臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：見所未見：詮釋性個案研究方法探索
書刊名：組織與管理
作者：侯勝宗 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hou, Sheng-tsung
出版日期：2012
卷期：5:1
頁次：頁111-153
主題關鍵詞：詮釋性個案研究；研究方法；科技意會；Interpretative case study；Methodology；Technology sense-making
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:166
詮釋性個案研究雖已被應用於資訊與組織管理研究領域之中，但此一研究方法在臺灣尚屬起步階段，相關應用仍未普及。探究其未能被廣為應用的原因，可能在於資料收集的田野工作、複雜的資料分析與理論辯證的過程裡，很難成文化地記錄、傳播與學習或教授所致。因此，為了彌補詮釋性個案研究方法難以擴散的缺憾，本文以新加坡、臺灣衛星派遣車隊的跨國科技採納研究為例，探討詮釋性個案研究如何進行資料收集工作與辯證分析。為了達成研究目的，本文著眼於將此一長達五年的跨國計程車田野研究經驗，系統化地彙整成一套研究方法工作實務，並介紹如何鑑賞質化研究作品。藉由此種強調情境相依勝於命題推導式的詮釋性個案研究，本文希望能提供一些有價值的研究方法參考，讓研究者能解構真實組織現象背後的深層原因，透過詮釋性個案研究來見所未見。
The interpretative case study has become one of the most important qualitative research methods in the management study field. However, very few studies in Taiwan have yet applied this methodology in current organizational and general management research. The reasons such methodology of interpretative case study has not yet been utilized widely were probably because of the tedious fieldwork for data collection, complex data analysis process and theoretical reasoning, and the difficulty of knowledge documentation and learning. By anchoring on a longitudinal case study on cross border technology adoption in the taxi industries of Singapore and Taipei, this paper addresses philosophical and theoretical issues concerning the nature of interpretative case studies, and demonstrates methodological tools which facilitates fieldwork and analyzes data in the interpretative case research. The study aims to provide a useful reference point for researchers who wish to adopt interpretative case studies, and more generally, to encourage thorough work on the conceptualization and execution of case studies in order to make the invisible visible.
期刊論文
1.Sherer, P. D.、Wright, N.、Rogovsky, N.(1998)。What drives employment relationships in taxicab organizations? Linking agency to firm capabilities and strategic opportunities。Organization Science，9(1)，34-48。  new window
2.張學孔、朱純孝(20080300)。考量最大願付價格下巡迴計程車市場最佳空車率與費率之研究。運輸計劃，37(1)，1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Isabella, L. A.(1990)。Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construct Key Organizational Events。Academy of Management Journal，33(1)，7-41。  new window
4.Pentland, Brian T.(1999)。Building Process Theory with Narrative: From Description to Explanation。Academy of Management Review，24(4)，711-724。  new window
5.Gephart, R. P.(2004)。Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal。Academy of Management Journal，47(4)，454-462。  new window
6.Griffith, T. L.(1999)。Technology features as triggers for sensemaking。Academy of Management Review，24(3)，472-488。  new window
7.Barley, S.(19860300)。Technology As An Occasion For Structuring: Evidence From Observations Of CT Scanners And The Social Order Of Radiology Departments。Administrative Science Quarterly，31(1)，78-108。  new window
8.Morgan, Gareth、Smircich, Linda(1980)。The Case for Qualitative Research。The Academy of Management Review，5(4)，491-500。  new window
9.DiMaggio, Paul J.(1995)。Comments on 'what theory is not'。Administrative Science Quarterly，40(3)，391-397。  new window
10.Golden-Biddle, Karen、Locke, Karen(1993)。Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince。Organization Science，4(4)，595-616。  new window
11.Orlikowski, W. J.、Gash, D. C.(1994)。Technology Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations。ACM Transactions on Information Systems，12(2)，174-207。  new window
12.Prasad, Pushkala(1993)。Symbolic Processes in the Implementation of Technological Change: A Symbolic Interactionist Study of Work Computerization。Academy of Management Journal，36(6)，1400-1429。  new window
13.侯勝宗、吳思華(20090600)。時空情境、科技意會與工作實務：以計程車實務社群為例。管理學報，26(3)，309-332。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Gopal, A.、Prasad, P.(2000)。Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction。MIS Quarterly，24(3)，509-546。  new window
15.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1991)。Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic。The Academy of Management Review，16(3)，620-627。  new window
16.Hartwick, John、Barki, Henri(1994)。Explaining the role of user participation in information system use。Management Science，40(4)，440-465。  new window
17.Hiltz, S. R.、Turoff, M.(1981)。The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing center。Communication of the ACM，24(11)，739-751。  new window
18.Kostova, T.(1999)。Transformational transfer of strategic organizational practices: a contextual perspective。Academy of Management Review，24(2)，308-324。  new window
19.Klein, H. K.、Myers, M. D.(1999)。A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretative field studies in information systems。MIS Quarterly，23(1)，67-94。  new window
20.Gephart, R. P.(2006)。Ethnostatistics and Organizational Research Methodologies。Organizational Research Methods，9(4)，417-431。  new window
21.Sahay, S.(1997)。Implementation of information technology: a time-space perspective。Organization，18(2)，229-260。  new window
22.DeSanctis, Gerardine、Poole, Marshall Scoott(1994)。Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: adaptive structuration theory。Organization Science，5(2)，121-147。  new window
23.Hu, Paul J.、Chau, Patrick Y. K.、Sheng, Olivia R. Liu、Tam, Kar Yan(1999)。Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology。Journal of Management Information Systems，16(2)，91-112。  new window
24.Orlikowski, Wanda J.(2002)。Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing。Organization Science，13(3)，249-273。  new window
25.Weick, Karl E.、Roberts, Karlene H.(1993)。Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks。Administrative Science Quarterly，38(3)，357-381。  new window
26.Louis, Meryl Reis、Sutton, Robert I.(1991)。Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking。Human relations，44(1)，55-76。  new window
27.Hsiao, Ruey-Lin、Wu, Se-Hwa、Hou, Sheng-Tsung(2008)。Sensitive Cabbies: Ongoing Sense-making Within Technology Structuring。Information and Organization，18(4)，251-279。  new window
28.Venkatesh, Viswanath、Morris, Michael G.、Davis, Gordon B.、Davis, Fred D.(2003)。User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View。Management Information Systems Quarterly，27(3)，425-478。  new window
29.Thompson, Ronald L.、Higgins, Christopher A.、Howell, Jane M.(1991)。Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization。MIS Quarterly，15(1)，125-143。  new window
30.Pettigrew, Andrew M.(1990)。Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice。Organization Science，1(3)，267-292。  new window
31.Eisenhardt, Kathleen M.(1989)。Building Theories from Case Study Research。Academy of Management Review，14(4)，532-550。  new window
32.Dyer, W. Gibb Jr.、Wilkins, Alan L.(1991)。Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Stories: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt。Academy of Management Review，16(3)，613-619。  new window
33.Kay, J.、Thomas, R. C.(1995)。Studying Long-Term System Use。Communications of the ACM，38(7)，61-69。  new window
34.Skok, W..(2003)。Knowledge management: New York City taxi cab case study。Knowledge and Process Management，10(2)，127-135。  new window
35.Skok, W..(2004)。Knowledge management: Taxis Parisians case study。Knowledge Management Research and Practice，2(3)，147-154。  new window
36.Skok, W.,、Baird, S.(2005)。Strategic use of emerging technology in the taxi cab industry。Strategic Change，14(6)，295-306。  new window
37.Skok, W.,、Kobayashi, S.(2007)。An international taxi cab evaluation: Comparing Tokyo with London, New York and Paris。Knowledge and Process Management，14(2)，117-130。  new window
38.Tissut, W. S.(2003)。Managing change: The London taxi cabs case study。Strategic Change，12(2)，95-108。  new window
39.張學孔、吳奇軒、陳育生(2009)。計程車產業關鍵因素分析。運輸計畫，38(2)，173-200。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.黃國平、賴柏瑎(2008)。衛星派遣計程車之乘客選擇意向比較。運輸計畫，20(2)，119-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.侯勝宗、樊學良(2011)。負面科技意會的前因與科技使用：台灣大車隊實證研究。管理評論，30(3)，73-91。  延伸查詢new window
42.Ashcraft, K. L.(2001)。Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybrid form。Academy of Management Journal，44，1301-1322。  new window
43.Jasperson, J.、Carter, P. E.、Zmud, R. W.(2005)。A Comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoption behaviours associated with information technology enabled work systems。MIS Quarterly，29(3)，525-557。  new window
44.Maitlis, S.(2005)。The social processes of organizational sense-making。Academy of Management Review，48(1)，21-49。  new window
會議論文
1.Siino, R. M.、Hinds, P. J.(2004)。Making Sense of New Technology as A Lead-in to Structuring: The Case of an Autonomous Mobile Robot。The Academy of Management Annual Meeting。  new window
2.Hsiao, R. L.、Wu, S. H.、Hou, S. T.(2005)。Technology sense-making: Local knowledge and patterns of technology adoption。2005 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Hawaii, USA。  new window
3.Rawley, E.、Simcoe, T. S.(2008)。Horizontal diversification and vertical contracting: Firm scope and asset ownership in taxi fleets。2008 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, L.A, USA。  new window
圖書
1.Zuboff, Shoshana(1988)。In the Age of the Smart Machine。New York：Basic Books。  new window
2.Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T.(1987)。The Social Construction of Technological Systems。Cambridge, MA：MIT。  new window
3.Scott, Wood Richard(1995)。Institutions and Organizations。Sage Publications。  new window
4.Morrow, R. A.(1994)。Critical theory and methodology。Sage Publications。  new window
5.Geertz, Clifford J.(1983)。Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology。Basic Books, Inc.。  new window
6.Yin, Robert K.(1994)。Case study research: Design and methods。Sage Publications。  new window
7.Georgano, G. N.(2000)。The London taxi。Oxford：Shire Publications。  new window
8.Gambetta, D.、Hamill, H.(2005)。Streetwise: How taxi drivers establish customers’ trustworthiness。New York, NY：Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
其他
1.McAfee, A.(2005)。MK taxi: Private Chauffeur Service，http://hbr.org/product/mk-taxi-privatechauffeur-service/an/605029-PDF-ENG?N=4294932927%204294935921&Ntt=Customers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Starbuck, W. H.、Milliken, F. J.(1988)。Executives' perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense。The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for studying Top Managers。Greenwich, CT：JAI Press。  new window
2.Lincoln, Y. S.、Guba, E. G.(2000)。Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences。The handbook of qualitative research。Sage。  new window
3.Weick, Karl E.(1990)。Technology as Equivoque: Sense-making in New Technologies。Technology and Organizations。San Francisco：Jossey Bass。  new window
4.Elaluf-Calderwood, S.、Sorensen, C.(2006)。Organizational agility with mobile ICT? The case of London black cab work。Agile Information systems: Conceptualization, construction, and management。Boston, MA：Butterworth-Heinemann。  new window
5.Schutz, A.(1973)。Concept and theory formation in the social sciences。Alfred Schutz collected papersⅠ : The problem of social reality。Hague：Martinus Nikhoff。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：513（臺灣：507，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67497275
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上