:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:景觀評估中之心理學模式之研究
書刊名:造園學報
作者:李英弘梁文嘉
作者(外文):Li, Ying-hungLiang, Wen-chia
出版日期:2000
卷期:7:1
頁次:頁67-87
主題關鍵詞:視覺偏好環境偏好矩陣語意分析法Visual preferenceEnvironmental preference matrixSemantic differential
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:58
在景觀評估研究中,Kaplan&Kaplan的環境偏好矩陣已被廣泛的應用於心理學評估模式之中。本研究主要目的除了想解受測者對景觀刺激所產生的心理層面感受外,也嘗試研擬出Kaplan&Kaplan環境偏好矩陣評估因子之中文操作性定義。本研究的景觀調查地點選擇中部東海大學校園,採用兩階段問卷:第一階段在研究地區作景觀點的調查選定,以東海大學的學生為樣本。將東海大學的28個景觀點勾選出十個景觀點,所得的結果,做為第二階段景觀點拍照的依據。每一景觀點隨機抽取三張景觀幻燈片,共得30張幻燈片。景觀偏好調查的受測者以靜宜大學觀光系學生共105人,針對每一張景觀幻燈片回答由語意分析法所研擬出的14對形容詞句。研究結果發現,在10個景觀點中,以文理大道的景觀美質最高,女鬼橋次之,路思義教堂第三。而藝術中心的景觀美質最低,中正紀念堂及圖書館則分佔美質倒數2、3名。在逐步多元迴歸(stepwise)分析中,9對形容詞中以新奇的--無趣、連貫--不連貫、沒規則、次序--有規則、次序三組形容詞具顯著預測能力(R2=0.96,p<0.01)。以Kaplan&Kaplan的四個評估因子而言,在逐步多元迴歸(stepwise)分析中,除複雜性之外,其餘三個因子(一致性、易讀性、及神秘性)均能顯著的預測景觀美質(R2=0.88,p<0.01)。
The purposes of this study were to understand psychological response of people when they viewed scenery, and to propose Chinese operationalizations of four psychological variables. There were two steps in the survey procedure. First, students in Tunghai University were sampled to select ten scenic spots out of twenty-eight within Tunghai University. Second, three photos were taken for each scenic point. As a result, 30 photos were taken as stimuli for the scenic beauty survey. Then, 106 students in Providence University were asked to participate this survey. The result showed that Wen-Lei Avenue had the highest scenic beauty, and Art Center had the lowest scenic beauty. Using step-wise regression analysis, pair-wise adjectives such as novel—uninterested, continuous—noncontinuous, unregulated & non-ordered-regulated &ordered were significant in predicting scenic beauty (R2=0.96, p<.01). By way of Kaplan & Kaplan’s model to predict scenic beauty, coherence, legibility, and mystery were significant using step-wise regression analysis (R2=0.88, p<.01). The Chinese operationalizations of four psychological variables were produced as well.
期刊論文
1.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen、Brown, Terry(1989)。Environmental Preference: A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors。Environment and Behavior,21(5),509-530。  new window
2.王小璘、吳靜宜(19970600)。景觀道路意象之研究--以玉山國家公園新中橫景觀道路為例。造園學報,4(1),17-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李素馨(20000700)。中山高速公路土地使用景觀偏好探討。造園學報,6(1/2),19-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.侯錦雄、尤俊雄(19951200)。垃圾焚化廠址的視覺影響之研究。造園學報,2(1),39-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃正綱、林晏州(1995)。水景型態及聲音對情緒體驗之影響。造園學報,2(1),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃正綱、林晏州(19981200)。都市雕塑品空間美學屬性對情緒體驗影響之研究。造園學報,5(2),73-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Zube, Ervin H.、Sell, James L.、Taylor, Jonathan G.(1982)。Landscape perception: Research, application and theory。Landscape Planning,9(1),1-33。  new window
8.林晏州(2000)。台北市鄰里公園之景觀美質評估。造園學報,6(1/2),91-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Hetherington, J. D.(1992)。Toward an Integrative Theory of Environmental Aesthetics(博士論文)。The University of Arizona。  new window
2.Mohd-Shariff, M. K. B.(1994)。A cross-cultural comparison of visual landscape preferences for the natural environment(博士論文)。Colorado State University。  new window
3.李美芬(1996)。植栽空間序列對情緒體驗及偏好影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Kaplan, S.、Kaplan, R.(1978)。Humanscape: Environments for People。Ann Arbor, MI:Ulrich's。  new window
2.Lynch, Kevin(1960)。The Image of the City。Cambridge:MIT Press。  new window
3.McAndrew, Francis T.、危芷芬(1995)。環境心理學。五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kaplan, Rachel、Kaplan, Stephen(1989)。The experience of nature: A psychological perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE