|
中文詞知識庫小組(2001):《中央研究院平衡語料庫詞集及詞頻統計3.1》。台北:中央研究院資訊科學研究所。[Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group (2001). Word list with accumulated word frequency in Sinica Corpus 3.1. Taipei: Institute of Information Science, Academic Sinica.] 吳瑞屯 (1995):<多目的心理學實驗及測量程序控制組合式電腦程式系統>。《中華心理學刊》,37,1-21。[Wu, J. T. (1995). A PC software system of lab automation for Chinese psychological experiments. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 37, 1-21.] Retrieved from https://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/137216 吳瑞屯、楊馥菱、林維駿(2013):<跨越單字辨識歷程研究裡的語音處理議題>。《中華心理學刊》,55,289-318。[Wu, J. T., Yang, F. L., & Lin, W. C. (2013). Beyond phonology matters in character recognition. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55, 289-318.] doi:10.6129/CJP.20130608 教育部國語委員會(2000):《常用字詞調查報告書》。台北:教育部。[National Language Committee (2000). Report of frequently used characters and words. Taipei: Ministry of Education.] 楊馥菱、吳瑞屯(2014):<漢字辨識作業中部首相同促發字的形似抑制效果>。《中華心理學刊》,56,49-63。[Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T. (2014). Orthographic inhibition between characters with identical semantic radicals in primed character decision tasks. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 56, 49-63.] doi:10.6129/CJP.20131028 劉英茂、莊仲仁、王守珍(1975):《常用中文詞的出現次數》。台北:六國。[Liu, I. M., Chuang, C. J., & Wang, S. C. (1975). Frequency count of 40,000 Chinese words. Taipei: Lucky Books.] Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802 Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234-254. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.234 Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461. doi:10.3758/BF03214334 Baayen, R. H. (1994). Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 447-469. doi:10.1080/01690969408402127 Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2509 Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.340 Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390-405. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2681 Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455. doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 857-871. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.857 Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Domic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). New York: Academic Press. De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365. doi:10.1080/01690960050119625 Dijkstra, T., Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Schulpen, B., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). A roommate in cream: Morphological family size effects on interlingual homograph recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 7-41. doi:10.1080/01690960444000124 Forster, K. I., & Shen, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 696-713. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.696 Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104-115. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.1.104 Gao, X. Y., Li, M. F., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2016). Comparing the frequency effect between the lexical decision and naming tasks in Chinese. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 110, e53815. doi:10.3791/53815(2016) Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effect of mask homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1011 Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518 Grainger, J., & Segui, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 191-198. doi:10.3758/BF03205983 Grainger, J., O''Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 189-195. doi:10.3758/BF03210696 Grainger, J., O''Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effect and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 49-56. doi:10.3758/BF03205073 Huang, H. W., Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. L., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words: Reaction time and ERP measurements. Neuro Report, 17, 1061-1065. doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000224761.77206.1d Jalbert, A., Neath, I., Bireta, T. J., & Surprenant, A. M. (2011). When does length cause the word length effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 338-353. doi:10.1037/a0021804 Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920-933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532 Lavidor, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80, 45-62. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2583 Li, M. F., Gao, X. Y., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2017). Neighborhood frequency effect in Chinese word recognition: Evidence from naming and lexical decision. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 227-245. doi:10.1007/s10936-016-9431-5 Li, M. F., Lin, W. C., Chou, T. L., Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T. (2015). The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 219-236. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9340-4 Li, Q. L., Bi, H. Y., & Zhang, J. X. (2010). Neural correlates of the orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 866-872. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07327.x Li, Q. L., Bi, H. Y., Wei, T. Q., & Chen, B. G. (2011). Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica, 136, 35-41. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.012 Liu, I. M., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59(2), 149-168. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00688-5 McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375 Monsell, s., Doyle, M. C., & Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 43-71. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43 Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen,R. H. (2005). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496-512. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.07.003 Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94(1), 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.015 Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 409-421. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.409 Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1142-1158. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142 Sandra, D. (1994). The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 227-269. doi:10.1080/01690969408402119 Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 Sears, C. R., Campbell, C. R., & Lupker, S. J. (2006). Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1040-1062. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1040 Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876-900. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.876 Segui, J., & Grainger, J. (1990). Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: Effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 65-76. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.1.65 Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107 Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7, 659-675. Retrieved from https://www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/publ_j_en.asp-aid=23.htm Wang, Q. H., & Zhang, J. W. (2011). N400 solution effect of Chinese character fragments: An orthographic neighborhood size effect. Brain Research Bulletin, 86, 179-188. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.07.006 Wu, J. T., & Chen, H. C. (2003). Chinese orthographic priming in lexical decision and naming. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 75-95. doi:10.6129/CJP.2003.4501.05 Wu, J. T., & Liu, I. M. (1988). A data base system about the Psychological features of Chinese characters and words. In I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen, & M. J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 171-186). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service. Wu, J. T., Chou, T. L., & Liu, I. M. (1994). The locus of the character/word frequency effect. In H. W. Chang, J. T. Huang, C. W. Hue, & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing (pp. 31-58). Taipei: National Taiwan University. Ziegler, J. C., & Perry, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart''s neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68(2), B53-62. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00047-X
|