1.Ajzen, I. (1974). Effects of information on interpersonal attraction: Similarity versus affective value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 374.380.
2.Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding events affect &; the construction of social action theise. Contemporary Psychology, 25(10), 775-776.
3.Ajzen, I. (1981). Message attitude behavior relationship theory, methodology &; application Cushman, mcphee. Contemporary Psychology, 26(12), 964-966.
4.Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A theory of Planned Behavior. J. Kuhl &; J. Bechmannn (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer, Heidelberg, pp.11-39.
5.Ajzen, I. &; T. J. Madden. (1986). Prediction of Goal-Directed Behaveior: Attitudes, Intentions, &; Perceived Behaveioral Control, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.22, 453-474.
6.Ajzen, I. (1987a). Attitudes, traits, &; actions dispositional prediction of behavior in personality &; social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 1-63.
7.Ajzen, I. (1987b). Communication &; persuasion - central &; peripheral routes to Attitude change &; Contemporary Psychology, 32(12).
8.Ajzen, I., (1988). Attitudes, Personality, &; Behavior: Dorsey Press.
9.Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude Structure &; Behavior, In A.Pratkans, A.R., Breckler, S.J., &; Greenwald, A.G. (eds). Attitude Structure &; Function .Hillsdale, N.J, Erlbaum &; Associates, pp.252
10.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior, Organizational Behavior &; Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
11.Armstrong, A. G., &; Hagel III, J. (1997). Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities, McKinsey &; Company.
12.Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, &; the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
13.Ajzen, I. &; Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behaviour. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, &; M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.Bentler, P. M. &; Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance Tests &; Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-600.
15.Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Development Psychology, 25(5), 729-735.
16.Bitner, M. J., Faranda, W. T., Hubbert, A. R., &; Zeithaml, V. A. (1997).
Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193-205.
17.Baym, N.（1998）. The emergence of on-line community. In S. Jones（Ed）, Cyberspace2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication &; community.（pp. 35-68）. London: Sage Publications.
18.Bagozzi, R. P., &; Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Open source software user communities: A study of participation in linux user groups. Management Science, 52(7), 1099-1115.
19.Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.20.Boyd, d., &; Ellison, N. (2007), Social network sites: Definition, history, &; scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
21.Bhattacherjee, A., and Premkumar, G.(2004). Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test, MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229-254.
22.Compeau, D. R., &; Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure &; initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
23.Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A. &; Huff, S. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory &; Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study, MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
24.Christina M. Finneran &; Ping Zhang.(2005). Flow in computer-mediated enviroments: promises &; challengs. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 15, 2005, 82-101
25.Csikszentmihalyi, M.（1975）.Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco：Jossey-Bass.
26.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
27.Csikszentmihalyi, M.＆Csikszentmihalyi, I.（1988）.Itroduction to part IV.In M.Csikszentmihalyi＆I.S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience：Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York：Cambridge University Press.
28.Christopher Allen, “Tracing the Evolution of Social Software” http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/10/tracing_the_evo.html (Retrieved Oct. 15, 2005)
29.Deighton J. (1996). The future of interactive marketing. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 151-160.
30.Donath, J. &; boyd, d.(2004), Public displays of connection, BT Technology Journal, 22 (4), 71-82.
31.Ducheneaut, Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Volume 15, 2005) 82-101art (Eds.), Proceedings of the Other Players conference. Copenhagen: IT University of Copenhagen.
32.Davis, F. D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology” MIS Quarterly 13(3), 1989, pp. 319-340
33.Fishbein, M. &; I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention &; Behavior: An Introduction to Theory &; Research, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
34.Fornell &; Larcker (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables &; measurement errors, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(2), 39-50.
35.Fernback, J. (1999). There is a there: Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. Doing internet research: Critical issues &; methods for examining the net. London: Sage, 203-241.
36.Fernback, J.（2007）. Beyond the diluted community concept: a symbolic interactionist perspective on online social relations. New Media &; Society, 9（1）, 49-69.37.Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16, 233-240.
38.Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. In Martin Fishbein (Eds.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement, 477-492.New York: Wiley.
39.Guieford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology &; education(4th ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
40.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., &; Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
41.Hsu, C. L. &; Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences &; flow experience, Information &; Management, 41(7), 853-868.
42.Hausman, A. V., Siekpe, J. S. (2009). The effect of web interface features on consumer online purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 5-13.43.Hwang J., Yoon Y. S., Park N. H. (2011). Structural effects of cognitive &; affective reponses to web advertisements, website &; brand attitudes &; purchase intentions: The case of casual-dining restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 897-907.
44.Hoffman, D. L., and Novak, T. P., “Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations”Journal of Marketing 60(3), 1996, pp. 50-69.
45.Herr, Paul M., Steven J. Sherman, &; Russell H. Fazio (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
46.Hoffman, L. D., Novak, P. T., and Duhachek, A., “The Influence of Goal-directed and Experiential Activities on Online Flow Experiences” Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1/2), 2003, pp. 3-16.47.Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., &; Cavaye, A.L.M.(1997). Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279-305.
48.Johnson, R. D., &; Marakas, G. M. (2000). The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition-toward refinement of the model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 402-417.
49.Jan. Davidson R. A. Winstock. Areca nut-abuse liability, dependence and public health.. Journal Article of Addiction Biology. 7(1):133-8, 2002.50.Jiang Z., Chan J., Tan B. C. Y., Chua W.S. (2010), Effects of interactivity on website involvement &; purchase intention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 34-59.51.Koufaris, M., “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior” Information Systems Research 13(2), 2002, pp. 205-223.
52.Kreijns K., Kirschner P. A., Jochems W., Buuren H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers &; Education, 49(2), 176-192.
53.Kyle, G. T., Graefe, A. R., Manning, R. and Bacon, J. (2004a) Predictors of behavioral loyalty among hikers along the Appalachian Trail, Leisure Science, 26 (1): 99-118.54.Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges &; opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.55.Laffey, J., Lin, G., &; Lin, Y. (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17 (2), 163-177.
56.Lin H. F. (2008). Determinants of successful virtual communities: Contributions from system characteristics &; social factors. Information &; Management, 45, p.522–527.
57.Luis V. Casal&;oacute;, Carlos Flavi&;aacute;n, Miguel Guinal&;iacute;u(2011). Understanding the intention to follow the advice obtained in an online travel community. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 622-633
58.Lu H. P., Hsiao K.L. (2010) The influence of extro/introversion on the intention to pay for social networking sites. Information &; Management, 47, 150–157.
59.Lu Y., Zhao L., Wang B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities &; its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research &; Applications, 9, 346–360.
60.Lee Y., Kozar K. A. (2012). Understanding of website usability: Specifying &; measuring constructs &; their relationships. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 450-463.61.Lee, C. &; Green, R. T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 289-305.
62.Mathieson, K.(1991), Predicting User Intention: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with Theory of Planned Behavior, Information Systems Research, Vol.2, No.3, pp.173-191.
63.Marios Koufaris(2002) "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior" Information Systems Research Vol.13, No. 2 66.
64.Moore K., McElroy J. C. (2012). The influence of personality on Facebook usage, wall postings, and regret. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 267-274.65.Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., and Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach, Marketing Science 19(1), pp.22-42.66.Oliver, R. L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions” Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-69.
67.Paia P. Y. &; Tsai H. T. (2011). How virtual community participation influences consumer loyalty intentions：in online shopping contexts: an investigation of mediating factors. Behaviour &; Information Technology, 1-13.
68.Pavlou, P. A., and Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior, MIS Quarterly 30(1), pp. 115-143.69.Phang C. W., Kankanhalli A., Sabherwal R. (2009). Usability &; Sociability in Online Communities: A Comparative Study of Knowledge Seeking &; Contribution. Journal of the association for information systems, 10(10), 721-741.
70.Paul Harvey &; Jeremy Lind.(2005) Dependency and humanitarian relief: a critical analysis. Humanitarian Policy Group.
71.Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success, Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(5), 347-356
72.Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability and supporting sociability. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
73.Park, S. Y.(2009), An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Educational technology &; society, 12 (3), 150–162.
74.Payne TJ. Smith PO. McCracken LM. McSherry WC. Antony MM. (1994). Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. [Journal Article] Addictive Behaviors. 19(3):307-17.
75.Rheingold, H. (1993). Virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Addison-Wesley.
76.Rheingold, H.（1993）. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
77.Segars, A. H., &; Grover, V. (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use &; Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis, MIS Quarterly, 17, pp. 517~525.
78.Shen K. N., Khalifa M. (2010). Explaining Virtual Community Participation: Accounting for the IT Artifacts through Identification &; Identity Confirmation. European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) 2010 Proceedings, p.87.
79.Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., &; Meece, J. L. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in education: Th eory, research, &; applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merril Prentice Hall.
80.Simmel, G., &; Hughes, E.（1949）. The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology, 55（3）, 254-261.
81.Sang, S., Lee, J. D. and Lee, J. (2010). E-government adoption in cambodia: A partial least squares approach. Transforming Government: People, Process, and Policy, 4(2), 138-157.
82.Sherman, S. J., &; Fazio, R. H. (1983). Parallels between attitudes and traits as predictors of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 308.345
83.Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., &; Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of fl ow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, pp. 158–176.
84.Taylor, S. &; Todd, P.A. (1995b). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Information Systems Research (6:2), pp. 144-17623.
85.Tsai, H. T., Huang, H. C., Chiu, Y. L. (2011). Brand community participation in Taiwan: Examining the roles of individual, group, &; relationship-level antecedents Original Research ArticleJournal of Business Research, Article In Press.
86.Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups, Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations(pp.61-76). London: Academic Press
87.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., &; Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp. 425-478.
88.Venkatesh, V., &; Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development &; Test, Decision Sciences (27:3), pp. 451-482.
89.Winstock, C. R. Trivedy et al., (2000). A dependency syndrome related to areca nutuse: some medical and psychological aspects among areca nut users in the Gujarat community in the UK. Addiction Biology.5, 173-179.
90.Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place &; cyberplace: the rise of networked individualism. In Keeble. L. &; Loader, B.D. (eds). Community Informatics: Shaping Computer-Mediated Social Relations. London: Routledge.
91.Wenger, E., McDermott, R., &; Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
92.Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., &; Ryan, L. (1993).The dimensionality and correlates of Flow in human computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426.
93.Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, Vol. 79, pp. 899-902.
94. Young, K. S. (2002). “Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder,” available at: http://www.netaddiction.com/articles/newdisorder.htm.
95.Zaltman, G., &; Burger P. C. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals &; Dynamics. Stanford: International Thomson Publishing.