:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從語意處理及表徵到語意發展
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:周泰立 引用關係范利霙 引用關係李姝慧翁巧涵
作者(外文):Chou, Tai-liFan, Li-yingLee, Shu-huiWong, Ciao-han
出版日期:2013
卷期:55:3
頁次:頁277-288
主題關鍵詞:表徵流變處理發展語意RepresentationsChangeProcessingDevelopmentSemantics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:42
  • 點閱點閱:58
過去四十年認知心理學的研究,在理論及技術上都產生持續的變化,相較於過去,此領域呈現出更多樣化,但卻更整合性的發展。此篇論文將以評論的方式,回顧中文語言研究的語意處理及語意表徵的流變,特別收錄來自台灣研究者在此議題的成果與貢獻。本文作者提出過去文獻中可能存在的限制,並且闡明一個研究方向的轉折,如何解釋或回答先前研究的不足。文中指出兩項研究方向的轉折,包括:由以成人參與者為主體的研究,轉變為融入以孩童參與者為主體的研究;由以行為測量為主體的研究,轉變為增加神經造影研究的趨勢。最後,這篇論文也提出三項延伸的議題,作為對於未來研究方向的建議。第一,研究譬喻相關的主題,探索大於字詞層次的語意理解。第二,增加語意歷程異常的病人研究,得以檢視語意表徵系統的功能性結構。第三,採用縱貫式的取向,對於檢驗語意處理及語意表徵的發展變化有更完整的瞭解。
In the past 40 years, the research of cognitive psychology has been changing in both theory and technology to make this field more diverse and yet more integrative than before. This article provides a critical review on the changes of semantic processing and semantic representations with a focus on Chinese studies of Taiwanese researchers. The authors point out what potential limitations are in the literature and how subsequent changes come to answer critical questions. Two trends of changes on semantic processing and representations are observed, including a shift from adult participants to child participants and a shift from behavioral measures to neuroimaging measures. In the end, three suggestions are proposed for future directions: exploring topics of metaphor to understand semantics beyond the character/word level, recruiting neurologically impaired participants to examine the functional architecture of semantic representational systems, and using a longitudinal approach to evaluating developmental changes of semantic processing and representations.
期刊論文
1.Liu, I. M.、Sue, I. R.、Chen, S. C.、Chou, T. H.(2007)。Sentence-frame frequency effects。Language and Cognitive Processes,22(5),661-688。  new window
2.Zhang, Hong(2007)。Numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese。Journal of East Asian Linguistics,16,43-59。  new window
3.Liu, I. M.(2003)。Introduction to Chinese character / word processing。A Special Issue of Chinese Journal of Psychology,43,1-9。  new window
4.Ahrens, Kathleen、Liu, Ho-Ling、Lee, Chia-Ying、Gong, Shu-Ping、Fang, Shin-Yi、Hsu, Yuan-Yu(2007)。Functional MRI of conventional and anomalous metaphors in Mandarin Chinese。Brain and Language,100(2),163-171。  new window
5.Huang, Hsu-Wen、Lee, Chia-Ying、Tsai, Jie-Li、Tzeng, Ovid J. L.(2011)。Sublexical ambiguity effect in reading Chinese disyllabic compounds。Brain and Language,117(2),77-87。  new window
6.Yang, Yung-Hao、Yeh, Su-Ling(2011)。Accessing the meaning of invisible words。Consciousness and Cognition,20(2),223-233。  new window
7.Constable, R. T.、Pugh, K. R.、Berroya, E.、Mencl, W. E.、Westerveld, M.、Ni, W.(2004)。Sentence complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study。NeuroImage,22,11-21。  new window
8.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Bitan, T.、Burman, D. D.、Bigio, J. D.、Cone, N. E.、Cao, F.(2006)。Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words。Human Brain Mapping,27(11),915-924。  new window
9.Coltheart, Max、Rastle, Kathleen、Perry, Conrad、Langdon, Robyn、Ziegler, J.(2001)。DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud。Psychological Review,108(1),204-256。  new window
10.Lee, Y. S.、Chiang, W. C.、Hung, H. C.(2008)。Lexical association and false memory for words in two cultures。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,37(1),49-58。  new window
11.翁巧涵、陳修元、周泰立、李姝慧(20110900)。國小三年級兒童識字能力與語意關係對中文語意處理的影響。中華心理學刊,53(3),293-307。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.McClelland, J. L.、Rogers, T. T.(2003)。The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,4(4),310-322。  new window
13.陳明蕾、王學誠、柯華葳(20091200)。中文語意空間建置及心理效度驗證:以潛在語意分析技術為基礎。中華心理學刊,51(4),415-435。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉英茂、Wu, Jei-Tun、Chou, Tai-Li(1996)。Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect。Cognition,59(2),149-168。  new window
15.吳瑞屯、Zhu, Y.、劉英茂(1992)。The long-term modality effect: In search of differences in processing logographs and alphabetic words。Cognition,43,31-66。  new window
16.Bedny, M.、Caramazza, A.(2011)。Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: The case from action verbs。Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1224,81-95。  new window
17.Chou, T. L.、Lee, S. H.、Hung, S. M.、Chen, H. C.(2012)。The role of inferior frontal gyrus in processing Chinese classifiers。Neuropsychologia,50,1408-1415。  new window
18.Friederici, A. D.、Kotz, S. A.(2003)。The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies。NeuroImage,20(Suppl.1),8-17。  new window
19.Johnson, M. H.(2011)。Interactive specialization: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development。Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience,1,7-21。  new window
20.Kuperberg, G. R.、Holcomb, P. J.、Sitnikova, T.、Greve, D.、Dale, A. M.、Caplan, D.(2003)。Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies。Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15,272-293。  new window
21.Kutas, M.、Federmeier, K. D.(2000)。Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory language comprehension。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4,463-470。  new window
22.Lee, Y. S.、Iao, L. S.、Lin, C. W.(2007)。False memory and schizophrenia: Evidence for gist memory impairment。Psychological Medicine,37(4),559-568。  new window
23.Patterson, K.、Nestor, P. J.、Rogers, T. T.(2007)。Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,8,976-988。  new window
24.Pulvermüller, F.、Fadiga, L.(2010)。Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,11(5),351-360。  new window
25.Rodd, J. M.、Davis, M. H.、Johnsrude, I. S.(2005)。The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity。Cerebral Cortex,15(8),1261-1269。  new window
26.Smith, E. E.、Shoben, E. J.、Rips, L. J.(1974)。Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions。Psychological Review,81(3),214-241。  new window
27.Wang, S.、Zhu, Z.、Zhang, J. X.、Wang, Z.、Xiao, Z.、Xiang, H.(2008)。Broca's area plays a role in syntactic processing during Chinese reading comprehension。Neuropsychologia,46(5),1371-1378。  new window
28.Zhu, Z.、Zhang, J. X.、Wang, S.、Xiao, Z.、Huang, J.、Chen, H. C.(2009)。Involvement of left inferior frontal gyrus in sentence-level semantic integration。NeuroImage,47,756-763。  new window
29.鍾素英、花茂棽、薛惠琪、張鈺姍、邱嘉凡、陳明招(20070300)。正常不識字老人與早期阿茲海默型失智症老人在語意流暢度測驗表現的比較研究。中華心理學刊,49(1),73-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.Booth, J. R.、Burman, D. D.、Meyer, J. R.、Gitelman, D. R.、Parrish, T. B.、Mesulam, M. M.(2002)。Modality independence of word comprehension。Human Brain Mapping,16(4),251-261。  new window
31.Collins, A. M.、Quillian, M. R.(1969)。Retrieval time form semantic memory。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,8,240-247。  new window
32.Cree, G. S.、McNorgan, C.、McRae, K.(2006)。Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,32,643-658。  new window
33.范利霙、周泰立(20120300)。Hierarchical Model Comparisons on Effective Connectivity in Semantic Judgments of Chinese Characters。中華心理學刊,54(1),31-46。new window  new window
34.Gold, B. T.、Balota, D. A.、Jones, S. J.、Powell, D. K.、Smith, C. D.、Andersen, A. H.(2006)。Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions。The Journal of Neuroscience,26(24),6523-6532。  new window
35.Harm, M. W.、Seidenberg, M. S.(2004)。Computing the Meanings of Words in Reading: Cooperative Division of Labor between Visual and Phonological Processes。Psychological Review,111,662-720。  new window
36.Lau, E. F.、Phillips, C.、Poeppel, D.(2008)。A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400。Nature Reviews Neuroscience,9(12),920-933。  new window
37.Morton, J.(1969)。Interaction of information in word recognition。Psychological review,76(2),165-178。  new window
38.Nation, K.、Snowling, M. J.(1999)。Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence form semantic priming。Cognition,70,1-13。  new window
39.Plaut, D. C.、McClelland, J. L.、Seidenberg, M. S.、Patterson, K. E.(1996)。Understanding Normal and Impaired Word Reading: Computational Principles in Quasi-regular Domains。Psychological Review,103(1),56-115。  new window
40.Seidenberg, Mark S.、McClelland, James L.(1989)。A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming。Psychological Review,96(4),523-568。  new window
41.Tan, Li Hai、Perfetti, Charles A.(1997)。Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning?。Journal of Memory and Language,37(1),41-57。  new window
42.Yeh, Su-Ling、He, Sheng、Cavanagh, Patrick(2012)。Semantic priming from crowded words。Psychological Science,23(6),608-616。  new window
43.吳瑞屯、Chou, T. L.(2000)。The Comparison of Relative Effects of Semantic, Homophonic, and Graphic Priming on Chinese Character Recognition and Naming。Acta Psychologica Sinica,32,34-41。  new window
44.吳瑞屯、陳欣進(20000600)。中文辨識與唸字作業中字音字義促發效果的比較分析。中華心理學刊,42(1),65-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Meyer, D. E.、Schvaneveldt, R. W.(1971)。Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations。Journal of Experimental Psychology,90(2),227-234。  new window
46.Collins, A. M.、Loftus, E. F.(1975)。A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing。Psychological Review,82(6),407-428。  new window
47.李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(20091200)。國小五年級孩童與成人的識字能力對中文字語意處理之效應的差異。中華心理衛生學刊,22(4),345-382。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.鄭瓊英、賴美味、劉英茂(19730000)。Category Norms in Chinese and English from Bilingual Subjects。中華心理學刊,15,81-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.Monsell, S.、Doyle, M. C.、Haggard, P. N.(1989)。Effects of Frequency on Visual Word Recognition Tasks: Where Are They?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118,43-71。  new window
50.Naccache, L.、Dehaene, S.(2001)。The Priming Method: Imaging Unconscious Repetition Priming Reveals an Abstract Representation of Number in the Parietal Lobes。Cerebral Cortex,11(10),966-974。  new window
51.Chou, T. L.、Booth, J. R.、Chen, C. W.、Fan, L. Y.、Chen, S. Y.(2009)。Testing for a cultural influence on reading for meaning in the developing brain: The neural basis of semantic processing in Chinese children。Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,3,(27)1-(27)9。  new window
52.Mummery, C. J.、Shallice, T.、Price, C. J.(1999)。Dual-process model in semantic priming: A functional imaging perspective。NeuroImage,9,516-525。  new window
圖書
1.胡志偉、高千惠、羅明(2005)。六百個中文字的自由聯想常模。臺灣心理學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lucy, John Arthur(1992)。Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Kövecses, Zoltán(2005)。Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Booth, J. R.(2010)。Development and language。Encyclopaedia of Behavioral Neuroscience。Amsterdam, the Netherlands:Elsevier。  new window
2.Chen, H. C.(1999)。How do readers of Chinese process words during reading for comprehension?。Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Kawamoto, A. H.(1988)。Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network。Lexical ambiguity resolution。San Mateo, CA:Morgan Kaufmann。  new window
4.Burgess, C.、Lund, K.(2000)。The dynamics of meaning in memory。Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual and representational change in humans and machines。Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
5.Chen, H. C.(1992)。Reading Comprehension in Chinese: Implication from Character Reading Times。Language Processing in Chinese。Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
6.Lakoff, George(1993)。The contemporary theory of metaphor。Metaphor and thought。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE