價值基礎策略觀點之公、私部門夥伴關係的價值共創：以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	價值基礎策略觀點之公、私部門夥伴關係的價值共創：以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例
作者：	蔡志豪
作者(外文)：	Chih-Hao Tsai
校院名稱：	國立中山大學
系所名稱：	企業管理學系研究所
指導教授：	方世杰蔡敦浩
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2015
主題關鍵詞：	文化創意產業；社會困境；價值基礎策略；共創；公、私部門夥伴關係(PPPs)；Cultural and creative industry；Social dilemma；Value-based strategy；Co-creation；Public-private partnerships (PPPs)
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:34

公、私部門組織的合作夥伴關係(PPPs)已成為現代組織管理中不可或缺的研究趨勢，然而，對於如何設計、管理與評估PPPs使其有助於政府機構、企業組織與公民社會進行價值建構，卻是管理領域的挑戰與持續發展的問題。本研究認為公、私部門間的合作夥伴關係將因公共性、異質性、集體行動等特質，無可避免的將衍生個別組織為自利而損及公利的社會困境問題。但是，透由價值基礎策略的觀點，若公、私部門間可以價值共創平台為基礎，則可以利用溝通對話、資訊透明度、資訊可及性與相互協商等創造機制，有效解決因PPPs所產生的社會困境問題，從而創造雙方均可接受，甚至更大的價值。本研究以我國文創產業之駁二藝術特區為研究田野，分析公部門與私部門間之PPPs所產生的合作、共享、價值判斷等三種社會困境；在價值共創平台下的運作下，成功創造經濟價值與社會價值，並以此提出管理理論與實務上的意涵。

以文找文

There has been a surge in research of public-private partnerships (PPPs). However, the understanding of how to develop, manage and assess PPPs in order to co-create value for governmental and business organizations and the society remains constrained. We contend that the characteristics of publicness, heterogeneity and collective actions in PPPs will inevitably result in situations that self-interests of individual organizations are placed above the public welfare; such phenomena are seen as “social dilemmas.” From a perspective of value-based strategy, we further argue that, social dilemmas between public and private organizations can be reduced using a platform that provides information accessibility and transparency, with which mutual dialogue and negotiation is facilitated; we term it as a “value co-creation platform”. Drawing on a case study of Pier 2 Art Center’s cultural innovation, we identified and analyzed three types of social dilemmas occurring in the cross-sector partnerships between Bureau of Cultural Affairs Kaohsiung City Government and operators of Pier 2 Art Center: cooperating dilemma, sharing dilemma and evaluating dilemma. We found these dilemmas were mitigated in the value co-creation platform, successfully generating economic and social value. The findings permit us to develop theoretical and managerial implications.

以文找文

參考文獻
中文部分
王武森(2007)，高雄市現代畫學會召開"駁二藝術特區願景座談會"全記錄　http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/kaokart1987/article?mid=-2&;prev=267&;l=f&;fid=1
行政院文化建設委員會(2003)，閒置空間再利用六個試辦點調查研究及評估期末報告。台北市：行政院文化建設委員會。
林欽榮(2006)，城市空間治理的創新策略: 三個台灣首都城市案例評析: 台北• 新竹• 高雄。新自然主義：台北。
吳毓星 (2011)，台灣文化創意產業未來發展之探討，華人前瞻研究。第 7 巻第 1 期，頁113-119。 new window

胡幼慧、姚美華（1996），一些質性方法上的思考，胡幼慧主編，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，巨流：台北市。
高雄市文化局(2003)，高雄市駁二藝術特區永續營運規劃，城市記憶公關顧問有限公司，高雄市。
張可婷譯，Boeije, H. 著(2013)，質性研究分析方法，韋伯文化：台北市。
張珃君(2005)，台灣地區藝術村經營管理之研究。國立中山大學藝術管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃琡媛(2008)，都市文化園區建構之制度化---以華山文化園區、駁二藝術特區為例。國立台北大學都市計劃研究所未出版碩士論文。
彭以惠(2011)，台灣文化產業園區發展經驗：以高雄市駁二藝術特區為例。
國立中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
楊燕枝、吳思華(2005)，文化創意產業的價值創造形塑之初探，行銷評論，第二卷，第三期，第313-338頁。 new window

樹德科技大學院長(2005)，樹德科技大學駁二藝術特區93、94 年營運結案報告，樹德科技大學。
潘淑滿（2003），質性研究的理論與應用，心理：台北市。
蘇志徹(2007)，高雄市現代畫學會召開"駁二藝術特區願景座談會"全記錄　http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/kaokart1987/article?mid=-2&;prev=267&;l=f&;fid=1
英文部分
Agarwal, R., Croson, R., &; Mahoney, J. T. 2010. The role of incentives and communication in strategic alliances: an experimental investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(4): 413-437.
Amit, R. &; Zott, C. 2001. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2): 493-520.
Andrews, K. R. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Irwin
Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bansal, P., &; Corley, K. 2011. The coming of age for qualitative research: Embracing the diversity of qualitative methods. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 233-237.
Barnes, C. M., Hollenbeck, J. R., Jundt, D. K., DeRue, S., &; Harmon, S. J. 2011. Mixing individual incentives and group incentives: Best of both worlds or social dilemma? Journal of Management, 37: 1611-1635.
Bejerot,E. &;Hasselbladh, H. 2013. Forms of intervention in public sector organizations: Generic traits in public sector reforms, Organization Studies, 34(9): 1357-1380.
Bennett, J. &; Iossa, E. 2006.Delegation of contracting in the privateprovision of public services.Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1-2): 75-92.
Boland, J.R. &; Tenkasi,R.V. 1995. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4): 350-372.
Bowman, C. &; Ambrosini, V. 2000. Value creation versus value capture: Towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1): 1-15.
Bowman, C. &; Ambrosini, V. 2001. “Value” in the resource-based view of the firm: A contribution to the debate. Academy of Management Review, 26: 501-502.
Boyne, G. A. 2002. Public and private management: What’s the difference?, Journal of management studies, 39(1): 97-122
Bridoux, F., Coeurderoy, R., &; Durand, R. 2011.Heterogeneous motives and the collective creation of value, Academy of Management Review, 36(4):711-730.
Bridoux, F.&;Stoelhorst, J. W.. 2013. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives, Strategic Management Journal, (forthcoming).
Brinkerhoff, D. W. &; Brinkerhoff, J.M. 2011. Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance, Public Administration and Development, 31(1): 2-14.
Carroll, G. R. 1993. A sociological view on why firms differ. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (4): 237-249.
Cooke, P. &; De Propris, L. 2011. A policy agenda for EU smart growth: the role of creative and cultural industries, Policy Studies, 32:4, 365-375.
Cuccurullo, C. &;Lega, F. 2013.Effective strategizing practices in pluralistic settings:the case of Academic Medical Centers, Journal of Management and Governance, 17:609-629.
Dyer, W. G., &; Wilkins, A. L. 1991. Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 613-619.
Florida, R. (2010). The Great Reset. HarperCollins Publishers: New York.
Glachanta, J-M, &;Saussier, S. 2006. Introduction, Review of Industrial Organization, 29(1-2): 1-2.
Grönroos, C. &; Voima, P. 2013. Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2): 133-150.
Hargrave, T. J. &; Van De Ven, A. H. 2006. A Collective action model of institutional innovation, Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864-888.
Jia, N. 2014. Are collective political actions and private political actions substitutes or complements? Empirical evidence from China’s private sector. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2): 292-315.
Kivleniece, I. &; Quelin, B. V. 2012.Creating and capturing value in public- private ties: aprivate actor’s perspective. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 272-299.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. P., McGahan, A. M., &;Pitelis, C. N. 2012. Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance. Strategic Organization, 10(3): 304-315.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. P., McGahan, A. M., &;Pitelis, C. N. 2013.Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations.Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7: 70-91.
Kollock, P. 1998. Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 183-214.
Kooiman, J.1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, Newbury Park. California: Sage.
Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., &;Pfarrer, M. D. 2012. A communicative framework of valuein cross-sector partnerships.Academy of Management Review, 37 (3): 332-354.
Kroeger, A. &; Weber, C. 2014. Developing a conceptual framework for comparing social value creation. Academy of Management Review, forthcoming.
Lawrence, T.B. &; Phillips, N. 2002. Understanding culture industries. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4): 430-411.
Liebrand, W.B.G. 1983. A classification of social dilemma games. Simulation &; Games, 14(2): 123-138.
Lincoln, Y. S., &; Guba, E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage.
Lownde,V.&; Skelcher, C. 2002.The Dynamics of Multi-organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance. in Stephen P. Osborne (ed.), Public Management: Critical Perspectives, Volume Ⅱ. London &; New York: Routledge.
Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M. &;Pitelis, C. N. 2009.Perspective- The interdependence of private and public interests.Organization Science, 20 (6): 1034‐1052.
McCarter, M.W., Rockmann, K.W. &; Northcraft, G.B. 2010. Is it even worth it? The effect of loss prospects in the outcome distribution of a public goods dilemma. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111:1-12.
McCarter, M.W., Mahoney, J.T., &; Northcraft, G.B. 2011. Testing the waters: How collective real options manage the social dilemma of strategic alliances. Academy of Management Review, 36(4): 621-640.
Metcalfe, L. &; Lapenta, A. 2014. Partnership as strategic choices in public management. Journal of Management Governance, 18: 51-76.
Miles, M. B., &; Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
Monge, P. R., Fulk J., Kalman M. E. &;Flanagin, A. J. 1998. Production of collective action in alliance- based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science, 9(3), 411-433.
Myers, M. D. 2009. Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Los Angeles: Sage.
Osborne, S. P. &; Strokosch, K. 2013. It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives, British Academy of Management, 24: S31-S47.
Pettigrew, A. M. 1997. What is a processual analysis? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 337-348.
Pitelis, C. N. 2009. The co-evolution of organizational value capture, value creation and sustainable advantage, Organizaion Studies, 30(10): 1115-1139.
Pitelis, C. 2012. Clusters, entrepreneurial ecosystem co-creation, and appropriability: a conceptual framework. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1359–1388.
Pitelis, C. N. &; Teece, D. J. 2009. The (new) nature and essence of the firm, European Management Review, 6(1): 5–15.
Porter, M.E. 1996. What is a strategy? Harvard Business Review, (November-December): 61-78.
Prahalad,C.K. &; Ramaswamy, V.2004. The Future of Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers, Harvard Business School Press.
Priem, R. L., Butler, J. E. &; Li, S. 2013. Toward reimagining strategy research: Retrospection and prospection on the 2011 AMR decade award article, Academy of Management Review, 38(4): 471-489.
Ramírez, R. 1999. Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research, Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 49-65.
Rangan, S., Samii, R. &; Van Wassenhove L. N. 2006. Constructive partnerships: when alliances between private firms ang public actors can enable creative strategies. Academy of Management Review. 31(3): 738-751.
Rufín, C.,&; Rivera-Santos, M. 2012. Between commonweal and competition: Understanding the governance of public-private partnerships.Journalof Management, 38 (5):1634-1654.
Strauss, A. L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew N., &; Forster, W.R. 2012. Reflection on the 2010 AMR decade award: Whither the promise? Moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Academy of Management Review, 37: 21-33.
Wang, B. C., Liu, S. C., &; Chou, F. Y. 2010. National Policy and Promotion Model of Cultural and Creative Industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Business Research, 10(1), 121-132.
Waring, J., Currie, G. &; Bishop, S. 2013. A contingent approach to the organization and management of public-private partnerships: An empirical study of English health care. Public Administration Review, 73(2): 313-326.
Williams, R. 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford University Press: London.
Yang, Y., Hou, Y. &; Wang, Y. 2013. On the development of public-private partnerships in transitional economics: An explanatory framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2): 301-310.
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
York, J. G., Sarasvathy, S. D. &; Wicks, A. C. 2013. An entrepreneurial perspective on value creation in public-private ventures. Academy of Management Review, 38(2): 307-315.
Zajac, E. J., &; Olsen, C. P. 1993. From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 30 (1): 131‐145.
Zeng, M. &; Chen, X.P. 2003. Achieving cooperation in multi-partner strategic alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 587-605.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	文化創意加值合作能創造有效資源？以龍巖公司為例
2.	鬼滅之刃文創商品行銷策略、涉入程度、與購買意願間關係之研究
3.	空間創生的社會創新模型建構：以創新擴散理論為視角
4.	以文創產業為對象之大學育成中心價值網絡創造：多層次利害關係人分析視角
5.	協同理論視角下的兩岸文化創意產業的交流與融合
6.	全球化下地方文化產業營造機制的建構：古坑咖啡產業個案分析
7.	文創商品策略與商業模式之建構：傘文創商品的發展觀點
8.	歷史城區的文化治理--論新竹市舊城區再生運動
9.	文化創意產業的媒體再現：2002~2012歷時性框架分析
10.	價值基礎策略觀點之公私部門夥伴關係的價值共創：以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例
11.	從價值鏈觀點探討運動服務業之競爭優勢
12.	文物典藏到文創產品的價值創造--以故宮與頑石合作案為例
13.	文創產品之創新設計與創業策略規劃：以福君包為例
14.	結合策略地圖與服務價值鏈的管理模式--文創企業優遊吧斯個案研究
15.	探討社會大眾對文化創意工藝產業之行為意向

1.	領導風格對價值共創的影響－集體策略願景與組織公平感知之調節效果
2.	台灣文化政策對城市文化治理之影響：以高雄市1998-2016年為例
3.	台南市五條港文化園區文化創意產業發展
4.	文化創意產業群聚活化凋敝社區的開創歷程：行動者網絡理論的觀點
5.	文化創意產業經理人專業職能、創新能力與產業績效關係之研究
6.	金門紀念品：從在地鑲嵌到文化創意的實踐

1.	全球化背景下：上海陸家嘴和臺北信義計畫區的研究比較
2.	數位科技也可以是好生意：時尚文創與科技藝術融匯的初探性研究

無相關著作

1.	文化創意產業園區之「閒置空間再利用」、「群聚效應」與「周邊觀光影響」--臺中文化創意產業園區個案研究
2.	撐起雨傘的非常城市：遇見他者的閾限空間
3.	跨縣市捷運系統營運管理之探討--(以「臺灣桃園國際機場聯外捷運系統建設計畫」為例)
4.	體驗行銷與顧客忠誠之研究
5.	圖書館的美學與建築設計改變之研究
6.	臺灣東北角南雅邊陲農業漁港之文化地景初探--一個歷史地理的考察
7.	環境態度與低碳旅遊認知對參與低碳遊程願付價格之研究
8.	城市行銷重要影響因素之研究--以基隆市為例
9.	蘭嶼「觀光地生命週期」興衰機制暨其關鍵作用者行動之研究：「永續觀光」的視角
10.	文化創意品牌形象與環境氛圍對消費者購買意願影響
11.	發展電影創意城鄉衡量工具--以宜蘭為試探對象
12.	中國大陸「80後」與「80前」員工工作態度之比較研究--工作價值觀之觀點
13.	文創產業創業投資評價機制建構之探討--以臺灣官民合作模式為例
14.	七美社區健康營造實施成效之評估--知覺與體驗觀點
15.	從竹籬笆到藝文休閒園區：以屏東勝利新村的再利用經驗為例

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫