|
References
Aldridge, Edith. 2004. Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Minimalist analysis of ergativity. Sophia Linguistica 55:123-142. Amberber, Mengistu. 2000. Valency-changing and valency-encoding devices in Amharic. In Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A.Y. 312-332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Asai, Erin. 1936. A study of the Yami language: An Indonesian language spoken on Botel Tobago Island. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiteitsboekhandel en Antiquariaat J. Ginsberg, Leiden. Baker, M. 1988b. Theta theory and the syntax of applicatives in Chichewa. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 353-389. Blust, Robert A. 1991. The Greater Central Philippines hypothesis. Oceanic Linguistics 30 (2): 73-129. Blust, Robert A. 2003. Three notes on early Austronesian morphology. Oceanic Linguistics 42 (2): 438-478. Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Chang, Chih-Wei Hugh. 2008. Causative constructions in Tsou. M.A.thesis. Chia-yi: National Chung Cheng University. Chang, Claire H. 2000. A Reference Grammar of Yami. Introduction to Formosan Languages. Series No. 13. Taipei: Yuan-liu Publishing Co.
Chang, Henry. Y. 2004. AF verbs: transitive, intransitive, or both. In Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday. Language and Linguistics monograph Series Number 4, ed. by Lin et al. 95-120. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. Chang, Henry Y. 2011. Transitivity, ergativity and status of O in Tsou. Language and cognition: Festschrift in Honor of James H-Y. Tai on his 70th birthday, ed. by Jung-hsing Chang &; Jenny Y.-C. Kuo. 277-308. Taipei: Crane. Chang, Yu-jing. 2011. A discussion of syntax and semantics on ma-verbs in Yami. M.A. thesis, National Tsing Hua University. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels &; Juan Uriagereka, 89-155. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge: MIT Press. Chung, Sandra, and Alan Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Vol. 3, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 202-258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Comrie, B. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In Syntax and Semantics 6: the Grammar of Causative Constructions. ed. by Shibatani, M. pp. 261-312 Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell. Comrie, B. 1985. Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III. ed. by Timothy Shopen. 309-348. Comrie, B. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Cole, Peter. 1983. The Grammatical Role of the Causee in Universal Grammar. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 115-133. Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: Chicago University of Press. Croft, William, C. Taoka &; E. J. Wood. 2001. Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian and Japanese. Language Sciences 23: 579-602. Deng, Duen-hun. 2005. Argument-function linking in Yami: An optimality-theoretic account. M.A. thesis. Taipei: National Cheng-Chi University. Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55.1: 59-138. Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dixon, R.M.W. and Aikhenvald, A.Y. (ed.) 2000. Changing valency: case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dixon, R.M.W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dowty, D. R. 1979. Word meaning and montague grammar. D. Reidel Publishing Company. Evans, Bethwyn and Ross, Malcolm. 2001. The history of Proto-Oceanic *ma-. Oceanic Linguistics 40 (2): 269-290. Foley, W. A. 1991. The Yimas languages of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Gibson, Jeanne. D and Starosta, Stanley. 1990. Ergativity east and west. In Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology. ed. by Philip Baldi, 195-210. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Grimes, C. E. 1991. The Buru language of eastern Indonesia. Ph.D. thesis. Australian National University. Haas, M. 1941. ‘Trumai’, pp. 351-3 of The Amazonian languages, Vol. IV. New York: JJ. Augustin. Haiman J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59.781-819. Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity, ed. by Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky, 87-120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Hetzron, R. 1976. On the Hungarian causative verb and its syntax, In Syntax and semantics 6: the grammar of causative constructions. ed. by Shibatani, M. pp. 371-98. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., and John U. Wolff. 1999. Toratán (Ratahan). Languages of the World/Materials 130. Munich: Lincom Europa. Ho, Arlene, Y. L. 1990. Yami Structure: A descriptive study of the Yami Language. M.A. thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. Ho, Arlene, Y. L. 1993. Transitivity, focus, case and the auxiliary verb systems in Yami. Taipei: Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 62(1): 83-147. Hopper, Paul, J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56 (2): 251-299. Huang, Lillian M. 2000. Verb classification in Mayrinax Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39 (2): 364-390. Huang, Shuanfan. 2005. Split O in Formosan languages. Language and Linguistics 6 (4): 783-806. Hsieh, Fuhui, and Huang, Shuanfan. 2006. The pragmatics of case marking in Saisiyat. Oceanic Linguistics 45(1): 91-109. Huang, Huei-ju, and Shuanfan Huang. 2007. Lexical perspectives on voice construction in Tsou. Oceanic Linguistics 46(2): 424-455. Huang, Shuping, and Li-May Sung. 2008. The undergoer focus ma- in Kavalan. Oceanic Linguistics 47(1):159-184. Huang, Wan-tin. 2006. Yami voice system revisited: with particular reference to the ditransitive constructions. M.A. thesis, National Cheng-Chi University, Taipei. Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ichihashi, Kumiko. 1996. The “applicative” in Hualapai: Its functions and meanings. Cognitive Linguistics 7(2): 227-239. Jeng, Heng-hsiung. 1981. Yami verbal classification and the cooccurrences of cases. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 12 (1): 29-55. Kachru, Y. 1976. On the semantics of the causative construction in Hindi-Urdu. In Syntax and semantics 6: the grammar of causative constructions. ed. by Shibatani, pp. 353-69. Kazenin, Konstantin I. 2001. Verbal reflexives and the middle voice. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard, König, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgand Raible (eds.) Language Typology and Language Universals, 916-927. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Keenan, Edward L. and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1): 63-99. Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Kemmer, S. and Verhagen, A. 1994. The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events. Cognitive Linguistics 5 (2), 115-156. Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. An overview of Uto-Aztecan grammar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington. LaPolla, Randy J. 2000. Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In Changing valency: case studies in transitivity. ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A.Y. 282-311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 19 (3): 335-391. Lee, Amy Pei-Jung. 1997. The case marking and focus systems in Kavalan. M.A. thesis, Tsing-Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Levin, Beth and Hovav, Malka Rappoport. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Lee, Gregory. 1971. Subjects and Agents II. Working Papers in Linguistics # 7, Department of Linguistics, the Ohio State University, Columbus. Li, Chao-Lin. 2010. The syntax and semantics of eventuality in Paiwan and Saaroa. Ph D dissertation. National Tsing Hua University. Li, Paul Jen-Kuei. 1973. Rukai structure. Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica, Special Publication No. 64. Li, Paul Jen-Kuei. 2000. Subgrouping of the Batanic languages. In The Fifth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, Hochiminh City, pp. 175-176. Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City: University of Social Sciences and Humanities. Liao Hsiu-chuan. 2002. The interpretation of tu and Kavalan ergativity. Oceanic Linguistics 41(1): 140-158. Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2004. Transitivity and ergativity in Formosan and Philippine languages. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai ‘i. Liao, Hsiu-chuan. 2011. On the development of comitative verbs in Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 12 (1):205-237. Maran, L. R. and Clifton, J. R. 1976. The causative mechanism in Jinghpaw. In Syntax and semantics 6: the grammar of causative constructions. ed. by Shibatani, M. pp. 443-58. Manning, Christopher. 1996. Ergativity: argument structure and grammatical relations. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI). Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Valency-changing derivation in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. In Changing valency: case studies in transitivity. ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A.Y. 84-114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Moriguchi, Tsunekazu. 1980. “The Yami language.” Nihonminzoku to Kuroshio-bunka, 308-386. Tokyo: Kadokawa Shoten. Nedyalkov, Vladimir P. and G. G. Silnitsky. 1973. The typology of morphological and lexical causatives. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, ed. by Ference Kiefer, 1-32. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing. Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, D. and Barnes, Jonathan. 2004.Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguisitc Typology 8: 149-211. Onishi, Masayuki. 2000. Transitivity and valency-changing derivations in Motuna. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, A. Y. ed. Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. 115-144. Cambridge University Press. Palmer, F. R. 1994. Grammatical roles and relations. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambrige University of Press. Payne, Thomas E. 1982. Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup’ip Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Language 6 (1): 75-106. Payne, Thomas. E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Perlmutter, David M. and Postal, Paul M. 1984. The I-Advancement Exclusiveness Law. In David M. Perlmutter &; Carol G. Rosen (eds.), Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 81-125. Peterson, David A. 2006. Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rackowski, Andrea, and Norvin Richards. 2005. Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Theory 23:381-457. Rau, D. Victoria, and Maa-Neu Dong. 2006. Yami texts with reference grammar and dictionary. Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica. Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria. 2005. Iconicity and tense, aspect, and mood morphology in Yami. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 31(1): 65-94. Reid, Lawrence A., and Hsiu-chuan, Liao. 2004. A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. Language and Linguistics 5 (2): 433-490. Ross, Malcolm D. 2005. The Batanic languages in relation to the early history of the Malayo-Polynesian subgroup of Austronesian, Journal of Austronesian Studies 1(2): 1-23. Ross, Malcolm and Stacy Fang-cing Teng. 2005. Formosan languages and linguistic typology. Language and Linguistics 6(4): 739-781. Saeed, John I. 2009. Semantics. 3rd edition. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Saksena, A. 1982. Contact in causation. Language 58: 820-31. Shih, Louise Y. M. 1997. Yami Morphology. M.A.thesis. Taichung: Providence University. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1973. Lexical versus periphrastic causatives in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 9: 281-97. Shibatani, Masayoshi. (ed.) 1976. Syntax and semantics 6: the grammar of causative constructions. New York : Academic Press:. Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1996. Applicatives and benefactives: a cognitive account. In Grammatical constructions: their form and meaning. ed. by Shibatani, M. and Thompson, Sandra A. 157-194. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Smith, C. S. 1997. The parameter of aspect. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Song, Jae Jung. 2001. Linguistic typology: morphology and syntax. Longman Linguistic Library. Harlow: Pearson Education. Song, Jae Jung. 1998. Benefactive marking in Oceanic languages: from possessive classifiers to benefactive markers. In Case, typology and grammar in honor of Barry J. Blake. ed. by Anna Siewierska and Jae Jung Song. 247-276. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin Song, Nam Sun 1993. Thematic relations and transitivity in English, Japanese and Korean. The Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawai ‘i. Starosta, Stanley. 1997. Formosan clause structure: Ergativity, transitivity, and case marking. In Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 125-154. Taipei: Academia Sinica. Starosta, Stanley. 1998. Ergativity, transitivity and clitic coreference in four western Austronesian languages. In Case, typology and grammar, ed, by Anna Siewierska and Jae Jung Song, 277-307. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Sung, Li-May and Chia-chi Shen. 2006. Reciprocals in Kavalan and a typological comparison. In Streams converging into an ocean: Festschrift in honor of Professor Paul Jen-Kuei Li on his 70th birthday, ed. by Henry Y. Chang, Lillian M. Huang, and Dah-an Ho, 239-77. Taipei: Academia Sinica. Talmy, L. 1976. Semantic causative types. In Shibatani, Masayoshi. ed. Syntax and semantics 6: the grammar of causative constructions. New York: Academic Press. Thomas, D. D. 1971. Chrau grammar. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication No. 7. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Thepkanjana, K. and Uehara, S. 2008. The verb of giving in Thai and Mandarian Chinese as a case of polysemy: A comparative study. Language Sciences 30: 621-651. Tsuchida, Shigeru, Yukihiro Yamada, and Tsunekazu, Moriguchi. 1987.Lists of selected words of Batanic languages. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo. Tsuchida, Shigeru, Ernesto Constantino, Yukihiro Yamada, and Tsunekazu, Moriguchi 1989. Batanic languages: Lists of sentences for grammatical features. Tokyo: Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo. Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1999. Transitivity and intransitivity. Journal of Asian and African Studies 57: 1-9. Tuggy, David. 1988. Nahuatl causative/applicatives in Universal Grammar. In Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 587-618. Van Valin, R. D. and Lapolla, R. J. 1997. Syntax structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Van Voorst J. 1995. The semantic structure of causative constructions. Studies in Languages 19 (2): 489-523. Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Wang, Shan-shan. 2004. An ergative view of Thao syntax. Ph.D dissertation, University of Hawai ‘i. Whaley, Lindsay J. 1997. Introduction to typology. The unity and diversity of language. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage Publications. Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predications. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1): 203-238. Wu, Joy Jing-Jan. 2007 “Voice” markers in Amis: A role and reference grammar analysis. Language and Linguistics 8:95-142. Yamada, Yukihiro, comp. 2002. Itbayat-English dictionary. Endangered Languages of the Pacific Rim (ELPR) Publications Series A3-006. Osaka: Osaka Gakuin University. Yami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible Society in the R.O.C. Yeh, Marie M. 2003. The syntax and semantics of verbs in Saisiyat. Ph.D dissertation. National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Lillian M. Huang, Marie M. Yeh, Anna H. Chang, and Joy J. Wu. 1996. The temporal, aspectual, and modal systems of some Formosan languages: A typological perspective. Oceanic Linguistics, 35(1): 21-56. Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Lillian M. Huang. 2000. Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages, Oceanic Linguistics 39(2): 391-414.
|