漢語數量詞組__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	漢語數量詞組
作者：	慎俊浩
作者(外文)：	Joonho Shin
校院名稱：	國立清華大學
系所名稱：	語言學研究所
指導教授：	蔡維天
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2008
主題關鍵詞：	數量詞組；浮動量化詞；整體-部分；限定詞組；空範疇；漢語；韓語；Numral Phrase；Floating Quantifier；Part-Whole；DP；Empty Category；Mandarin Chinese；Korean
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:30

　　本文討論漢語數量詞組的分布，特別是數量詞組跟相關的名詞組分隔出現的時候的分布。總共有四個情形：第一、數量詞組出現在動詞前面，表達句首名詞組的整體數量（Ａ組）；第二、數量詞組在動詞後面，句首的名詞組表達種類的語意（Ｂ組）；第三、數量詞組在動詞後面，表達句首名詞組的部分數量（Ｃ組）；第四、數量詞組在動詞前面，跟「有」搭配，表達句首名詞組的部分數量（Ｄ組）。因為數量詞組是用來表示名詞組的量，所以這兩個詞組通常合成一個成分，但是上面的四組顯示數量詞組沒有跟名詞組搭配而單獨出現，跟它相關的名詞組則在別的地方出現。這樣的語言現象產生一個問題：在數量詞組與名詞組分隔出現的時候，如何說明其語意關係？　　為了解釋這個問題，我們參考對浮動量化詞組已有的研究，即擱淺分析和狀語分析。但若我們用這兩種方法來分析Ａ組的情形，就會發現這些分析都有一些問題。因此，本文提出新的分析法，即論元分析。在論元分析之下，數量詞組在動詞的論元位置原位合併，而相關的名詞組佔據主題或者其他非論元的位置。這個分析方法能夠說明A組數量詞組的分布，也抓住A組和C-D組在結構上的平行。至於Ｂ組，我們可以用擱淺分析和論元分析來說明表種類的名詞組在句法上的表現。　　C組和D組的例子表示整體-部分的語意關係：名詞組表達整體，而數量詞組表達部分。為了解釋數量詞組表部分的語意，我們假設數量詞組外層的限定詞組是由空限定詞充當中心語的詞組，而且這個空限定詞有兩個特色：一個是它的回指性，另外一個是它一定被運算子約束或者佔據特定位置而得到語意。這個運算子包含表部分的「有」。雖然部分的「有」跟呈現的「有」稍微不一樣，但在句法上這兩個都可以被視為助動詞。也就是說，部分的「有」帶一個子句（或者動詞組）論元。在詞法以及句法上的證據都支持這個看法。　　最後，我們討論韓語數量詞組的分布。雖然漢語跟韓語在句法上有很大的不同，但是在觀察跟漢語的四組相對應的韓語例子之後，我們發現這兩個語言的數量詞組的表現在很多地方相似。有些不同的地方是由格標誌的存在有無以及基本語序不同等等原本句法上的差異而引起的。

以文找文

This dissertation discusses distribution of numeral phrases (NumPs) in Mandarin Chinese, especially the distribution of NumPs which are away from their related NPs. There are four cases: the first one is that the NumP precedes the verb and expresses the whole quantity of the related NP in the front of the construction (Group A); the second one is that the NumP precedes the verb and the NP has a kind-denoting reading (Group B); the third one is that the NumP is preceded by the verb and expresses a part of the NP (Group C); the fourth one is that the NumP precedes the verb, co-occurring with you ‘have’, and also has a part-of reading (Group D). Since the NumP is used for indicating the quantity of the NP, the two phrases are usually presented in a form of one constituent. However, the above four cases show that the NumP can occur in isolation without the nearby NP, which may occur elsewhere. This phenomenon leads to a question: how can we explain the semantic relation between the NumP and its related NP when they are separated? 　　In order to answer this question, we refer to the analyses of floating quantifiers, i.e., the stranding analysis and the adverbial analysis. When these analyses are applied to Group A, however, some problems are found. Hence, this study proposes a new analysis, i.e., the argument analysis. Under this analysis, the NumP is originally merged in the VP, and the related NP occurs in topic positions or other A’- positions. This analysis can explain the distribution of NumPs in Group A, and furthermore can catch the parallelism between Group A and Groups C and D. As for Group B, we can explain the grammatical behavior of the kind-denoting NPs with the stranding analysis and the argument analysis. Groups C and D exhibit the part-whole relationship, i.e., the NP expresses the whole and the NumP the part. We assume that the DP outside the NumP has an empty determiner as a head. This empty determiner has two properties: one is anaphoricity, the other is that it should be bound by the operator or occur in a specific position for semantic interpretation. The operator includes partial you ‘have’. Although this you is a little different from existential you, the two can be classified as auxiliaries. In other words, the partial you takes a clausal argument. The morphological and grammatical evidence supports this view. This study also discusses the distribution of NumPs in Korean. Mandarin and Korean are different, but after observing the Korean examples corresponding to Groups A-D in Mandarin, we found that NumPs’ behaviors of the two languages are similar in many ways. Some distinct parts are due to the basic differences such as the existence of case markers and the word order, etc.

以文找文

朱德熙，1982，《語法講義》，北京：商務印書館。呂叔湘等編著，1980，《現代漢語八百詞》，北京：商務印書館。張麗麗、黃居仁，1995，〈漢語數量詞後置初探〉，Proceedings of Joint Conference of IACL5 and NACCL8，頁1-18，University of Wisconsin-Madison。陸儉明，1988，〈現代漢語中數量詞的作用〉，《語法研究和探索（四）》，北京大學出版社。黃正德，1988，〈說「是」和「有」〉，《中研院史語所集刊》，第五十九本，第一分冊，43-64 頁。趙元任，1980，《中國話的文法》，丁邦新譯，香港：中文大學。劉丹青，2001，〈論元分裂式話題結構初探〉，原載《語言問題再認識——慶祝張斌先生從教五十周年暨八十華誕》，上海教育出版社。蔡維天，2002，〈一、二、三〉，《語言學論叢》，第二十六輯，301-312頁，商務印書錧，北京。蔡維天，2003，〈談「有人」、「有的人」和「有些人」〉，《漢語學報》。鄧思穎，2003，〈數量詞主語的指稱和情態〉，《語法研究和探索》，中國語文雜誌社編，商務印書館：北京292-308。 Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Benmamoun, Elabbas. 1999. The Syntax of Quantifiers and Quantifier Float. Linguistic Inquiry　30: 621-642. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2003. “Floating Quantifiers: Handle with Care”, in L. Cheng and R. Sybesma (eds.) The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book, Mouton, Berlin, pp.107-148. Boskovic, Zeljko,. 2001. Floating Quantifiers and Theta-Role Assignment. NELS 31: 59-78. Boškovi´c, Željko. 2004. Be careful where you float your quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22:681–742. Brisson, Christine. 2000. Floating quantifiers as adverbs. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth EasternStates Conference on Linguistics, ed. Rebecca Daly and Anastasia Riehl, 13–24. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press. Chen, Liang. 2002. A study of Quantifier floating in Chinese. NACCL-14. Cheng, L.-S. Lisa. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions, PhD Dissertation, MIT. Cheng, L.-S. Lisa. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197-234. Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & Rint Sybesma. 1998. Yi-wan Tang, Yi-ge Tang: Classifiers and Massifiers. The TsingHua Journal of Chinese Studies, New series vol.28 No.3, 385-412. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405. Chiu, Bonnie Hui-chun. 1993. The Inflectional Structure of Chinese. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California in Los Angeles. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiry: the Framework. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Funtional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. Ken Hale: a Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Doetjes, Jenny. 1997. Quantifiers and selection: On the distribution of quantifying expressions in French, Dutch, and English, volume 32 of HIL Dissertations. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics. Dowty, David, and Belinda Brody. 1984. The semantics of “floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3, ed. Mark Cobler, Susannah MacKaye, and Michael T.Wescoat, 75–90. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Asociation. Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fitzpatrick, Justin. 2006. The Syntactic and Semantic Roots of Floating Quantification. MIT PhD dissertation. Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2005. Two Types of Modifiers and Parallelisms between DPs and TPs in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 6.3:397-429. Hsieh, Miao-Ling. 2007. The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese: Number and Referentiality. Ms. Huang, C.-T. J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, Ph D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531-574. Huang, C.-T. J. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Theory. in O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Huang, C.-T. J. 1992. Complex Predicates in Control. in R. Larson et al.(eds.). Control and Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Huang, C.-T. J. 1999. Chinese Passives in Comparative Perspective. Tsing-Hua Journal of Chinese Studies New Series 29 Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Yafei Li (m.s.) The syntax of Chinese, Draft 2004 Huang, Ray Rui-heng & Jen Ting. 2006. Are There Dangling Topics in Mandarin Chinese? Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32.1: 119-146. Kayne, Richard S. 1969. The transformational cycle in French syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge MA. Lee, Thomas. 1986. Studies on Quantification in Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts. Li, Charles & Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Li, Xiaoguang. 1997. Deriving distributivity in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine. Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1999. “Plurality in a Classifier Language”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 75-99 Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 2006. Chinese ba. In Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds.,The Blackwell companion to syntax, volume 1, 374-468. Oxford: Blackwell. Lin, Tzong-Hong. 1998. On ge and other related problems. In Liejiong Xu (ed.) The Referential properties of Chinese noun phrases, 209- 253. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Estudes en Sciences Sociales. Lin, Tzong-Hong. 2005. Syntactic Structures of Complex Sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Nanzan Linguistics 2: Research Results and Activities 2005. Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998. Distributivity in Chinese and Its Implications. Natural Language Semantics 6: 201-243. Liu, Chen-Sheng L. 2005. Grammatical tense, degree modifiers, and Chinese gradable adjectives. Taiwan: National Chiao Tung University, MS. Lobeck, Anne. 1995. On Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McCloskey, James. 2000. Quantifier float andWh-movement in an Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31:57–84. Merchant, Jason. 1996. Object scrambling and quantifier float in German. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 26, ed. Kiyomi Kusumoto, 179–193. Amherst, MA: GLSA. Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1989. Structure and case marking in Japanese. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. Pan, haihua and Jianhua Hu. 2003. Head Noun Movement, Focus, and Topicalization in Mandarin Chinese, Chinese Syntax and Semantics, eds. By Jie Xu, Donghong Ji, and Kim Teng Lua. Singapore: Prentice Hall. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337. Shi, Dingxu. 2000. Topic and Topic-Comment Constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Language, Volume 76, Number 2. 383-408. Shin, Joonho. 2007. Topic-Focus Structure and Quantification of Dou ‘all’. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 5.1: 49-76. Shlonsky, Ur. 1991. Quantifiers as functional heads: A study of quantifier float in Hebrew. Lingua 84:159–180. Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Mandarin Chinese. PhD. dissertation. University of Southern California. Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19:425–449. Tang, C.-C. 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X'-theory. PhD dissertation, Cornell University Tang, C.-C. 1996. Ta Mai-le Bi Shi-zhi and Chinese Phrase Structure. BIHP 67.3 Tang, Sze-Wing. 2004. Some Notes on the Syntax of Chinese Partitives and Indefinites. Linguistic Society of Hong Kong Annual Research Forum December 11-12, 2004, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Ting, Jen. 2006. The Middle Construction in Mandarin Chinese and the Presyntactic Approach. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32.1: 89-117. Tsai, Dylan W.-T. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependency. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1999. On Lexical Courtesy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 39-73. Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2001. "On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface," Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10, 129-168. Tsao, Feng-Fu. 1990. Sentence and Clause Structure in Chinese: A Functional Perspective. Taipei: Student Book. Wu, Jianxin. 1999. Syntax and Semantics of Quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park Xu, ding. 1997. Functional Categories in Mandarin Chinese. Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics. Netherlands. Yamashita, Hideaki. 2001. "FNQ-Scrambling" in Japanese. In: Second Report of Minimalization of Each Module in Generative Grammar, 221-252. Nagoya: Nagoya University. Zhang, Niina. 1997. Syntactic Dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto. Zhang, Niina. 2006. Representing specificity by the internal order of indefinites. Linguistics 44-1, 1-21.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	Subject Raising in Chinese Modal Auxiliary Verb Constructions: A-movement or A'-movement?
2.	On the Syntax of Hoo Constructions in Taiwanese Southern Min
3.	Semantics and Syntax of the Passive Construction in Hainan Min
4.	More on the Licensing Conditions of NP-ellipsis and the Structure of Noun Phrases in Mandarin
5.	Exhaustivity and Bare Numeral Phrases in Mandarin
6.	Taxonomy of Questions in Taiwan Southern Min
7.	華語被字句的分類及其教學建議
8.	華語代詞性謂語之事件結構分析
9.	A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Patient-subject Constructions in Chinese
10.	The Structure of Split Questions in Mandarin Chinese
11.	Modern Chinese You Based on Conceptual Reference Point Processing
12.	A Revisit to the [Num-Cl-Modifier-de-N]/[Modifier-de-Num-Cl-N] Variation in Mandarin Chinese
13.	Left Is Right, Right Is Not: On the Constituency of the Classifier Phrase in Chinese
14.	Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese
15.	On Locative Alternation Verbs in Mandarin Chinese

1.	漢語句法-言談介面研究
2.	海圖新繪：從句法—語用介面看台灣閩南語的製圖分析
3.	《卜辭「侑」、「有」、「又」相關研究─以句法、語意、語用、構形的互動為例》
4.	客語輕動詞邊緣地貌圖
5.	Left Periphery and Reference of DP in Mandarin Chinese
6.	漢語的詞組性空範疇
7.	析取、並列、與疑問：一個比較性的研究
8.	從構式語法看漢語結果複合動詞
9.	漢語次要謂語研究
10.	漢語的謂語與切割結構

1.	上古漢語：語法綱要
2.	The Interal Structure of Noun Phrases in Chinese
3.	閩南語和台灣國語中的『有』--談句法學中的社會因緣與歷史知識

無相關著作

1.	現代漢語形狀量詞的來源及其演變研究
2.	書評：張寧，《漢語的量詞結構》(Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013)
3.	Semantic Variation on Chinese Classifiers for Vehicles: A Case Study on liang(輛), bu(部) and tai(臺)
4.	論華語中分類詞與量詞之語意區分
5.	漢語名詞的性質和數量詞使用的關係
6.	韓語數量詞片語的文法特徵
7.	淺談華語量詞--從一隻狗還是一條狗說起
8.	漢語分類詞的語義與認知基礎：功能語法觀點

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫