:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中國校辦企業發展進程:以北京清華大學為例
作者:吳宣儀
作者(外文):Hsuan-Yi Wu
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:商學研究所
指導教授:陳忠仁
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:校辦企業產學合作創新創業生態系
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:7
近幾十年,大學裡的授權、專利與新創活動一直很活躍。傳統上,大學的建立是為了教育和研究知識和智慧財產權的創造和分享。近年來,大學第三任務浪潮興起,使得大學涉及在社會經濟發展中的角色與作用引起廣泛的討論與注意。在影響社會和促進地方和區域發展及經濟成長的意義上,大學比以往任何時候都更具創業精神。最引人注目的案例是史丹佛大學和北加州矽谷的UC系統以及麻州波士頓大都會區128號公路附近的麻省理工學院。在亞洲,一個著名的案例是北京中關村的清華大學。本研究旨在了解中國大陸的一流大學如何在其所面臨的制度環境下發展出獨特的技術轉移與商業化系統,以促進創新和創業。透過制度觀點,本研究探討北京清華大學如何發展其技術轉移和商業化體系。在中國,大學透過所謂的校辦企業來進行商業活動的推展。大學所擁有及經營的企業,多半是以開發創建源於大學擁有的知識產權為主所延伸出的商業活動,其使命是將技術產業化應用於市場。在所有的校辦企業中,最著名的是清華控股公司,這是一家由清華大學100%擁有的資產管理公司,在上海證券交易所上市。截至2017年6月底,清華控股總資產約為580億美元,銷售額為75億美元。作為一家資產管理公司,截至2016年底,清華控股持有來自1,432家公司的股權,主要經營資產管理、投資、併購、諮詢和培訓、技術開發、技術推廣、技術服務和高科技企業孵化器等業務。清華大學和清華控股在發展技術創業方面保持著牢固的關係,使得清華大學發展出獨特的創業生態系統。本文提供一個探索性的研究,用於描繪清華大學的創業生態系統,探討清華大學如何透過清華大學科技園、技術轉移研究院、清華大學x-lab建構其創業支援系統。清華大學具有高度的靈活性和與中國共產黨及政府的密切關係,獲得了各種資源來支持其創新和創業,清華大學的校辦企業對中國市場影響很大。然而,清華的行動突破並不僅限於中國,還透過校友網絡擴展到全球。以追趕戰略成為快速追隨者,清華生態系統透過制度創新為其帶來了快速成長。儘管如此,作為追隨者,清華大學在邁向創新驅動社會發展的同時,如何突破成長極限以及如何在華人社會脈絡下找到原創思維是清華大學在下一階段的研發過程必須面對的問題。本研究使用個案研究方法,透過研究北京清華大學,我們希望從理論上探討制度與策略之間的相互作用,觀看制度環境是否在塑造大學發展策略中發揮關鍵作用。我們期望透過了解中國大陸的制度背景,建構對創業型大學的獨特性的理解,並為大學行政管理者和政策制定者提供處理大學在創業生態系統中發揮關鍵作用的意涵。
In China, there is a so-called ‘university-run enterprise’ (URE). The university-run enterprise is the kind of enterprise owned by universities and belonged to the government. The university-run enterprises develop technologies and create business originated from university-owned IP with the mission to industrialize technology results in the market. Amongst all the URE, the most well-known one is Tsinghua Holdings Corp., an asset management company 100%-owned by Tsinghua University listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange. By the end of June 2017, the total assets of Tsinghua Holdings had achieved approximately USD 58 billion with sales of USD 7.5 billion. As an asset management company, by the end of 2016, Tsinghua Holdings hold equities from 1,432 companies involving businesses in asset management, investment, merge and acquisition, consulting and training, technology development, technology promotion, technical services, and high-tech business incubator etc. Tsinghua University and Tsinghua Holdings maintain strong relationship in developing technological entrepreneurship that enables an entrepreneurial ecosystem in China. This paper provides an exploratory study on making a portrait of the entrepreneurial ecosystem of Tsinghua University to depict the strategy and how Tsinghua University builds up the entrepreneurial support system with Tsinghua University Science Park, the Office of Technology Transfer, Tsinghua Holdings, Tsinghua x-lab etc. The study concludes that with high flexibility and strong relationship with CPC and the government, Tsinghua University has received various resources to support its innovation and entrepreneurship. Its UREs are now important enterprises in multiple industries with high impact on domestic market. However, the breakthrough of Tsinghua’s action is not limited in China only, but also expands globally with alumni networks. With catch-up strategy as fast follower, the institutional innovation on organizations in Tsinghua’s ecosystem has brought rapid growth as a whole in its dynamic systems. Following CPC and National Plans, guanxi has played an important role for Tsinghua’s ecosystem becoming a strong system to sustain its businesses and influences around the world. Nevertheless, as a follower, it is still difficult for Tsinghua University to overcome the limit of growth while moving towards an innovation-driven society. As a follower, the meaning of “innovation” in China against the western world is different while considering originality and innovative culture. How to fight against the limit of growth and how to find the original thinking in Chinese way is what Tsinghua University has to face in the next stage of research and development.
Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2013). The nature of academic entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the focus on entrepreneurial activities. Research Policy, 42(2), 408-422.
Adams, J. T. (1931). The Epic of America. New Brunswick.
Al Harthy, S. H. M. (2014). The entrepreneurial university and the entrepreneurial environment: organizational analysis and policy considerations (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester).
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in organizational behavior.
Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1058-1067.
Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., & Lavoie, F. F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27(5), 306-318.
Andreas, J. (2009). Rise of the red engineers: the Cultural Revolution and the origins of China''s new class. Stanford University Press.
Asheim, B., & Isaksen, A. (1997). Location, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards Regional Innovation Systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3): 299-330.
Atherton, A. (2008). From “fat pigs” and “red hats” to a “new social stratum” The changing face of enterprise development policy in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(4), 640-655.
Atkinson, R. D. (2017). Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific Hearing on China’s Technological Rise: Challenges to U.S. Innovation and Security [online] Available at: http://www2.itif.org/2017-testimony-foreign-affairs-committee-china.pdf [Accessed 2 July 2018]
Baldini, N. (2006). University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature. Research evaluation, 15(3), 197-207.
Berdahl, R. O., & McConnell, T. R. (1994). Autonomy and accountability: Some fundamental issues. Higher education in American society, 55-72.
Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). The rise of china in technology standards: New norms in old institutions. Prepared for the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 16.
Chen, D., Li, O. Z., & Xin, F. (2017). Five-year plans, China finance and their consequences. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(3), 189-230.
Cheng, T.-F. (2017). Tsinghua Unigroup fighting to become a top chipmaker [online] Available at: http://asia.nikkei.com/Features/Interview/Tsinghua-Unigroup-fighting-to-become-a-top-chipmaker [Accessed 17 July 2017]
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
China Daily (2018). Domestic demand backbone of China’s economic development [online] Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201804/10/WS5acc5895a3105cdcf651746e.html [Accessed 29 June 2018]
Clark, B. R. (1998a) Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation (Issues in Higher Education), New York: Elsevier.
Clark, B. R. (1998b). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response. Tertiary Education & Management, 4(1), 5-16.
Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2).
Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124.
Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, M. D., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership in an organized anarchy. Organization and governance in higher education, 16-35.
Colyvas, J. A. (2007). From divergent meanings to common practices: The early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University. Research Policy, 36(4), 456-476.
Cooke, P. (1998). Introduction: Origins of the Concept. In H. Braczyk, P. Cooke, & M. Heidenreich (Eds.), Regional Innovation Systems (pp. 2-25). London: UCL Press.
Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 945-974.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.
Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1998). Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. Environment and planning A, 30(9), 1563-1584.
Comen, E. (2017). 10 universities spending billions on R&D. [online] Available at: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/careersandeducation/10-universities-spending-billions-on-randd/ar-BBzjbN7 [Accessed 28 December 2017]
Dill, D. (1994). Rethinking the Planning Process. Planning for Higher Education, 22(2), 8-13.
Ding, S., & Knight, J. (2009). Why has China grown so fast? The role of structural change. [online] Available at: https://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/working_papers/paper415.pdf [Accessed 2 July 2018]
Doloreux, D. (2002). What We Should Know About Regional Systems of Innovation. Technology in Society, 24: 243-263.
Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Psychology Press.
Eesley, C., & Roberts, E. B. (2009). Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT.
Eesley, C. E., & Miller, W. F. (2018). Impact: Stanford University’s Economic Impact via Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Eileen, Y. H. T. (2015). Understanding Chinese Society: Changes and Transformations (Vol. 37). World Scientific.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The riple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337.
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64-77.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. Routledge.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix--University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The endless transition: a ‘Triple Helix’ of university industry government relations.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2006). Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability. Science and public policy, 33(1), 77-83.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2007, May). Regional innovation initiator: the entrepreneurial university in various triple helix models. In Triple Helix 6th Conference theme paper, Singapore.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research policy, 29(2), 313-330.
Feld, B (2012) Startup Communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city, Hoboken: NJ, Wiley.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter, London.
Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73-110.
Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045-1057.
Goh and Sullivan (2011). The Most Misunderstood Business Concept In China [online] Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-most-misunderstood-business-concept-in-china-2011-2 [Accessed 2 July 2018]
Goldstone, Jack A. (1997). Methodological issues in comparative macrosociology. Great Britain: JAI Press.
Gumport, P. J., & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional adaptation: Demands for management reform and university administration. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 103-145). Springer, Dordrecht.
Gulbrandsen, M., & Slipersaeter, S. (2007). The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model. Universities and strategic knowledge creation, 112-143.
Guerrero, M. (2008). The creation and development of entrepreneurial universities in Spain: An institutional approach (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona).
Guerrero-Cano, M., Kirby, D., & Urbano, D. (2006). A literature review on entrepreneurial universities: An institutional approach. In 3rd Conference of Pre-communications to Congresses, University of Barcelona.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The journal of technology transfer, 37(1), 43-74.
Guston, D.H. and Keniston, K., 1994, The Fragile Contract (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Harayama, Y. (1998) “Private Incentive and the Role of Government in Technology Advancement: Silicon Valley, Stanford University and The Federal Government”. Mimeo, University of Geneva.
Huffman, D., & Quigley, J. M. (2002). The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale. The Annals of Regional Science, 36(3), 403-419.
Hui, W. (2005). China today: Misguided socialism plus crony capitalism. New Perspectives Quarterly, 22(2), 32-34.
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution, Harvard Business Review, 88(6), pp. 41– 50.
Isenberg, D (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship, Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Babson College, Babson Park: MA
Keller, G. (1983). Shaping an academic strategy. Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education, 1-17.
Kenney, M., & Patton, D. (2011). Does inventor ownership encourage university research-derived entrepreneurship? A six university comparison. Research Policy, 40(8), 1100-1112.
Kirby, D. A. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599-603.
Kleinman, D. L., & Vallas, S. P. (2001). Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States. Theory and Society, 30(4), 451-492.
Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840, 243-275.
Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities?. Higher education policy, 20(4), 441-456.
Leute, K. J. (2013). Fostering Innovation for the Benefit of Society: Technology Licensing’s Role at Stanford. In Fulfilling the Promise of Technology Transfer (pp. 71-81). Springer Japan.
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research policy, 29(2), 243-255.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and public policy, 25(3), 195-203.
List, F. (1841). The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Liu, H., & Jiang, Y. (2001). Technology transfer from higher education institutions to industry in China: nature and implications. Technovation, 21(3), 175-188.
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research policy, 34(7), 981-993.
Lundvall, B.-A. (Ed.), 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.
Luo, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, S. L. (2011). Comparative strategic management: An emergent field in international management. Journal of international management, 17(3), 190-200.
Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240-259.
Kantis, H. and Frederico, J. (2011) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Latin America: the role of policies. [online] Available at: http://www.innovacion.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/EntrepreneurialEcosystems-in-Latin-America_the-role-of-policies.pdf [Accessed 26 June 2018]
Kenney, M. and Patton, D. (2009). Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model, Research Policy 38 (2009) 1407–1422
Kirchberger, M. A., & Pohl, L. (2016). Technology commercialization: a literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1077-1112.
Malecki E J. (2011) Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 14, 36-59.
Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401-1423.
Martin, P. L. (2006). Competing for global talent: The US experience. Competing for global talent, 87.
Mason, C. & Brown, R. (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship, The Hague, Netherlands.
McKern, B. (2016). Made in China: Three ways Chinese business has evolved from imitation to innovation [online] Available at: https://www.smartcompany.com.au/business-advice/innovation/made-china-three-ways-chinese-business-evolved-imitation-innovation/ [Accessed 4 July 2018]
Miles, Matthew B. & Huberman, A. Michael (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Moore, R. L. (1988). Face and networks in urban Hong Kong. City & Society, 2(1), 50-59.
Morone, J., & Ivins, R. (1982). Problems and opportunities in technology transfer from the national laboratories to industry. Research Management, 25(3), 35-44.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2004). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 115-127.
Mowery, David C., et al. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980. Research policy 30.1 (2001): 99-119.
Napier, G and Hansen, C (2011) Ecosystems for Young Scaleable Firms, FORA Group.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council. A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices, Cross-Cutting.
Nielsen, F. (2017). Human Societies as Sociocultural Systems [online] Available at: https://www.unc.edu/~nielsen/soci111/m2/soci111m2.pdf [Accessed 14 June 2018]
Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2010). From policy to practice: engaging and embedding the third mission in contemporary universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(7/8), 341-353.
Nelson, A. J. (2014). From the ivory tower to the startup garage: Organizational context and commercialization processes. Research Policy, 43(7), 1144-1156.
Nelson, R. R. (Ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
OECD (1994). Science and Technology Policy: Review and Outlook (OECD, Paris).
OECD (2012). A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities [online] Available at: https://www.oecd.org/site/cfecpr/EC-OECD%20Entrepreneurial%20Universities%20Framework.pdf [Accessed 26 June 2018]
O’kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421-437.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O''Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1-16.
O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653-666.
Paik, W., & Baum, R. (2014). Clientelism with Chinese Characteristics: Local Patronage Networks in Post‐Reform China. Political Science Quarterly, 129(4), 675-702.
Palo Alto History.Org (2017). The Stanford Research Park: The Engine of Silicon Valley [online] Available at: http://www.paloaltohistory.org/stanford-research-park.php [Accessed 17 July 2017]
Ragin, Charles (1997). Turning the tables: How case-oriented research challenges variable-oriented research. Comparative Social Research, 16, 27-42.
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262.
Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602-612.
Rhoades, G. (1995). Rethinking Restructuring in Universities. Journal for Higher Education Management, 10(2), 17-30.
Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2011). Entrepreneurial impact: The role of MIT. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 7(1–2), 1-149.
Roessner, J. D. (2000). Technology transfer. Science and technology policy in the US. A time of change. Longman, London.
Ronstadt, R. (2002). Forward: Technology Choices and The New Discipline Of Technology Commercialization, in s.a. Thore (ed.), Technology commercialization: DEA and related analytical methods for evaluating the use and implementation of technical innovation, New York: Springer, P.11-22
Rosenberg, N., 1994, Exploring the black box. Technology, economics, and history (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and corporate change, 16(4), 691-791.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 453-473.
Schwartzman, S., Pinheiro, R., & Pillay, P. (Eds.). (2015). Higher education in the BRICS countries: Investigating the pact between higher education and society (Vol. 44). Springer.
Scott, B. R. (2006). The political economy of capitalism. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2010). The innovation system and innovation policy in the United States. Competing for Global Innovation Leadership: Innovation Systems and Policies in the USA, Europe and Asia. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Verlag, 5-29.
Shi, X. (2001a). China’s macroeconomy: expanding domestic demand and interim reforms. Rand-publications-mr-all series-, 193-204. [online] Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1300/MR1300.ch8.pdf [Accessed 29 June 2018]
Shi, Y. (2001b). Technological capabilities and international production strategy of firms: the case of foreign direct investment in China. Journal of World Business, 36(2), 184-204.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 23(4), 640-660.
Silverstein, A. (1988). An Aristotelian resolution of the idiographic versus nomothetic tension. American Psychologist, 43(6), 425-430.
Slaughter, S., 1993, Retrenchment in the 1980s: The Politics of Prestige and Gender, Journal of Higher Education 64(3).
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-4319.
Smart, A. (1993). Gifts, bribes, and guanxi: A reconsideration of Bourdieu''s social capital. Cultural anthropology, 8(3), 388-408.
Sombart, W. (1976). Capitalism in the United States. In Why is there no Socialism in the United States? (pp. 3-14). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121-134.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Stake, R. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.
Stanford Research Park (2017). About Stanford Research Park [online] Available at: http://stanfordresearchpark.com/about [Accessed 17 July 2017]
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York, NY: Palmer.
Thursby, J. G., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research policy, 31(1), 109-124.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management science, 48(1), 90-104.
Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2007). University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620-639.
Tsen, W. H. (2010). Exports, domestic demand, and economic growth in China: Granger causality analysis. Review of Development Economics, 14(3), 625-639.
Tsinghua University. “Research Projects Overview.” Internet: http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/newthuen/newthuen_cnt/research/research-1-1.html [Nov. 24, 2017].
Tsinghua University International Technology Transfer Center (2017). Profile [online] Available at: http://www.ittc.com.cn/ittc/english/html/aboutus/profile.asp [Accessed 17 July 2017]
Turner, J. H. (1997). The institutional order: Economy, kinship, religion, polity, law, and education in evolutionary and comparative perspective. Longman Publishing Group.
Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., Van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40(4), 553-564.
Vialle, P., Song, J., & Zhang, J. (2012). Competing with dominant global standards in a catching-up context. The case of mobile standards in China. Telecommunications Policy, 36(10-11), 832-846.
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research policy, 33(1), 147-175.
Wang, H., & Zhou, Y. (2011). China: Challenges for higher education in a high growth economy. In Universities in transition (pp. 143-170). Springer New York.
Weigley S. and Hess A. (2013). Universities Getting the Most Government Money. [online] Available at: http://247wallst.com/special-report/2013/04/25/universities-getting-the-most-government-money/2/ [Accessed 28 December 2017]
Wildes, K.L. and Lindgren, N.A. (1985). A Century of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT 1882-1982 (MIT Press, Cambridge).
Wills, D. (2014). Cultural Anthropology: main components of a sociocultural system [online] Available at: https://www.cpp.edu/~ddwills/courses/ant102/readings102/Study%20Guide%202.html [Accessed 14 June 2018]
Xing, L., & Shaw, T. M. (2013). The political economy of Chinese state capitalism. Journal of China and International Relations, 1(1).
Xiwei, Z., & Xiangdong, Y. (2007). Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China’s national innovation system. Technology in Society, 29(3), 317-325.
Yang, L. (2013). China’s Growth Miracle: Past, Present, and Future. United Nation Research Institute for Social Development, 7.
Yang, M. M. H. (1988). The modernity of power in the Chinese socialist order. Cultural Anthropology, 3(4), 408-427.
Yang, M. M. H. (1989). The gift economy and state power in China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1), 25-54.
Yin, Robert (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yip, G. S., & McKern, B. (2016). China''s Next Strategic Advantage: From Imitation to Innovation. MIT Press.
Yip, G. (2016). 5 Strategy Lessons Companies Can Learn From China [online] Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ceibs/2016/06/06/5-strategy-lessons-companies-can-learn-from-china/#5bcba86c6f82 [Accessed 4 July 2018]
Zacharakis, A. Shepard, D. and Coombs, J. (2003) The development of venture-capita-backed internet companies: An ecosystem perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 217-231.
Zhang, X. (2012). A Comparison between the Chinese Guanxi and the Western Business Networking. 语文学刊, (12).
Zweig, D., & Wang, H. (2013). Can China bring back the best? The Communist Party organizes China’s search for talent. The China Quarterly, 215, 590-615.
刘继安. “一九九七年高校科技产业总体情况.” Internet: http://huanan.eol.cn/20010821/189448.shtml [Nov. 24, 2017].
许路阳 (新京报新媒体). “清华大学校办企业2013年度净利润最高.” Internet: http://www.bjnews.com.cn/news/2014/12/31/348291.html, Dec. 31, 2014. [Nov. 24, 2017].
盛景新聞. “徐井宏:清华控股已是千亿级公司,旗下几大领域也将冲千亿 | 《总裁五分钟》导师巡礼.” Internet: http://www.shengjing360.com/contents/170/10076.html Aug. 2016. [Nov. 25, 2017].
清华控股. “【清华经管学院案例】清华控股的战略变革与发展.” Dec. 13 2016 Internet: http://www.thholding.com.cn/News/show/contentid/1193.html [Nov. 26, 2017]
經濟觀察網,2018,“校办企业成高校反腐重灾区 纳入国资监管体系能否一劳永逸?” [online] Available at: http://www.eeo.com.cn/2018/0519/328690.shtml [Oct. 8, 2018]
科學網,2017,“校企管理混乱根在现代大学制度缺失” [online] Available at: http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/6/380529.shtm [Oct. 8, 2018]
新華網,2018,“高校企业改革破冰 多项发展难题待解” [online] Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2018-08/15/c_1123270805.htm [Oct. 8, 2018]
中華人民共和國教育部,2015,“教育部关于进一步规范和加强直属高等学校
所属企业国有资产管理的若干意见” [online] Available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A05/s7504/201507/t20150707_192795.html [Oct. 8, 2018]
四川省教育廳四川教育網財務管理處,2005,“教育部关于积极发展、规范管理高校科技产业的指导意见” [online] Available at: http://cww.scedu.net/p/13/?StId=st_app_news_i_x4003_12243 [Oct. 8, 2018]
中國證券網,2018,“清华相继转让启迪与紫光控制权 高校企业国资体制改革加速” [online] Available at: http://news.cnstock.com/paper,2018-08-13,1039778.htm [Oct. 8, 2018]
中國論文網,韦立平,高校经营性资产监管的缺失及对策 [online] Available at: https://www.xzbu.com/2/view-440903.htm [Oct. 8, 2018]
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top