臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：漢語語氣副詞探索:'難道'及其同類詞的個案研究
作者：吳翠萍 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Tsui-ping
校院名稱：國立清華大學
系所名稱：語言學研究所
指導教授：連金發
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2013
主題關鍵詞：語氣副詞；語法化；詞彙化；反詰問句；Mood adverb；Grammaticalization；Lexicalization；Rhetorrical question
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
摘 要
本論文研究以漢語語氣副詞（mood adverb）為中心，並以「難道」為例，探討漢語語氣副詞「難道」的歷時（diachronic）發展及共時（synchronic）現象。研究主要分成兩方面：一方面以「難道」為例，探討漢語語氣副詞「難道」的語法化（grammaticalization）進程；另一方面，探討現代漢語語氣副詞（mood adverb）的構式（construction）、語意特性（semantic characteristics）及層次結構（hierarchical structure），並探討「難道」與其他相關語氣副詞間的異同。
在現代漢語中，「難道」的語意以由實詞意義轉向反詰語氣（rhetorical question），因此我們以歷時的角度來探討難道語法化（grammaticalization）的進程，我們以Heine(2002)的語法化四階段（four-stage scenario of grammaticalization）為理論根據，來探討「難道」語法化（grammaticalization）現象，從語料中我們發現：「難道」由實詞來源意義（source meaning）轉向功能詞目標意義（target meaning）的語法化進程發芽於宋朝，直至明清時期驅趨於成熟。
此外，我們以「難道」為例，來探究語氣副詞在現代漢語中的構式及語意上的特性。在現代漢語中，「難道」的語意並非單指反詰語氣（rhetorical question），有時也可單純表達臆測，常常必需依賴上下文的語境（context）才能決定，也就是說，語用功能（pragmatic function）在語氣副詞中扮演重要的角色，「難道」的反詰語意處在詞彙化（lexicalization）的進程中，尚未達詞彙化完成的階段。另一方面，我們用共時（synchronic）的角度來觀察另一個語氣副詞，「到底」，的構式表現及語意分類；「VP到底」可表空間、過程和程度，「到底VP」則可表達主觀時間和確認的意義，「VP到底」的語意較具象，可表達「直達底部」的實詞意，而「到底VP」則趨向語法化，只能表達對命題的主觀意義，已喪失實詞功能。
最後我們也另闢篇幅探討語氣副詞的層次結構，觀察語氣副詞及情態動詞（modal verb）的線性順序，及其與否定詞（negation）的互動關係。其中否定詞及情態動詞的層次位置可互換，其高低取決於否定詞的管轄範域；否定詞的管轄範域可高於情態動詞也可位於情態動詞之下，所產生的語意多所不同。此外，越接近動詞本身的功能範疇層次越低，反之則層次越高。語氣副詞常常位於句首，離動詞最遠，所以位於較高的層次，管轄範圍及於全句，也因而語意作用在全句，而非只作用於動詞本身。
The studies focus on the mood adverbs in Mandarin Chinese and take nandao for example to explore the diachronic and synchronic phenomena. On the one hand, we aim to trace the process of grammaticalization of nandao. On the other hand, we discuss the construction, characteristics, and hierarchical structure of the mood adverb nandao. The differences from its ilk are also included in the dissertation.
In Modern Mandarin Chinese, the semantic content of nandao refers to rhetorical question. Based on the four-stage scenario of grammaticalization (Heine 2002), we diachronically explore the process of grammaticalization in nandao. According to the historical documents we collect, the grammaticalization of nandao from the source meaning to the target meaning sprouted in the Song Dynasty. It is developed gradually and totally achieved in the Ming and Qing Dynasty.
In addition to the grammaticalization of nandao, we make great effort to explore the complexity of mood adverbs both in semantics and syntax. On the one hand, we discuss the semantic vagueness between rhetoric and speculation in sentences with nandao. Sometimes we need the context to disambiguate the meanings. On the other hand, another related mood adverb, daodi, is synchronically discussed in the dissertation. “VP + daodi” can denote the space, process and degree meanings. It can express the content meaning “to the end”. However, “daodi + VP” can only express subjective time and confirmation toward the propositions.
Finally, we observe the hierarchical structure of mood adverbs as well as the linear ordering of the mood adverb, the modal verb and the negation. The negation can precede or follow the modal verb according to the scope it dominates. In addition, mood adverbs usually express the judgment toward the propositional content and it usually occurs in the sentence-initial position, so hierarchically, it is on the highest layer of the structure.
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English Word Formation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Blank, Andreas. 2001. Pathways of lexicalization. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard
Konig, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible, eds., Language Typology and Language Universals. Vol. II, 1596-1608. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicaliation reconsidered: on the Late Use of Temperal Adverbs. In Teresa Fanago, Maria Jose Lopez-Couso, nd Javier Perez-Guerra, eds., English Histirical Syntax and Morphology: Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7-11 September 2000, 67-97. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee,Joan, Revere Perkins, &; William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, Joan, and Suzanne Fleischman (ed.). 1995. Modality in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan, and Paul Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the Emergency of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Machanisms of change in grammaticalization. The Role of Frequency. In Joseph and Janda, eds., 602-623.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1948. Mandarin Primer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1975. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Cheng, Robert. 1978. Tense Interpretation of four Taiwanese modal verbs. in Proceedings of Symposinm on Chinese Linguistics, 1977 Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of Amercia, ed. By Robert L. Cheng, Ying-Che Li, Ting-chi Tang. 243-266.
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language. 35-1: 26-57.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chu, Yan-fang. 2008. Mofei, mobushi, nandao bienxi—jianluen sanzhe de yufahua guocheng. [The analysis of mofe, mobushi and nandao : the grammaticalization of the three words]. Journal of Choko Studies. 6: 55-58.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cinque, Gulielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Coniglio M and Iulia Zegrean. 2010. Splitting up force, evidence from discourse particles. Working Papers in Linguistics. Vol. 20. University of Venice.
Dahl, Osten. 1985. Tense and Aspectual System. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Diewald, G. 1999. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. Paper presented at the symposium on New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Potsdam, 17-19 June.
Douglas, Rev. Cartairs. 1873. Chinese-English Dictionary of the Vernacular or Spoken Language of Amoy with the Principal Variations of the Chang-chew and Chin-chew Dialects. London: Trubner and Co.
Dowty,, D.R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Evan, N, and Wilkins, D. 1998. The knowing ear: An Australian test of universal claims about the semantic structure of sensory verbs and their extension into the domain of cognition. Cologne: Institute for Sprachwissenschaft.new window
Grice, H.P. 1967. Logic and Convention. D. [The William James lectures]. Harvard University.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government &; Binding Theory (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1994. Some Key features of Distributed Morphology. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley, and Tony Bures(eds.) Papers on Phonology and Morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, 275-288.
Halliday, M.A.K., Ruqaia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Han, Chung-hye. 2002. Interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112: 201-229.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043-1068.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular
reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry
Perridon, (eds.), Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization, Typological Studies in Language, 59: 17–44 Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hunnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: a Conceptual Framwork. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. New Reflections On Grammaticalization, ed. by Wischer, Ilse and Diewald, Gabriele, 83-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On Some Principles of Grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, eds. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I. 17-36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elisabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C.-T. James, and Masao Ochi. 2004. Syntax of hell: Two types of
dependencies. In Proceedings of NELS 34, ed. Keir Moulton and Matthew
Wolf. Amherst: UMASS GLSA.
Huang, Lillian M. &; P. Davis. 1989. An aspectual system and its manifestation in Mandarin Chinese JCL 17,1.
Huang, Tzyh-lai. 1978. A contrastive Analysis of English and Chinese Verbal Systems: Tenses, Aspects, and Modals and its pedagogical Application to the Teaching of English to Chinese Students. Thesis. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18 (3): 369-412.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2007. Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Boas’ view of grammatical meaning. Selected Writings, Vol. II, Word and Language, 489-496. The Hague: Mouton.
Jesperson, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
Julien, Marit. 2002. Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. New York; Oxford University Press.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kovekses, Zoltan and Gunter Radden. 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77.
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. 1975. The Evolution of Grammatical Categories. Esquisses linguistiques. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1:5–38.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Concept, Image, and Symbol; the Cognitive Basis of grammar. Berlin; New York: Mounton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughs on Grammaticalization. A programmatic Sketch. Vol.I. Koln: Arbeiten des Kolner Universalien-Projekt, Nr. 48.
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughs on Grammaticalization. Munchen and Newscasatle: LINCOM EUROPA.
Lessau, Donald A. 1994. A Dictionary of Grammaticalization. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Charles N. &; Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles:: University of California Press.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. University of Chicago Press.
Lien, Chinfa. 1994. Taiwan Minnanyu wanjie shixiangci shilun [Phase words in Taiwan Southern Min]. Papers from the 1994 Conference on Language Teaching and Linguistics in Taiwan, Vol. I: Southern Min, ed. by Fengfu Tsao, and Mei-hui Tsai, 121-140. Taipei: Crane.
Lien, Chinfa. 2001. The semantic extension of Tioh8著 in Taiwanese Southern Min: an interactive approach. Language and Linguistics 2.2: 173-202.
Lien, Chinfa. 2005. Phase and aspect markers in Li Jing Ji. Essays in Chinese Historical Linguistics: Festschrift in Memory of Professor Fang-Kuei Li on His Centennial Birthday, 393-420. Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Lien, Chinfa. 2009. The focus marker si7 是 and lexicalization of Si7 Mih8 是乜 into what wh-words in earlier southern min texts. Language and Linguistics 10.4: 745-764.
Liu, Jian and Jang S-Y. 1990. Jindai Hanyu Yufa Shiliao Huebian Tang Wudai Juan [The Data Collection of Modern Chinese: Tang Wudai]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Liu, Jian and Jang S-Y. 1992. Jindai Hanyu Yufa Shiliao Huebian Songdai Juan [The Data Collection of Modern Chinese: Song Dynasty]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Liu, Jian and Jang S-Y. 1995. Jindai Hanyu Yufa Shiliao Huebian Yuandai Mingdai Juan [The Data Collection of Modern Chinese: Yuan and Ming Dynasty]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Lu, John H-t. 1973. The verb-verb construction with a directional complement in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, I-3. 1973. 397-413.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mattews, P.H. 1997. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
McClureW. 1995. Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Meillet, Antoine. 1958. L’evolution des formes grammaticales. Meillt 1958. 130-148.
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F.R. 1979. Modality and the English Modals. London; New York: Longman
Palmer, F.R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, F.R. 1990. Modality and the English Modals. 2ed ed. New York: Longman.
Pagliuca, William, ed. 1994. Perspectives on Grammaticalization. (Current Issues in
Linguistic Theory, 109.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum. 1973. University Grammar of English. London: Longman Group.
Ramat, Paolo. 2001. Degrammaticalization or transcategorization? In Chris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison, and Friedrich Neubarth, eds., Naturally! Linguistic Studies in Honor of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler Presented on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, 393-401. Torino: Rosenbach and Sellier.
Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin. 1998a. Morphology and lexical semantics, in A. Zwicky and A. Spencer, eds., Handbook of Morphology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. 248-271.
Rappaport Hovav and B. Levin 1998b. The Internal Structure of Complex Events. MS: Bar Ilan University and Northwestern University.
Radford, Andrew. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robertston, Ian E. 1990. The tense-mood-aspect system of Berbice Dutch. In Jon Victor Singer(ed.) Pidgin and Creole tense-mood-aspect systems, 169-184. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Ross C. and J.S Ma. 2006. Modern Mandarin Chinese Grammar. New York: Routledge Modern Grammars.
Ross, John R. A proposed rule of tree prunin. In David A. Riebel and Sanford A Shane(eds.). Modern Studies in English: Reading in Transformational Grammar. 1969. 288-299.
Saeed, John Ibrahim. 1997. Semantics. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Searle, J.R. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Language, Mind, and Knowledge 7, 334-369.
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sun, Ju-fen. 2007. Fuci nandao de xingcheng [The Formation of nandao]. Language Teaching and Studies. 4: 48-53.
Sweetser, Eve E. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Axmaker, Jaisser, and Singmaster, eds., 389-405.
Tai, James H-Y. 1973. A derivational constraint on adverbial placement in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1-3: 397-413.
Tai, James H-Y. 1984. Verbs and times: Vendler’s categories, Lexical Semantics 289-296. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Tang, Ting-chi. 1972. A Case Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Taipei: Hai-Guo Book Co.
Tang, Ting-chi and Tang Zhe-zheng. 1997. Studies on Modals in Chinese. Papers on the fifth Chinese Teaching Conference. 175-197. Taipei: World Chinese Publishing Co.
Ten, Shou-hsin. 1974. Negation and Aspect in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1-1:14-37.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31-55.
Traugott, Elizabeth and Ekkenhard Konig. 1991. The Semantic-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott and Heine, eds., Vol I, 189-218.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Stein Dieter and Susan Wright, 31-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda. (ed.), A Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 624-647. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1994. On the mechanisms and constraints in syntactic change: Evidence from Chinese dialects. International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics 2: 389-420.
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1999. On three Aspect— related morphemes “U” “Ø” “A” in Taiwanese Minnan. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28 (3): 299-334.
Van de Velde, F. 2012. A structural-functional account of NP-internal mood. Lingua 122: 1-23.
Vendler, Zero. 1957. Verbs and times. Phiosophical Review 56: 143-160.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Verbs and times, Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Wang, William S-Y. 1965. Two aspect markers in Mandarin. Language. 41: 457-470.
Willis, Hulon. 1972. Modern Descriptive English Grammar. New York: Chandler Publishing Co.
Xie, Jia-ling. 2002. Modality in Mandarin Chinese. Dissertation. Xinchu: Tsinghua University.
Xin, Ai-li. 1999. Studies on Modality in Taiwan Southern Min. Dissertation. Xinchu: Tsinghua University.
Zheng, Li-jun. 1994. An elementary generative syntax of verbal constructions in Chinese. Mphil thesis. Norway: University of Trondheim.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：747（臺灣：739，外國：8） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2000451 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67800677
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上