參考文獻
一、中文部分
丁振豐、林清山(民82)。心理計量分析與Siegler認知分析對天平槓桿平衡問題測量之比較。測驗年刊, 40, 215-234。王龍錫(民80)。我國學生自然科概念發展與診斷教學之研究(一):小學生浮力概念發展之結構圖研究。國科會專題研究報告:NSC 79-0111-S-153-007-D。
江新合、許榮富、林寶山(民80)。我國學生自然科概念發展與診斷教學之研究:(1)中學生浮力相關概念發展及其相關迷思概念的分析研究。國科會專題研究報告:NSC 79-0111-S-017-07-D。江文慈(民82)。槓桿認知能力發展的評量與學遷移歷程的分析─動態評量的應用。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
江秋坪(民84)。動態評量對國語資源班學童鑑別與協助效益之探討。國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。邱上真(民85)。動態評量-教學評量的新嘗試。高雄師範大學主辦:中小學教學革新研討會大會手冊, 33-49.
邱上真(民88)。認知取向的教育診斷:多元評量觀。發表於學習落後學生的補救教學與輔導研討會。
邱上真, 王惠川, 朱婉艷, 沈明錦 (民81)。國小中年級數學科解題歷程導向之評量。特殊教育與復健學報, 2, 235-271。何榮桂(民86)。從「測驗電腦化與電腦化測驗」再看網路化測驗。測驗與輔導雙月刊, 144, 2972-2974。
林秀娟(民82)。動態評量結合試題反應理論在空間視覺學習潛能評量之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。林柏恒(民86)。電腦化數位邏輯技能教學之評量工具研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
林素微(民85)。國小六年級學童數學解題彈性思考動態測量之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林敏慧(民81)。國小輕度智障兒童學習潛能評量之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。吳裕益(民84)。電腦在測驗上的應用。教育實習輔導季刊,1(5), 10-13。
吳國銘(民83)。國小學童在動態評量中數學解題學習歷程與遷移效益之探討。國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。吳國銘、洪碧霞、邱上真(民84)。國小學童在動態評量中數學解題學習歷程與遷移效益之探討。中國測驗學會測驗年刊, 42, 61-84。吳鐵雄、洪碧霞(民87)。實作評量問與答。測驗與輔導雙月刊, 149, 3102-3103。
胡永崇(民82)。動態性評量及其對特殊教育的啟示。初等教育研究, 5, 24-63。
徐芳立(民87)。提示系統對增進國中一年級學生自問自答策略與閱讀理解能力之成效分析。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文。
徐順益(民85)。類比解題策略之研究:國中物理力學(II)。NSC85-2511-S018-007。
桂怡芬(民85)。紙筆與實作的互補 : 我的實作評量經驗。教育資料與研究, 13, 24-35。莊雅茹(民86)。不同學生特質在探究式CAL環境中對動畫研究II:CAL軟體動畫界面設計學習成效與情意效用研究。國科會專題研究報告:NSC86-2511-030-002-CL。
莊麗娟(民85)。國小六年級浮力概念動態評量的效益分析。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。許家吉(民83)。電腦化動態圖形歸類測驗發展之研究。國立台南師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文。許擇基(民87)。適性測驗的適用性。文教新潮,3(4), 17-23。
溫明正(民88)。電腦在未來教學評量上的應用。教師天地, 99, 54-60.
溫玲玉、洪銘建(民85)。商業職業教育季刊, 66, 38-42。
陳玉玲、周宣光、井敏珠(民87)。虛擬實境在建構教學上的應用。教育研究雙月刊, 61, 65-71。陳易芬(民82)。教育測量電腦化。測驗與輔導, 116, 2371-2374。
陳進福(民86)。國小輕度智障學童數學解題動態評量之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
黃國禎(民86)。遠距學習環境中智慧型學習測驗及評估系統之研製。國科會專題研究報告:NSC 86-2511-S260-001-ICL。
黃湘武、黃寶鈿(民75)。學生推理能力與概念發展之研究。認知與學習研討會專集。台北巿:行政院國家科學委員會。
程麗蓉(民86)。超媒體智慧型電腦輔助教學系統之建構與應用研究。國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
歐瑞賢(民86)。國小學生比例推理能力動態評量之效益分析。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
歐滄和(民85)。微電腦在現代測驗上的應用。測驗統計簡訊雙月刊, 9, 1-13。
劉瀅清, 蔡浚松 (民85)。認識多媒體。全欣訊圖書。
鄭富森(民88)。目前教學評量之省思與改進之道。教師天地, 99, 18-24。
簡月梅(民87)。互動式提示多點計分電腦化適性測驗。國立台灣師範資訊教育研究所碩士論文。
簡茂發(民88)。多元評量之理念與方法。教師天地, 99, 11-17.簡榮宏(民86)。智慧型遠距合作學習環境中測驗管理系統之研究。國科會專題研究報告:NSC 86-2511-009-007-ICL。
二、英文部分
Balazic, Josef(1997). Dunamic assessment of reading abilities. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: MQ28697.
Baron, J. B.(1991). Strategies for the development of effective performance exercises. Applied Measurment in Eduction, 4(4),305-318.
Bethge, H. J., Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H.(1982). The effects of dynamic assessment procedures on raven matrices performance,visual search behavior, test anxiety and test orientation. Intelligence, 6(1), 89-97.Bolig, E. E., & Day, J. D.(1993). Dynamic assessment and giftedness: The promise of assessing training responsiveness. Report Review, 16(2), 110-13.
Bryant, N. R.(1982). Preschool children‘s learning and transfer of matrices problems: A study of proximal development. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinosis.
Bryant, N. R., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C.(1983). Preschool children‘s learning and transfer of matrices problems: Potential for improvement. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development.
Buchanan, T.(1998). Using the world wide web for formative assessment. J. Educational Technology Systems, 27(1), 71-79.
Budoff, M., & Corman, L.(1974). Demographic and psychometric factors related to improved performance on the Kohs learning potential procedure. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 578-585.
Budoff, M.(1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential(pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.
Bunderson, C. V., Inouye D. I., & Olsen, J. B.(1989). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (ED.) Educational measurement(3rd ed., pp.369-407). New York : American Council on Education.
Burns, M. S. et al.(1987). Static and dynamic measures of learning in young handicapped children. Diagnostique, 12(2), 59-73.
Campione, J. C.(1989). Assisted assessment: A taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(3), 151-65.
Campione, J. C. et al.(1985). Breakdowns in flexible use of information: Intelligence-related differences in transfer following equivalent learning performance. Intelligence, 9(4), 294-315.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L.(1985). Dynamic assessment: One approach and some initial data. Technical report No.361. Nation Inst. of Child Health and Human Development, Washington, DC.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 26973).
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L.(1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential(pp. 82-115). New York: Guilford Press.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H.(1978). Use of testing-the-limits procedures in the assessment of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Deficiency, 82, 559-564.
Carlson, J. S., &Wiedl, K. H.(1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing-the-limits employing the Raven matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323-344.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H.(1992). The dynamic assessment of intelligence. In H. C. Haywood, &D. Tzuriel(Eds.), Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Chletsos, P. N.(1988). An application of Vygotsky‘s theory to understanding formal operational strategies on Piaget’s balance beam task [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 8827339
Coniam, D.(1999). Subjects’ reactions to computer-based tests. Journal Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 195-206.
Chronic Illness, and Job Matching, 2, see EC 303 150. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED372519).
Delclos, V. R. et al.(1992). Improving the quality of instruction: Roles for dynamic assessment. In H. C. Haywood, &D. Tzuriel(Eds.), Interactive assessment(pp. 317-331). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V.(1986). A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
Embretson, S. E.(1987a). Toward development of a psychometric approach. In C. S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential(pp. 141-170). New York: Guilford Press.
Embretson, S. E.(1987b). Improving the measurement of spatial aptitude by dynamic testing. Intelligence, 11, 333-358.
Ferrara, R. A.(1987). Learning mathematics in the zone of proximal development : The importance of flexible use of knowledge [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 8803037
Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C.(1986). Children‘s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57, 1087-1099.
Ferretiti, R. P., & Butterfield, E. C.(1992). Intelligence-related differences in the learning, maintenance, and transfer of problem-solving strategies. Intelligence, 16, 207-224.
Feuerstein, R.(1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instrument, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B.(1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD : University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R. et. al.(1986). Learning potential assessment. Special Services in the Schools, 2(2-3), 85-106.
Frisby C. L. & Braden J. p.(1992). Feuerstein’s dynamic assessment : A semantic logical, and empirical critique. The Journal of Special Education, 26(3), 281-301.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D.(1986). Effects of systematic formative formative evaluation : A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208.
Gallomore, R. & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education. (pp. 175-205). Cambridge University Press.
Greenspan S. I. et al.(1995). A new vision for Assessment. Exceptional Parent, 25, 23-25.
Gerber, M. M., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I.(1994). Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication. Exceptional Children, 61(2), 114-125.
Goodwin, L. A.(1997). Assessment for equity and inclusion : Embracing all our children. New York : Routledge.
Hall, L., & Day, J. D.(1982). Comparison of the zone of proximal development in learning disabled, mentally retarded and normal children. Paper presented at the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED218829).
Harth, R.(1982). The Feuerstein perspective on the modification of cognitive performance. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15(3), 1-12.
Hasselbring T. S. et al.(1989).Using Microcomputers for Assessment and Error Analysis. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED353745).
Haywood, H. C. et al.(1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 411-22.
Heal, L. W.(1992). Current assessment practices in the United States : Norm referenced, criterion referenced, and dynamic assessment. 載於國立彰化師範大學主辦 : 國際特殊兒童評量研討會論文集, 316-32。
Hewson, M. G. A’B.(1986). The acquisition of scientific knowledge: Analysis and representation of student conceptions concerning density. Science Education, 70(2), 159-170.
Jensen, M. R., & Feuerstein, R.(1987). The learning potential assessment device: From philosophy to practice. In C. S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.
Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J.(1993a). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis. Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 14(5), 6-18.
Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J.(1993b). An exploratory study of dynamic assessment involving two instructional strategies on experts and novices‘ performance in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Diagnostique, 18(4), 305-25.
Jitendra, A. K., Kameenui, E. J.(1996). Experts’ and novices’ patterns in solving part-whole mathematical word problems. Journal of Educational Research, 90,42-51.
Knodel, Monika C.(1997). Dynamic assessment of written language (learning disabilities). [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: MQ20833.
Kovalik, C. L., & Dalton, D. W.(1999). The process/outcome evaluation model : A conceptual framework for assessment. J. Educational Technology Systems, 27(3), 183-94.
Kragler, S.(1986). Dynamic versus static testing: Impact on reading placement of reading underachievers [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 8618648
Laughon, P.(1990). The dynamic assessment of intelligence: A review of three approaches. School Psychology Review, 19(4), 459-70.
Lazear, D. (1999). Multiple Intelligences approaches to Assessment. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
Lidz, C. S.(1991). Practitioner‘s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
Lidz, C. S.(1992). The extent of incorporation of dynamic assessment into cognitive assessment courses: A national survey of school psychology trainers. Journal of Special Education, 1, 325-31.
Linn, M. C.(1977). Scientific reasoning: Influences on task performance and response categorization. Science Education, 61, 357-65.
Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E.(1995). Measurement and assessment in teaching. London : Prentice Hall.
National Research Council(1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press.
Ochoa,T. A., Vaspuez, L. R., & Gerber, M. M.(1999). New generation of computer-assisted learning tools for students with disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 34, 251-54.
Osborne, R.(1980). Children’s dynamic. The Physics Teacher, 22(8), 504-08.
Parameswaran, G.(1993). Dynamic assessment of sex differences in spatial ability (horizontality) [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9328925
Pena et al.(1992). The application of dynamic methods to language assessment : A nonbiased procedure. Jounal of Special Education, 26, 269-280.
Puckett, Margaret B., & Black, Janet K.(1994). Authentic Assessment of the young child. New York: MacMillan College Publishing Company.
Salvia, J. S., & Hughes, C.(1990). Curriculum-based assessment : Testing what if taught. New York : MacMillan Publishing Company.
Samuels, M., Tzuriel, D., & Malloy-Miller, T.(1989). Dynamic assessment of children with learning difficulties. In R. T. Brown & M. Chazan(Eds.). Learning difficulties and emotional problems(pp.145-165). Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.
Seiverd, K. D.(1994). Dynamic assessment vs. traditional intelligence assessment in low-achieving minority and nonminority children [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9327910
Siegler, R. S.(1983). Five generalizations about cognitive development. American Psychologist, 38, 263-277.
Skuy, M. et al(1988). Dynamic assessment of intellectually superior Israeli children in a low socio-economic status community. Gifted Education International, 5(2), 90-96.
Solano-Floares, G., Shavelson R. T., & Bachman, M.(1999). On the development and evaluation of a shell for generating science performance assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 293-315.
Spector, J. E.(1992). Predicting progress in beginning reading: Dynamic assessment of phonemic awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology , 84, 353-363.
Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & Kibler, J. M.(1990). Dynamic assessment, individual differences, and academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(1), 113-127.
Stanley, N. V.(1993). Gifted and the “zone of proximal development .” Gifted Education Internation, 9(2), 78-81.
Stanley, N. V., Siegel, J., Cooper, L., & Marshall, K.(1995). Identification of gifted with the dynamic assessment procedure. Gifted Education Internation, 10, 85-87.
Stepans, J.I. et al.(1986). Misconceptions die hard. Science Teacher, 53(6), 65-69.
Supancheck, S. P.(1989). Effects of dynamic assessment approach with developmentally delayed children. Doctor of Philosophy in Special Education, CSULA-UCLA University of California(microform). Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI.
Swanson, H. L.(1995). Using the cognitive processing test to assess ability : Development of a dynamic assessment. School Psychology Review, 24, 672-693.Swanson, H. L.(1996). Classification and dynamic assessment of children with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional children, 28, 1-19.
Thorpe, Pamela K.(1999). A hierarchical linear modeling approach towards the dynamic assessment of mathematical conceptual learning. [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9835543.
Tzuriel, D., & Feuerstein, R.(1992). Dynamic group assessment for prescriptive teaching: Differential effects of treatments. In H. C. Haywood, &D. Tzuriel(Eds.), Interactive assessment(pp. 187-206). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Vanderbilt, Univ.(1983). Learning potential assessment for preschool children. Final Report. Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 249 667).
Vye, N. J. et al.(1987). A comprehensive approach to assessing intellectually handicapped children. In C. S. Lidz(Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluation learning potential(pp. 327-359). New York: Guilford Press.
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.