中文部分
Tapscott, D. (1998). N世代：主導二十一世紀數位生活的新新族群(陳曉開、袁世珮譯)。臺北：美商麥格羅．希爾國際股份有限公司。
Turkle, S. (1998). 虛擬化身：網路世代的身份認同(譚天、吳佳真譯)。臺北：遠流出版公司。
中央大學 (2006)。首度國際評量─臺灣學童閱讀時數偏低、文章偏短。桃園縣：中央大學。線上檢索日期：2012年8月6日。網址：http://sec.ncu.edu.tw/news/press_content.php?P_ID=9592
王宏喜 (1992)。文體結構舉要。北京：經濟管理出版社。
朱錦鳳 (1994)。超文件(Hypertext)於教學上應用的特性分析。資訊與教育雜誌，4，31-36。
余民寧 (1997)。有意義的學習－概念構圖之研究。臺北：商鼎。
吳訓生 (2002)。國小高、低閱讀理解能力學生閱解理解策略之比較研究。特殊教育學報，16，65-104。吳敏而 (1993a)。摘取文章大意的教材教法。載於臺灣省國民學校教師研習會主編，國民小學國語科教材教法第三輯(頁87-101)。臺北市：臺臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
吳敏而 (1993b)。國民小學學生文章理解層次分析。載於臺灣省國民學校教師研習會主編，國民小學國語科教材教法第三輯 (頁73-85)。臺北市：臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
呂芸樺 (2006)。網路超文本的閱讀理解歷程之探討。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育科技學系，臺北。
宋文菊 (1999)。國小學童在閱讀理解實作評量上的表現分析。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，臺南。
宋曜廷、黃嶸生、張國恩 (2002)。具多重策略的閱讀理解輔助系統之設計與應用。論文發表於第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會，臺北：中央研究院。
李碩豪、楊永信 (1982)。說明文寫作常識。廣東：廣東人民出版社。
周玉婷 (2007)。不同閱讀策略應用於網路資源教學對於國小高年級學童學習成效之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學教育學系，臺南。
林于弘 (2007)。九年一貫國語課文文體量化統計與分布研究。國立編譯館館刊，35(1)，3-14。
林巧敏 (2009)。推動國中小學童數位閱讀計畫之探討。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，5(2)，49-67。
林佩欣 (2004)。交互教學法對國中學習障礙學生閱讀理解學習效果之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所，彰化。林怡君 (2006)。國小學童閱讀互動式光碟故事書與紙本童書之閱讀理解與重述能力之差異比較。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學教育學系課程與教學，臺南。
林建平 (2001)。整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。市北教育學刊，10，177-198。林珊如 (2010)。數位時代的閱讀：青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊，8(2)，29-53。林珊如、劉應琳（2003）。從詮釋現象學的觀點看愛書人之休閒閱讀經驗。中國圖書館學會會報，71，21-36。林淇漾 (2001)。書寫與拼圖: 臺灣文學傳播現象研究。 臺北市: 麥田。
林清山 (1990)。教育心理學：認知取向。臺北：遠流出版社。
林綵薰 (2006)。孩子不識字，怎麼讀？─談幼兒閱讀。網路社會學通訊。線上檢索日期：2011年2月10日。網址： http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/59/59-19.htm
林蕙君 (1995)。閱讀能力、說明文結構對國小高年級學生的閱讀理解及閱讀策略使用之影響研究。新竹師院國民教育研究所論文集，1，57-85。
林寶貴、錡寶香 (2000)。中文閱讀理解測驗之編製。特殊教育研究學刊，19，79-104。林寶貴、錡寶香 (2003)。中文閱讀理解測驗。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。邱皓政 (2005)。量化研究與統計分析。臺北：五南。
柯華葳 (1999)。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗施測說明。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。柯華葳 (2010)。閱讀理解評量。載於柯華葳主編，中文閱讀障礙(頁34-35)。臺北：心理。柯華葳、方金雅 (2010)。閱讀理解評量。載於柯華葳主編，中文閱讀障礙(頁167-179)。臺北：心理。洪蘭 (2004)。閱讀決定思想。教師天地，129，4-7。
洪蘭、曾志朗 (2000)。兒童閱讀的理念－認知神經心理學的觀點。教育資料與研究，38，1-4。胥彥華 (1989)。學習策略對國小六年級學生閱讀效果之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所，臺北。
徐麗球 (1999)。國語文低成就學童閱讀能力亞型探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺東師院國民教育研究所，臺東。
祝佩貞 (2003)。電子童書與紙本童書對國小學童閱讀理解及閱讀態度之比較研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺中師範學院語文教育學系，臺中。
馬行誼 (1997)。國小學童說明文寫作現象分析-班級小組討論教學法之個案研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所，臺中。
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學：三化取像的理論與實踐。臺北：東華。
張郁蔚 (2004)。網路超文本閱讀之探討。圖書資訊學刊，1(4)，59-79。張淑慧 (2008)。合作學習對國小五年級學童網路閱讀理解及策略影響之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，嘉義。
許惠娟 (2012)。國中生的中文閱讀理解表現：不同媒介、年級與性別之比較。未出版之碩士論文，大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班，彰化。
連啟舜 (2002)。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，臺北。
陳英豪、吳裕益 (1995)。測驗與評量。高雄市：復文書局出版社。
陳海泓 (2008)。紙本閱讀和電腦閱讀文章對國小五、六年級學生閱讀理解之影響。教育學誌，20，121-168。陳海泓 (2007)。國小中年級學童線上閱讀和紙本閱讀說明文文章之閱讀理解。載於慈濟大學主編，慈濟大學2007年「教與學」研討會論文集(頁77-91)。花蓮縣：慈濟大學。
陳海泓 (2011)。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地，172，28-36。
陳嘉成 (1998)。合作學習式概念構圖在國小自然科教學之成效評析。教育心理研究，21，107-128。陳慧卿 (2003)。國小二年級學童對電子童書與紙本童書之閱讀能力研究。未出版之碩士論文，朝陽科技大學幼兒保育系碩士班，臺中。
陳櫻代 (1999)。概念構圖策略促進閱讀理解能力之研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所，臺北。
曾志朗 (2000)。閱讀是多元智慧成功的基本條件。教師天地，106，4-5。
曾祥芹、張復琮 (1992)。文體閱讀法。河南：大象出版社。
楊玉國 (2008)。第五次國民閱讀調查顯示:網路閱讀首超圖書閱讀。中國報導-國際在線。線上檢索日期：2012年8月17日。網址：http://gb.cri.cn/18824/2008/04/24/3245@2031963.htm
楊玉國 (2012)。第九次國民閱讀調查顯示:去年人均閱讀圖書4本，超半數國民自認閱讀量少。中國報導-國際在線。線上檢索日期：2012年8月17日。網址： http://big5.chinabroadcast.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/27824/2012/04/23/3245s3654661.htm
楊家興 (1993)。超媒體：一個新的學習工具。教育科技與媒體，12，28-39。葉瓊華、詹文宏 (2000)。概念構圖、自問自答及畫重點策略對國小閱讀障礙兒童閱讀理解能力及後設認知能力教學成效之研究。特殊教育學報，14，189-231。劉雅筑 (2000)。國中學生批判思考、創造思考、閱讀理解策略與閱讀理解成就之相關研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學教育學系，高雄。
潘麗珠 (2004)。我對閱讀的一些看法。教師天地，129，16-20。網址：http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j.htm
蔡銘津 (1997)。學童閱讀能力的測驗與評量。特殊教育季刊，65，23-28。鄭妃玲 (2003)。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立嘉義大學教育研究所，嘉義。
鄭涵元 (1994)。 詞的閱讀學習策略對國小兒童閱讀理解影響效果之實徵研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，臺北。
駐澳大利亞代表處文化組 (2012年6月14日)。澳洲學生數位閱讀素養全球第二。教育部，516。線上檢索日期：2012年8月20日。網址：http://epaper.edu.tw/windows.aspx?windows_sn=10304
錡寶香 (1999 )。國小學童閱讀理解能力之分析。國教學報，11，100-133。
顏若映 (1994)。先前知識與文章連貫性對國小學童閱讀理解之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學教育研究所，臺北。顏榮泉 (1996)。全球資訊網在教學與學習上之應用探討。教育科技與媒體，25，33-41。蘇宜芬 (2004)。閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教學上的意義。教師天地，129，21-28。
外文部分
Alshaali, S., & Varshney, U. (2005). On the usability of mobile commerce. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 3(1), 29-37.
Altun, A. (2003). Understanding hypertext in the context of the reading on the web: Language learners' experience. Current Issue in Education, 6(12). Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number12/.
Anderson, R., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York, NY: Longman.
Beentjes, J. W., & Van der Voort, T. H. (1989). Television and young people's reading behaviour: A review of research. European Journal of Communication, 4(1), 51-77.
Bell, B. J., & Torrance, N. (1986). Learning to make and recognize inferences in the early grades. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 275988).
Bisland, B. M. (1999). Lysbet and the Fire KA Historical Inquiry. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 11(4), 1-4.
Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2008). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York: Guilford.
Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2001). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practice. New York: Guilford.
Block, C. C., Parris, S. R., Reed, K. L., Whiteley, S. W., & Cleveland, M. D. (2009). Instructional approaches that significantly increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 262-281.
Bos, C. S., & Vaughn, S. (1994). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2004). Does the influence of reading purpose on reports of strategic text processing depend on students' topic knowledge? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 324-336.
Brown, G. T. L. (2003). Searching informational texts: Text and task characteristics that affect performance. Reading Online, Retrieved from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_ index.asp?HREF=brown/index.html.
Brown, A. L., Day, J. D., & Jones, R. S.(1983). The development of plans for summarizing texts. Child Development, 54, 968-979.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49(4), 1076-1088.
Bryant, I. M. (2010). Digital reading environments as a teaching tool in the secondary classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, U.S.A.
Chan, L. K. S., & Cole, P. G. (1986). The effect of comprehension monitoring training on the reading competence of learning disabilities and regular class students. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 33-40.
Clyde, L. A. (2005). Electronic books. Teacher Librarion, 32(5), 45-47.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257.
Cory, K. A. (1991). Effects of display variables and cognitive field orientation on time to learn a task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, U.S.A.
De Argaez, E. (2006). One billion internet users. Internet World Stats News, 14.
Doty, D. E. (1999). CD-ROM storybooks and reading comprehension of young readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, U.S.A.
Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-Rom storybooks and young readers’reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 374-384.
Draheim, M. E. (1986, December). Directed reading-thingking activity, conceptual mapping, and underlining: Their effects on expository text recall in a writing task. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Nation Reading Conference, Californica, U.S.A.
Duke, N. K. (2004). The case for informational text. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 40-44.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Edmondson, K. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricular. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 777-793.
Englert, C. S., & Hiebart. E. H. (1984). Children's developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology,. 76(1), 65-74.
Feldmann, S. C., & Fish, M. C. (1988). Reading comprehension of elementary, junior high and high school students on print vs. microcomputer-generated text. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 159-166.
Feldmann, S. C., & Fish, M. C. (1987). A comparison of reading comprehension using print and microcomputer presentation. Journal of Computer-based Instruction, 14, 57-61.
Fisch, S. M., & Truglio, R. T. (2001). “G”is for growing: Thirty years of research on children and Sesame Street. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Forrest-Pressley, D. L., & Gillies, L. A. (1983). Children's flexible use of strategies during reading. In M. Pressley, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 133-156). NY: Springer-Verlag.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, NY: Harper Collins Cillege Publishers.
Gajria, M., & Salvia, J. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on text comprehension instruction on text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508-516.
Gambrell, L. B. (2005). Reading Literature, reading text, reading the internet: The times they are a' Changing. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 588-591.
Gibson, E. J., & Levin, H. (1975). The psychology of reading. Combridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Goldman, S. R., & Bisanz, G. (2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres:Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. León, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Barnes, V., Finn, R., Grischkowsky, N., & Minuto, S. (1987). Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper: Attempts to isolate a single variable explanation. Human Factors, 29(3), 269-299.
Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinarta, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial & Special Education, 21(6), 356-365.
Guffey, B. B. (2007). The effects of explicit instruction in reading and learning strategies for expository text instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Union University, U.S.A.
Hackbarth, S. (1997). Integrated web-based learning Activities into school curriculum. Educational Technolog, 37(3), 59-71.
Hansen, J., & Pearson, P. D. (1980). The effects of inference training and practice on young children's comprehension. (Report 166).
Harris, J. (1990). Text annotation and underlining as metacognitive strategies to improve comprehension and retention of expository text. Unpunlished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, U.S.A.
Havel, P., & Treagust, D. F. (1989). Visual library research: A method for helping low achieving students learning science. School Science and Mathematics, 89 (3), 220-227.
Hayashi, K. (1999). Reading strategies and extensive reading in EFL classes. RELC Journal, 30, 114-132.
Heilman, A., Blair, T., & Rupley,W. (1986). Principles and pratcices of teaching reading. Columbus OH: Merrill.
Heppner, F. H., Anderson, J. G. R., Farstrup, A. E., & Weiderman, N. H. (1985). Reading performance on a standardized test is better from print than from computer display. Journal of Reading, 28, 321-325.
Hidi, S., & Anderson, V. (1986). Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction. Review of Educational Research, 56 (4), 473-493.
Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge-of words and the world. American Educator, 27(1), 10-13.
Hynd, C. R., & Chase, N. D. (1991). The relation between text type, tone, and written response. Journal of Reading Behavior, 3, 281-306.
Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14(4), 379-396.
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2000). Training reading comprehension in adequate decoders/poor comprehensions: Verbal versus visual strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 772-782.
Johnsson-Smaragdi, U., & Jonsson, A. (2006). Book reading in leisure time: Longterm changes in young peoples’ book reading habits. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(5), 519-540.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Hypertext as instructional design. Eductational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 83-92.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye to fixation to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.
Kerr, M. A., & Symons, S. E. (2006). Computerized presentation of text: Effects on children's reading of informational material. Reading and Writing, 19(1), 1-19.
Kim, H. S., & Kamil, M. L. (2003). Electronic and multimedia documents. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 166-175). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp.71-92). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
Konishi, M. (2003). Strategies for reading hypertext by Japanese ESL learners. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 97-119.
Leong, C. K. (1995). Effects of on-line reading and simultaneous DECtalk auditing in helping below average and poor reader comprehend and summarize text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(2), 101-116.
Lerner, J. (2000). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108-127.
Leu, D. J., & Zawilinski, L. (2007). The new literacies of online reading comprehension. New England Reading Association Journal, 43(1), 1-7.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, 5(1), 1570-1613.
Leung, L. (2004). Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the Internet as predictosr of online activities and Internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 333-348.
Maclellan, E. (1997). Reading to learn. Studies in higher education, 22(3), 277-288.
Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Expextional Children, 58, 270-279.
Maria, K., & Junge, K. (1993, December). A Comparison of fifth graders' comprehension and retention of scientific information using a science textbook and an informational storybook. Paper presented at the meeting of National Reading Conference, U.S.A.
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357-371.
Maynard, S., & Cheyne, E. (2005). Can electronic textbooks help children to learn? The Electronic Library, 23(1), 103-115.
McGee, L. M., & Richgels, D. J. (1985). Teaching expository text structure to elementary students. The Reading Teacher, 38(8), 739-748.
Miall, D. S., & Dobson, T. (2001). Reading Hypertext and the Experience of Literature. Journal of Digital Information, 2(1), Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewArticle/35/37
Miller, L. M. S., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (1998). Aging and the effects of knowledge on on-line reading strategies. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(4), 223-233.
Meyer, B., & Rice, G. (1984). The structure of text. In P. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 293-347). New York: Longman.
Montali, P., & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271-279.
Bradshaw, T., & Nichols, B. (2004). Reading at risk: A survey of literary reading in America. (Report 46). National Endowment for the Arts.
Neuman, S. (1988). The displacement effect: Assessing the relation between television viewing and reading performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 414-440.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1989). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ollmann, H. E. (1989). Cause and effect in the real world. Journal of Reading, 33(3), 224-225.
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Language strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cresswell, J., & Vayssettes, S. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Leu, D., Coiro, J., Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York: Lawrence.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). The Definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Retrieved From http://www.deseco.admin.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.downloadList.2296. DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.
Paris, S. G., & Jacobs, J. E. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55(6), 2083-2093.
Payne, S. J., & Reader, W. R. (2006). Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 461-474.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., & Kennedy, A. M. (2007). Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS): PIRLS 2006 Technical Report. MA: Boston College.
Poostay, E. J. (1984). Show me your underlines: A strategy to teach comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 37(9), 828-830.
Reynolds, C. R., & Fletcher-Janzen, E. (2007). Encyclopedia of special education: A reference for the education of children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities and other exceptional individuals. New York: Wiley.
Prater, D. L., & Terry, C. A. (1988). Effects of mapping strategies on reading comprehension and writing performance. Reading Psychology, 9(2), 101-120.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
Reinking, D. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 484-498.
Reinking, D., & Rickman, S. S. (1990). The effects of computer-mediated texts on the vocabulary learning and comprehension of intermediate-grade readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(4), 395-411.
Reinking, D., & Schreiner, R. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 536-552.
Rich, M. (2008). Literacy Debate: Online, R U really reading? The New York Times, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/27/books/27reading.htm?_r=2&oref=slogin& oref=slogin
Richgels, D., McGee, L., Lomax, R., & Sheard, C. (1987). Awareness of four text structures: Effect on recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 177-197.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530.
Rubin, D. (1980). The teacher handbook of reading/thinking exercises. NY: Hott, Rinehart and Winston.
Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 80-85.
Schnell, T. R., & Rocchio, D. J. (1974, October). A Study of the Relative Effectiveness of Various Underlining Strategies on Reading Comprehension. Paper presented at the Annual metting of the College Reading Association, U.S.A.
Schunk, D. H., & Rice, J. M. (1993). Strategy fading and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and comprehension among students receiving remedial reading services. Journal of Special Education, 27, 257-276.
Searfoss, L. W., & Readence, J. W. (1994). Helping children learn to read. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Sears, S., Carpenter, C., & Burstein, N. (1994). Meaningful reading instruction for learners with special needs. The Reading Teacher, 47(8), 632-638.
Shaughnessy, M. F., & Baker, B. (1988). Learning strategies:Teaching students how to learn. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 300 357)
Sindelar, P. T., Monda, L. E., & O’Shea, L. J. (1990). Effects of repeated readings on instructional-and mastery-level readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 220-226.
Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Starr, M. L., & Krajcik, J. S. (1990). Concept maps as heuristic for science curriculum development: Toward improvement in process and product. Journal of Research of Science Teaching, 27, 987-1000.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
Suber, J. R., & Schroeder, M. (2007). Effects of prior knowledge and heading on processing of informative text. Contemporary Educational Psycholgoy, 32, 485-498.
Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: An overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4) , 438-446.
Sung, Hwang, Su, & Chang (2003, June). The design and application of a computer assisted reading comprehension system with multiple strategies. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 2003-World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Tolhurst, D. (1995). Hypertext, hypermedia, multimedia defined?. Educational Technology, 35(2), 21-26.
Tanyeli, N. (2009). The efficiency of online English language instruction on students' reading skills. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 564-567.
Tancock, S. M., & Segedy, J. (2004). A comparison of young children’s technology-enhanced and traditional responses to texts: An action research project. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19(1). 58-65.
Tregaskes, M. R. (1987). Metacognitive strategies: Their effects on reading comprehension of sixth grade social studies students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brigham Young University, U.S.A.
Van Den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend. In B. Taylor, P. Van Den Broek, & M. Graves (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1-31). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Tanzman, M. S. (1994). Components of reading ability: Issues and problems in operationalizing word identification, phonological coding, and orthographic coding. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 279-324). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
Wade, S., & Trathen, W. (1989). Effect of self-selected study methods on learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 40-47.
Weisberg, R., & Balajthy, E. (1990). Development of disabled readers'metacomprehension ability through summarization training using expository text: Results of three studies. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 6(2), 117-136.
Wilkinson, R. T., & Robinshaw, H. M. (1987). Proof reading: VDU and paper text compared for speed, accuracy and fatigue. Behaviour and Information Technology, 6, 125-133.
Zaphiris, P., & Kurniawan. S. H. (2001, August). Reading online or on paper: Which is faster? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, New Orleans, LA.