居連譯（1995）。學習與教學。台北：心理出版社。
劉正山（2008）。交互白板環境下國小數學領域教學設計的互動研究。未出版碩士論文，台北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所，台北。
劉博、劉家勳（2005）。交互白板在教學中的應用。中小學電教－教學研究，6。
劉惠卿（2006）。概念構圖教學對國小六年級學童國語文摘寫大意學習成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立花蓮教育大學國民教育研究所，花蓮。
劉紹庭（2004）。一位小學教師實施合作學習歷程之研究－以修辭、句型為例。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院課程與教學研究所，台北。
蔡雅泰（2006）。概念構圖融入國語教學對國小五年級學童閱讀理解、大意摘要能力與語文學習態度影響之研究。未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。蔡銘津（1995）。文章結構分析策略教學對增進學童閱讀理解與寫作成效之研究。未出版博士論文。國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。蔡麗萍、吳麗婷（2004）。從概念構圖研究探討其在教學上之應用。台東特教，19，48-55。
鄭仁燦（2009）。互動式電子白板融入國小英語教學之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學教育學系，台中。
鄭昭明（1987）。認知心理學與教學研究。現代教育，2(2)，86-114。
鄭晉昌（1996）。建構主義與合作學習。教育研究雙月刊，49，14-15。
鄭婉敏（1999）。認知的學習理論的教學意涵及其對教學的啟示。台中師院學報，13，57-72。鄭紹薰（1982）。怎樣指導學生摘寫課文大意。中國語文，50(5)，45-47。
鄭發育（1972）。態度與團體關係。載於路君約等著心理學。中國行為科學社出版。
鄭惠敏（2008）。教師使用互動式電子白板於自然科教學之教學信念與師生互動個案研究。未出版碩士論文，國立新竹教育大學人資處應用科學系，新竹。
鄭博真（1999）。運用師生對話促進學生寫作表現。新世紀中小學課程改革與創新教學學術研討會論文集，國立高雄師範大學，291-297。蕭英勵（2007a）。資訊教育新趨勢－以互動式電子白板融入教學為例。中等教育，58(4)，118-130。蕭英勵（2007b）。探討中小學將互動式電子白板導入教學之策略。全國教師在職進修網教師專業發展電子報，2。線上檢索日期：2009年7月22日。http://inservice.edu.tw/EPaper/200712/indexView.aspx?EID=48。
賴保禎（1986）。學習態度測驗指導手冊。台北：中國行為科學社。
賴銳霞（2002）。合作學習對國小五年級學生國語科學習成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
錢蘋（1969）。教育心理學。台北：三民。
錢俊元（1994）。文章段落的閱讀。北京：語文出版社。
錡寶香（1999）。國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報，11，100-133。
鍾鳳香（2005）。合作學習對國小兒童閱讀表現影響之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所，屏東。
謝真華（1999）。概念構圖教學對國小四年級學童在自然科學習成效之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所，嘉義。
謝淑美（2008）。國小教師協助學生摘寫故事體文章大意之行動研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台中教育大學教育學系，台中。
謝順榮（1997）。合作學習對輕度智障學生閱讀學習成效及同儕關係之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所，台北。
簡妙娟（1999）。高中公民科合作學習教學實驗之研究。未出版博士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。簡妙娟（2003）。合作學習理論與教學應用。載於張新仁主編：學習與教學新趨勢（403-463）。台北：心理出版社。
藍瑞霓（1990）。空軍軍官學校與屏東師範學院學生對學校態度問卷調查研究。測驗與輔導，5-15。
顏菀廷（2007）。應用互動式電子白板融入國小數學教學成效之探究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北教育大學教育傳播與科技研究所，台北。
顏綠清（1980）。大學生國文態度之研究。教育學院學報，5，3-125。
魏靜雯（2003）。心智繪圖與摘要教學對國小五年級學生閱讀理解與摘要能力之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所，台北。
羅瑞玉（1993）。班都拉社會學習論及其在生活教育上之涵義。高市文教，49，15-21。
羅秋昭（1996）。國小語文科教材教法。台北：五南。
鐘樹椽（1996）。國小學生電腦合作學習之研究：小組友誼、獎勵結構和學生因素之探討。台北：師大書苑。
鐘樹椽、林菁（1994）。問題引導式電腦合作學習在槓桿學習成就上之研究。國立嘉義師範學院學報，8，57-92。
貳、英文部分
Adams, D. M., & Hamm, M. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum. Illinois: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Alice, U. S. (1994). A decision-making model for curricular adaptations in cooperative groups. In Thousand, J. S., Villa, R. A. & Nevin, A. I. (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 59-77). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. M. Murchison (Ed.). Handbook of social psychology. Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
Anderson , V. & Hidi, S. (1989).Teaching students to summarize: By following several simple precepts, teachers can help their students learn to select important ideas and to condense text. Educational Leadership, 46(4), 26-28.
Armstrong, V. & Currna, S. (2005). Developing a Collaborative Model of Research Using Digital Video. Paper presented at the Computers and Learning (CAL) Virtual Learning Conference, Bristol, 4-6.
Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., Thompson, I. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: these of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469.
Asher, S. R. & Markell, R. (1974). Sex differences in comprehension of high- and low-interest reading material. Journal of Psychology, 66, 680-687.
Atkinson, A. H. & Green, V. P. (1990). Cooperative learning: The teachers’ role. Childhood Education, 67(1), 8-11.
Aulls, M. W. (1978). Developmental and remedial reading in the middle grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 19(1), 4–7.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice -Hall.
Bank, B. J., Briddle, B. J., & Good, T. L.(1980). Sex roles, Classroom instruction and reading achievement - spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal,14, 51-71
Bean, T. W., Sorter, J., Singer, H., & Frazee, C. (1986). Teaching students how to make predictions about events in history with a graphic organizer plus options guide. Journal of Reading, 739-745.
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Primary Schools: towards an effective transition framework. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327-348.
BECTA (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Retrieved July.5. 2009 from http://www.becta.org.uk/re search.
BECTA (2004).Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard - a guide for primary school. Retrieved July.5. 2009 from http://www.becta.org.uk/re search.
Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive white- boards help? Retrieved from February 12, 2009 from the World Wide Web：http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland _am.pdf.
Belcher, V. C. (1984). The effects of induced mental imagery upon the reading comprehension of above and below average third and fourth grade students. Unpublished dissertation, University of Maryland College Park.
Bell, M. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard ? Retrieved July 12 2009 from http://teachers.net/ gazette/JAN02/mabell.html
Birch J. (2003). Using an electronic whiteboard. Retrieved July 12 2009 from http:// www.bucksict.org.uk/Teacher%Resources/DownloadDocs/Curriculum/ Whiteboards.doc.
Blane, D. (2003). Access across the board. Times Educational Supplement, 15.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacan.
Boyd, S. L., & Tompkins, R. S. (1992). Preparing pre-service teachers to implement cooperative learning successfully. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 203-206.
Boyle, J. (2002). Virtual magic. Times Educational Supplement, 26 April 2002.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cooking, R.R. (2002). “How people learn :brain, mind, experience and school.” National Academy Press, Washington DC.
Brown, A. L., & Day, J. D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing text : The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural unit of prose passages : A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S. (1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Burden, K. (2002). Learning from the bottom up – the contribution of school based practice and research in the effective use of interactive whiteboards. Learning and Skills Research – Making an Impact Regionally Conference. The Earth Centre. Doncaster.
Calhoun, E. (1993). Action research: Three approaches. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 62-65。
Carter, A. (2002). Using interactive whiteboards with deaf children. Retrieved July 8 2009 from http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/activities/intranet/teacher/ ict/whiteboards index.htm.
Caswell, R. M., & Heim, K. (1988). The use of mapping as a mediating strategy by poor readers to produce written summaries. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311399).
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1) 5-23.
Clarke, C. (2004). Secretary of State for the Education and Skills, Retrieved 7 June 2009 from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ictinschools/index.cfm
Clemens, A., Moore, T. & Nelson B. (2001). Math intervention ‘SMART’ project (student mathematical analysis and reasoning with technology). Retrieved 7 July http://www. smarterkids.org/research/paper10.asp.
Cogill, J. (2002). The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary classroom: what is effective practice and how does this relate to effective practice in teaching with ICT? BECTA Research Conference 2003: Proving Effective Practice with ICT. Retrieved July. 8. 2009 from http://www.becta.org.uk/research/research. cfm? section=1&id=2854.
Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of education Research, 64, 1-35.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S. E. (1987). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED284181)
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics and science. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Bobert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Edlbaum.
Commission, E. (2003). Elearning : better elearning then for Europe. Location : European commission, directorate – general for education and culture. Luxemburg.
Cox, J. et al.(1984). Cooperative learning: AN innovative approach to teaching to teaching reading theory and practice. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED140979).
Damcott, D., Landato, J., Marsh, C. & Rainey, W. (2000). Report on the use of the smart board interactive whiteboard in physical science. Retrieved June 22 2009 from http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper3.asp.
Davidson, N. (1994). Cooperative and collaborative learning: An integrative perspective. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp.13-30). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
DfES (2004). Interactive Whiteboards. Retrieved June 22 2009 from http://www. teachernet.gov.uk/educationoverview/briefing/curentstrategy/interactivewhiteboards/.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 61(2). 239-264.
Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practice for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.) What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Edwards, J., Hartnell, M. & Martin, R. (2002). Interactive whiteboards: some lessons for the class-room. Micromath, 18(2), 30–34.
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Strategies for teachers. Allyn & Bacon.
Ekhami, L. (2002). The power of interactive whiteboards. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 18(8), 35–38.
Ellis, A. K. (2001). Research on educational innovations. NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
Englert, C.S. and Hiebert, D.H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 , 65-74.
Eskicioglu, A. & Kopec, D. (2003) . The Ideal Multimedia-Enabled Classroom: Perspectives from Psychology, Education, and Information Science. Retrieved March 18 2009 from http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~kopec/Publications/ new/ASEE2003final.pdf.
Evertson, C. M., Emmer E. T. , Clements, B. S. , Sanford, J. P. , & Worsham, M. E. (1994). Classroom management for elementary teachers. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.
Farivar, S. & Webb, N. M. (1994). Helping and getting help - Group problem solving. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 521-525.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1995). Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 10(2), 69-75.
Fernandez, J. & Luftglass, M. (2003). Interactive whiteboards: A powerful learning tool. Principal, 83(1), 63.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I.(1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology , 21, 1-9.
Flanders N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fletcher, G. H. (2006). Imagine the possibilities. T. H. E. Journal, 33(16), 6.
Gage J. (2002). So what is an electronic whiteboard? Should you want one? Micromaths, 18, 5–7.
Garner, R. (1982). Efficient text summarization: Costs and benefits. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 275-279.
Gatlin, M. (2004). Interactive Whiteboard System Creates "Active Classrooms" for Rural Georgia School System. T. H. E. Journal, 31(6), 50-52.
Gerard, F. et al. (1999). Using SMART Board in foreign language classrooms. Paper presented at SITE 99: Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference. San Antonio, Texas.
Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1997). The effects of training in cooperative learning on differential student behavior and achievement. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(1), 1-9.
Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001a). Missioners, tentative and luddites: leadership challenges for school and classroom posed by the introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK, paper presented at the BEMAS Conference, Newport Pagnell, October.
Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001b). Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information. Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257–275.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2005a). The interactive whiteboard : a literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2005b). Leadership implications of using interactive whiteboards - linking technology and pedagogy in the management of change. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(5), 27-30.
Goldman, S.R. (2003). Learning in complex domains: when and why do multiple representations help? Learning and Instruction 13, 239 –244.
Goodson, T. (2003). Integration ICT in the classroom: a case study of two contra sting lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5), 549 -566.
Graves, T. (1991). The controversy over group rewards in cooperative classroom. Educational Leadership, 48(7), 77-79.
Greenwald, A. G. (1990). Why are attitude important? In attitude structure and Function. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Greiffenhagen C. (2002). Out of the office into the school: electronic whiteboards for education. Retrieved July 26 2009 from http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/ work/christian.greiffenhagen/ pub/boards/.
Gunter, M. A., Estes, T. H., & Schwab, J. H. (1990). Instruction: A models approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hadderman, M.(1992). Cooperative learning in elementary school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED342088)
Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Original article: Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21(2), 102-117.
Hamm, M., & Adams, D. (1992). The collaborative dimensions of learning. Ablex Publishing Co.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinso, P. (1990). Ethnography Principle in Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Hare, V. C., & Bingham, A. B.(1986). Teaching students’ main idea comprehension: Alternatives to repeated exposures. In J. F. Baumann (Ed.), Teaching main idea comprehension (pp.179-194). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hare, V. C., & Borchardt, K. M. (1984). Direct instruction of snmmarization skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 62-78.
Hare, V. C., Rabinowitz, M., & Schieble, K. M.(1989). Text effects on main idea comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 24(1) , 72-88.
Hauserman, C. (1992). Seeking an effective cooperative learning strategy. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 185-190.
Head, M. H., Readence, J. E., & Buss, R. R.(1989). An examination of summary writing as a measure of reading comprehension. Reading instruction and instruction, 28(4), 1-11.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473-493.
Higgins, D., Beauchamp, G. & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the Literature on Interactive Whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.
Higgins, D., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H. & Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. University of Newcastle.
Hilke, E. V. (1990). Cooperative Learning. Bloomington: Phi Detta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Hillman, D., Willis. J. & Gunawardena, N. (1994). Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education : An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2).
Holmberg, B. (1995). Theory and practice of distance education. New York: Routledge.
Holubec, E. J. (1992). How do you get there from here? Getting started with cooperative learning. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 181-184.
Hycner, R. C. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279-303.
Jackson, A. M. (1995). The cooperative group research paper project: Using cooperative learning principles for research in the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teachers (pp.385-406). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Jacobs, G. M. (1990). Foundations of cooperative learning. Retrieved July 26. 2009 from http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Thebes/1650/foundati.htm.
Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (1999). Methods for Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Jamerson, J. (2002). Helping all children learn: action research project. Retrieved June 16 2009 from http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper15.asp.
Jaques, D. (1994). Learning in group (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Jewitt, C., Moss, G., & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teacher’s design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 303-317.
Jitendra, A. K., Hoppes, M. K., & Xin, Y. P. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 127-139.
Johnson, C. (2002). The writing’s on the board. Educational Computing & Technology, 58–59.
Johnson, D. D., & P. D. Pearson. (1984). Teaching reading vocabulary (2nd ed.). New York, Holt : Rinehart and Winston.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989a). Cooperation and competition: Theory and Research. Minnesota: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989b). Social skills for successful group work. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 29-33
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and Research (pp.23-37). New York: Praeger Publishers.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992a). Implementing cooperative learning. Contemporary Education, 63(3), 173-180.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992b). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative group: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. (pp. 174-199). NY: Cambridge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1992c). Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy. In N. Davidson & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning. (pp.120-137). NY: Teachers college.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R.T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Using the structured academic controversy strategy to teach language arts. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teachers. (pp.357-384). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998a). Cultural diversity and cooperative learning. In J. W. Putnam (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion (2nd ed.). (pp.67-85). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1998b). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myers. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups.(pp.9-35). New York: Plenum Press.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999a). Learning together and alone: Cooperative , competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999b). Learning together. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.51-65). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999c). Structuring academic controversy . In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.66-81). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994a). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994b). Cooperative learning in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1995). Learning together in the language arts classroom: Practical applications. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.49-70). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Holubec, E. J., & Roy, P. (1984). Circles of learning: Cooperation in classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved Sep 17 2009 from http://www.clcrc.com/pages/ cl-methods.html
Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1992). Models of teaching. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Kagan, S. (1989). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 12-15.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. CA.
Kagan, S. (1998). New cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, and inclusion. In J. W. Putnam (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion (2nd ed.) (pp.105-136). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (1999). The structural approach: Six keys to cooperative learning. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.115-136). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Kagan, S., & Stone, J. M. (1995). Co-op Co-op in the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.299-318). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Kauchak, D. P., & Eggen, P. D. (1998). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (3rd ed.). Allen & Bacon.
Kelman, H.C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.
Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(12), 101–116.
Kennewell, S. (2004). Researching the Influence of Interactive Presentation Tools on Teacher Pedagogy. Paper presented at British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Manchester, UK.
Kenyon, G. S. (1968). A conceptual model for characterizing. Physical activity. Research Quarterly, 39, 96-105.
Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E.,& Miller, N.(1969). Attitudes change. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ins.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85 (5), 363-394.
Knight, G. P., & Bohlmeyer, E. M. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement: Methods for assessing causal mechanisms. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp.1-22). New York: Praeger Publishers.
Knight, P., Pennant, J. & Piggott, J. (2004). What Does It Mean to ‘Use the Interactive Whiteboard’ in the daily Mathematics Lessons? MicroMath, 20(2), 14 -16.
Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problem of social psychology. NY: Mcgraw-Hill book co.
Latham, P. (2002). Teaching and learning primary mathematics: the impact of interactive whiteboards. North Islington Education Action Zone: BEAM research papers. Retrieved July 21 2009 from http://www.beam.co.uk/pdfs/ RES03.pdf.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leal, D. J. (1993). The power of literary peer-group discussion: How children collaboratively negotiate meaning. The Reading Teacher, 47(2), 114-120
Lee, F.-L., Pun, S.W., Li, S.C., Kong, S.C., Chan, Y.Y.R., & Ip, W.H.C. (2006). The Development of Using Interactive Whiteboards in Enhancing Learning and Teaching in School.. Unpublished working paper at EMB, HK.
Lee, M. & Boyle, M. (2003). The Educational Effects and Implications of the Interactive Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School. Richardson Primary School: ACT, Australia, Retrieved July 27 2009 from http://www. richardsonps. act.edu.au/RichardsonReview_Grey.pdf.
Lehr, S.(1988). The child’s developing sense of theme as a response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 337-357.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools :a developmental study. Retrieved May 3 2009 from http:// dis. shef. ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park.
Lipsky, C. K. (1981). The modification of students' attitudes toward disabled persons.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED207287）.
Lotan, R., & Whitcomb, J. A. (1995). Poetry in groupwork: Complex instruction in the language arts literature classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.319-344). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Lukens, R. J.(2005). A Critical Handbook of Children's Literature (5th eds) . Chicago, IL: Scott, Foresman & Co..
Lyman, L., Foyle, H. C., & Azwell, T. S. (1993). Cooperative learning in the elementary classroom. A National Education Association Publication.
Mcallister, W. (1995). Are pupils equipped for group work without training or instruction? British Educational Journal, 21(3), 395-404.
McCormack, R. L. (1993). What shall we say when the teacher’s away? A look at a second grade peer response group. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference.
McLean, D. L. (1992). Cooperative learning: Theory to practice in the young child’s classroom. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED343667).
McManus, S. M., & Gettinger, M. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. The Journal of Educational Research, 90 (1), 13-22.
Merrett, S., & Edwards, J. (2005). Enhancing mathematical thinking with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath. 21(3), 9-12.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miller, D. (2003). Developing interactive whiteboard activity. Micromath, 19, 33–35.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2) , 1-6.
Morrison, D. (2003). From chalkface to interface – the impact of the interactive whiteboards in the history of the classroom. Retrieved May 29 2009 from http://www. ngflscotland.gov.uk/ nq/Chalkface.asp.
Murray, F. B. (1994). Why understanding the theoretical basis of cooperative learning enhances teaching success. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp.3-11). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Myers, J. J. (1995). Promoting purposeful talk in the cooperative language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.407-422). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Nagel, G, K. (2001). Effective grouping for literacy instruction. Allyn & Bacon
Nattiv, A. (1986). The effects of cooperative learning instruction strategies on achievement among sixth grade social studies students. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Nevin, A. I., Smith, K. A., & Udvari-Solner, A. (1994). Cooperative group learning and higher education. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp.115-126). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Nist, S.L., & Simpson, M. (2002). College studying. Reading Online, 5(8). Retrieved May 29 2009 from http://www.readingonline.org/ articles/art_index.asp? HREF= handbook/nist/ index.html.
Orlich, D. C., Kauchak, D. P., Harder, R. J., Pendergress, R. A., Callahan, R. C. Keogh, A. J., & Kravas, C. H. (1998). Teaching strategies: A guide to better instruction (5th ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Parker, R. E. (1985). Small-group cooperative learning improving academic, social gains in the classroom. NASS Bulletin, 69(47), 48-57.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research Method. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.。
Pearson, P. D., & Johnston, D. D. (1978). Teaching Reading Comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pressley, M., Cariglia-Bull, T., & Deane, S. (1987). Short-term memory, verbal competence, and age as predictors of imagery instructional effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 43, 194-211.
Priest, Q. G., Lockhart, C., & Stahl, R. J. (1995). Student teams-achievement divisions (STAD): Applications to the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.181-212). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Putnam, J. W. (1993). The process of cooperative learning. In J. W. Putnam (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom (pp.15-40). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Putnam, J. W. (1997). Cooperative learning in diverse classroom. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rambis, K. A. (1993). Evaluation criteria for small group discussions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, A. (2002). Effective questioning in teaching mathematics using an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 18(2), 8–12.
Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., & Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422-438.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco: Jossey-bass Inc., Publishers.
Rosenberg, M. J.& Hovland, C. I.(1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioral components of attitudes. Inc.
Roy, P. (1995). Cultivating cooperative group process skills within the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teachers (pp.17-48). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Schultz, J. L. (1989). Cooperative learning: Refining the process. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 43-45.
Schwarz, R. M. (1994). Ground rules for groups. Training & Development, 48(8), 46-53.
Schwier, R. A., & Misanchuk, E. R. (1993) Interactive multimedia instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publication.
Scott, W. A.（1969）. Attitude Measurement. In G. Lindzey, K.,＆E.Aronson（Ed）. The handbook of Social Psychology. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley.
Selinger, B., Huston, B., & Fortune, J. (1993). Starting at the top: Using hierarchical structure to train college students to summarize. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED364296)
Sharan, S. (1999). Cooperative learning and the teacher. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.336-348). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1989). Group investigation expands cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 17-21.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sharan, Y., & Sharan, S. (1999). Group investigation in the cooperative classroom. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.97-114). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1966). The Psychology of Ego-Involvements: Social Attitudes and Identifications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Simich-Dudgeon, C. (1998). Classroom strategies for encouraging collaborative discussion. August 12 2009 from http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/ncbepubs/directions/ 12.htm
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M. & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning and the cooperative school. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 7-13.
Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Comprehensive cooperative learning models: Embedding cooperative learning in the curriculum and the school. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp.261-283). New York: Praeger Publishers.
Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative group: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. (pp. 145-173). NY: Cambridge.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). A practical guide to cooperative learning. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43-69.
Slavin, R. E. (1999). Student teams-achievement divisions. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.3-19). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1999). Team assisted individualization and cooperative integrated reading and composition. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.20-33). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Stevens, R. J. (1989). Cooperative learning models for the 3 R’s. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 22-28.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., & Stevens, R. J. (1995). Cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC): Applications for the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.345-356). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Smith, A. (1999). Interactive whiteboard evaluation. Retrieved August 6 2009 from http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/pubs/smartboard.htm.
Smith, H. (2001). Smart Board evaluation. Retrieved August 10 2009 from http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/whiteboards/report.html
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005) Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 21, 91-101
Solomon, R. D., Davidson, N., & Solomon, E. C. L. (1992). Some thinking skills and social skills that facilitate cooperative learning. In N. Davidson & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning. (pp.101-119). NY: Teachers college.
Stahl, R. J. (1994). The essential elements of cooperative learning in the classroom. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED370881).
Stahl, R. J. (1995a). Cooperative learning: A language arts context and an overview. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.1-16). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Stahl, R. J. (1995b). Forming heterogeneous groups and computing base scores, improvement points, bonus points, and grades within a cooperative learning context: Practical guidelines or language arts teachers. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.71-110). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Stahl, R. J., & Priest, Q. G. (1995). Teams-games-tournament (TGT): Applications to the language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teachers (pp.213-234). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Stahl, R. J., Stahl, N. N., & Stahl, M. Y. (1995). Using group investigation successfully within language arts classroom. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.267-298). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
STCC (2002). Student perceptions of the use and educational value of technology at the STCC Retrieved August 15 2009 from http://www.stcc.cc.tx.us/~research/ reports/pdfs/Student_Perceptions_Technology.pdf
Stephens, C. D. (2000). Forget the sailboard-let’s go white boarding! Dental Update, 27(5), 236–240.
Stevens, R.J. (1988). Effects of strategy on the identification of the main idea expository passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 21-26.
Stice, C. F., & Alvarez, M. C. (1986). Hierarchical concept mapping: Young children learning how to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 274946).
Stone, J. M., & Kagan, S. (1995). Integrated language arts instruction: The structural approach. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teachers (pp.111-138). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand oaks: SAGE.
Sutherland, R., Breeze, N., Gall, M., Godwin, S., Matthewman, S., Shortis, T., & Triggs, P. (2002). Pedagogy and Purpose for ICT in Primary Education. Retrieved August 23 2009 from http://www.interactiveeducation.ac.uk/out_ sut.pdf.
Svanaes, D. (2000). Understanding Interactivity: Steps to a Phenomenology of Human - Computer Retrieved August 6 2009 from http://dag.idi.ntnu.no/ interactivity.pdf
Thomas, A. (2002). The white stuff. Times Educational Supplement. 24-28.
Thomas, A. (2003). Little touches that spell success. Times Educational Supplement, 35-38.
Thomas, W. J. & Znaniecki, F. J. (1918). The polish peasant in Europe and America. Boston: Badger.
Topping, K. (1988). The peer tutoring handbook: Promoting co-operative learning. Cambridge: Brookline Books.
Towel, M.(1982). Learning how to be a student when you have a learning disability. Journal of learning disability ,15 ,90-93.
Udvari-Solner, A. (1994). A decision-making model for curricular adaptations in cooperative groups. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp.59-77). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Utsumi, M. C., & Mendes, C. R. (2000). Researching the attitudes towards Mathematics in basic education. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 237-244.
VanSickle, R. L., & Bailey, S. K. (1995). Jigsaw II: Cooperative learning with “ expert group” specialization in language arts. In R. J. Stahl (Ed.), Cooperative learning in language arts: A handbook for teacher (pp.139-158). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Vermette, P. J. (1998). Making cooperative learning work: Student teams in K-12 classroom. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Villa, R. A., & Thousand, J. S. (1994). One divided by two or more. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp.79-101). Virginia: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wagner, E.D. (1994). In Support of a Functional Definition of Interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-9.
Walker, D. (2002). White Enlightening. Times Educational Supplement, 19.
Walker, D. (2003). Quality at the Dockside. TES Online. 66 -67.
Wasserman, B. L. (1979). Incomplete pictures and retarded children’s oral prose learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED271 938)
Webb, N. M. (1985). Verbal interaction and learning in peer-directed groups. Theory into Practice, 24 (1), 32-39.
Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small group. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366-389.
Webb, N. M. (1997). Assessing students in small collaborative groups. Theory into Practice, 36 (4), 205-213.
Weinstein, R. S. (1982). Student perceptions of schooling. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED221553)
Weisberg, R.,& Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers’ metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Reading, Writing, and Learning disabilities, 6, 117-136.
Wiggins, J. & Ruthmann A. (2002). Music teachers’ experiences: learning through SMART board technology. Retrieved August 27 2009 from http://www. smarterkids.org/research/29paper14.asp.
William, J. P., Taylor, M. B., & Decani, J. S. (1984). Constructing macrostructure for expository text. Journal of Educational psychology, 76 , 1065-1075.
Williams, J.P., Taylor, M.B., & Ganger S. (1981). Text variations at the level of the individual sentence and the comprehension of simple expository paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(6), 851-865.
Winograd, P. N. (1984). Strategic difficulties in summarizing text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 404-425.
Wittrock, M. C. (1978). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
Wohl, A., & Klein-Wohl, E. (1999). Teaching and learning the language arts with cooperative learning methods. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Handbook of cooperative learning methods (pp.177-192). Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Wood, C. (2001). Interactive whiteboards – a luxury too far? Teaching ICT 1, 2.
Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn, 2nd Edition. Retrieved August 27 2009 from http://www.bucksict.org.uk/ Teacher% 20Resources/DownloadDocs/ Curriculum/Whiteboards.doc.