:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:劉大櫆「因聲求氣」說之理論與驗證
書刊名:臺中師院學報
作者:楊淑華
作者(外文):Yang, Shu-hua
出版日期:1999
卷期:13
頁次:頁219-239
主題關鍵詞:劉大櫆因聲求氣古文
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:69
     清代論文,倡復唐宋,推崇「古文」,自初葉而然。至桐城立說,始以「義法」 深化其思想內涵、辯析其形式特徵。故桐城論古文最講求誦讀的功夫,殆因桐城派著重文章 聲律,以為須透過朗讀諷誦、品味字句等具體途徑,親自體驗文詞的音節美感,方得以會通 作者欲表達的思想情感,故有所謂『因聲求氣』說之提出。 今逆溯其源,殆承齊梁對聲律之認識、與唐宋古文家以熟讀經書為作文根柢之觀念而來, 但由觀念提出而至於理論建立,應非一蹴而幾,期間必有其遠承前說、開拓觀點、奠定理論 基礎者,劉大櫆「神氣音節字句」之提出,即為確立『因聲求氣』說之關鍵。 而後綜觀《論文偶記》及諸文集等論述,可知海峰首先確立「古文」之藝術特質,並對 聲—氣關係之領會特多,故其說除融貫韓愈、柳宗元等古文家之讀書心得,更以神主氣,以 聲律、字句探求「氣」,建立「古文」藝術形式之完整層次,為習文者指明具體之路徑—聲 律、字句,與學習方法—因聲求氣。 同時,驗之於海峰評點《古文辭類纂》論辨類之部分篇章,更可與其論文氣之說相互發 揮,而知海峰評文確實循以「因聲求氣」之準則。惟其所謂之「氣」,乃較偏重文章辭氣、 語勢等而言;而其所求之「文氣」亦較偏好雄渾、勁健而簡峻者,正與其本身才雄而氣肆之 情性相符。
     Beginning from the early days of the dynasty, Qing writings advocate a revival of Tang and Song learning and heap praise upon "classical prose." As for the thinkers of the Tungcheng School, in the beginning they believed in using "righteousness and law" to enrich the content of their thought and dissect the formal characteristics of classical prose. The Tungcheng School consequently argued that classical prose required skillful oral recitation. Tungcheng School emphasized rhythmic intonation, believed it was necessary to recite literature out loud and appreciate the words and phrases, and advocated personally experiencing the beauty of the syllables of the language in order to understand the thoughts and feelings that the author had wished to express ; consequently this school proposed the so-called "seeking qi from the sound" approach. If we wish to trace the origin of this approach, it may be possible to trace it back to Cheng Qiliang's understanding of rhythmic intonation and the view of the classical Tang and Song dynasty prose writers that familiarity with the Confucian classics was the foundation of literary composition. However, going from the proposal of a view to the establishment of a theory is not something that can be done on the first try ; the process must include long-standing prior ideas, the development of a point of view, and consolidation of a theoretical foundation. Liu Dakui's proposal of "divinely inspired syllables, words, and phrases" was a key to the establishment of the theory of "seeking qi from the sound." An overview of "random Notes on Essay-Writing" and various collections of writings shows that Hai Feng's first proposal of the artistic characteristics of "classical prose," and qi, incorporates the ideas concerning literary appreciation of such classical prose authors as Han Yu and Liu Zongyuan, and also advocates the precedence of spirit over qi. Hai Feng's use of rhythmic intonation and words and expressions to pursue "qi" and establish the final level of "classical prose" as an art form points out a specific route for aspiring writers-rhythmic intonation, and words and phrases and a learning method- "seeking qi from the sound." The test of these ideas in some of the chapters of "Classified Literary Dection from Classical Prose" containing Hai Feng's added punctuation fully conforms to his explanation of literary style, and shows us that Hal Feng's punctuation ideed follows the principle of "seeking qi from the sound." However, his "qi" more-or-less refers to the diction and style of a piece a writing, while he seeks a "literary spirit" that leans towards forceful, vital, and austere, as one would expect from his talented and vigorous character.
期刊論文
1.柯萬成(19900100)。韓愈「以文為詩」的問題。孔孟月刊,28(5)=329,44-50。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郁沅(1982)。桐城派美學理論中的《神氣說》。江淮論壇,1982(6)。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳孟復(1982)。建國以來關於桐城派問題研究討論情況綜述。江淮論壇,1982(5)。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳孟復(1982)。桐城派三題。江淮論壇,1982(4),78-87。  延伸查詢new window
5.汪洋(1982)。韓愈姚鼐文學觀之異同。江淮論壇,1982(3)。  延伸查詢new window
6.顧易生(1982)。方苞姚鼐的文論及其歷史地位。江淮論壇,1982(2)。  延伸查詢new window
7.杜若(19831200)。桐城方苞。臺肥月刊,24(12),37-44。  延伸查詢new window
8.張春榮(19890200)。姚惜抱著述知見錄。中國學術年刊,10,399-411。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.萬陸(1983)。簡論桐城派出現的歷史必然性。江淮論壇,1983(2)。  延伸查詢new window
10.王鎮遠(1983)。桐城詩派詩論初探。江淮論壇,1983(2)。  延伸查詢new window
11.李伯平(19840800)。桐城吳汝綸的生平志業。臺肥月刊,25(8),43-50。  延伸查詢new window
12.曾錦坤(19880700)。桐城後學論古文八要。東方雜誌,22(1),39-45。  延伸查詢new window
13.馮永敏(19930600)。劉大櫆「論文偶記」探賾。臺北市立師範學院學報,24,215-235。  延伸查詢new window
14.李娟(19840700)。桐城派·湘鄉派·賀濤。臺肥月刊,25(7),27-30。  延伸查詢new window
15.葉龍(19941200)。戴名世與桐城派三祖的文論。國立編譯館館刊,23(2),145-169。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.鄭美慧(1994)。劉海峰論文偶記研究(碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃雅淳(1995)。劉大櫆散文研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張春榮(1988)。姚惜抱及其文學研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉大櫆(1874)。海峰文集。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉大櫆。海峰文集。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉大櫆。劉大櫆集。上海。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉大櫆(1847)。論文偶記。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳闓生(1970)。桐城吳氏古文法。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳闓生(1969)。吳評《古文辭類纂》。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.劉大櫆。海峰詩集。台大研究生圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.劉大櫆。海峰小稱集。國家圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.姚翠慧(1988)。方望溪文學研究。臺北:文史哲。  延伸查詢new window
10.朱任生(1984)。古文法纂要。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉師培(1976)。捍衛六朝專家文研究。臺北:臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.范文瀾(1972)。文心雕龍註。臺北:明倫。  延伸查詢new window
13.王鎮遠(1991)。桐城派。臺北:國文天地。  延伸查詢new window
14.張滌華(1990)。古代詩文總集選介。臺北:國文天地。  延伸查詢new window
15.周振甫(1990)。怎樣學習古文。臺北:國文天地雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉聲木、徐天祥(1989)。桐城文學淵源撰述考。安徽:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
17.杜松柏(1993)。桐城於「義法」縱錯意見。香港:新亞書院。  延伸查詢new window
18.朱自清(1982)。詩言志辨。臺北:臺灣開明書店。  延伸查詢new window
19.胡楚生(1991)。韓柳文新探。臺北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
20.王基倫(1996)。韓柳古文新論。里仁書局。  延伸查詢new window
21.劉大櫆、吳孟復(1990)。劉大櫆集。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.葛曉音(1990)。漢唐文學的嬗變。北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.劉師培(1965)。論文雜記。劉申叔先生遺書。臺北:大新書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.錢穆(1983)。雜論唐代古文運動。中國學術思想史論叢。台北:東大圖書。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE