:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中文辨識與唸字作業中字音字義促發效果的比較分析
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:吳瑞屯陳欣進 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Jei-tunChen, Hsin-chin
出版日期:2000
卷期:42:1
頁次:頁65-86
主題關鍵詞:促發效果頻率效果字彙判斷作業唸字作業語義促發形似促發同音促發Priming effectFrequency effectLexical decisionCharacter recognitionCharacter namingSemantic primingHomophonic primingGraphic priming
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:143
     近來許多有關閱讀行為的研究,試圖探討語音是否在文字辨識歷程中扮演重要的 角色。 Perfetti 等人( 1992;1995 )提出了「普遍語音原則」,主張各種文字的文字辨 識中皆存在語音的自動激發,並且以中文研究為該原則的主要支持證據。本研究採用字彙判 斷作業與唸字作業,分別藉由分析促發程序中的音同促發效果與義似促發效果,探討中文文 字辨識歷程的樣貌。 實驗一使用一般的嘗試內促發程序,在不同的 SOA 操弄下,探討同音 促發與語義促發對高低頻目標字可能產生的影響,結果兩作業在目標字為高頻字時,都沒有 穩定的音義促發效果;而當目標字為低頻字時,兩作業皆出現穩定而顯著的義似促發效果, 但是音同促發效果則只穩定的出現於唸字作業中。實驗二改採嘗試間促發程序,探討同音促 發、語義促發、及形似促發對高低頻目標字可能產生的影響,結果除了額外的發現了形似促 發的抑制效果以外,也得到了與實驗一一致的結果。由於實驗一、二在兩作業皆得到了頻率 效果以及低頻目標字上的義似促發效果,此時卻沒有字彙判斷作業中穩定的音同促發效果, 按照 Perfetti 等的推論邏輯,這樣的結果並不支持漢字辨識中必然存在語音歷程的說法。
     Two experiments were conducted in the present study to reappraise the role of phonological processing in identification of Chinese characters. Experiment 1 adopted a within-trial priming procedure and manipulated the character frequency and stimulus onset asynchrony to evaluate the effects of homophonic priming and semantic priming on recognition and naming of Chinese characters. Results indicated that in neither recognition nor naming, an effect of homophonic priming or semantic priming on processing high-frequency characters could be clearly demonstrated. When the target character was of low frequency, a stable facilitation effect of semantic priming was observed for both recognition and naming, yet a facilitation effect of homophonic priming was reliably found in the naming task only. Experiment 2 adopted a between-trial priming procedure and manipulated the character frequency to evaluate the effects of homophonic priming, semantic priming, and graphic priming on character recognition and naming. The results agreed with those of Experiment 1. Further, an inhibitory effect of graphic priming was found in both tasks. It is noted that no stable homophonic priming facilitation effect was observed in the lexical decision task, despite that the effects of both character frequency and semantic priming on processing low-frequency characters were robust. These results appear not to support an obligatory role of phonological processing in identification of Chinese characters.
期刊論文
1.Perfetti, C. A.、Bell, L.(1991)。Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters。Journal of Experimental Psychology,” Learning Memory and Cognition,17,633-643。  new window
2.Leek, K. J.、Weekes, B. S.、Chen, M. J.(1995)。Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers。Memory and Cognition,23,468-476。  new window
3.Flores D'Arcais, Giovanni B.、Saito, Hirofumi、Kawakami, Masahiro(1995)。Phonological and Semantic Activation in Reading Kanji Characters。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21(1),34-42。  new window
4.Hue, C. W.(1992)。Recognition processes in character naming。Advances in Psychology,90,93-107。  new window
5.Seidenberg, M. S.(1985)。The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems。Cognition,19(1),1-30。  new window
6.Zhang, S.、Perfetti, C. A.(1996)。The Universal Word Identification Reflex。The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,33,159-189。  new window
7.Van Ordem, G. C.(198705)。A ROWS Is a ROSE: Spelling, Sound, and Reading。Memory and Cognition,15(3),181-198。  new window
8.劉英茂、Wu, Jei-Tun、Chou, Tai-Li(1996)。Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect。Cognition,59(2),149-168。  new window
9.Tan, Li Hai、Perfetti, Charles A.(1997)。Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning?。Journal of Memory and Language,37(1),41-57。  new window
10.周有光(1978)。現代漢字聲旁的表音功能問題。中國語文,146,172-177。  延伸查詢new window
11.Perfetti, Charles A.、Tan, Li Hai(1998)。The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,24(1),101-118。  new window
12.吳瑞屯(19950600)。多目的心理學實驗及測量程序控制組合式電腦程式系統。中華心理學刊,37(1),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Zhang, Sulan、Perfetti, C. A.(1995)。Very Early Phonological Activation in Chinese Reading。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21,24-33。  new window
14.Frost, R.(1994)。Prelexical and Postlexical Strategies in Reading: Evidence from a Deep and a Shallow Orthography。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,20,116-129。  new window
15.Bentin, S.、Katz, L.、Frost, R.(1987)。Strategies for Visual Recognition and Orthographical Depth: A Multilingual Comparison。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,13,104-115。  new window
16.Sebastian-Galles, N.(1991)。Reading by analogy in a shallow orthography。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,17,471-477。  new window
17.Feldman, L. D.、Katz, L.(1983)。Relation between Pronunciation and Recognition of Printed Words in Deep and Shallow Orthographies。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,9,157-166。  new window
18.Pollatsek, A.、Lesch, M. F.(1993)。Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,19(2),285-294。  new window
19.Turvey, M. T.、Lukatela, G.(1994)。Visual lexical access is initially phonology: Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudo-homophones。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123,331-353。  new window
20.Delaney, S. M.、Bell, L. C.、Perfetti, C. A.(1988)。Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking。Journal of Memory and Language,27,59-70。  new window
21.Laghi, L.、Tabossi, P.(1992)。Semantic Priming in the Pronunciation of Words in Two Writing Systems: Italian and English。Memory & Cognition,20,303-313。  new window
22.Chen, H.-C.、d'Arcais, G. B. F.、Cheung, S.-L.(1995)。Orthographic and phonological activation in recognizing Chinese characters。Psychological Research,58(2),144-153。  new window
23.Turvey, M. T.、Carello, C.、Lukatela, G.(1994)。Lexical involvement in naming does not contravene pre-lexical phonology: Comment to Sebastian-Galles (1991)。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,20,192-198。  new window
24.Hildebrant, N.、Besner, D.(1987)。Orthographic and phonological codes in the oral reading of Japanese Kana。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,13,335-343。  new window
25.Besner, D.、Baluch, B.(1991)。Visual word recognition: Evidence for strategic control of lexical and nonlexical routines in oral reading。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,17,644-652。  new window
26.Peng, D. L.、Hoosain, R.、Tan, L. H.(1995)。Role of Early Presemantic Phonological Code in Chinese Character Identification。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,21(1),43-54。  new window
27.d'Ydewalle, G.、Olson, A.、Humphreys, G. W.、Verstaen, A.(1995)。Are phonemic effects in backward masking evidence for automatic prelexical phonemic activation in visual word recognition。Journal of Memory and Language,34,335-356。  new window
會議論文
1.畢彥超、王芯賢、陳烜之(1997)。漢字識別中形、音、意訊息的觸發及其時序。香港。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳瑞屯、劉英茂(1987)。中文字詞語音、語義屬性的研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳瑞屯(1997)。中文單字語意類別判斷作業、遮蔽作業、促發作業與受試者的因應策略(一)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.石瑞儀(1986)。文字閱讀中,[字形- 字音] 關係對字彙觸接歷程的影響(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳嫻(1998)。語音訊息在中文單字和雙字詞辨識歷程中所扮演的角色,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Frost, R.、Katz, L.(1992)。The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis。Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning。Amsterdam, Netherlands:Elsevier。  new window
2.Kirk, Roger E.(1995)。Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences。Brooks/Cole Publishing Company。  new window
3.Frost, R.、Bentin, S.(1992)。Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography。Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
4.Turvey, M. T.、Lukatela, G.、Carello, C.(1992)。Can theories of word recognition remain stubbornly non-phonological?。Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
5.Taylor, I.(1997)。Psycholinguistic reasons for keeping Chinese characters in Korean and Japanese。The cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages。Hong Kong。  new window
圖書論文
1.Fang, S. P.、Horng, R. Y.、Tzeng, O. J. L.(1986)。Consistency Effects in the Chinese Character and Pseudo-Character Naming Tests。Linguistics, Psychology and the Chinese Language。Hong Kong:University of Hong Kong Press。  new window
2.Perfetti, C. A.、Zhang, S.、Berent, I.(1992)。Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a ''universal'' phonological principle。Orthography, morphology, and meaning。Oxford:North-Holland。  new window
3.Cheng, C. M.、Shih, S. I.(1988)。The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgment。Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language。Hong Kong:Asian Research Service。  new window
4.吳瑞屯、周泰立、劉茂英(1994)。中文字詞處理過程裡的頻率效果分析。Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing。Taipei。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cheng, C. M.(1992)。Lexical Access in Chinese: Evidence from Automatic Activation of Phonological Information。Language Processing in Chinese。Netherlands:Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
6.Liu, I. M.、Wu, J. T.(1997)。Phonological activation in pronouncing characters。The cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages。Hong Kong:The Chinese University of Hong Kong。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE