中文部分
王全興（2008）。認知負荷理論及其在e化學習的應用。師大學報，53(4)，173-194。
台灣省國民教師研習會（1988）。第二期國民小學科學教育環境調查研究報告書。教育部中等教育司。
朱錦鳳（2003） ：「問題解決創造力測驗」的發展及其相關研究。教育與心理研究，26，671-695 頁。
何榮桂（2001）。九年一貫資訊教育課程規劃與相關問題。台北市：師大。
何縕琪、林清山（1994）：表徵策略教學對提升國小低解題正確率學生解題表現之之研究。教育心理學報，27，259-279 頁。
宋曜廷（2000）。先前知識、文章結構與多媒體呈現對文章學習的影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
林淑菁（2002）：國小資源班學生正整數乘除文字題之圖示教學效果研究—以台北一國小為例。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系碩士班論文。
徐文鈺（1992）：圖示策略訓練課程對國小五年級學生的數學應用題解題能力與錯誤類型之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳正己（2001）。從英特爾e教師計畫談資訊融入教學。資訊與教育，85，15-21。
吳昭容（1990）：圖示對國小學童解數學應用題之影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究獨立研究。
吳昭容（1993）：國小兒童使用數學圖示之發展研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC 82-0111-S-002-004）。
吳瑞源、吳慧敏（2008）。動畫教材之學習者控制撥放模式與多媒體組合形式對學習成效與學習時間影響之研究。師大學報，53(1)，1-26。
周子敬（2006）：八大多元智慧問卷的信、效度分析。教育心理學報，37，215-229 頁。
許良榮（1996）：圖形與科學課文學習關係的探討。教育研究資訊，4，121-131 頁。
徐易稜（2001）。多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究。國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文，未出版。
翁嘉鴻（2001）。以認知負荷觀點探討聽覺媒體物件之媒體呈現方式對學習成效之影響。國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
唐大崙、張文瑜（2007）。利用眼動追蹤法探索傳播研究。中華傳播學刊，12， 165-211。
唐大崙、莊賢智（2005）。由眼球追蹤法探索電子報版面中圖片位置對注意力分佈之影響。廣告學研究，24，89-104。
陳政瑜（1994）。由球體透視概念探討學生學習月相成因之困難。臺灣師範大學地球科學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
陳彙芳、范懿文（2000）。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理研究，2(2)，45-49。
陳密桃（2003）。認知負荷理論及其對教學的啟示。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊，21，29-51。
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008)。藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報，39，127-149 。
郭秀緞（2006）。以認知負荷理論探討數學問題設計與後設認知策略教學對國小高年級學生數學解題之影響。高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。未出版。
黃克文（1996）。認知負荷與個人特質及學習成就之關聯。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
黃柏勳（2003）。認知上的瓶頸－認知負荷理論。教育資料與研究，55，71-78。
張景媛（1995）：國中生建構幾何概念之研究暨統整式合作學習的幾何策略效果之評估。教育心理學報，28，99-144 頁。
葉渝芳（2007）。自我解釋鷹架對多重表徵動畫學習之影響。國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系博士論文。未出版。
楊淑芬（2001）：國小資源班學生使用圖示策略解決比較類加減應用題之成效研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所特殊教育教學碩士班碩士論文。
劉嘉茹、侯依伶(2011)。以眼動追蹤技術探討先備知識對科學圖形理解的影響。教育心理學報，43，227-250。
韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立（2008）。心、眼與世界的連結-從認知神經科學看知覺與心像的關係。科學教育月刊，308，16-23。
韓承靜、蔡介立（2008）。眼動軌跡記錄－科學學習研究的明日之星。科學教育月刊，310，2-11。

英文部分
Anderson, C.W., Bratman, J.A. 2008. Translating thoughts into actions by finding patterns in brainwave. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Yale Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems, Yale University, New Haven, CT, June 2008, pp. 1–6.
Adler, C. (1993). Directed picture processing: The effects for learners on recall of related text. Dissertation Abstract International, 54(3-A), 863.
Baddeley, A. D. (1999). Essentials of Human Memory. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., and Rao R. P. N. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
Bera, S., &; Liu, M. (2006). Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment. Comput. Hum. Behav., 22(2), 295-319.
Bernard, R. M. (1990). Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations. British Journal of Education Technology, 21, 215–225.
Betrancourt, M., &; Bisseret, A. (1998). Integrating textual and pictorial information via popup windows: An experimental study. Behavioral Information Technology, 17, 263–273.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
Boucheix, J. M., &; Lowe, R. K.(2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20, 123-135.
Boucheix, J. M., Lowe, R.K., &; Soirat, A. (2006). On line processing of a complex technical animation: Eye tracking investigation during verbal description. In Proceedings of the EARLI-SIG 2 Congress, UK: University of Nottingham.
Brandt, S. A., &; Stark, L. W. (1997). Spontaneous eye movements during visual imagery reflect the content of the visual scene. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 27-38.
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., &; Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 53-61.
Canham, M., &; Hegarty, M. (2010). Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 155-166.
Carney, R. N., &; Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-25.
Change, C. C., Lei, H., &; Tseng, J. S. (2011). Media presentation mode, English listening comprehension and cognitive load in ubiquitous learning environments: modality effect or redundancy effect? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 633–654.
Chuang, H. H., &; Liu, H. C. (2011). Effects of different multimedia presentations on viewers’ information-processing activities measured by eye-tracking technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9316-1.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., &; Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221-239.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., &; Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 111-122.
Dillon, A., &; Jobus, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). Cambridge MA:Cambridge University Press.
Duchowski, A. T. (2003). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Verlag London Limited, pp.186-187.
Eshach, H. (2011). Science for Young Children: A New Frontier for Science Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 435-443.
Fang, Z. (1996). Illustrations, text, and the child reader. What are pictures in children’s storybooks for? Reading Horizons, 37, 130–142.
Gandini, D., Lemaire, P., &; Dufau, S. (2008). Older and younger adults’ strategies in approximate quantification. Acta Psychologica, 129(1), 175-189.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., &; Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive Neurosience: the biology of the brain (2nd ed.). New York: W. W.Norton &; Company, Inc.
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., &; Cierniak, G. (2009). The Scientific Value of Cognitive Load Theory:A Research Agenda Based on the Structuralist View of Theories. Educational Psychology Review 21, 43–54.
Gog, T., Ericsson, K. A., Rikers, M. J. P., &; Paas, F. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 73-81.
Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., &; Sweller, J (2009). The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning:Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations. Educational Psychology Review 21, 21–30
Greene, J. A., Costa, L. J., Robertson, J., Pan, Y., &; Deekens, V. M. (2010). Exploring relations among college students’ prior knowledge, implicit theories of intelligence, and self-regulated learning in a hypermedia environment. Computers &; Education, 55, 1027–1043.
Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 498-504.
Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., &; Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, &; R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain.(pp. 537-562). Oxford: Elsevier.
Hoffler, T. N., &; Schwartz, R. N. (2011). Effects of pacing and cognitive style across dynamic and non-dynamic representations. Computers &; Education, 57, 1716–1726.
Huber,S.,&;Krist,H. (2004).When is the ball going to hit the ground?Duration estimates, eye movements, and mental imagery ofobject motion.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform,30(3), 431.
Humphreys, G. W., &; Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading. Behavioral &; Brain Sciences, 8, 689-740
Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172–176.
Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., &; Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: evidence from eye fixation patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 44-55.
Iding, M. K. (1997). Can questions facilitate learning from illustrated science texts? Reading &; Psychology, 18, 1–29.
Inhoff, A. W., &; Radach, R. (1998). Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 29-53). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., &; van Gog, T. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 146-154.
Jeroen, J. G., van Merri¨enboer, &; John Sweller (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning : Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-178.
Just, M. A., &; Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
Just, M.A., &; Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329-354.
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., &; Kirschner, P. A. (2009). A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning:United Brains for Complex Tasks. Educational Psychology Review 21, 31–42.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., &; Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.
Koun-tem Sun, Yuan-cheng Lin, Chia-jui Yu (2008). A Study on Learning Effect among Different Learning Styles in a Web-Based Lab of Science for Elementary School Students. Computers &; Education, 50(4), 1411-1422.
Krauzlis, R. J. (2005). The control of voluntary eye movements: New perspectives. The Neuroscientist, 11(2), 124-137. doi: 10.1177/1073858404271196.
Lai, C.L., Lin R.T., Liou, L.M., &; Liu, C.K. (2010). The role of event-related in cognitive decline in Alzhemer’s disease. Clinical Neurophysiology, 194-199.
Levie, W. H., &; Lentz, R (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication &; Technology Journal, 30, 195-232.
Levin, J. R. (1981). On functions of pictures in prose. In F. J. Pirozzolo et M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (203-228). New York: Academic Press.
Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., &; Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D. M. Willows &; H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer.
Levin, J.R., &; Mayer, R.E. (1993). Understanding illustrations in text. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, &; M. Brinkley (Eds.), Learning from Textbooks (pp. 95–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leslie, K. C., Low, R., Jin, P., &; Sweller, J. (2012). Redundancy and expertise reversal effects when using educational technology to learn primary school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1–13.
Lijia L., Robert K., &; Atkinson. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes. Computers &; Education, 56, 650–658
Lin Y. C ., &; Liu, C. J. (2007). A Study on Learning Effects Among Students With Different Learning Styles Using Chemistry Education Website . NARST 2007, New Orleans.
Lin, Y. C., Liu, B. Y., &; Liu, C. J. (2012). A Study of Applying Cognitive Load Theory to Science Education Websites. International Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(3), 55-61.
Lin, Y. C., Liu, B. Y., &; Shen, M. H. (2012). A Research of Employing Cognitive Load Theory in Science Education via Web-pages. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design.
Liu, H. C., &; Chuang, H. H. (2011). An examination of cognitive processing of multimedia information based on reviewers’ eye movements. Interactive Learning Environments, 19, 503–517.
Liu, H. C., &; Chuang, H. H. (2011). Examination of viewers’ cognitive processing of multimedia information from the perspective of eye movements. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 503-517.
Liu, H. C., Lai, M.-L., &; Chuang, H.-H. (2011). Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes.Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2410–2417.
Mast, F. W., &; Kosslyn, S. M. (2002). Eye movements during visual mental imagery. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6(7), 271-272.
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Multimedia Learning: Are We Asking The Right Questions? Educational Psychologist, 3(3), 147-165.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: are we asking the right question? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769.
Mayer, R. E., &; Chandler, Paul. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster depper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychologyt, 93(2), 390-397.
Mayer, R. E., &; Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.
Mayer, R. E., &; Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312–320.
Mayer, R. E., &; Moreno, R. (2003). Nine way to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mayer, R. E., &; Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.
Meyer, K., Rasch, T., &; Schnotz, W. (2010). Effects of animation’s speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction, 20, 136-145.
Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J. H., &; Novak, J. D. (Eds.), (2000). Assessing science understanding (pp. 304–341). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Mevarech, Z. R., &; Kramarsky, B. (1997). From verbal descriptions to graphic representation: Stability and change in students’ alternative conception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 229-263.
Moreno, R., &; Mayer, R. E., (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychologyt, 91(2), 358-368.
Morris, C., Bransford, J. D., &; Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning &; Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
Mousavi, S., Low, R., &; Sweller, J., (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychologyt, 87(2), 319-334.
Moyer , J. C., Sowder, L., Threadgill-Sowder, J., &; Moyer, M. B. (1984). Story problem formats：Drawn versus verbal versus telegraphic. Journal for Research in Mathematical Education, 15, 342-351.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., &; Walling, J. R. (1976). Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning &; Memory, 2, 523-528.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., &; McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning &; Memory, 3, 485-497.
Ollerenshaw, A., Aidman, E., &; Kidd, G. (1997). Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style, and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension. International Journal of Instructional Media, 24, 227–238.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitiveload approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
Paas, F., &; Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.
Paas, F., &; Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., &; Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J., Tabbers, H., &; Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63–72.
Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419–430.
Paas, F., Ayres, P., Pachman, M. 2008. Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning: Theory, methods and applications. In D.H. Robinson, G. Schraw (Eds.), Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate student learning (pp. 11–35). Information Age Publishing.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., &; Sweller, J (2003), Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Pawley, D., Ayres, P., Cooper, M., &; Sweller, J. (2005). Translating Words into Equations: A cognitive load theory approach. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 75-97.
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart &; Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Paivio, A., &; Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176-206.
Paivio, A., &; Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory. Journal of Verbal Learning &; Verbal Behavior, 20, 532–539.
Park, S. M., &; Gabrieli, D. E. (1995). Perceptual and nonperceptual components of implicit memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory &; Cognition, 21, 1583-1594.
Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning &; Instruction, 3, 227–238.
Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., &; Brunken, R. (Eds.), (2010). Cognitive load theory. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Potter, M. C., &; Faulconer, B. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Reinking, D. R., Hayes, D. A., &; McEneaney, J. E. (1988). Good and poor readers’ use of explicitly cued graphic aids. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 229–243.
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., &; Schworm, S. (2009). Example-Based Learning in Heuristic Domains:A Cognitive Load Theory Account. Educational Psychology Review 21, 67–78.
Riding, R. J., &; Douglas, G. (1993). The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Education Psychology, 63, 297–307.
Roediger, H. L. III (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 1043-1056.
Sadoski, M., &; Willson, V. L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically-based large scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 137–154.
Sankey, M, D. (2003). Visual and multiple representation in learning materials: an issue of literacy. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://www.usq.edu.au/users/sankey/Resources/CreatEd2003.pdf
Sanchez, C.,&; Wiley, J. (2006) Effects of working memory capacity on learning from illustrated text.Memory &; Cognition, 34(2), 344-355.
Salvucci, D. D.,&; Anderson, J. R. (1998). Tracing eye movement protocols with cognitive process models. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the CognitiveScience Society(pp. 923-928). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., &; Glowalla, U. (2010). Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: new insights from investigating students’ viewing behavior. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 226–237.
Schnotz, W., &; Lowe, R. (2003). External and internal representations in multimedia learning - Introduction. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 117-123.
Schnotz, W., &; Lowe, R. K. (2008). A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In R. K. Lowe, &; W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 304-356). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Schooler, J., Ohlson, S., &; Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 122(2), 166-183.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning &; Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
Stewig, J. W. (1992). Reading pictures, reading text: Some similarities. New Advocate, 5 (1), 11–22.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional Design in Technical Areas. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Sweller, J (2003), Evolution of human cognitive architecture., In B. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, 215-266, San Diego, CA: Academic.
Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9-31.
Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive Bases of Human Creativity . Educational Psychology Review 21, 11–19.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., &; Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load in the structure of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176-192.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., &; Pass, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-295.
Tabbers, H., K., Martens, R., L., &; Van Merriënboer, J., J., G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cuing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 71-81.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., &; Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychologyt: Applied, 3(4), 257-287.
Tiene, D. (2000). Sensory Mode and ‘Information Load’: Examining the Effects of Timing on Multisensory Processing. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(2), 183-198.
Tversky, B., &; Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 113, 169-193.
Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., &; Yang, F. Y. (2011).Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: An eye-tracking analysis. Computers &; Education, 58, 375- 385.
Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., &; Schmidt, H. G. (2004). Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology, 41, 167–174.
Van Gog, T., &; Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43, 16–26.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., &; Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Effects of process-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer performance. Learning and Instruction, 16, 154–164.
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., &; Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 18, 211–222.
Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., &; Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes:Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325–331.
van Gog, T., &; Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95-99.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., De Croock, M. B. M., &; Paas, F. (2002). Redirecting learners attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11–37.
van Merrienboer , J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., &; Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5-13.
van Merrienboer , J. J. G., &; Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
van Merrienboer , J. J. G., &; Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2009). Toward a Synthesis of Cognitive Load Theory, Four-Component Instructional Design, and Self-Directed Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 55-66.
Wedel, M., &; Pieters, R. (2000). Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science, 19(4), 297-312.
Weidenmann, B. (1989). When good picture fail: An information-processing approach to the effect of illustrations. In H. Mandl &; Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and picture (pp. 157-170). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Weldon, M. S., &; Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory &; Cognition, 15, 269-280.
Weldon, M., Roediger, H. L., &; Challis, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory &; Cognition, 17, 95-105.
Weldon, M. S., &; Coyote, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &; Cognition, 22, 670-686.
White, B. Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and instruction, 10(1), 1-100.
Williams, L. M., Loughland, C. M., Green, M. J., Harris, A. W. F., &; Gordon, E. (2003). Emotion perception in schizophrenia: An eye movement study comparing the effectiveness of risperidone vs. haloperidol. Psychiatry Research, 120(1), 13-27.
Yang, F. Y., Chang, C. Y., Jien, W. R., Jien, Y. T. Tseng, Y. H. (2013). Tracking learners’ visual attention during a multimedia presentation in a real classroom. Computers &; Education, 208-220.
Xie, B., &; Salvendy, G. (2000). Review and reappraisal of modeling and predicting mental workload in single- and multi-task environments. Work and Stress, 14, 74–99.