參考文獻
一、中文部分
郭汾派、林光賢、林福來（1989）。國中生文字符號概念的發展。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告（報告編號：NSC 77-0111-S003-05A），未出版。
國立編譯館（1977）。師專數學第六冊。台北市：國立編譯館。
教育部（2005）。國民中小學九年一貫課程正式綱要。台北市：教育部。
張淑怡（1995）。加減問題之解題活動類型：一個國小低年級兒童的個案研究。國立高雄師範大學數學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳維民（1998）。兒童的未知數概念研究－一個國小六年級兒童的個案研究。國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士班碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
陳維民（2003）。未知數概念發展的可能架構。數學學習領域基礎研習手冊，92，53-60。台北縣：國立教育研究院籌備處。教育部主編。
陳維民（審稿中）。國小六年級學童未知數解題類型之個案研究－介於算術與代數階段的約估策略。東大學報。陳維民（印製中）。六年級學童在解未知數僅出現一次且在方程式同側不同位置時之解題類型研究。台灣數學教師電子期刊。陳維民（審稿中）。六年級學童未知數解題類型之個案研究－未知數出現在單側兩次的合成問題。科學教育研究與發展季刊。
甯自強（1987）。「根本建構主義」─認知研究的另一種架構。師友月刊，240，30-32。
甯自強(1991)。藉由解題活動了解兒童及促進兒童增加對數學的了解。教師之友，32 (5)，47-51。
甯自強（1993a）。單位量的變換（一）~正整數乘除法運思的啟蒙~。教師之友，34 (1) ，27-34。
甯自強（1993b）。數的運算概念啟蒙~『算式填充題』的引入。教師之友，34 (1) ，35-39。
甯自強（1994a）。單位量的變換（二）正整數乘除運思的融合。教師之友，36 (5)，35-44。
甯自強（1994b）。國小低年級兒童數概念發展研究(I)－「數概念」類型研究(II)。行政院國家科學發展委員會專題研究成果報告（報告編號：NSC 82-0111-S-023-001A），未出版。
甯自強（1998）。涂景翰的數概念。科學教育學刊，6 (3)，255-269。二、英文部分
Bardini, C., Radford, L. Sabena, C. (2005). Struggling with variables, parameters, and indeterminate objects or how to go insane in mathematics. In Chick, H. L. & Vincent, J. L. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 29nd PME International Conference, 2, 129-136.
Bednarz, N., & Janvier, B. (1996). Emergence and development of algebra as a problem-solving tool: Continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.). Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115-136). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M. & Earnest D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37 (2), 87-115.
Charbonneau, L. (1996). From Euclid to Descartes: Algebra and its Relation to Geometry. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.). Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 15-37). Dordrech, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Collis, K. F. (1975). A Study of Concrete and Formal Operations in School Mathematics: A Piagetian Viewpoint. Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Davis, R.B. (1985). ICME-5 report: algebraic thinking in the early grades. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 4, 195-208.
Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1984). From an arithmetical thought to an algebraic thought. In J. Moser (Ed.), Proceedings of PME-NA VI, Madison, Wisconsin, 51-56.
Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19-25.
Gray, E., & Tall, D. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A “proceptual” view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 116-140.
Harper, E. W. (1980). The boundary between arithmetic and algebra: conceptual understanding in two language systems. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 11, 237-243.
Harper, E. (1979). The boundary between arithmetic and algebra: conceptual understanding in two language systems. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 11, 237-243.
Harper, E. (1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 75-90.
Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59-78.
Kaput, J. J. (1989). Linking Representations in the symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.). Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra. (pp.167-194). Reston,VA:NCTM.
Katz, V. J. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185-201.
Kieran, C.(1989).The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.). Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra. (pp.33-56). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp.390-419). New York: Macmillan Pub.
Kieran, C. (2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutierrez, P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the Psychology of mathematics education: Past, Present, and Future (pp.11-49). New York: Sense Publishers.
Kuchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K. hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11-16 (pp. 102-119). London: John Murray.
Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr .(1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on the unknown in the context of equations. Education Studies in Mathematics, 30, 39-65.
Malisani, E. (2006). The concept of variable in the passage from the arithmetic language to the algebraic language in different semiotic contexts (Doctoral Dissertation, Comenius University of Bratislava, 2006). Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (G.R.I.M.), 16 (1). Available from: http://math.unipa.it/~grim/quad_16_suppl_1. htm).
Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In G. A. Miller & E. Lennerberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought. (pp.27-64). New York: Academic Press.
Ning, T. C. (1992). Children‘s meanings of fractional number words. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. Columbia: University Press.
Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 23-34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Radford, L. (1995). Before the other unknowns were invented: Didactic inquiries on the methods and problems of mediaeval Italian algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 28-38.
Radford, L. (1997). On psychology, historical epistemology, and the teaching of mathematics: Towards a socio-cultural history of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 26-33.
Ricoeur, P. (1971). The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as a text. Social Research, 38(3), 529-562.
Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L.(1994).The Gains and the pitfalls of reification－the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228.
Sfard, A. (1995). The Development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14, 15-39.
Stacey, K., Chick, H., & Kendal, M. (2004). The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI Study. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Steffe, L. P., Ludlow, A. S., & Ning, T. C. (1989). Elementary algebra for teachers: A quantitative approach. (Unpublish).
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. K. Lesh, A. E. (Ed.), Research design in mathematics and science education. (pp. 267-307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thompson, P. W. (1990). A theoretical model of quantity-based reasoning in arithmetic and algebraic. Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Education: San Diego State University.
Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 165-208.
Thompson, P. W., & Ball, D. L. (1995). Research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(4), 300-303.
Thorndike, E. L., Cobb, M. V., Orleans, J. S., Symonds, P. M., Wald, E., & Woodyard, E. (1923). The psychology of algebra. New York: MacMillan.
Usiskin, Z. (2004). A significant amount of algebra. Retrieved June 15, 2009, from Mathematisch Instituut Universiteit Leiden Web site: http://www.math.leidenuniv. nl/~naw/serie5/deel05/jun2004/pdf/usiskin.pdf
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1980). The concept of equilibration in a contructivist theory of knowledge. In F. Benseler, P. M. Hejl, & W. K. Kock (Eds.), Autopoiesis, communication and society (pp. 75-85). New York: Campus.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1981). An attentional model for the conceptual construction of units and numbers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(3), 83-94.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Eds.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. (pp.3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In T. Husen & N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education. Supplementary vol.1 (pp.162-163). New York: Pergamon Press.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Piaget’s constructivist theory of knowing .In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning (pp. 53-75). PA: Taylor & Francis Inc.