:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:數學臆測教學中教師擔任協調者角色之教學行為
書刊名:臺灣數學教育期刊
作者:張廖珮鈺林碧珍
作者(外文):Chang Liao, Pei-yuLin, Pi-jen
出版日期:2020
卷期:7:2
頁次:頁1-23
主題關鍵詞:協調者教師角色教學行為數學臆測教學ModeratorTeacher roleTeaching behaviorTeaching conjecture in mathematics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:1
期刊論文
1.Pithers, R. T.、Soden, R.(2000)。Critical thinking in education: A review。Educational Research,42(3),237-249。  new window
2.Chin, C.、Osborne, J.(2010)。Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(7),883-908。  new window
3.林碧珍(20150300)。國小三年級課室以數學臆測活動引發學生論證初探。科學教育學刊,23(1),83-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Cañadas, M. C.、Deulofeu, J.、Figueiras, L.、Reid, D.、Yevdokimov, O.(2007)。The conjecturing process: Perspectives in theory and implications in practice。Journal of Teaching and Learning,5(1),55-72。  new window
5.林碧珍、鄭章華、陳姿靜(20160400)。數學素養導向的任務設計與教學實踐--以發展學童的數學論證為例。教科書研究,9(1),109-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Conner, A.、Singletary, L. M.、Smith, R. C.、Wagner, P. A.、Francisco, R. T.(2014)。Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students' engagement in mathematical activities。Educational Studies in Mathematics,86(3),401-429。  new window
7.Lin, P. J.、Tsai, W. H.(2016)。Enhancing students' mathematical conjecturing and justification in third-grade classrooms: The sum of even (odd) numbers。Journal of Mathematics Education,9(1),1-15。  new window
8.Lin, P. J.(2018)。The Development of Students' Mathematical Argumentation in a Primary Classroom。Educação & Realidade,43(3),1171-1192。  new window
9.Chen, Y. C.、Hand, B.、Norton-Meier, L.(2017)。Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation。Research in Science Education,47(2),373-405。  new window
10.林碧珍、鄭俊彥、蔡寶桂(20180900)。國小六年級學生「數學論證評量工具」之建構。測驗學刊,65(3),257-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.林碧珍(2020)。素養導向的臆測教學模式。小學教學(數學版),2020(1),8-11。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lin, P. J.(2016)。Improving knowledge for teaching mathematical argumentation in primary classrooms。Journal of Mathematics Education,11(1),17-30。  new window
13.Berland, L. K.、Reiser, B. J.(2011)。Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation。Science Education,95(2),191-216。  new window
會議論文
1.Cañadas, M. C.、Castro, E.(2005)。A proposal of categorization for analyzing inductive reasoning。The CERME 4 international conference。Sant Feliu de Guíxols, Catalonia。401-408。  new window
2.Lin, P. J.(2018)。The norms of argumentation in a primary classroom。The 8th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education,(會議日期: May 7-11, 2018)。Taipei:EARCOME。83-92。  new window
3.Lin. P. J.、Horng. S. Y.(2017)。The conjecturing contributing to the group argumentation in primary classrooms。The 9th Classroom Teaching Research for All Students Conference。Dalian。  new window
4.Lin, P. J.、Miao, J. Y.(2018)。Teachers' supports for students engaging in mathematical argumentation。The Clute International Conference。San Francisco, CA。  new window
5.Lin, P. J.、Chang Liao, P. Y.(2019)。Teacher's multiple roles for students engaging mathematically conjecturing in elementary classrooms。The Clute International Conference。New York, NY。  new window
6.Lin, P. J.(2017)。Enhancing students' mathematical argumentation in primary classroom。The 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education。PME。  new window
7.Chang Liao, P. Y.、Lin, P. J.(2019)。The role of dispenser in conjecturing instruction。The international conference of the 2019 Classroom Teaching Research for All Students Conference。Beijing。  new window
圖書
1.Lakatos, I.(1976)。Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Walton, Douglas N.(2006)。Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.王秀芳、林碧珍、鐘秀施(2016)。數學臆測任務設計與實踐。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
4.Toulmin, Stephen Edelston(1958)。The Uses of Argument。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Torrance, E. P.(1988)。The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing。The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top