資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.116.90.11)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
易地移民搬遷對農戶生態系統服務依賴度的影響--來自陜南的證據
書刊名:
中國人口.資源與環境
作者:
李聰
/
康博緯
/
李萍
/
高夢
出版日期:
2017
卷期:
2017(11)
頁次:
115-123
主題關鍵詞:
易地移民搬遷
;
生態系統服務
;
生態系統服務依賴度指數
;
農戶
;
陜南
;
Relocation and resettlement program
;
Ecosystem services
;
Index of human dependence on ecosystem services
;
Household
;
South Shaanxi Province
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:4
為從微觀農戶視角分析易地移民搬遷對生態系統服務依賴度的影響,本文構建了農戶生態系統服務依賴度指數,將農戶從生態系統服務中獲取的各種收益進行整合和量化,利用在陜南安康地區的入戶調研數據,對比分析不同搬遷類型和特征家庭的生態系統服務收益和依賴度差異,并進一步檢驗易地移民搬遷對農戶生態系統服務依賴度的影響。結果發現:搬遷戶獲得的生態系統總凈收益、供給、調節、文化等服務凈收益以及社會經濟凈收益均高于非搬遷戶;不同搬遷特征的農戶之間的生態系統服務依賴度差異顯著;易地移民搬遷工程的實施能有效的降低農戶對生態系統服務的依賴程度,參與易地移民搬遷有利于農戶收入結構的優化,在降低從生態系統獲取供給服務的同時,也提高了社會經濟收入所占比重;自愿搬遷、集中安置和新階段的移民等特征也在降低農戶對生態系統服務的依賴上起到了積極作用,自愿搬遷的農戶比非自愿搬遷農戶能更好的應對和適應向非資源依賴型生計模式的轉變。集中安置的方式能夠產生一定的規模效應和政策溢出,使農戶有機會獲得更多配套和后續支持,從而提高對外部機會和資源的占有能力,拓寬非資源型收入的途徑,此外,新階段易地移民搬遷工程所提供的惠民措施和補貼力度都較以往零星的自主搬遷有較大提高,同時也強調搬遷農戶在非農轉變過程中的自我發展能力的建設和引導。本研究為實現生態系統服務與家庭福祉在微觀尺度的結合提供路徑支持和方法借鑒,也為新時期易地扶貧搬遷政策的持續推進提供啟示。
以文找文
This study mainly analyzes the impact of relocation and settlement program( RSP) on the dependence of ecosystem services from the perspective of micro rural households.Based on the construction of index of dependence on ecosystem services( IDES),this study integrated and quantified the net incomes of households from ecosystem services.It comparatively analyzes differences of income from ecosystem services and dependence on ecosystem services among households with different relocation types and characteristics,and further tests the effects of relocation on rural households’ IDES by using the data collected from South Shaanxi Province.It is found that the relocation households are significantly higher than non-relocation households in terms of the total net income from ecosystem services,provisioning services,regulating services,cultural services as well as socio-economy.There are significant differences of IDES between the groups in terms of relocation,relocation type,resettlement mode and resettling time.RSP not only significantly decreases the IDES,but also optimizes the income structure,which increases the share of socio-economic income as well as reduces the income from ecosystems.Meanwhile,voluntary relocation,centralized resettlement,and new stage relocation also have significant effects on decreasing households’ IDES.Compared to non-voluntary relocation,voluntary relocation households are more positive to respond to and adapt to the changes of non-resource-dependent livelihood.Centralized resettlement can produce a certain scale effect and policy spillover,so that rural households have the opportunity to get more follow-up support,thereby enhancing the ability to occupy the external opportunities and resources and broadening the ways to get non-resource-based income.In addition,these benefit measures and subsidies provided by the RSP are greatly improved compared with those of the past,and the construction and guidance of self-development ability in the process of non-agricultural transformation of farmers are also emphasized.This study provides approach and method for linking ecosystem services and human well-being at micro scale,as well as policy implication to the RSP in the future.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
ZHENG, Z. R.、FENG, C. Y.、YE, S. X.(2015)。Ecological pressures on grassland ecosystems and their conservation strategies in Northern China。Chinese journal of population, resources and environment,13(2),87-91。
2.
Li, C.、Zheng, H.、Li, S. Z.(2015)。Impacts of conservation and human development policy across stakeholders and scales。Proceedings of national academy of sciences,112(24),7396-7401。
3.
Larondelle, Neele、Haase, Dagmar(2013)。Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural-urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities。Ecological indicators,29(6),179-190。
4.
Yang, W.、Dietz, T.、Liu, W.(2013)。Going beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: an index system of human dependence on ecosystem services。Plos one,8(5),e64581。
5.
Daily, G. C.、歐陽志雲、鄭華(2013)。保障自然資本與人類福祉:中國的創新與影響。生態學報,33(3),669-676。
延伸查詢
6.
Ash, N.、Blanco, H.、Brown, C.(2010)。Ecosystems and human well-being: a manual for assessment practitioners。Civil engineering,42(1),77-101。
7.
Daily, G. C.、Matson, P. A.(2008)。Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation。Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,105(28),9455-9456。
8.
Costanza, R.、D'Arge, R.、Groot, R. D.(1997)。The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital。Nature,387(6630),253-260。
9.
Liu, J.、Dietz, T.、Carpenter, S. R.、Folke, C.、Alberti, M.、Redman, C. L.、Schneider, S. H.、Ostrom, E.、Pell, A. N.、Lubchenco, J.、Taylor, W. W.、Ouyang, Z.、Deadman, P.、Kratz, T.、Provencher, W.(2007)。Coupled human and natural systems。AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment,36(8),639-649。
10.
Daily, Gretchen C.、Söderqvist, Tore、Aniyar, Sara(2000)。The value of nature and the nature of value。Science,289(5478),395-396。
11.
Polasky, Stephen、Nelson, Erik、Pennington, Derric、Johnson, Kris A.(2011)。The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota。Environmental and resource economics,48(2),219-242。
12.
Busch, Malte、Gee, Kira、Burkhard, Benjamin(2011)。Conceptualizing the link between marine ecosystem services and human well-being: the case of offshore wind farming。International journal of biodiversity science, ecosystem services & management,3,190-203。
13.
Wegner, Giulia、Pascual, Unai(2011)。Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: a multidisciplinary critique。Global environmental change,21(2),492-504。
14.
Inge, L.、Marijeb, S.、Leo, D. N.(2013)。Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium。Land use policy,30(1),549-559。
15.
Broekx, S.、Liekens, I.、Peelaerts, W.(2013)。A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services。Environmental impact assessment review,40,65-74。
16.
Yang, W.、Dietz, T.、Kramer, D. B.(2013)。Going beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment: an index system of human wellbeing。Plos one,8(5),e64582。
17.
趙雪雁(2013)。不同生計方式農戶的環境影響--以甘南高原為例。地理科學,33(5),545-552。
延伸查詢
18.
賈國平、朱志玲、曉濤(2016)。移民生計策略變遷及其生態效應研究--以寧夏紅寺堡區為例。農業現代化研究,37(3),505-513。
延伸查詢
19.
譚靈芝、王國友(2012)。氣候變化對乾旱區家庭生計脆弱性影響的空間分析--以新疆於田綠洲為例。中國人口科學,2012(2),67-77。
延伸查詢
20.
李樹茁、梁義成、Feldman, W. M.(2010)。退耕還林政策對農戶生計的影響研究--基於家庭結構視角的可持續生計分析。公共管理學報,7(2),1-10。
延伸查詢
21.
蔡林(2014)。中國生態移民工程的問題及規範性研究。環境保護,2014(23),45-47。
延伸查詢
22.
Taru, Josiah、Chazovachii, Bernard(2015)。Rural households' livelihoods diversification through termite utilization in depressed region of Zimbabwe。Chinese journal of population, resources and environment,13(4),373-378。
23.
Wang, G. L.、Lu, Q.(2016)。Influence of social capital on farmer household in come gap: total effect and structrual effect。Chinese journal of population, resources and environment,14(1),30-37。
圖書
1.
Reid, W. V.、Mooney, H. A.、Cropper, A.(2005)。Millennium ecosystem assessment ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis。Washington, D C:Island Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
無相關博士論文
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
社會-生態系統恢復力理論對雲南傣族水文化變遷的解讀
2.
教師傷害事件折射出的師生生態失諧及調適
3.
陌生的新家園--異地重建後新北川居民的空間商榷和文化調適
4.
“國家在場”下湘西苗族文化的調適策略與現實啟示--基於口述史的研究
5.
傳統與現代婚姻觀念之間的調適及社會影響--以涼山彝族婚姻觀念變遷為例
6.
基於社會生態系統視角的長三角地級城市韌性度評價
7.
探討重複開案受虐兒童家庭特質及社工處遇
8.
受虐兒童保護服務處遇模式之研究--以生活模型觀點分析
QR Code