臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公部門資訊組織整合之實務研究與意義建構歷程
作者：陳珮華
作者(外文)：Pei-Hua Chen
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：資訊管理學研究所
指導教授：曹承礎
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2016
主題關鍵詞：意義建構；多重個案研究法；資訊組織整合；電子化政府；組織溝通；Sense-making；Multiple case study；Information organization integration；Electronic government；Organizational communication
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 歷年統計：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:37
由於新科技之變革所引領之雲端化政府趨勢，本研究有幸參與國內重要部會面臨前述新科技變革與跨組織整合需求之契機，並透過實務理論及工具之探討，以及學術理論之詮釋，參與財政部財政資訊中心面對新科技引進及因應組織改造之資訊資源整合議題。透過參與研究場域--財政部財政資訊中心於100年6月至102年11月之七個研究案，並藉由多重個案研究法、電子化政府整合評估以及組織溝通與意義建構之相關文獻探討架構，試圖匯整研究場域之整合過程、組織溝通過程，以及意義建構歷程，以回應公部門如何面對新科技引進之跨組織整合過程，以及公部門面對新科技引進之跨組織整合過程。
研究結果發現，新科技的引進一向被視為組織創新的重要元素，亦被視為加速組織整合與提升競爭力的重要工具，然而單獨藉由科技並無法達成組織內整合目的，組織溝通與意義建構的歷程才能真正提升組織內部的信任感與認同感，進而達成組織意會的綜效，達成組織整合的重要目的。而其中科技意義建構、組織意義建構、信任感累積，皆為連續且動態社會化歷程，而階段性任務之達成而進行變化不同的意義建構歷程亦需不同的溝通網絡之配合，更是組織進行溝通的重要關鍵。
Since new technology leading the trend of cloud-government, this study have the opportunity to participate the important opportunity of information organization integration, and apply the practical and academic theory to participate the fiscal information agency to face the information resources integration organizations in response to the organization transformation. Through participation in the case study from 2011 to 2013, apply multiple case studies, e-government organizational integration, organizational communication and sense-making to aggregate the processes of organizational integration, organizational communication, and sense-making, in response to how to deal with public sector organizations across the integration process of the introduction of new technologies, as well as public sector organizations across the face of the introduction of new technology integration process.
The results found that the introduction of new technology has always been regarded as an important triger of organizational innovation, it is also considered to accelerate the organizational integration and enhance the competitiveness of an important tool, but by technology alone can not achived, organizational communication and sense-making can really enhance a sense of trust and identity, and then reached the synergies sense of organization and reached an important objective of organizational integration. The technology sense-making, organizational sense-making, trust accumulated, are all continuous and dynamic, and reached the stage of the mission carried different communication network are important to organizational communication.
Abramson, M. A., & Means, G. (2001). E-government: Rowman & Littlefield.
Akbulut, A. Y., Kelle, P., Pawlowski, S. D., Schneider, H., & Looney, C. A. (2009). To share or not to share? Examining the factors influencing local agency electronic information sharing. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 4(2), 143-172.
Andersen, D. F., & Dawes, S. S. (1991). Government information management: A primer and casebook: Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Applegate, L. M., Austin, R. D., & Deborah, L. S. (2009). Corporate Information Strategy and Management: Text and Cases (8 ed.): McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., . . . Zaharia, M. (2009). Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing (E. Department, Trans.): University of California at Berkeley.
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R. H., Konwinski, A., . . . Stoica, I. (2009). Above the clouds: A berkeley view of cloud computing: Technical Report UCB/EECS-2009-28, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley.
Atabakhsh, H., Larson, C., Petersen, T., Violette, C., & Chen, H. (2004). Information sharing and collaboration policies within government agencies Intelligence and Security Informatics (pp. 467-475): Springer.
Bajaj, A., & Ram, S. (2003). IAIS: A methodology to enable inter-agency information sharing in egovernment. Journal of Database Management (JDM), 14(4), 59-80.
Barnard, C. (1938). 1. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge/Mass.new window
Barnard, C. (1968). The functions of the executive (Vol. 11): Harvard university press.
Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Homburg, V. (2005). The information ecology of e-government : e-government as institutional and technological innovation in public administration. Washington, DC: IOS Press.
Bellamy, C., & Raab, C. (2005). Multi-agency working in British social policy: Risk, information sharing and privacy. Information Polity, 10(1), 51-63.new window
Bellamy, C., Raab, C., Warren, A., & Heeney, C. (2007). Institutional shaping of interagency working: Managing tensions between collaborative working and client confidentiality. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 405-434.
Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS quarterly, 23(1), 3-16.new window
Benjamin, R. I. (1983). Information technology: a strategic opportunity.
Berners-Lee, T. (2006). Linked data, 2006.
Black, L. J., Cresswell, A. M., Luna, L. F., Pardo, T., Martinez, I., Thompson, F., . . . Cook, M. (2003). A dynamic theory of collaboration: A structural approach to facilitating intergovernmental use of information technology. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
Brazelton, J., & Gorry, G. A. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing community: if you build it, will they come? Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 23-25.
Caffrey, L. (2000). Information Sharing between and within Governments: Commonwealth Secretariat.
Canestraro, D. S., Pardo, T. A., Raup-Kounovsky, A. N., & Taratus, D. (2009). Regional telecommunication incident coordination: Sharing information for rapid response. Information Polity, 14(1), 113-126.new window
Carr, N. G. (2003). IT Doesn''t Matter. [Article]. Harvard Business Review, 81(5), 41-49.
Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors*. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25.new window
Chau, M., Atabakhsh, H., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2001). Building an infrastructure for law enforcement information sharing and collaboration: Design issues and challenges.
Chen, Z., Gangopadhyay, A., Holden, S. H., Karabatis, G., & McGuire, M. P. (2007). Semantic integration of government data for water quality management. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 716-735.
Chiles, T. H., Meyer, A. D., & Hench, T. J. (2004). Organizational emergence: The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri''s musical theaters. Organization Science, 15(5), 499-519.
Claver, E., Gonzalez, R., & Llopis, J. (2000). An analysis of research in information systems (1981–1997). Information & Management, 37(4), 181-195.
Craighead, C. W., Patterson, J. W., Roth, P. L., & Segars, A. H. (2006). Enabling the benefits of Supply Chain Management Systems: an empirical study of Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 44(1), 135-157.new window
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of management review, 9(2), 284-295.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dawes, S. S. (1996). Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15(3), 377-394.
Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2002). Building collaborative digital government systems Advances in Digital Government (pp. 259-273): Springer.
Dervin, B. (1983). An Overview of Sense-making Research: Concepts, Methods, and Results to Date. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind’s eye of the user: The Sense-Making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In G. JD & P. RR (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Dervin, B. (1999). On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 727-750.
Dervin, B. (2005). What methodology does to theory: sense-making methodology as exemplar: na.
Dervin, B., & Frenette, M. (2001). Sense-making methodology: Communicating communicatively with campaign audiences. Public communication campaigns, 69-87.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5(2), 121-147.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450-467.
Drake, D. B., Steckler, N. A., & Koch, M. J. (2004). Information Sharing in and Across Government Agencies The Role and Influence of Scientist, Politician, and Bureaucrat Subcultures. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 67-84.new window
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68.new window
Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1993). A classification of information systems: analysis and interpretation. Information Systems Research, 4(2), 166-204.
Faerman, S. R., McCaffrey, D. P., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2001). Understanding interorganizational cooperation: Public-private collaboration in regulating financial market innovation. Organization Science, 12(3), 372-388.
Farhoomand, A., & Drury, D. H. (1999). A Historiographical Examination of Information Systems. Communications of the AIS, 1(19), 1-27.new window
Fedorowicz, J., Gogan, J. L., & Williams, C. B. (2007). A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 785-807.
Fraga, E. (2002). Trends in e-government how to plan, design, secure, and measure e-government. Paper presented at the Government Management Information Sciences (GMIS) Conference.
Gil-Garcia, J., & Helbig, N. (2006). Exploring e-government benefits and success factors. Encyclopedia of Digital Government, 2, 803-811.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187-216.
Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., & Burke, G. (2010). Conceptualizing information integration in government. Advances of Management Information Systems, 17, 179.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Chengalur-Smith, I., & Duchessi, P. (2007). Collaborative e-Government: impediments and benefits of information-sharing projects in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 121-133.
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Chun, S. A., & Janssen, M. (2009). Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical. Information Polity, 14(1), 1-10.new window
Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J., & Llopis, J. (2005). Information systems outsourcing risks: a study of large firms. Industrial management & Data systems, 105(1), 45-62.new window
Gopal, A., & Prasad, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in symbolic context: Shifting the focus from technology to interaction. MIS quarterly, 509-546.
Gottschalk, P. (2009a). E-Government interoperability: frameworks for aligned development. IGI Global, Norway.
Gottschalk, P. (2009b). Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 75-81.new window
Gouillart, F. J., & Kelly, J. N. (1995). Transforming the organization (Vol. 658): Mcgraw-hill New York.
Griffith, T. L. (1999). Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management review, 24(3), 472-488.
Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1996). Cognitive elements in the implementation of new technology: can less information provide more benefits? Mis Quarterly, 99-110.
Harrell, H. W., & Higgins, L. (2002). IS integration: Your most critical M&A challenge? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 13(2), 23-31.
Hasselbring, W. (2000). Information system integration. Communications of the ACM, 43, 32-38.
Jenster, P. V. (1986). Firm performance and monitoring of critical success factors in different strategic contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17-33.
Johnston, K. D., & Yetton, P. W. (1996). Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5(3), 189-211.
Kast, F. E., & Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization and management: a systems and contingency approach: McGraw-Hill.
Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22-44.new window
Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2006). The Impact of Organizational Context and Information Technology on Employee Knowledge‐Sharing Capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 370-385.
Klischewski, R., & Scholl, H. J. (2008). Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharing. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(2), 203-225.
Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37-48.new window
Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework. Information & Management, 38(8), 507-521.
Lam, W. (2005). Barriers to e-government integration. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 511-530.
Landsbergen, D. J., & Wolken, G. J. (2001). Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 206-220.
Landsbergen Jr, D., & Wolken Jr, G. (2001). Realizing the promise: Government information systems and the fourth generation of information technology. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 206-220.
Lazer, D., & Binz-Scharf, M. C. (2004). Information sharing in e-Government projects: Managing novelty and cross-agency cooperation. Report prepared for the IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
Lee, J.-N. (2001). The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information & Management, 38(5), 323-335.
Lee, J., & Rao, H. R. (2007). Exploring the causes and effects of inter-agency information sharing systems adoption in the anti/counter-terrorism and disaster management domains. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th annual international conference on Digital government research: bridging disciplines & domains.
Leedom, D. K. (2001). Sensemaking Symposium. USA: Command and Control Reseach Program Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence.
Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006). Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1641-1656.
Liao, L.-F. (2006). A learning organization perspective on knowledge-sharing behavior and firm innovation. Human Systems Management, 25(4), 227-236.
Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I. (1991). Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human relations, 44(1), 55-76.new window
Luna-Reyes, L. F., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Cruz, C. B. (2007). Collaborative digital government in Mexico: Some lessons from federal Web-based interorganizational information integration initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 808-826.
Luo, X. (2002). Trust production and privacy concerns on the Internet: A framework based on relationship marketing and social exchange theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), 111-118.
Markus, M. L. (1997). The Qualitative Difference in Information System Research and Practice. In A. Lee, J. Liebenau & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research (pp. 11-27). London: Chapman & Hall.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.001
Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of cloud computing (draft). NIST special publication, 800, 145.
Menge, W. (2005). Pre-Merger IT strategies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Twente Student Conference on IT.
Minoli, D. (2008). Enterprise architecture A to Z: frameworks, business process modeling, SOA, and infrastructure technology: CRC Press.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
OECD. (2005). e-Government for Better Government (pp. 206).
OECD. (2014). Recommendation of the Council on Digital Government Strategies.
OMB. (2012). Digital Government: Building A 21st Century Platform to Better Serve The American People: Office of Management and Budget.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174-207.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134. doi: doi:10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., & Feltz, F. (2007). Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 29-51.
Pardo, T. A., Cresswell, A. M., Dawes, S. S., & Burke, G. B. (2004). Modeling the social & technical processes of interorganizational information integration. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
Pardo, T. A., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Burke, G. B. (2006). Building response capacity through cross-boundary information sharing: The critical role of trust. Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, 507-514.
Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., & Burke, G. B. (2012). E-Government Interoperability Interaction of Policy, Management, and Technology Dimensions. Social Science Computer Review, 30(1), 7-23.new window
Pardo, T. A., & Tayi, G. K. (2007). Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 691-715.
Park, J.-Y., & Kim, J. S. (2005). The impact of IS sourcing type on service quality and maintenance efforts. Information & Management, 42(2), 261-274.
Plummer, D. C., Bittman, T. J., Austin, T., Cearley, D. W., & Smith, D. M. (2008). Cloud computing: Defining and describing an emerging phenomenon. Gartner, June, 17.
Prasad, P. (1993). Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change: A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1400-1429.
Premkumar, G. P. (2000). Interorganization Systems and Supply Chain Management: An Information Processing Perspective. Information Systems Management, 17(3), 1-14.
Ring, P. S., & Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 276-286.
Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Operationalizing the competing values approach: Measuring performance in the employment service. Public Productivity Review, 141-159.
Roldan, J. L., & Leal, A. (2003). A validation test of an adaptation of the DeLone and McLean’s model in the Spanish EIS field. Critical reflections on information systems. A systemic approach, 66-84.
Rosenbaum, H. (1996). Managers and information in organization: towards a structurational concept of the information use environment of managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University. New York.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
Scholl, H. J., & Klischewski, R. (2007). E-government integration and interoperability: framing the research agenda. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(8-9), 889-920.
Schwarz, G. (2014). Public Shared Service Centers: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of US Public Sector Organizations (Vol. 16): Springer.
Scott, W. R. (2007). Organizations and organizing : rational, natural, and open system perspectives Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sheehan, N. T. (2005). Why old tools won''t work in the “new” knowledge economy. Journal of Business Strategy, 26(4), 53-60.
Shuraida, S., & Barki, H. (2013). The influence of analyst communication in IS projects. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(9), 482.
Siguaw, J. A., Baker, T. L., & Simpson, P. M. (2003). Preliminary evidence on the composition of relational exchange and its outcomes: the distributor perspective. Journal of Business Research, 56(4), 311-322.
Siino, R. M., & Hinds, P. J. (2004). Making Sense of New Technology as A Lead-in to Structuring: The Case of an Autonomous Mobile Robot. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
Silva, L., & Hirschheim, R. (2007). Fighting against windmills: Strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 327-354.
Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2012). This Is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases: John Wiley & Sons.
Sullivan, W. E., & Ngwenyama, O. K. (2005). How are Public Sector Organizations Managing IS Outsourcing Risks?: An Analysis of Outsourcing guidelines from Three Jurisdictions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 73-87.
Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence (Vol. 1): McGraw-Hill New York.new window
Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers: SAGE Publications.
Walton, R. E. (1989). Up and running: Integrating information technology and the organization: Harvard Business School Press.
Weber, K., & Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick’s theory. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639-1660.
Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing (Second edition): McGraw Hill.
Weick, K. E. (1990). Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3): Sage.
Weiss, P. (2002). Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and their Economic Impacts. U.S.: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Winter, S. J., & Tqylor, S. L. (2001). The Role of Information Technology in Transformation of Work. London: Sage Publication, Inc.
Yang, T.-M., & Maxwell, T. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 164-175.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods: SAGE Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods: Sage publications.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods: Sage Publications.
Zack, M. H. (1999). Managing Organizational Ignorance. Knowledge Directions 1(Summer), 36-49.new window
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.
Zhang, J., & Dawes, S. S. (2006). Expectations and perceptions of benefits, barriers, and success in public sector knowledge networks. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(4), 433-466.
Zhang, J., Dawes, S. S., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Exploring stakeholders'' expectations of the benefits and barriers of e-government knowledge sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(5), 548-567.
行政院研考會. (2012). 政府部門資料加值推動策略與挑戰.
行政院研究發展考核委員會. (2011). 電子化政府報告書. 主要國家電子化政府發展趨勢. Retrieved from http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/Attachment/22611341571.pdf
行政院研究發展考核委員會. (2013). 第四階段電子化政府計畫. Retrieved from http://www.rdec.gov.tw/public/attachment/311612112171.pdf
何瑞萍. (2014). Dervin 與 Weick 意義建構理論之分析與比較. 大學圖書館, 18(1), 83-105.new window
吳思怡. (2009). 社會網絡及社會交換對知識分享行為的影響-社會認知理論觀點. 碩士, 國立成功大學, 台南.
李瑋倫. (2010). 以釋意觀點探索數位學習系統的使用：以一家製藥公司為例. 碩士, 國立嘉義大學.
林仁祥. (2012). 以科技意會理論探討科技使用者之行為. 碩士, 國立雲林科技大學.
林育琦. (2003). 高一學生科學經驗意義化過程之研究--以簡諧運動為例. 碩士, 高雄師範大學.
林瑞億. (2009). 微網誌Plurk使用行為之研究─以科技意會的觀點. 碩士, 國立國立臺灣大學.
侯勝宗. (2006). 科技心理擁有感、在地知識與科技採用：科技意會觀點. 博士, 國立政治大學.new window
侯勝宗. (2012). 見所未見: 詮釋性個案研究方法探索. 組織與管理, 5(1), 111-153.new window
涂崇俊. (1977). 國民中學校長-教師溝通問題研究. 未出版碩士論文, 台灣師範大學教育研究所, 台北.
張家生. (2012). 從台北市看政府公開資料. 研考雙月刊, 36.
張博雅. (2008). 從意義建構取向探討國立中央圖書館臺灣分館之視障服務. 碩士, 國立台灣大學.new window
張善政. (2012). 政府資料開放加值應用的契機與展望. 研考雙月刊, 36.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2011). 財政部共用應用系統推動策略及項目之研究. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財稅資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2012a). 因應雲端時代，財政資訊發展趨勢之研究. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財稅資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2012b). 後網路報稅時代如何精進納稅服務之研究. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財稅資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2012c). 財政資訊公開及加值之研究. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財稅資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2013a). 用公、私部門資源，整合財政資訊業務之研究 -賦稅、國產面. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財政資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2013b). 善用公、私部門資源，整合財政資訊業務之研究 -國庫、財金面. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財政資訊中心.
曹承礎, & 陳珮華. (2013c). 善用公、私部門資源，整合財政資訊業務之研究 -關務、關貿面. 賦稅資訊系統整合再造更新整體實施計畫-地方稅建置委外服務案. 財政部財政資訊中心.
梁定澎. (1997). 資訊管理研究方法總論. 資訊管理學報, 4(1), 1-6.new window
葉家伶. (2011). 以演化心理學為基礎探討使用者之科技意會. 碩士, 國立雲林科技大學.
廖久慧. (2014). 建構團隊績效模型：集體效能與參與式意義建構之中介效果和團隊內競爭之調節效果. 碩士, 國立交通大學.
蕭瑞麟. (2007). 不用數字的研究 : 鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究. 台北市: 紅螞蟻圖書有限公司.
蘇俊榮. (2012). Open 168，整合送給您--「導入雲端運用，強化財政資訊」. 當代財政, 第017期.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1392（臺灣：1373，外國：19） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2940656 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：84266998
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上