:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:科學話語與科學概念之學習:以國中生理化課學習為例
作者:李暉
作者(外文):Lee, Huei
校院名稱:彰化師範大學
系所名稱:科學教育研究所
指導教授:郭重吉
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2000
主題關鍵詞:科學學習社會建構論維高斯基符號學語言科學術語話語分析論述分析science learningsocial constructivismVygotskysemiologylanguagescience terminologydiscourse analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
  本研究係基於索緒爾(Saussure)的符號學和維高斯基(Vygotsky)的社會建構論,以質的方法與話語分析(discourse analysis)的取向進行分析,嘗試瞭解在國中理化教室中師生及同儕間是如何談論科學,以及這些有關科學的對話,對於學生建構科學概念所產生之影響。
研究對象為一個國三自願就學班,資料收集歷時一學期,每週四節理化課。收集方式包括教室觀察的現場記錄、錄音、錄影、問卷調查、教師和部份學生的課後訪談,以及討論工作單、學生成績等其它文件資料的收集。資料分析係以錄音、錄影資料轉錄後與現場記錄合併重建現場,再針對科學術語以及科學概念之相關對話整理成對話片段。其次將對話片段依研究問題建立編碼類別,並與其他來源資料交叉比對形成初步發現,再以持續比較法由資料中做歸納性的發展而建構結論。
本研究發現,學生科學概念的建構,是藉著科學話語不斷進行社會磋商的動態過程。因為學生的潛在發展區(ZPD)各不相同,加上不同程度的參與,使得他們在科學語言上的發展,從最初基於經驗直接以字面意義解釋不熟悉的科學術語,到完整地利用科學陳述表達想法之間,出現不同的發展程度。藉著科學語言的使用主動參與討論,對於科學概念的建構有正面的助益。此外,教室互動過程中科學概念的學習受到知識的權威性的影響,但影響程度因人而異,學習成就愈低者受科學知識權威性的影響愈大。且學生參與互動的意圖,對其知識建構的影響舉足輕重。
  The purpose of this study was to explore the teacher-student and student-student science discourse in the context of a science classroom. Based on Saussure’s semiology and Vygotskian social constructivism, the science dialogue and interaction of the teacher and students were analyzed by discourse analysis and qualitative methods. Attempt was made to understand how the teacher and students talked about science and how their dialogues influenced students’ construction of science concepts.
Nineteen 9th grade students of a class participated in this study. All of them could choose to apply for entering senior high schools without attending the regional entrance examination. Data collection of this study, by ways of questionnaires, classroom observation, interviews, pupils’ worksheets, and other documents, was conducted during a whole semester for five months. The dialogues in discussions and interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed, then the events happened in the science classroom were reconstructed. Moreover, the dialogues related to science terms and concepts were divided into paragraphs. The paragraphed dialogues were not only coded according to the research problems, but also triangulated with the data from other sources. Finally, constant comparative method was used to establish the assertions.
The findings of this study indicated that, students’ construction of science concepts was not merely a continuous process of social negotiation using science discourse. Students’ development in the use of scientific languages varied, because of the differences in the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and the extent of participation. It varied from the initially literal explanation of unfamiliar daily experiences to the pertinent use of scientific statements in expressing their thoughts. Active participation in discussions using scientific languages was found to render meaningful advantages in the construction of science concepts. It was worth noting that the authority of knowledge influenced the interaction process in classroom; however, the effects were not the same for all the students. The poorer the students’ understanding, the more they were influenced by the knowledge authority. Besides, students’ intention to participate in the interaction with others was also essential for their knowledge construction.
一、中文部份
王秀雲(民87)從科學革命到科學戰爭。當代,126,42-47。
王德威譯(M. Foucault著)(民82)知識的考掘。臺北:麥田出版社。
朱元鴻(民81)布希亞科幻劇場。當代,75,12-27。
呂慧娟譯(R. Hoffmann著)(民87)迴盪化學兩極間。臺北:天下遠見出版公司。
沈中偉(民83)魏考斯基理論在認知策略上的應用。教學科技與媒體,2,23-31。new window
李幼蒸(民85a)人文符號學─人文科學認識論研究。臺北:唐山出版社。
李幼蒸(民85b)語義符號學─意義的理論基礎。臺北:唐山出版社。new window
李英明(民81)哈伯馬斯。世界哲學家叢書。臺北:東大圖書公司。
李維譯(L.S Vygotsky著)(民87)思維與語言。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。
林芬遠(民86)國中生物課教室口語之探究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
林崇熙(民87)從革命到被革命──科學家何以不願科學研究來研究科學。當代,126,18-33。
林曉雯(民83)國中生物教師教學表徵的詮釋性研究。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。new window
高敬文(民77)質的研究──實施歷程與發現邏輯之評估。發表於「質的探討在教育研究上的應用」學術研討會(民77,5月,屏師)。
郭重吉(民77)從認知的觀點探討自然科學的學習。教育學院學報,13,351-379。
許玫理(民81)我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之調察研究。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
張恩光譯(E. Seiter著)(民79)符號學與電視研究。當代,60,20-32。
陳墇津譯(D. Macdonell著)(民84)言說的理論。臺北:遠流出版公司。
傅大為(民81)從科學哲學談到異文化與雙語人。當代,75,58-71。
鄒理民譯(P.L. Berger & T. Luckmann著)(民80)知識社會學:社會實體的建構。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
熊同鑫(民87)語言在自然科教室內的意涵:一間後山教室內教學活動的記事。台東師院學報,九期,頁 1-36。new window
蔣佳玲(民84)從符號互動論的觀點探討國小學生科學家形象的建構。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
蔣佳玲(民88)從權力的觀點探討學生小組互動中科學知識的建構。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。new window
蔡敏玲(民85)豈只是自言自語而已:維高斯基(Vygotsky)和皮亞傑關於「自語」的對話。百年校慶學術研討會──皮亞傑與維高斯基的對話。臺北市立師範學院。
蔡敏玲,彭海燕譯(C.B. Cazden著)(民87)教室言談:教與學的語言。臺北:心理出版社。
二、英文部份
Bell, B. & Freyberg, P. (1985). Language in the science classroom. In R. Osborne & P. Freyberg(Eds.) Learning in Science: The implications of children''''s science(pp.29-40). Auckland, NZ:Heinemann.
Blanck, G. (1990). The historical context of Vygotsky''''s work: a sociohistorical approach. In L. C. Moll (Ed.). Vygotsky and education: instructional implication and application of sociohistorical psychology. New York:Cambridge University Press.
Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S.K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and method, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective. In J. Wertsch(Ed.)(1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cazden, C. B. (1986). Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching(3rd. ed. pp 432-463), New York: Macmillan.
Chandler, D. (1995). Semiotics for beginners. (http://www.aber.ac.uk/~dgc/semiotic.html)
Cobern, W.W. (1993). Contextual constructivism: the impact of culture on the learning and teaching of science. In K. Tobin (Ed.). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Doig, B. (1997). What makes scientific dialogue possible in the classroom? Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March, 1997).(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413 246)
Duit, R. & Treagust, D.F. (1997). Learning in science: from behaviourism Towards social constructivism and beyond. In B.J. Fraser & K. Tobin(Eds.). International Handbook of Science Education. 3-55.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretative communities. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies. London:Routledge.
Gee, J.P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies. London:Falmer.
Gee, J.P. & Green, J.L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: a methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
Goetz, J.P. & LeCompte, M.D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park:Sage.
Hicks, D. (1995). Discourse, learning, and teaching. Review of Research in Education, 21.,49-95.
Howe, A. C. (1996). Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework. Science Education, 80(1), 35-51.
Kamen, M., Roth, W.M., Flick, L.B., Shapiro, B., Barden, L., Kean, E., Marble, S., & Lemke, J. (1997). A multiple perspective analysis of the role of language in inquiry science learning: to build a tower. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1). (http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/kamen_etal.html)
Klaassen, C.W.J.M. & Lijnse, P.L. (1996). Interpreting students'''' and teachers'''' discourse in science classroom: an underestimated problem? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2),115-134.
Lebeaupin, T. (1990). Science as a foreign language: which language Teaching methodology for scientists? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 324 963)
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J. L. (1991). Science, semantics, and social change. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, 1991). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 828)
Luke, A. (1995). Text and discourse in education: an introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education, 21, 3-48.
Meyerson, M., Ford, M., Jones, W. & Ward, M. (1991). Science vocabulary knowledge of third and fifth grade students. Science Education, 75(4), 419-428.
Moje, E.B. (1995). Talking about science: an interaction of the effect of teacher talk in high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4),349-371.
Moje, E.B. (1997). Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in Chemistry class. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 35-44.
Moll, L. C. (Eds.). (1990). Vygotsky and education: instructional implication And application of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mueller, A. (1997). Discourse of scientific inquiry in the elementary classroom. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(1), 15-33.
Nussbaum, J. (1989). Classroom conceptual change: philosophical perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 530-540.
Nuthall, G. (1997). Understanding student thinking and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Biddle et al (eds.), International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching, pp.681-768. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
O''''Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a sociocultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 791-820.
Pines, A. L. & West, L. H. T. (1986). Conceptual understanding and science learning: an interpretation of research within a sources-of-knowledge framework. Science Education, 70(5), 583-604.
Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classroom: social processes In small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.
Roth, W. M. (1990). Collaboration and constructivism in the science classroom. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Boston, MA, 1990). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 883)
Tobin, K. (1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Tuyay, S.; Jennings, L. & Dixon, C. (1995). Classroom discourse and opportunities to leare: An ethnographic study of knowledge construction in a bilingual third-grade classroom. Discourse Processes, 19, 75-110.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997a). Discourse as structure and process. London: SAGE.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997b). Discourse as social interaction. London: SAGE.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Question and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.)(1993). The practice of constructivism in science education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. (Trans. A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Wells, G. (1994a). Text, talk and inquiry: schooling as semiotic apprenticeship. In N. Bird et al. (Eds.) Language and Learning. Hong Kong: Institute for Language in Learning, Department of Education. (http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/~ctd/DICEP/sociocultural.html)
Wells, G. (1994b). Discourse as tool in the activity of learning and teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 619)
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top